Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.privacy.anon-server > #50500
| From | Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> |
|---|---|
| References | <26b069e68ddf5919bfca6d97e993b56c@hoi-polloi.org> <59a323099f329623bf6cc042703cfb6c@remailer.paranoici.org> <7efdd2bfb4a7190c5be7d7d4760e5116@hoi-polloi.org> |
| Subject | Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains |
| Message-ID | <585805e2e6c19bbe4c1a968e69ca708d@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2016-04-14 08:37 +0200 |
| Newsgroups | alt.privacy.anon-server |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
In article <7efdd2bfb4a7190c5be7d7d4760e5116@hoi-polloi.org> Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> wrote: > > Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> wrote: > > >Strange. Why effectively block these remailers? > > > >Broken type-I remailer chains: > >(* brabus) > >(* holland) > >(* leafy) > >(* redjohn) > >(* senshi) > > > >all appear to have good stats 100% uptime with and > >reasonable latency: 2 of which are exits? > > > >How many times on this forum have I heard type-I users > >whining about a lack of support from remops? > > > >I would seriously advise the remops of the above remailers > >to pull the plug on type-I support. > > Who are you to recommend ceasing an anonymity service? > > > It's a much less > >secure format than type-2 remailers. > > You're so brillant! > > Now tell us how to build reply chains with Type 2 remailers. You put the chain in the coconut and drink it all up. When it comes out it's randomized and has many links.
Back to alt.privacy.anon-server | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-12 08:53 -0400
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-13 00:18 +0200
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Brabus <altaylor06@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 03:35 -0700
Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-13 12:14 +0100
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2016-04-13 14:42 +0000
Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2016-04-13 16:54 +0000
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-13 21:35 +0200
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-14 05:50 +0200
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-14 03:06 -0400
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201604.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2016-04-15 00:40 +0000
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-15 08:45 +0200
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-15 15:30 +0200
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Brabus <altaylor06@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 23:46 -0700
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2016-04-14 08:37 +0200
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-14 16:41 +0100
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Cornelis Tromp <nobody@holland.remailer.nl> - 2016-04-14 22:54 +0100
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-14 07:22 +0100
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-13 13:31 +0000
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-13 17:14 +0100
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-13 17:54 +0100
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Red John <redjohn@nym.mixmin.net> - 2016-04-13 17:58 +0100
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-13 19:05 +0100
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-13 18:53 +0000
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Cornelis Tromp <nobody@holland.remailer.nl> - 2016-04-13 22:45 +0100
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-13 22:04 +0000
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains SEC3 <sec3-pinger@sec3.invalid> - 2016-04-13 18:41 -0400
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-14 08:33 +0200
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-14 11:07 -0400
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone.mooo.com> - 2016-04-14 22:30 +0200
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-13 18:36 -0400
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2016-04-14 02:17 +0200
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-13 23:56 -0400
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains elvis-85503@notatla.org.uk - 2016-04-14 08:55 +0000
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201604.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2016-04-15 01:44 +0000
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-14 10:52 +0000
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains SEC3 <sec3-pinger@sec3.invalid> - 2016-04-14 14:13 -0400
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-15 10:04 +0000
Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-15 13:01 +0100
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-15 13:22 +0000
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-15 13:55 +0000
Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-15 17:27 +0100
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201604.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2016-04-15 18:12 +0000
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2016-04-15 20:29 +0000
Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-15 16:31 +0100
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-15 13:29 -0400
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-15 18:54 +0000
Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-15 11:18 -0400
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains SEC3 <sec3-pinger@sec3.invalid> - 2016-04-15 11:45 -0400
Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains elvis-85503@notatla.org.uk - 2016-04-16 09:06 +0000
csiph-web