Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #31829

Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks!

Show all headers | View raw

In reply to Sinister Midget who posted:

> On 2011-06-10, Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> claimed:
>
>> Indeed.  I don't use ssh as a tunnel, but as a secure shell.
>>
>> Therefore I don't use the phrase "ssh tunnel", and thus am not
>> subject to abuse from the nancy-boy net-nanny troll.  :-D
>
> Maybe you /should/ use a ssh tunnel. You could join the Ssh Tunnel Club
> then. That's where we sit around running ssh tunnels in defiance of
> Rhonda Queef. And we say 'ssh tunnel' a lot. Because we can.
>
> I use a ssh tunnel regularly. I like ssh tunnels. Ssh tunnels are
> something I think everbody should try at least once before they die.
> Except Quack. He shouldn't use ssh tunnels for anything. He should just
> drink and die in his vomit. Without every experiencing the joys of a
> ssh tunnel.

LMAO!

-- 
"!sgub evah t'nseod CP sihT ?sgub naem ayaddahW"
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. 
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." 
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! "KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE" <KUTLOZE@evil.fucker.com> - 2011-06-09 20:49 +0200
  Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-09 20:38 +0000
    Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-09 17:40 -0400
      Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 16:58 -0500
        Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-09 18:50 -0400
        Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 19:50 -0500
          Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-09 21:11 -0400
            Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 10:02 +0200
              Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-10 08:23 +0000
                Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 10:50 +0200
                Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-10 12:18 -0400
                Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-10 06:08 -0400
                Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-10 07:26 -0500
                Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-06-10 17:08 +0200
                Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Sinister Midget <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 07:40 -0500
                Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-10 13:46 +0100
                Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-06-10 17:09 +0200
                Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Sinister Midget <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 10:38 -0500
                Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-10 09:33 -0400
                Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 15:51 +0200
                Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 15:50 +0200
                Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Clog_-_wog (®) <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> - 2011-06-10 17:19 +0200
                Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-10 11:44 -0400
                Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-10 12:20 -0400
          Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! "KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE" <KUTLOZE@evil.fucker.com> - 2011-06-10 17:06 +0200
      Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2011-06-12 15:43 -0700
    Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-09 23:49 +0100
    Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! "KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE" <KUTLOZE@evil.fucker.com> - 2011-06-10 17:17 +0200
      Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-10 15:52 +0000
        Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-10 11:52 -0500
          Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-10 12:54 -0400
          Re: More solid proof that "chrisv" is a useless piece of shit. "Hannibal Pointdexter" <run@invalid.com> - 2011-06-10 12:56 -0400

csiph-web