Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.sys.apple2.programmer > #6284

Re: malloc with cc65

From Bill Chatfield <bill_chatfield@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups comp.sys.apple2.programmer
Subject Re: malloc with cc65
Date 2023-12-18 00:58 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <20231218005802.24df6e51@smilodon-gracilis> (permalink)
References <20231214135300.3f65fe0f@smilodon-gracilis> <ulfvsv$2pb5c$1@solani.org> <20231214215955.353cd4e4@smilodon-gracilis> <ulirs5$4fr4$1@solani.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 00:43:49 -0000 (UTC)
Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc@web.de> wrote:

> What I state above means that using c is faster/smaller than using b
> like this:
> *c = 2
> *b = 2

You're hard-coding the array into zero-page absolute address 2. Am I
understanding that correctly and is that what you meant?

Back to comp.sys.apple2.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

malloc with cc65 Bill Chatfield <bill_chatfield@yahoo.com> - 2023-12-14 13:53 -0500
  Re: malloc with cc65 Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc@web.de> - 2023-12-14 22:34 +0000
    Re: malloc with cc65 Bill Chatfield <bill_chatfield@yahoo.com> - 2023-12-14 21:59 -0500
      Re: malloc with cc65 Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc@web.de> - 2023-12-16 00:43 +0000
        Re: malloc with cc65 Bill Chatfield <bill_chatfield@yahoo.com> - 2023-12-18 00:58 -0500
          Re: malloc with cc65 Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc@web.de> - 2023-12-18 19:51 +0000
            Re: malloc with cc65 Bill Chatfield <bill_chatfield@yahoo.com> - 2023-12-20 10:52 -0500
              Re: malloc with cc65 Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2023-12-27 10:00 +1100
                Re: malloc with cc65 Bill Chatfield <bill_chatfield@yahoo.com> - 2023-12-31 11:58 -0500
                Re: malloc with cc65 Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2024-01-03 19:05 +1100
        Re: malloc with cc65 Colin Leroy-Mira <colin@colino.net> - 2024-02-01 21:54 +0100

csiph-web