Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #661735

Re: Mercury

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Mercury
Date 2025-03-06 13:31 -0800
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <67CA1436.1ECE@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References (18 earlier) <67C7F9E0.50EA@ix.netcom.com> <67C8A415.7043@ix.netcom.com> <m2so7cFgbeU2@mid.individual.net> <67C93419.480E@ix.netcom.com> <m2t1b3F56m6U1@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am Donnerstag000006, 06.03.2025 um 06:35 schrieb The Starmaker:
> 
> >>> Can you name the Primary Colors?
> >>>
> >>> If you ask that question to ANYBODY..they will all give you the WRONG
> >>> answers.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Here is the right answer: red, blue, green and yellow.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> definition:
> >>> pri·ma·ry a primary color.
> >>>
> >>> https://www.google.com/search?q=define+primary&oq=define+primary
> >>
> >> Not true for light:
> >>
> >> With color-picker(1), if I mix red and green, I get yellow.
> >>
> >> https://imgur.com/ZBxIObk
> >
> > Another person as inglish for a second language..
> >
> > The Question reads: "Can you name the Primary Colors?"
> >
> > you named 3, you're missing the color Blue.
> >
> >
> There are no such things as 'the primary colours', because color itself
> is a function of the (human) eyes and brain.
> 
> But 'human eyes' are actually specific to us as human beings and
> therefore not 'primary'.
> 
> What we humans regard as colour is created by three types of cells in
> the eyes, which are receptive for certain spectra in the visible range,
> which we humans call 'red', 'green' and 'blue'.
> 
> With these three types of cell we can see colours in the visible part of
> the vast range of possible em-frequencies.
> 
> Other creatures have different eyes and can see diffent colours,
> possibly with a different set of primary colours (for which we have no
> names).
> 
> TH


I gave everybody a link so they can understand the definition of the
word..."primary".


The link states:

definition:
a primary color.



And dis German guy sez "There are no such things as 'the primary
colours'"!



Is anybody surprised?




I cannot even ask dat German guy to name 'a primary color' since he
tinks  "There are no such things as 'primary colours'"



i guess he thinks the World Belongs To Him.



he gots his own fucking dictionary!!!! My Kampftictionary.



Vhy does he put a u in colors???? 


ENGLISH is the Offical Language of the United States!...and tomorrow the
...VORLD!


So learn inglish quick, or death by hanging.

And learn how to spel "colors" corecttly!












-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-23 09:56 -0800
  Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-24 14:09 -0800
    Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-24 19:57 -0800
      Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-24 21:59 -0800
        Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-24 22:15 -0800
          Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-25 10:21 -0800
            Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-25 14:56 -0800
              Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-26 16:51 -0800
                Re: Mercury Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-27 13:03 -0600
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-28 10:24 -0800
                Re: Mercury Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 12:34 -0600
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-28 11:35 -0800
                Re: Mercury Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 18:01 -0600
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-28 22:51 -0800
                Re: Mercury % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 07:15 -0700
                Re: Mercury Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 10:41 -0600
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-01 12:57 -0800
                Re: Mercury Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 15:48 -0600
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-01 14:00 -0800
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-01 23:17 -0800
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-04 23:14 -0800
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-05 11:20 -0800
                Re: Mercury vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-06 04:56 +0000
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-05 21:35 -0800
                Re: Mercury vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-06 05:38 +0000
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-06 13:34 -0800
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-10 22:35 -0700
                Re: Mercury Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-03-06 08:32 +0100
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-06 13:31 -0800
                Re: Mercury Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-03-08 08:17 +0100
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-11 17:41 -0700
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-11 20:50 -0700

csiph-web