Re: RPC and BT?

From	spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com>
Subject	Re: RPC and BT?
Newsgroups	comp.sys.acorn.misc
Date	2012-04-23 00:01 +0100
Message-ID	<5284a0c19cspam.pling@btinternet.com> (permalink)
References	<528464ae15dave@davenoise.co.uk> <52846a5395spam.pling@btinternet.com> <5284752fe6see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid>
Organization	Que? Orga-what

Show all headers | View raw

In article <5284752fe6see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid>,
   Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> wrote:
> In article <52846a5395spam.pling@btinternet.com>,
>    spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> wrote:

> > Works fine, but the individual user accounts have
> > individual passwords that MUST be used when sending mail.

> I have no intention of ever again, ever, having anything to
> do with BT directly. I leave that soul-destroying task to my
> telco. It is, in part, what I pay them for.

> But, just out of interest, you could presumably still send
> your e-mail via a third-party SMTP server using SMTP
> Authentication? Or does BT block that too?

It isn't blocking - each account name has its own security. The Pipex setup
accepted stuff from one account for all the aliases, the BT setup has
aliases available but also distinct account names.

I carried on using the Pipex for a while after the change so that isn't
blocked.

-- 

Steve Pampling

Back to comp.sys.acorn.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

RPC and BT? "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 13:04 +0100
  Re: RPC and BT? Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-22 13:29 +0100
    Re: RPC and BT? Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 13:56 +0100
      Re: RPC and BT? Jeremy Nicoll - news posts <jn.nntp.scrap007@wingsandbeaks.org.uk> - 2012-04-22 14:36 +0100
        Re: RPC and BT? Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 17:08 +0100
      Re: RPC and BT? Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-22 15:20 +0100
  Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 14:06 +0100
    Re: RPC and BT? Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-22 16:05 +0100
      Re: RPC and BT? T M Smith <thomas.smith57@ntlworld.com> - 2012-04-22 22:04 +0100
        Re: RPC and BT? Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 22:26 +0100
          Re: RPC and BT? T M Smith <thomas.smith57@ntlworld.com> - 2012-04-22 22:43 +0100
          Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:08 +0100
            Re: RPC and BT? Tony Moore <old_coaster@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:03 +0000
              Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 09:06 +0100
            Re: RPC and BT? Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 02:15 +0200
              Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-23 19:57 +0100
                Re: RPC and BT? Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-24 05:25 +0200
                Re: RPC and BT? cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-04-24 13:25 +0100
            Re: RPC and BT? Rosemary Miskin <miskin@orpheusmail.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 19:20 +0100
      Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:16 +0100
        Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-23 20:01 +0100
          Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-24 09:30 +0100
      Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-23 00:01 +0100

csiph-web