Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #11959
| From | Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Basic question about compiling |
| Date | 2012-02-11 20:11 -0800 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <26600475.229.1329019899102.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbbpm9> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <6230500.347.1328894981750.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcmg9> <d734cb97-8b87-4cb6-9bb3-60251049e949@1g2000yqv.googlegroups.com> <20674881.352.1328908283351.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbbmr9> <0d859227-3c9c-48c1-bd55-cdf3a86a5b38@n12g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4f36f27e$0$285$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
Arne Vajhøj wrote: > simplicity wrote: > > Lew wrote: > >> simplicity wrote: > >>> "Go do your research" is a typical response of a clueless buffoon > >>> whose only characteristic is that he/she cannot keep his/her mouth > >>> shut. > >> > >> So you're saying that reading the documentation is not a good idea? > > > > No. What I am saying is that, in the professional world, question > > asked, any question for that matter, mandates answer different than > > "RTFM" type. > > Occasionally RTFM is the best answer. > > If the level of the question is below what is the expectation > in the group. "simplicity", you seriously need to get over yourself. This is not your personal, private little slave pool to offer answers to any questions you ask and take abuse from you. This is a Usenet *discussion* group, and any help you get is at the discretion and voluntary desire to help of the other participants. It is just too bad for you that you didn't find my answer helpful, but that is not any kind of excuse for your rudeness and ingratitude and downright snarkiness. You have no basis whatsoever for this arrogant attitude of entitlement you evince, nor have I done anything so rude as to merit the kind of personal attack in which you've engaged. The answers I gave are helpful to you, should you get down off your high horse to do the kind of studying and learning you so clearly need to do. As Arne said, this newsgroup will point you to basic documentation if that exists for basic questions such as yours. It is a personal failing on your part, and a darned shame, "simplicity", that you cannot or will not observe the rudiments of basic human decency and understand your proper place here. We are all equals here; none of us is your subordinate, not that you should behave that way to subordinates either. -- Lew
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 08:12 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2012-02-10 09:00 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 09:29 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 11:48 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 13:11 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-11 13:17 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-11 17:58 -0500
Re: Basic question about compiling Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-11 20:11 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-12 09:39 -0500
Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-11 22:14 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-02-12 00:36 -0600
Re: Basic question about compiling Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-02-14 06:15 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-12 09:37 -0500
Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-12 11:04 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-12 14:34 -0500
Re: Basic question about compiling Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2012-02-14 12:29 +0200
Re: Basic question about compiling RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2012-02-15 10:38 +0000
Re: Basic question about compiling rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2012-02-11 18:57 +0000
Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-11 15:14 -0500
Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-11 12:58 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-11 16:18 -0500
Re: Basic question about compiling Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-02-11 18:13 -0400
Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-11 22:21 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 11:26 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2012-02-10 11:37 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 11:51 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 12:30 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-11 15:00 -0500
Re: Basic question about compiling Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-02-10 23:30 +0100
Re: Basic question about compiling Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-02-11 02:33 -0800
csiph-web