Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.sys.apple2.programmer > #6297

Re: malloc with cc65

From Bill Chatfield <bill_chatfield@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups comp.sys.apple2.programmer
Subject Re: malloc with cc65
Date 2023-12-31 11:58 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <20231231115819.34756963@smilodon-gracilis> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <ulirs5$4fr4$1@solani.org> <20231218005802.24df6e51@smilodon-gracilis> <ulq7su$3g1p$1@solani.org> <20231220105200.7f518465@smilodon-gracilis> <rh2s5k-642.ln1@hendrix.foo>

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, 27 Dec 2023 10:00:43 +1100
Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> wrote:

>   There's no overloading going on here (notwithstanding its use the
> multiplication operator). It's really quite simple. The * operator
> means "the object pointed at". When used in a declaration it still
> means "the object pointed at". A pointer to foo (where foo is a type)
> declaration essentially means, "Declare an object which is a pointer
> such that the object pointed at by it is a foo."

I see what you're saying, after much mind bending. Maybe that is the
correct way to think about it.

The way I was thinking about it, in the declaration, the * produces a
pointer. In an expression the * produces data from a pointer.

Back to comp.sys.apple2.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

malloc with cc65 Bill Chatfield <bill_chatfield@yahoo.com> - 2023-12-14 13:53 -0500
  Re: malloc with cc65 Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc@web.de> - 2023-12-14 22:34 +0000
    Re: malloc with cc65 Bill Chatfield <bill_chatfield@yahoo.com> - 2023-12-14 21:59 -0500
      Re: malloc with cc65 Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc@web.de> - 2023-12-16 00:43 +0000
        Re: malloc with cc65 Bill Chatfield <bill_chatfield@yahoo.com> - 2023-12-18 00:58 -0500
          Re: malloc with cc65 Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc@web.de> - 2023-12-18 19:51 +0000
            Re: malloc with cc65 Bill Chatfield <bill_chatfield@yahoo.com> - 2023-12-20 10:52 -0500
              Re: malloc with cc65 Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2023-12-27 10:00 +1100
                Re: malloc with cc65 Bill Chatfield <bill_chatfield@yahoo.com> - 2023-12-31 11:58 -0500
                Re: malloc with cc65 Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2024-01-03 19:05 +1100
        Re: malloc with cc65 Colin Leroy-Mira <colin@colino.net> - 2024-02-01 21:54 +0100

csiph-web