Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #599771

Re: FoR

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: FoR
Date 2023-01-17 13:36 -0800
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <63C714C3.7258@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <80f187e9-d47b-48b3-84e2-f0c57cb6b8a8n@googlegroups.com> <63C5B5A7.4889@ix.netcom.com> <63C5D287.7DC5@ix.netcom.com> <63C6468D.7C98@ix.netcom.com> <63C703FC.11BE@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 9:02:34 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Saturday, January 14, 2023 at 4:23:08 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The first atom was probably bigger than our Sun.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And just what amazing evidence do you have to offer for this > out-of-your-ass claim?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The evidence is overwhelming!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I mean, a 3 year can explain it...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > simply, it just takes one material object to create a whole universe.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is your question what is the size of the first atom??? Are you using a
> > > > > > > 12" ruler??
> > > > > > WHERE did you people get the idea that the universe comes from a itty
> > > > > > bitty tinny winney...atom?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > skool?
> > > > >
> > > > > So... you have zero evidence to provide support for your outrageous claim... got it!
> > > >
> > > > Of course I have 100 percent evidence that "The first atom was BIGGER than our Sun.", the same evidence
> > > > your belief that the first atom is SMALLER than our Sun.
> > > >
> > > > But first, I have to layout the foundation...
> > > >
> > > > Why do you think he changed the name to...a cosmic egg?
> > > >
> > > > Because he was pressured too when they discovered his first atom was bigger that our SUN!
> > > >
> > > > Many times bigger than our sun...but you people are not suppose to know that because LeMaitre was not Jewish, he was Catholic.
> > > >
> > > > Anybody smaarter than Einstein was simply shot to death. Buried!
> > > >
> > > > Now you got to go and dig up LeMaitre's grave and you'll discover...
> > > >
> > > >  Georges Lemaître who suggested the idea of a 'primeval atom’ (first atom).. He illustrated the idea by imagining an object 30 times larger than the volume of the sun containing all the matter of the Universe.
> > > >
> > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmon
> > > >
> > > > "a particle named Cosmon."
> > > >
> > > > and Today, they (the scientific community) gave that particle a new name...
> > > >
> > > > Can you guess the name?
> > > > (of course they STOLE the idea from LeMaitre)
> > > > Can you guess the name?
> > > >
> > > > I'll give you a clue...a single particle.... the heaviest form of matter at the beginning of the big bang.
> > > >
> > > > Bigger than our Sun, right?
> > > >
> > > > Now, let me go a step further (if you can handle it)...
> > > >
> > > > The earth was contained in what you people call...'the first atom', (which was bigger than our sun)
> > > >
> > > > The earth existed even before space and time.
> > > >
> > > > Then there was Light..
> > >
> > > That means...dat the age of the Earth is the same age of the universe.
> > >
> > > When are yous people going to get that right????
> > >
> > > Are yous just going to remain stupid for the rest of your life??
> > >
> > > waiting for somebody to tell you what to think?
> > >
> > > stupid.
> >
> > ...and you people keep forgetting The Code: 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.'
> >
> > In this case, "and" is the operative word. "And" definition means: 'together at the same time'.
> >
> > That means, heavens and the earth were both created at the same Time.
> >
> > The earth was contained *in* the...singularity..
> >
> > The singularity was 30 times bigger than our sun then.
> >
> > dats enoug space for a piece of a grain of sand dis earth is floating in space.
> >
> > This singularity, broke up into little pieces...everywhere.
> >
> > broke up into little pieces...everywhere is wat yous call the big bang, by the 'big bang man'.
> >
> > dey dont tech yous dis stuff in skool because of religious wars between jewish religion and catholic religion.
> >
> > Oh, and dat:
> >
> > > > "a particle named Cosmon."
> > > >
> > > > and Today, they (the scientific community) gave that particle a new name...
> > > >
> > > > Can you guess the name?
> > > > (of course they STOLE the idea from LeMaitre)
> > > > Can you guess the name?
> >
> > The...One.
> >
> >  #1 Best Seller in Cosmology
> > https://www.amazon.com/One-Ancient-Holds-Future-Physics/dp/1541674855/ref=zg_bs_14545_sccl_7/135-7395175-6306629?psc=1
> >
> > it's already at a nitroflare near you...
> 
> but the book is based on only One word... monism.
> 
> All you have to do is look up the definition of the word:  monism
> 
> and it's like reading the whole book.
> 
> You know, another one of those ripoffs books where the author takes one idea in
> a sentence and expands it to 600 pages.
> 
> but this is worse...one word into 600 pages!
> 
> you can do the same thing with ChatGPT...
> 
> Maybe I should write a book! "How To Blow Up the Planet"
> 
> Number One best seller on Amazon!
> 
> 600 pages!
> 
> I'm working on the second book already while ChatGPT is still writing the first one...
> 
> "How To Blow Up The Moon"
> 
> oh my gawd, i'm already running out of planets!
> 
> I'm not going to blow up Pluto, the kids would be angry with me....
> 
> no telling wat those little motherfuckers would do.

I think it's more exciting to blow up the moon instead of the earth, because then you can watch how everything enfolds...








-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-14 02:10 -0800
  Re: FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-14 10:09 -0800
    Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 16:23 -0800
      Re: FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-14 17:16 -0800
        Re: FoR Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-14 18:05 -0800
          Re: FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-15 02:54 -0800
      Re: FoR Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-14 18:06 -0800
        Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 19:15 -0800
          Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 21:02 -0800
            Re: FoR Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-14 21:47 -0800
              Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 22:15 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-14 22:48 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 00:19 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 00:44 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 01:03 -0800
              Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-15 11:47 -0800
              Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-16 12:37 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-16 14:41 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-16 22:56 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-17 12:24 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-17 13:36 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-19 13:52 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-19 21:27 -0800
                Re: FoR The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-20 09:23 -0800
            Re: FoR whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-15 00:18 -0600
              Re: FoR Peter Kinane <pkinane@iol.ie> - 2023-01-15 03:16 -0800
          Re: FoR whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-15 00:16 -0600

csiph-web