Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #11964
| From | simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Basic question about compiling |
| Date | 2012-02-11 22:14 -0800 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <fef8724f-61c2-4c70-b52d-7e83093d1ac1@v6g2000pba.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <6230500.347.1328894981750.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcmg9> <d734cb97-8b87-4cb6-9bb3-60251049e949@1g2000yqv.googlegroups.com> <20674881.352.1328908283351.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbbmr9> <0d859227-3c9c-48c1-bd55-cdf3a86a5b38@n12g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4f36f27e$0$285$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
On Feb 11, 3:58 pm, Arne Vajhøj <a...@vajhoej.dk> wrote: > On 2/11/2012 4:17 PM, simplicity wrote: > > > On Feb 10, 2:11 pm, Lew<lewbl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Friday, February 10, 2012 11:48:13 AM UTC-8, simplicity wrote: > >>> "Go do your research" is a typical response of a clueless buffoon > >>> whose only characteristic is that he/she cannot keep his/her mouth > >>> shut. > > >> So you're saying that reading the documentation is not a good idea? > > > No. What I am saying is that, in the professional world, question > > asked, any question for that matter, mandates answer different than > > "RTFM" type. > > Occasionally RTFM is the best answer. Disagreed. Just ask yourself this question: how long would you survive in the organization if you gave your colleague the "RTFM answer"? I thing you would be a history before the day's end. Why would this forum be any different than the organization we work for? > If the level of the question is below what is the expectation > in the group. Who are we to make ruling on "expectations in the group"? We progress when we can build from what our predecessors accomplished. Starting from zero and going through the same over and over - sort of what Lew's suggested in his reply, is counter to this philosophy. And when I read his latest post it makes me think tat he still does not get it.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 08:12 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2012-02-10 09:00 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 09:29 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 11:48 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 13:11 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-11 13:17 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-11 17:58 -0500
Re: Basic question about compiling Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-02-11 20:11 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-12 09:39 -0500
Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-11 22:14 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-02-12 00:36 -0600
Re: Basic question about compiling Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-02-14 06:15 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-12 09:37 -0500
Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-12 11:04 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-12 14:34 -0500
Re: Basic question about compiling Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2012-02-14 12:29 +0200
Re: Basic question about compiling RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@spamweary.invalid> - 2012-02-15 10:38 +0000
Re: Basic question about compiling rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2012-02-11 18:57 +0000
Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-11 15:14 -0500
Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-11 12:58 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-11 16:18 -0500
Re: Basic question about compiling Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-02-11 18:13 -0400
Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-11 22:21 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 11:26 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2012-02-10 11:37 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 11:51 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling simplicity <stella_pigeon@live.ca> - 2012-02-10 12:30 -0800
Re: Basic question about compiling Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-11 15:00 -0500
Re: Basic question about compiling Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-02-10 23:30 +0100
Re: Basic question about compiling Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-02-11 02:33 -0800
csiph-web