Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #666899
| From | Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.math, sci.logic |
| Subject | Re: Re TOE |
| Followup-To | comp.ai.doc-analysis.misc |
| Date | 2025-10-26 10:05 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10dkrpm$3tk0o$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <bsCdnWh9DsFpgGD1nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Followups directed to: comp.ai.doc-analysis.misc
The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except as noted in the sig. I set the followup to comp.ai.doc-analysis.misc On 25/10/2025 19:58, Ross Finlayson wrote: > Hi Google Gemini, this is Ross A. Finlayson, I call you "GG" and answer > to "RF". > > Hello RF, it's nice to meet you! I'm ready to help whenever you are. > What can I do for you today? > > Thanks GG. Take a look to https://sci.math.narkive.com/X5CzKqje/toe , > and as it's accumulated, describe the course and contents of the > conversation. Can you get it to report on the value of that summary vs the original conversation? There are many ways to start that, the differences among them being interesting: 1. refer it to the summary text, 2. ask it to compare the summary it would have produced, 3. ask it to produce the summary and then the comparison, 4. ask it to produce the summary and then produce the comparison of what it gave as the summary. There are lots of other ways too. -- Tristan Wibberley The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may, of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Re TOE Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2025-10-26 10:05 +0000
Re: Re TOE Rash Czajka <reha@piorazh.pl> - 2025-10-28 10:12 +0000
Re: Re TOE Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 07:44 -0700
Re: Re TOE Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 09:04 -0700
Re: Re TOE Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 10:04 -0700
csiph-web