Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #666899

Re: Re TOE

From Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.math, sci.logic
Subject Re: Re TOE
Followup-To comp.ai.doc-analysis.misc
Date 2025-10-26 10:05 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <10dkrpm$3tk0o$4@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <bsCdnWh9DsFpgGD1nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Followups directed to: comp.ai.doc-analysis.misc

Show all headers | View raw


The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except
citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except as noted in
the sig.

I set the followup to comp.ai.doc-analysis.misc

On 25/10/2025 19:58, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>  Hi Google Gemini, this is Ross A. Finlayson, I call you "GG" and answer
> to "RF".
> 
> Hello RF, it's nice to meet you! I'm ready to help whenever you are.
> What can I do for you today?
> 
> Thanks GG. Take a look to https://sci.math.narkive.com/X5CzKqje/toe ,
> and as it's accumulated, describe the course and contents of the
> conversation.

Can you get it to report on the value of that summary vs the original
conversation?

There are many ways to start that, the differences among them being
interesting:

 1. refer it to the summary text,
 2. ask it to compare the summary it would have produced,
 3. ask it to produce the summary and then the comparison,
 4. ask it to produce the summary and then produce the comparison of
what it gave as the summary.

There are lots of other ways too.

--
Tristan Wibberley

The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except
citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,
of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it
verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to
promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation
of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general
superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train
any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that
will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Re TOE Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2025-10-26 10:05 +0000
  Re: Re TOE Rash Czajka <reha@piorazh.pl> - 2025-10-28 10:12 +0000
    Re: Re TOE Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 07:44 -0700
      Re: Re TOE Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 09:04 -0700
        Re: Re TOE Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-10-28 10:04 -0700

csiph-web