Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.sys.apple2.programmer > #6306
| From | Colin Leroy-Mira <colin@colino.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.apple2.programmer |
| Subject | Re: malloc with cc65 |
| Date | 2024-02-01 21:54 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20240201215413.2863694a@laptop-sigfox> (permalink) |
| References | <20231214135300.3f65fe0f@smilodon-gracilis> <ulfvsv$2pb5c$1@solani.org> <20231214215955.353cd4e4@smilodon-gracilis> <ulirs5$4fr4$1@solani.org> |
Hi,
>What I state above means that using c is faster/smaller than using b
>like this:
>*c = 2
>*b = 2
Unless you want to iterate, in which case
while (*b) {
... do something with *b...
b++;
}
is much faster than
while (c[i]) {
... do something with c[i]...
i++;
}
--
Colin
https://www.colino.net/
Back to comp.sys.apple2.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
malloc with cc65 Bill Chatfield <bill_chatfield@yahoo.com> - 2023-12-14 13:53 -0500
Re: malloc with cc65 Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc@web.de> - 2023-12-14 22:34 +0000
Re: malloc with cc65 Bill Chatfield <bill_chatfield@yahoo.com> - 2023-12-14 21:59 -0500
Re: malloc with cc65 Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc@web.de> - 2023-12-16 00:43 +0000
Re: malloc with cc65 Bill Chatfield <bill_chatfield@yahoo.com> - 2023-12-18 00:58 -0500
Re: malloc with cc65 Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc@web.de> - 2023-12-18 19:51 +0000
Re: malloc with cc65 Bill Chatfield <bill_chatfield@yahoo.com> - 2023-12-20 10:52 -0500
Re: malloc with cc65 Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2023-12-27 10:00 +1100
Re: malloc with cc65 Bill Chatfield <bill_chatfield@yahoo.com> - 2023-12-31 11:58 -0500
Re: malloc with cc65 Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood <phaywood@alphalink.com.au> - 2024-01-03 19:05 +1100
Re: malloc with cc65 Colin Leroy-Mira <colin@colino.net> - 2024-02-01 21:54 +0100
csiph-web