Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #623954 > unrolled thread

Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..."

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..."  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-19 00:16 -0800
    Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 11:57 -0700
    Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-20 13:40 -0800
      Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-22 12:14 -0800
        Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-22 13:32 -0700
        Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-24 13:27 -0800
          Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-25 09:51 -0700
    Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 15:49 -0700
      Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-20 15:58 -0700
        Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> - 2017-03-21 09:10 -0400
          Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-21 07:24 -0700
    Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-03-20 15:52 -0700
      Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-20 16:10 -0700
    Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..."  Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-03-20 22:21 -0500
      Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-20 23:53 -0800
    Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> - 2017-03-26 10:41 -0400
      Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 10:47 -0700
      Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-26 11:20 -0800
        Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> - 2017-03-27 01:11 -0400
          Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-26 23:08 -0800
            Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> - 2017-03-27 23:08 -0400
              Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-27 21:11 -0700
              Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-27 21:16 -0800
                Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> - 2017-03-28 08:06 -0400
                  Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-28 09:54 -0700
                  Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-28 23:17 -0800
          Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-26 23:14 -0700
      Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-03-26 12:56 -0700
      Re: Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2017-03-26 16:43 -0400
        Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-03-26 19:49 -0800
          Re: Albert Einstein said..."If you oppose my theories, you're..." noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 20:09 -0700
            estupid noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-03-27 08:39 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#625491

On 3/27/2017 3:08 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
>>
>> On 3/26/2017 3:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 3/19/2017 4:16 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
>>>>>
>>>>> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
>>>>
>>>> It's pretty much the exact opposite: What he said was more like "If
>>>> you're anti-semitic, you may oppose my theories."
>>>>
>>>> First he claims "men of science" don't oppose his theories, leaving only
>>>> non-scientists. Scientists don't oppose his theories.
>>>
>>>
>>> What does this comment mean to you?
>>>
>>> "Even the physi
>>> cists who opposed my theory did so for
>>> political reasons"
>>
>> It appears to be a contradiction to say "men of science" don't oppose
>> him and then talk about physicists opposing him. But he mentions the
>> physicists oppose him for political reasons, so not for scientific
>> reasons. So he simply implied those so-called physicists weren't "men of
>> science", which makes sense, since opposing an idea for (any) political
>> reason certainly isn't science.
>>
>> Anyway, my point stands, he never stated anything like "If you oppose my
>> theories, you're anti-semitic."
>
> i didn't use ...quotes.
>

Yes you did.

In article with Message-ID: <58CE3E7B.997@ix.netcom.com> you wrote 
(using the single quote mark):

>> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
>>
>> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
>>

Liar.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#625492

Liar "Anon Y. Mouse"-dreck  <nobody@home.invalid>
<news:obcmom$1k20$1@gioia.aioe.org> didn't get the
message for he is too stupid, phony and sanctimonious
which is seen in here:
>
"Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> "Anon Y. Mouse"-dreck
is the criminal Identity thief from <news:oaa7dl$19rf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
who with amongst his other nyms *uses* the Jew "reber G=emc^2"
<herbertglazier0@gmail.com>, by sanctimoniously "defending"
Full Swine Glazier to further the "Anon Y. Mouse"-dreck's virulent
Anti-Semitic Obsessions & Fixations...
>
& Glazier, the Cretin & Jewish Jailbird, is taking the bait with
"Shrieks of impotent rage" & even sucks up to the Mouse-dreck
who is a vicious Anti-Semite, that said:
>
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said:
"Israel will not survive the next 25 years,  the Jewish
state will be hounded until it is destroyed."... and..
>
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said: ~ "Israel's Cities
are very convenient for our nukes. Lots of Jews are
concentrated there. It's like shooting fish in a barrel"
>
>
So, Mouse-dreck wrote in message news:obcmom$1k20$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> On 3/27/2017 3:08 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/26/2017 3:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>> Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3/19/2017 4:16 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own 
>>>>>> words' he said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
>>>>>
>>>>> It's pretty much the exact opposite: What he said was more like "If
>>>>> you're anti-semitic, you may oppose my theories."
>>>>>
>>>>> First he claims "men of science" don't oppose his theories, leaving 
>>>>> only
>>>>> non-scientists. Scientists don't oppose his theories.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What does this comment mean to you?
>>>>
>>>> "Even the physi
>>>> cists who opposed my theory did so for
>>>> political reasons"
>>>
>>> It appears to be a contradiction to say "men of science" don't oppose
>>> him and then talk about physicists opposing him. But he mentions the
>>> physicists oppose him for political reasons, so not for scientific
>>> reasons. So he simply implied those so-called physicists weren't "men of
>>> science", which makes sense, since opposing an idea for (any) political
>>> reason certainly isn't science.
>>>
>>> Anyway, my point stands, he never stated anything like "If you oppose my
>>> theories, you're anti-semitic."
>>
>> i didn't use ...quotes.
>>
>
> Yes you did.
>
> In article with Message-ID: <58CE3E7B.997@ix.netcom.com> you wrote (using 
> the single quote mark):
>
>>> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own 
>>> words' he said:
>>>
>>> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
>>>
>
> Liar. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#625494

Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
> 
> On 3/27/2017 3:08 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/26/2017 3:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 3/19/2017 4:16 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
> >>>>
> >>>> It's pretty much the exact opposite: What he said was more like "If
> >>>> you're anti-semitic, you may oppose my theories."
> >>>>
> >>>> First he claims "men of science" don't oppose his theories, leaving only
> >>>> non-scientists. Scientists don't oppose his theories.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> What does this comment mean to you?
> >>>
> >>> "Even the physi
> >>> cists who opposed my theory did so for
> >>> political reasons"
> >>
> >> It appears to be a contradiction to say "men of science" don't oppose
> >> him and then talk about physicists opposing him. But he mentions the
> >> physicists oppose him for political reasons, so not for scientific
> >> reasons. So he simply implied those so-called physicists weren't "men of
> >> science", which makes sense, since opposing an idea for (any) political
> >> reason certainly isn't science.
> >>
> >> Anyway, my point stands, he never stated anything like "If you oppose my
> >> theories, you're anti-semitic."
> >
> > i didn't use ...quotes.
> >
> 
> Yes you did.
> 
> In article with Message-ID: <58CE3E7B.997@ix.netcom.com> you wrote
> (using the single quote mark):
> 
> >> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
> >>
> >> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
> >>
> 
> Liar.


http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/quotes.asp

Rule 1. Use double quotation marks to set off a direct (word-for-word) quotation.


I did not break Rule 1, I did not use double quotation marks.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#625528

On 3/28/2017 1:16 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
>>
>> On 3/27/2017 3:08 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 3/26/2017 3:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/19/2017 4:16 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's pretty much the exact opposite: What he said was more like "If
>>>>>> you're anti-semitic, you may oppose my theories."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> First he claims "men of science" don't oppose his theories, leaving only
>>>>>> non-scientists. Scientists don't oppose his theories.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What does this comment mean to you?
>>>>>
>>>>> "Even the physi
>>>>> cists who opposed my theory did so for
>>>>> political reasons"
>>>>
>>>> It appears to be a contradiction to say "men of science" don't oppose
>>>> him and then talk about physicists opposing him. But he mentions the
>>>> physicists oppose him for political reasons, so not for scientific
>>>> reasons. So he simply implied those so-called physicists weren't "men of
>>>> science", which makes sense, since opposing an idea for (any) political
>>>> reason certainly isn't science.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, my point stands, he never stated anything like "If you oppose my
>>>> theories, you're anti-semitic."
>>>
>>> i didn't use ...quotes.
>>>
>>
>> Yes you did.
>>
>> In article with Message-ID: <58CE3E7B.997@ix.netcom.com> you wrote
>> (using the single quote mark):
>>
>>>> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
>>>>
>>>> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
>>>>
>>
>> Liar.
>
>
> http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/quotes.asp
>
> Rule 1. Use double quotation marks to set off a direct (word-for-word) quotation.
>
>
> I did not break Rule 1, I did not use double quotation marks.

I knew that's exactly how you'd try to slither out of that, which is why 
I pointed out how you used single quotes.

Face it, you tried to put words in Einstein's mouth with a 'quote', a 
quote supposedly 'in his own words' that 'he said', no less, with the 
ability to deny it actually being a quote if called out on it. You knew 
most people don't follow a strict single/double quote usage.

Pretty slimy. No, real slimy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#625595

The "Pretty slimy. No, real slimy Anon Y. Mouse"dreck <nobody@home.invalid>
from <news:obdm8k$1bik$1@gioia.aioe.org...>  is the criminal 
Identity thief from <news:oaa7dl$19rf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
who with amongst his other nyms *uses* the Jew "reber G=emc^2"
<herbertglazier0@gmail.com>, by sanctimoniously "defending"
Full Swine Glazier to further the "Anon Y. Mouse"-dreck's virulent
Anti-Semitic Obsessions & Fixations...
>
& Glazier, the Cretin & Jewish Jailbird, is taking the bait with
"Shrieks of impotent rage" & even sucks up to the Mouse-dreck
who is a vicious Anti-Semite, that said:
>
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said:
"Israel will not survive the next 25 years,  the Jewish
state will be hounded until it is destroyed."... and..
>
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said: ~ "Israel's Cities
are very convenient for our nukes. Lots of Jews are
concentrated there. It's like shooting fish in a barrel"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#625768

Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
> 
> On 3/28/2017 1:16 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/27/2017 3:08 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 3/26/2017 3:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>> Anon Y. Mouse wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 3/19/2017 4:16 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>>>> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It's pretty much the exact opposite: What he said was more like "If
> >>>>>> you're anti-semitic, you may oppose my theories."
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> First he claims "men of science" don't oppose his theories, leaving only
> >>>>>> non-scientists. Scientists don't oppose his theories.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What does this comment mean to you?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Even the physi
> >>>>> cists who opposed my theory did so for
> >>>>> political reasons"
> >>>>
> >>>> It appears to be a contradiction to say "men of science" don't oppose
> >>>> him and then talk about physicists opposing him. But he mentions the
> >>>> physicists oppose him for political reasons, so not for scientific
> >>>> reasons. So he simply implied those so-called physicists weren't "men of
> >>>> science", which makes sense, since opposing an idea for (any) political
> >>>> reason certainly isn't science.
> >>>>
> >>>> Anyway, my point stands, he never stated anything like "If you oppose my
> >>>> theories, you're anti-semitic."
> >>>
> >>> i didn't use ...quotes.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes you did.
> >>
> >> In article with Message-ID: <58CE3E7B.997@ix.netcom.com> you wrote
> >> (using the single quote mark):
> >>
> >>>> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
> >>>>
> >>>> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
> >>>>
> >>
> >> Liar.
> >
> >
> > http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/quotes.asp
> >
> > Rule 1. Use double quotation marks to set off a direct (word-for-word) quotation.
> >
> >
> > I did not break Rule 1, I did not use double quotation marks.
> 
> I knew that's exactly how you'd try to slither out of that, which is why
> I pointed out how you used single quotes.
> 
> Face it, you tried to put words in Einstein's mouth with a 'quote', a
> quote supposedly 'in his own words' that 'he said', no less, with the
> ability to deny it actually being a quote if called out on it. You knew
> most people don't follow a strict single/double quote usage.
> 
> Pretty slimy. No, real slimy.

Maybe you don't understand one's English style. I'm an American. I have a style of writing.

So, when I write:  'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'

and I use single quotes, it simply means I'm conveying to yous what Albert Einstein was thinking.

'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.' is what Albert Einstein was ...thinking.

What he said was clearly posted from the beginning of the thread:



http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/
http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/
http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf

""Why were men of science opposed
to your theory when you first made it
known ?"
"No men of science," he replied, em
phasizing the last'word, "were against
the theory."
"But there was some opposition?"
"Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that
was purely political. Even the physi
cists who opposed my theory did so for
 political reasons?in my opinion, o'
 course."
"What do you mean when you say
the opposition was political?"
"Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's
answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""


Okay, here is more of what Albert Einstein was thinking:

Reporter: "Why were men of science opposed
to your theory when you first made it
known ?"

Einstein: 'No fucking men of SCIENCE were against the theory.'

Reporter: "But there was some opposition?"

Einstein:  'Yeah, but that
was motherfuckin purely political. Even those fucking physi
cists who opposed my theory did so for
 stupid political reasons, that's a fact jack.'


Reporter: "What do you mean when you say
the opposition was political?"


Einstein: 'They are fuckin Anti-Semitics. Fuckin Jew Haters!  Because they know I'm a fucking Jew.'


'If you oppose dare my theories, you're a fuckin anti-semitic.' is what Albert Einstein was ...thinking.

 

In other words, if you want to say what a person said, you use double quotes.


If you want to say what they are thinking...you use single quotes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#625294

"Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> "Anon Y. Mouse"-dreck
is the criminal Identity thief from <news:oaa7dl$19rf$1@gioia.aioe.org> 
who with amongst his other nyms *uses* the Jew "reber G=emc^2" 
<herbertglazier0@gmail.com>, by sanctimoniously "defending" 
Full Swine Glazier to further the "Anon Y. Mouse"-dreck's virulent 
Anti-Semitic Obsessions & Fixations... 
>
& Glazier, the Cretin & Jewish Jailbird, is taking the bait with 
"Shrieks of impotent rage" & even sucks up to the Mouse-dreck
who is a vicious Anti-Semite, that said:
>
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said:
"Israel will not survive the next 25 years,  the Jewish
state will be hounded until it is destroyed."... and..
>
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said: ~ "Israel's Cities
are very convenient for our nukes. Lots of Jews are
concentrated there. It's like shooting fish in a barrel"
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#625202

"Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> "Anon Y. Mouse"-dreck
 is the criminal Identity thief from <gioia.aioe.org>, who amongst his
other handles uses his Anti-Semitic fixation by sanctimoniously and
constantly "defending" Full Swine Glazier to show how gross and
stupid Jews can be   ( ... & Cretin Glazier is taking the bait and even
sucks up to the Mouse-dreck ...) when  in fact
>
"Anon Y. Mouse"-dreck is a vicious Anti-Semite, who said:
>
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said:
"Israel will not survive the next 25 years,  the Jewish
state will be hounded until it is destroyed."... and..
>
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said: ~ "Israel's Cities
are very convenient for our nukes. Lots of Jews are
concentrated there. It's like shooting fish in a barrel"
>
__________________________________________
>

"Anon Y. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> wrote in message 
news:ob8k0n$qee$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> On 3/19/2017 4:16 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own 
>> words' he said:
>>
>> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
>
> It's pretty much the exact opposite: What he said was more like "If you're 
> anti-semitic, you may oppose my theories."
>
> First he claims "men of science" don't oppose his theories, leaving only 
> non-scientists. Scientists don't oppose his theories.
>
> Then he states that political (not scientific) opposition was often from 
> anti-semitic people, stating that those people, already anti-semitic, 
> oppose his theories just because he was a Jew.
>
>
>> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/
>> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/
>> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf
>>
>> ""Why were men of science opposed
>> to your theory when you first made it
>> known ?"
>> "No men of science," he replied, em
>> phasizing the last'word, "were against
>> the theory."
>> "But there was some opposition?"
>> "Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that
>> was purely political. Even the physi
>> cists who opposed my theory did so for
>>  political reasons?in my opinion, o'
>>  course."
>> "What do you mean when you say
>> the opposition was political?"
>> "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's
>> answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#625209

On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 10:41:54 -0400, "Anon Y. Mouse"
<nobody@home.invalid> wrote:

>On 3/19/2017 4:16 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
>>
>> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
>
>It's pretty much the exact opposite: What he said was more like "If 
>you're anti-semitic, you may oppose my theories."
>
>First he claims "men of science" don't oppose his theories, leaving only 
>non-scientists. Scientists don't oppose his theories.
>
>Then he states that political (not scientific) opposition was often from 
>anti-semitic people, stating that those people, already anti-semitic, 
>oppose his theories just because he was a Jew.
>
>
>> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/
>> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/
>> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf
>>
>> ""Why were men of science opposed
>> to your theory when you first made it
>> known ?"
>> "No men of science," he replied, em
>> phasizing the last'word, "were against
>> the theory."
>> "But there was some opposition?"
>> "Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that
>> was purely political. Even the physi
>> cists who opposed my theory did so for
>>  political reasons?in my opinion, o'
>>  course."
>> "What do you mean when you say
>> the opposition was political?"
>> "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's
>> answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""

If this is a quote from Einstein, he seems to contradict himself:

1. "No men of science," he replied, emphasizing the last word, "were
against the theory."

2. "Even the physicists who opposed my theory ..."

unless he is claiming that "physicists" are not "scientists" or that
their mere opposition to his theory had rendered them "non-scientists"
-lol.

Mike
See you at the show trials - lol.
---------------------------------------------------
Michael J. Strickland			Reston, VA
---------------------------------------------------

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#625266

Michael J. Strickland wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 10:41:54 -0400, "Anon Y. Mouse"
> <nobody@home.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >On 3/19/2017 4:16 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >> Not everybody else...but according to Albert Einstein...'in his own words' he said:
> >>
> >> 'If you oppose my theories, you're an anti-semitic.'
> >
> >It's pretty much the exact opposite: What he said was more like "If
> >you're anti-semitic, you may oppose my theories."
> >
> >First he claims "men of science" don't oppose his theories, leaving only
> >non-scientists. Scientists don't oppose his theories.
> >
> >Then he states that political (not scientific) opposition was often from
> >anti-semitic people, stating that those people, already anti-semitic,
> >oppose his theories just because he was a Jew.
> >
> >
> >> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/
> >> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3/ocr/
> >> http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030214/1921-04-03/ed-1/seq-3.pdf
> >>
> >> ""Why were men of science opposed
> >> to your theory when you first made it
> >> known ?"
> >> "No men of science," he replied, em
> >> phasizing the last'word, "were against
> >> the theory."
> >> "But there was some opposition?"
> >> "Yes," was the quiet reply, "but that
> >> was purely political. Even the physi
> >> cists who opposed my theory did so for
> >>  political reasons?in my opinion, o'
> >>  course."
> >> "What do you mean when you say
> >> the opposition was political?"
> >> "Anti-Semitism," was the scientist's
> >> answer. "Because I am a Jew." ""
> 
> If this is a quote from Einstein, he seems to contradict himself:
> 
> 1. "No men of science," he replied, emphasizing the last word, "were
> against the theory."
> 
> 2. "Even the physicists who opposed my theory ..."
> 
> unless he is claiming that "physicists" are not "scientists" or that
> their mere opposition to his theory had rendered them "non-scientists"
> -lol.
> 
> Mike
> See you at the show trials - lol.
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Michael J. Strickland                   Reston, VA
> ---------------------------------------------------




He was not contradicting...he simply got caught in a lie, and he corrected himself.

The reporter asked: "But there was some opposition?"  "Yes," was the quiet reply,..."

"quiet reply" means Einstein lowered his voice when he realized he got caught in a lie...like any little kid would do.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#625270

the theory is quite elementary,
except for the nonsense from Minkowski about timennspacenn,
then, he died.  but, there must be a halfzillion other things
that he did, some of them not even n-ary

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#625339 — estupid

any one got any other Minkowski-stuff, show it.
the only other problem with relativity, is just because
of Newton's bogus theory of 0-dimensional rocktons,
like assuming that only a single "ray
of the wavefront is the whole of the wave.

> the theory is quite elementary,
> except for the nonsense from Minkowski about timennspacenn,
> then, he died.  but, there must be a halfzillion other things
> that he did, some of them not even n-ary

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web