Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains

From	Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk>
Subject	Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains
References	<slrnngsih5.995.admin@fleegle.mixmin.net>
Message-ID	<084e3306829e22727208ef06fd97b6c6@remailer.org.uk> (permalink)
Date	2016-04-13 19:05 +0100
Newsgroups	alt.privacy.anon-server

Show all headers | View raw

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 04/13/2016 09:31 AM, Zax wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 08:53:33 -0400 (EDT), Jack Ryan wrote in
> Message-Id: <99688457279687a69a40d6ad2ca10fb8@remailer.cpunk.us>:
> 
>> Broken type-I remailer chains:
>> (* brabus)
>> (* holland)
>> (* leafy)
>> (* redjohn)
>> (* senshi)
>> (dizum anon)
>> (dizum austria)
> 
>> Does this mean that brabus holland leafy redjohn senshi
>> are effectively unusable?
> 
> Interesting!
> 
> Looking at my pinger, they all show a high percentage uptime so Echolot
> is getting flawless replies back from each of them.
> 
> When messages are chained from any remailer to them, they appear to be
> completely broken: Echolot sees no responses.
> 
> Holland and Brabus are Exit remailers so this isn't a randhop issue
> (Exits don't randhop).
> 
> All the broken chains are to remailers running Mixmaster >= 3.0.3b,
> excepting Senshi that runs Reliable.
> 
> I'm guessing at a PGP symmetric key issues but it is only a guess.  Are
> any of those remops seeing errors in their mixmaster log?

I run sinkhole and leafy.

I sent a test this morning. A handrolled pgp encrypted message.

dizum > leafy > me@myisp.net 

I then logged into my VPS where leafy is running. I turned up the verbosity
on Mixmaster's error.log and then sat back and watched (tail -f error.log)

This is the relevant part:

[2016-04-13 10:30:03] Info: [22402] Added message to pool.
[2016-04-13 10:30:03] Info: [22402] Destination pinger@anonusa.net not allowed.
[2016-04-13 10:30:03] Info: [22402] Added message to pool.
[2016-04-13 10:30:03] Info: [22402] Destination echolot@remailer.cypherpunks.to not allowed.
[2016-04-13 10:30:03] Info: [22402] Added message to pool.
[2016-04-13 10:30:03] Info: [22402] Destination echolot1024+ping=1460557200=93a4b97b@fleegle.mixmin.net not allowed.
[2016-04-13 10:30:03] Info: [22402] Added message to pool.
[...]
[2016-04-13 10:43:31] Info: [22585] Added message to pool.
[2016-04-13 10:45:03] Info: [22591] Destination me@myisp.net not allowed.
[2016-04-13 10:45:04] Info: [22591] Added message to pool.
[2016-04-13 10:45:04] Notice: [22591] Blocked header line: From: Echolot Pinger <echolot@pinger.noreply.org> matches /^From:/.
[2016-04-13 10:45:04] Info: [22591] Sending message (2551 bytes)
[2016-04-13 10:45:04] Info: [22591] Sending message (3489 bytes)
[2016-04-13 10:47:34] Info: [22653] Added message to pool.
[...]

I don't understand why these "not allowed" messages.
And I'm unclear about whether these are related to the
(* leafy) broken chain issue.


Here are the contents of my dest.alw file:

## List of addresses to which Mixmaster will deliver, even in
## middleman mode. Beware: substring matches

##
## allowed destinations
##

## Allows mail to *@example.com
#/@example\.com$/

## Matches *myaddress@example.net*
#myaddress@example.net

## Allows direct posts to alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages
## (only mix posts unless mail2news@ is whitelisted, too)
#/^Newsgroups: +(alt\.test|alt\.anonymous\.messages)$/

## nymservers
##
/@nym\.mixmin\.net$/
/@mixnym\.net$/
/@is-not-my\.name$/
/@nymph\.paranoici\.org$/
/@nymphet\.paranoici\.org$/
/@nym\.now\.im$/
##
## Some (not all) pingers
/^echolot\+/
/^pinger\+/
/^estragon\+.+@frell\.theremailer\.net$/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJXDmy2AAoJEH4ArKjShx9pUakH/j1TrVcRcw2ZyZmEw+pLcDa+
6Azad40EVQvw406XvMq2dE++WKpqvkYRMhKXKZ6CPBEwRenkzDq32GrDHp52RFUZ
NxQFzp36ykMTZEH0TAnqBJ35wG7kf4GUwzae75ud9XWTQLG37FMMogGKbnTqshLB
XsOF5Ge62efeRA9zkYsfcPFvLSBUU7unShhJJsYAikzum3mXRJV+bxY6dTG2ChIe
TP/ME69eMdK2jpIgyq1PR8/K7/lreZdqujc6xabUCAud7p5UPAH68otheGg17Wwh
zS/F10e2j27CA4wxdpErgfuJI27tA+IDjvV7F0ZU4H34/JZwCzGPXRnPp+6Vnrw=
=9MGS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Back to alt.privacy.anon-server | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-12 08:53 -0400
  Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-13 00:18 +0200
    Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Brabus <altaylor06@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 03:35 -0700
    Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-13 12:14 +0100
      Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2016-04-13 14:42 +0000
    Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2016-04-13 16:54 +0000
      Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-13 21:35 +0200
        Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-14 05:50 +0200
          Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-14 03:06 -0400
            Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201604.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2016-04-15 00:40 +0000
              Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-15 08:45 +0200
                Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-15 15:30 +0200
        Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Brabus <altaylor06@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 23:46 -0700
        Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2016-04-14 08:37 +0200
          Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-14 16:41 +0100
            Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Cornelis Tromp <nobody@holland.remailer.nl> - 2016-04-14 22:54 +0100
      Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-14 07:22 +0100
  Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-13 13:31 +0000
    Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-13 17:14 +0100
      Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-13 17:54 +0100
    Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Red John <redjohn@nym.mixmin.net> - 2016-04-13 17:58 +0100
    Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-13 19:05 +0100
      Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-13 18:53 +0000
        Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Cornelis Tromp <nobody@holland.remailer.nl> - 2016-04-13 22:45 +0100
          Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-13 22:04 +0000
            Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains SEC3 <sec3-pinger@sec3.invalid> - 2016-04-13 18:41 -0400
              Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-04-14 08:33 +0200
              Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-14 11:07 -0400
                Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone.mooo.com> - 2016-04-14 22:30 +0200
    Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-13 18:36 -0400
      Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2016-04-14 02:17 +0200
        Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-13 23:56 -0400
        Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains elvis-85503@notatla.org.uk - 2016-04-14 08:55 +0000
          Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201604.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2016-04-15 01:44 +0000
    Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-14 10:52 +0000
      Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains SEC3 <sec3-pinger@sec3.invalid> - 2016-04-14 14:13 -0400
        Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-15 10:04 +0000
          Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-15 13:01 +0100
            Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-15 13:22 +0000
              Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-15 13:55 +0000
                Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-15 17:27 +0100
                Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201604.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2016-04-15 18:12 +0000
                Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2016-04-15 20:29 +0000
              Type 1 Blocked Chains Nathan Hale <nobody@remailer.org.uk> - 2016-04-15 16:31 +0100
                Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-15 13:29 -0400
                Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains Zax <admin@mixmin.net> - 2016-04-15 18:54 +0000
            Type 1 Blocked Chains Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2016-04-15 11:18 -0400
            Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains SEC3 <sec3-pinger@sec3.invalid> - 2016-04-15 11:45 -0400
        Re: Type 1 Blocked Chains elvis-85503@notatla.org.uk - 2016-04-16 09:06 +0000

csiph-web