Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #661826

Re: Mercury

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am Donnerstag000006, 06.03.2025 um 22:31 schrieb The Starmaker:
> > Thomas Heger wrote:
> >>
> >> Am Donnerstag000006, 06.03.2025 um 06:35 schrieb The Starmaker:
> >>
> >>>>> Can you name the Primary Colors?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you ask that question to ANYBODY..they will all give you the WRONG
> >>>>> answers.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here is the right answer: red, blue, green and yellow.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> definition:
> >>>>> pri·ma·ry a primary color.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=define+primary&oq=define+primary
> >>>>
> >>>> Not true for light:
> >>>>
> >>>> With color-picker(1), if I mix red and green, I get yellow.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://imgur.com/ZBxIObk
> >>>
> >>> Another person as inglish for a second language..
> >>>
> >>> The Question reads: "Can you name the Primary Colors?"
> >>>
> >>> you named 3, you're missing the color Blue.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> There are no such things as 'the primary colours', because color itself
> >> is a function of the (human) eyes and brain.
> >>
> >> But 'human eyes' are actually specific to us as human beings and
> >> therefore not 'primary'.
> >>
> >> What we humans regard as colour is created by three types of cells in
> >> the eyes, which are receptive for certain spectra in the visible range,
> >> which we humans call 'red', 'green' and 'blue'.
> >>
> >> With these three types of cell we can see colours in the visible part of
> >> the vast range of possible em-frequencies.
> >>
> >> Other creatures have different eyes and can see diffent colours,
> >> possibly with a different set of primary colours (for which we have no
> >> names).
> >>
> >> TH
> >
> >
> > I gave everybody a link so they can understand the definition of the
> > word..."primary".
> >
> >
> > The link states:
> >
> > definition:
> > a primary color.
> >
> >
> >
> > And dis German guy sez "There are no such things as 'the primary
> > colours'"!
> 
> Look at this:
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trichromacy
> 
> Quote:
> "The normal explanation of trichromacy is that the organism's retina
> contains three types of color receptors (called cone cells in
> vertebrates) with different absorption spectra. In actuality, the number
> of such receptor types may be greater than three, since different types
> may be active at different light intensities. In vertebrates with three
> types of cone cells, at low light intensities the rod cells may
> contribute to color vision.
> 
> Humans and other animals that are trichromatsHumans and some other
> mammals have evolved trichromacy based partly on pigments inherited from
> early vertebrates. In fish and birds, for example, four pigments are
> used for vision. "
> 
> >
> > Is anybody surprised?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I cannot even ask dat German guy to name 'a primary color' since he
> > tinks  "There are no such things as 'primary colours'"
> >
> Well, you need to specify, to which kind of beings you refer with
> 'primary colour'.
> 
> Humans have three primary colours, which are called 'red, blue and green'.
> 
> ...
> 
> TH


Are you saying Yellow is not a primary color????









-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-23 09:56 -0800
  Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-24 14:09 -0800
    Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-24 19:57 -0800
      Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-24 21:59 -0800
        Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-24 22:15 -0800
          Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-25 10:21 -0800
            Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-25 14:56 -0800
              Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-26 16:51 -0800
                Re: Mercury Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-27 13:03 -0600
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-28 10:24 -0800
                Re: Mercury Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 12:34 -0600
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-28 11:35 -0800
                Re: Mercury Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 18:01 -0600
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-28 22:51 -0800
                Re: Mercury % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 07:15 -0700
                Re: Mercury Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 10:41 -0600
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-01 12:57 -0800
                Re: Mercury Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-01 15:48 -0600
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-01 14:00 -0800
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-01 23:17 -0800
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-04 23:14 -0800
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-05 11:20 -0800
                Re: Mercury vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-06 04:56 +0000
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-05 21:35 -0800
                Re: Mercury vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-03-06 05:38 +0000
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-06 13:34 -0800
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-10 22:35 -0700
                Re: Mercury Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-03-06 08:32 +0100
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-06 13:31 -0800
                Re: Mercury Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-03-08 08:17 +0100
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-11 17:41 -0700
                Re: Mercury The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-03-11 20:50 -0700

csiph-web