Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #11959

Re: Basic question about compiling

From Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Basic question about compiling
Date 2012-02-11 20:11 -0800
Organization http://groups.google.com
Message-ID <26600475.229.1329019899102.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbbpm9> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <6230500.347.1328894981750.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcmg9> <d734cb97-8b87-4cb6-9bb3-60251049e949@1g2000yqv.googlegroups.com> <20674881.352.1328908283351.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbbmr9> <0d859227-3c9c-48c1-bd55-cdf3a86a5b38@n12g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4f36f27e$0$285$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>

Show all headers | View raw


Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> simplicity wrote:
> > Lew wrote:
> >> simplicity wrote:
> >>> "Go do your research" is a typical response of a clueless buffoon
> >>> whose only characteristic is that he/she cannot keep his/her mouth
> >>> shut.
> >>
> >> So you're saying that reading the documentation is not a good idea?
> >
> > No. What I am saying is that, in the professional world, question
> > asked, any question for that matter, mandates answer different than
> > "RTFM" type.
> 
> Occasionally RTFM is the best answer.
> 
> If the level of the question is below what is the expectation
> in the group.

"simplicity", you seriously need to get over yourself. This is not your 
personal, private little slave pool to offer answers to any questions you ask 
and take abuse from you. This is a Usenet *discussion* group, and any help you 
get is at the discretion and voluntary desire to help of the other 
participants.

It is just too bad for you that you didn't find my answer helpful, but that is 
not any kind of excuse for your rudeness and ingratitude and downright 
snarkiness. You have no basis whatsoever for this arrogant attitude of 
entitlement you evince, nor have I done anything so rude as to merit the kind 
of personal attack in which you've engaged. The answers I gave are helpful to 
you, should you get down off your high horse to do the kind of studying and 
learning you so clearly need to do. As Arne said, this newsgroup will point 
you to basic documentation if that exists for basic questions such as yours.

It is a personal failing on your part, and a darned shame, "simplicity", that 
you cannot or will not observe the rudiments of basic human decency and 
understand your proper place here. We are all equals here; none of us is your 
subordinate, not that you should behave that way to subordinates either.

-- 
Lew

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 08:12 -0800
  Re: Basic question about compiling Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2012-02-10 09:00 -0800
    Re: Basic question about compiling Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 09:29 -0800
      Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 11:48 -0800
        Re: Basic question about compiling Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 13:11 -0800
          Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-11 13:17 -0800
            Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-11 17:58 -0500
              Re: Basic question about compiling Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-11 20:11 -0800
                Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-12 09:39 -0500
              Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-11 22:14 -0800
                Re: Basic question about compiling Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-02-12 00:36 -0600
                Re: Basic question about compiling Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-02-14 06:15 -0800
                Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-12 09:37 -0500
                Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-12 11:04 -0800
                Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-12 14:34 -0500
                Re: Basic question about compiling Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2012-02-14 12:29 +0200
                Re: Basic question about compiling RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2012-02-15 10:38 +0000
        Re: Basic question about compiling rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2012-02-11 18:57 +0000
        Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-11 15:14 -0500
          Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-11 12:58 -0800
            Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-11 16:18 -0500
            Re: Basic question about compiling Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-02-11 18:13 -0400
              Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-11 22:21 -0800
    Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 11:26 -0800
      Re: Basic question about compiling Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2012-02-10 11:37 -0800
        Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 11:51 -0800
        Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 12:30 -0800
          Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-11 15:00 -0500
        Re: Basic question about compiling Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-02-10 23:30 +0100
  Re: Basic question about compiling Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-02-11 02:33 -0800

csiph-web