Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #11964

Re: Basic question about compiling

From simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Basic question about compiling
Date 2012-02-11 22:14 -0800
Organization http://groups.google.com
Message-ID <fef8724f-61c2-4c70-b52d-7e83093d1ac1@v6g2000pba.googlegroups.com> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <6230500.347.1328894981750.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcmg9> <d734cb97-8b87-4cb6-9bb3-60251049e949@1g2000yqv.googlegroups.com> <20674881.352.1328908283351.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbbmr9> <0d859227-3c9c-48c1-bd55-cdf3a86a5b38@n12g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4f36f27e$0$285$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>

Show all headers | View raw


On Feb 11, 3:58 pm, Arne Vajhøj <a...@vajhoej.dk> wrote:
> On 2/11/2012 4:17 PM, simplicity wrote:
>
> > On Feb 10, 2:11 pm, Lew<lewbl...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >> On Friday, February 10, 2012 11:48:13 AM UTC-8, simplicity wrote:
> >>> "Go do your research" is a typical response of a clueless buffoon
> >>> whose only characteristic is that he/she cannot keep his/her mouth
> >>> shut.
>
> >> So you're saying that reading the documentation is not a good idea?
>
> > No. What I am saying is that, in the professional world, question
> > asked, any question for that matter, mandates answer different than
> > "RTFM" type.
>
> Occasionally RTFM is the best answer.

Disagreed. Just ask yourself this question: how long would you survive
in the organization if you gave your colleague the "RTFM answer"? I
thing you would be a history before the day's end.

Why would this forum be any different than the organization we work
for?

> If the level of the question is below what is the expectation
> in the group.

Who are we to make ruling on "expectations in the group"?

We progress when we can build from what our predecessors accomplished.
Starting from zero and going through the same over and over - sort of
what Lew's suggested in his reply, is counter to this philosophy. And
when I read his latest post it makes me think tat he still does not
get it.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 08:12 -0800
  Re: Basic question about compiling Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2012-02-10 09:00 -0800
    Re: Basic question about compiling Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 09:29 -0800
      Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 11:48 -0800
        Re: Basic question about compiling Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 13:11 -0800
          Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-11 13:17 -0800
            Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-11 17:58 -0500
              Re: Basic question about compiling Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-11 20:11 -0800
                Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-12 09:39 -0500
              Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-11 22:14 -0800
                Re: Basic question about compiling Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-02-12 00:36 -0600
                Re: Basic question about compiling Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-02-14 06:15 -0800
                Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-12 09:37 -0500
                Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-12 11:04 -0800
                Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-12 14:34 -0500
                Re: Basic question about compiling Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2012-02-14 12:29 +0200
                Re: Basic question about compiling RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2012-02-15 10:38 +0000
        Re: Basic question about compiling rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2012-02-11 18:57 +0000
        Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-11 15:14 -0500
          Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-11 12:58 -0800
            Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-11 16:18 -0500
            Re: Basic question about compiling Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-02-11 18:13 -0400
              Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-11 22:21 -0800
    Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 11:26 -0800
      Re: Basic question about compiling Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2012-02-10 11:37 -0800
        Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 11:51 -0800
        Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 12:30 -0800
          Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-11 15:00 -0500
        Re: Basic question about compiling Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-02-10 23:30 +0100
  Re: Basic question about compiling Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-02-11 02:33 -0800

csiph-web