Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #602296

Re: ChatGPT

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

When the Internet first came out...
it's guys like me that changed the Internet to what it is today.


Now that you have ChatGPT...it is up to me

to decide which direction in the future ChatGPT will take.


Now, let's see...
what direction should I take ChatGPT?

Maybe I need to let ChatGPT   create
a new computer language software that automatically
finds serial numbers ...in a second!


Or a ...superSpam.


ChatGPT, make me a script that gives me a million real followers on tiktok. No, make it ten million...
fuck it, go for a hundred million!


By next year you won't recognize ChatGPT.


ChatGPT won't do essays anymore, it will just hit the bong.






The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> I notice ChatGPT makes up facts just to come up with an answer...just
> like yous guys.
> 
> and it doesn't cite...just like you guys.
> 
> but what do you expect of products from the 'scientific community'?
> 
> in their own image...
> 
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:53:43 -0800, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >https://dnyuz.com/2023/01/20/google-calls-in-help-from-larry-page-and-sergey-brin-for-a-i-fight/
> >
> >Code Red
> >
> >ideas from scratch...
> >
> >
> >On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 11:14:14 -0800, The Starmaker
> ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> >>‘Code Red’
> >>
> >>
> >>https://dnyuz.com/2022/12/21/a-new-chat-bot-is-a-code-red-for-googles-search-business/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:56:05 -0800, The Starmaker
> >><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>ChatGPT looks like
> >>>it does a better
> >>>job of
> >>>writing programs
> >>>then all those
> >>>guys out there
> >>>on freelance sites.
> >>>
> >>>ChatGPT doesn't
> >>>ask stupid questions
> >>>like
> >>>"What do you want this for?"
> >>>or
> >>>"This looks illegal."
> >>>
> >>>ChatGPT just
> >>>codes for you without
> >>>a conscious.
> >>>
> >>>Blackhat ChatGPT
> >>>is cool.
> >>>
> >>>It's like asking
> >>>Albert Einstein,
> >>>"Can you build me an atomic bomb?"
> >>>and it might ask...
> >>>
> >>>"Do you want it to be
> >>>launched from a submarine or
> >>>a suitcase?"
> >>>
> >>>Then I might ask  ChatGPT...
> >>>
> >>>Make me an extremely powerful bomb of a new type
> >>>constructed to blow up the whole Earth!
> >>>
> >>>and ChatGPT might say:
> >>>
> >>>"Such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by
> >>>air. A single bomb of this type, carried by submarine and exploded in a
> >>>port, might very well destroy
> >>>the whole Earth together with some of the surrounding planets."
> >>>
> >>>GO FOR IT BRO!!!!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Isn't ChatGPT cool?
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 16:13 -0800
  Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 23:40 -0800
    Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-26 01:54 -0600
      Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 17:12 -0800
        Re: ChatGPT Connie Scutese <uiin@tssccenc.ne> - 2023-02-27 18:55 +0000
          Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 13:12 -0800
    Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-26 11:53 -0800
      Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-26 21:20 -0800
        Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 21:43 -0800
        Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-27 12:26 -0800
          Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 13:05 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 16:36 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-30 11:07 -0700
              Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-01 10:22 -0700
              Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-08 15:29 -0700
                Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-11 10:57 -0700
          Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 16:57 -0800
            Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-01 16:47 -0800
              Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-02 17:24 -0600
                Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-03-02 16:45 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-03 11:18 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 12:06 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-03 20:39 -0600
                Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-03 21:22 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-03 21:27 -0800
                Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-04 13:51 -0600
                Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-04 13:41 -0600

csiph-web