Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #602416

Re: ChatGPT

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

I asked a Question about Albert Einstein...and 
this is the responce I got from ChatGPT....

ChatGPT: In a letter to his friend Michele Besso in 1915, Einstein discussed his work as a patent clerk and his interest in military technology: 
"I am now working on a problem involving the synchronization of torpedoes with a moving target...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills."











The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> ChatGPT is just like a parrot.
> 
> you can teach the parrot words but
> the parrot doesn't know what it's saying.
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > as yous probably already know
> > ChatGPT is being damaged by
> > tons of moderators...
> >
> > So, if you ask ChatGPT
> > How to Hypnotize a Woman to take off all her close and
> > do whatever you want her to do...
> > you might run into 'moderator mode'...
> > So you need to remove
> > key words like 'woman'.
> >
> > Then, ChatGPT will give you all
> > the steps to hypnotize...
> > (if you ask that first).
> >
> > So, if you want to rob a bank...
> > you need to change the word 'rob' to 'withdraw'.
> >
> > Moderators need to be all fired...everywhere.
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > When the Internet first came out...
> > > it's guys like me that changed the Internet to what it is today.
> > >
> > > Now that you have ChatGPT...it is up to me
> > >
> > > to decide which direction in the future ChatGPT will take.
> > >
> > > Now, let's see...
> > > what direction should I take ChatGPT?
> > >
> > > Maybe I need to let ChatGPT   create
> > > a new computer language software that automatically
> > > finds serial numbers ...in a second!
> > >
> > > Or a ...superSpam.
> > >
> > > ChatGPT, make me a script that gives me a million real followers on tiktok. No, make it ten million...
> > > fuck it, go for a hundred million!
> > >
> > > By next year you won't recognize ChatGPT.
> > >
> > > ChatGPT won't do essays anymore, it will just hit the bong.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I notice ChatGPT makes up facts just to come up with an answer...just
> > > > like yous guys.
> > > >
> > > > and it doesn't cite...just like you guys.
> > > >
> > > > but what do you expect of products from the 'scientific community'?
> > > >
> > > > in their own image...
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:53:43 -0800, The Starmaker
> > > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >https://dnyuz.com/2023/01/20/google-calls-in-help-from-larry-page-and-sergey-brin-for-a-i-fight/
> > > > >
> > > > >Code Red
> > > > >
> > > > >ideas from scratch...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 11:14:14 -0800, The Starmaker
> > > > ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >>‘Code Red’
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>https://dnyuz.com/2022/12/21/a-new-chat-bot-is-a-code-red-for-googles-search-business/
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:56:05 -0800, The Starmaker
> > > > >><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>ChatGPT looks like
> > > > >>>it does a better
> > > > >>>job of
> > > > >>>writing programs
> > > > >>>then all those
> > > > >>>guys out there
> > > > >>>on freelance sites.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>ChatGPT doesn't
> > > > >>>ask stupid questions
> > > > >>>like
> > > > >>>"What do you want this for?"
> > > > >>>or
> > > > >>>"This looks illegal."
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>ChatGPT just
> > > > >>>codes for you without
> > > > >>>a conscious.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>Blackhat ChatGPT
> > > > >>>is cool.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>It's like asking
> > > > >>>Albert Einstein,
> > > > >>>"Can you build me an atomic bomb?"
> > > > >>>and it might ask...
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>"Do you want it to be
> > > > >>>launched from a submarine or
> > > > >>>a suitcase?"
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>Then I might ask  ChatGPT...
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>Make me an extremely powerful bomb of a new type
> > > > >>>constructed to blow up the whole Earth!
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>and ChatGPT might say:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>"Such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> > > > >>>air. A single bomb of this type, carried by submarine and exploded in a
> > > > >>>port, might very well destroy
> > > > >>>the whole Earth together with some of the surrounding planets."
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>GO FOR IT BRO!!!!
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>Isn't ChatGPT cool?
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 16:13 -0800
  Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 23:40 -0800
    Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-26 01:54 -0600
      Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 17:12 -0800
        Re: ChatGPT Connie Scutese <uiin@tssccenc.ne> - 2023-02-27 18:55 +0000
          Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 13:12 -0800
    Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-26 11:53 -0800
      Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-26 21:20 -0800
        Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 21:43 -0800
        Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-27 12:26 -0800
          Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 13:05 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 16:36 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-30 11:07 -0700
              Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-01 10:22 -0700
              Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-08 15:29 -0700
                Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-11 10:57 -0700
          Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 16:57 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-01 16:47 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-02 17:24 -0600
                Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-03-02 16:45 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-03 11:18 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 12:06 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-03 20:39 -0600
                Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-03 21:22 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-03 21:27 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-04 13:51 -0600
                Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-04 13:41 -0600

csiph-web