Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #35579
| Message-ID | <6315a8ca@news.ausics.net> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> |
| Subject | Re: A small puzzle. |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| References | (8 earlier) <0hgeui-l0d.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <631534e8@news.ausics.net> <tf3d3f$3bkih$1@dont-email.me> <631553e5@news.ausics.net> <tf3v0g$rjbu$1@solani.org> |
| Date | 2022-09-05 17:44 +1000 |
| Organization | Ausics - https://www.ausics.net |
Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote: > Am 05.09.22 um 03:41 schrieb Computer Nerd Kev: >> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> You can conceal your mobile phone number. >> >> No I mean I don't tell people my mobile number so that I'm not >> obliged to use it, I only want people to call on the landline. It's >> only turned on when I want to use it anyway. PayPal will call up a >> landline for their verification code system, but the bank insists >> on a mobile number. > > Where do you live? Australia. > In Switzerland 2FA via SMS for internet banking was abolished roughly 4 > years ago for security reasons. Today a smart phone is needed that > allows to scan a complex optical pattern created and valid only for a > very short period of time. That's surprising. But my bank only started requiring 2FA for transactions this year (I don't know whether it was an option previously), so hopefully that's still some way off. The account only briefly holds enough money to pay for each purchase I make so I'd personally be happy with 1FA for that. My accounts for keeping money long-term are offline-only, and in fact they're with a different bank. I don't really trust online banking no matter how many "factors" they require for authentication. That said, I did drop the folder with all my banking details inside on the way back to the car a few months ago, and didn't realise until I got home (15min drive away). No sign of it when I went back, but fortunately someone handed it in a few days later. So I can't pretend that in-person banking is fool-proof either. There's only so much someone could have done with it without any ID though. -- __ __ #_ < |\| |< _#
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-03 01:03 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. "25B.Z969" <25B.Z969@noda.net> - 2022-09-02 20:14 -0400
Re: A small puzzle. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2022-09-03 11:49 +1000
Re: A small puzzle. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2022-09-02 21:30 -0700
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-03 11:06 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2022-09-03 13:59 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-03 13:31 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2022-09-03 21:59 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-04 10:05 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2022-09-04 13:50 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-04 13:19 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2022-09-04 22:17 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2022-09-03 14:01 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-03 13:34 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2022-09-03 22:02 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-09-03 20:25 +0000
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-04 10:23 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2022-09-04 13:58 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2022-09-05 09:29 +1000
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-05 00:41 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2022-09-05 11:41 +1000
Re: A small puzzle. "25B.Z969" <25B.Z969@noda.net> - 2022-09-05 00:40 -0400
Re: A small puzzle. Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-09-05 06:49 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2022-09-04 23:03 -0700
Re: A small puzzle. "25B.Z969" <25B.Z969@noda.net> - 2022-09-05 20:00 -0400
Re: A small puzzle. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2022-09-06 12:50 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-09-06 15:24 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-05 08:28 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-09-05 10:38 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-05 11:11 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-09-05 17:54 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-05 17:24 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-09-05 22:13 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-06 09:04 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2022-09-05 22:27 +0000
Re: A small puzzle. "25B.Z969" <25B.Z969@noda.net> - 2022-09-05 22:26 -0400
Re: A small puzzle. "25B.Z969" <25B.Z969@noda.net> - 2022-09-05 19:58 -0400
Re: A small puzzle. Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-09-05 06:47 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2022-09-05 17:44 +1000
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-05 09:34 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-09-05 10:42 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-05 11:15 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-09-05 18:03 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2022-09-05 09:43 -0700
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-05 19:25 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-09-06 08:12 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-06 09:07 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2022-09-05 15:11 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2022-09-06 08:34 +1000
Re: A small puzzle. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2022-09-05 15:22 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-04 10:16 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2022-09-04 14:04 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-04 13:26 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2022-09-04 13:23 +0000
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-03 10:56 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202209.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2022-09-04 17:17 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2022-09-03 09:11 +0200
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-03 11:19 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2022-09-03 16:13 +0000
Re: A small puzzle. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-04 10:04 +0100
Re: A small puzzle. "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2022-09-04 14:06 +0200
csiph-web