Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Lew Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Basic question about compiling Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:11:39 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 51 Message-ID: <26600475.229.1329019899102.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbbpm9> References: <0fffb4b6-426a-4304-a249-63de08dd6d33@d15g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> <6230500.347.1328894981750.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcmg9> <20674881.352.1328908283351.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbbmr9> <0d859227-3c9c-48c1-bd55-cdf3a86a5b38@n12g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4f36f27e$0$285$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.164.137.214 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1329020283 9982 127.0.0.1 (12 Feb 2012 04:18:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:18:03 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <4f36f27e$0$285$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=173.164.137.214; posting-account=CP-lKQoAAAAGtB5diOuGlDQk0jIwmH0T User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:11959 Arne Vajh=F8j wrote: > simplicity wrote: > > Lew wrote: > >> simplicity wrote: > >>> "Go do your research" is a typical response of a clueless buffoon > >>> whose only characteristic is that he/she cannot keep his/her mouth > >>> shut. > >> > >> So you're saying that reading the documentation is not a good idea? > > > > No. What I am saying is that, in the professional world, question > > asked, any question for that matter, mandates answer different than > > "RTFM" type. >=20 > Occasionally RTFM is the best answer. >=20 > If the level of the question is below what is the expectation > in the group. "simplicity", you seriously need to get over yourself. This is not your=20 personal, private little slave pool to offer answers to any questions you a= sk=20 and take abuse from you. This is a Usenet *discussion* group, and any help = you=20 get is at the discretion and voluntary desire to help of the other=20 participants. It is just too bad for you that you didn't find my answer helpful, but that= is=20 not any kind of excuse for your rudeness and ingratitude and downright=20 snarkiness. You have no basis whatsoever for this arrogant attitude of=20 entitlement you evince, nor have I done anything so rude as to merit the ki= nd=20 of personal attack in which you've engaged. The answers I gave are helpful = to=20 you, should you get down off your high horse to do the kind of studying and= =20 learning you so clearly need to do. As Arne said, this newsgroup will point= =20 you to basic documentation if that exists for basic questions such as yours= . It is a personal failing on your part, and a darned shame, "simplicity", th= at=20 you cannot or will not observe the rudiments of basic human decency and=20 understand your proper place here. We are all equals here; none of us is yo= ur=20 subordinate, not that you should behave that way to subordinates either. --=20 Lew