Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #877622 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-07-15 14:37 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-09-27 07:12 -0700 |
| Articles | 3 on this page of 163 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-15 14:37 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 17:59 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-16 18:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 18:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-16 20:48 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 22:33 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-17 06:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 14:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-17 15:02 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 06:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-04 06:09 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 14:15 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-06 08:33 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 08:34 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 11:15 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 13:25 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-15 10:58 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 15:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 08:23 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-17 14:46 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 22:30 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-17 19:01 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 03:07 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2023-07-17 04:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 04:58 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-17 22:21 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 06:01 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-18 11:56 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 07:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-19 06:37 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-21 16:55 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-22 16:37 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-22 17:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 04:42 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 15:03 -0400
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 16:17 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-25 16:25 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 15:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 05:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:53 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-23 19:46 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 04:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-23 22:00 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 05:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 05:39 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-24 21:44 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 07:38 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-25 08:52 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:02 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:58 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 00:34 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:16 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:30 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:59 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 00:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 00:27 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 18:52 +0200
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:50 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 19:09 +0200
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:53 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 16:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 05:07 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 11:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-27 14:46 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 16:40 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 18:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-27 23:01 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 22:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 08:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 14:19 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:28 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 22:32 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 23:00 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 00:07 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 08:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 17:03 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 14:21 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 12:25 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-30 12:48 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:27 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 15:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:55 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 23:06 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-06 15:08 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 22:59 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-07 10:19 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-06 19:43 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 18:17 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 15:41 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 08:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-10 15:22 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 23:55 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 15:57 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-13 08:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-13 14:57 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 08:45 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 14:26 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 15:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 08:33 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-15 10:52 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 11:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-15 15:37 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 14:37 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-08-15 14:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 16:06 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-08-15 16:32 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 21:34 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-08-16 07:28 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 12:16 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 14:48 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 14:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 19:47 -0400
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 18:12 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 05:24 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 05:10 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 07:21 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 13:41 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 15:24 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 17:35 -0400
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 22:24 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-10 17:36 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 23:53 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 09:10 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 15:09 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 08:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 18:02 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 18:41 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-07 14:14 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 21:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 06:58 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 07:00 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 05:50 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 14:42 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-28 13:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 08:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 12:15 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 16:01 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-02 08:24 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-02 14:16 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 13:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 14:46 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 14:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 16:28 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:32 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 08:50 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 07:10 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 14:13 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 15:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 19:55 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 23:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 15:36 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 18:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 18:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 20:22 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 13:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 08:30 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 18:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 07:12 -0700
Page 9 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-26 08:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <76468b95-e3d3-4d25-8172-41442ca6ef95n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #881018 |
On Friday, September 22, 2023 at 1:35:22 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Sunday, 16 July 2023 at 07:37:29 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > > > > https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > > > > > > Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. > > https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 > > shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. > > (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) > > The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. > > In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. > > In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. > > Then, again and again, with the hits. > > Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. > > > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee > > > https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/690084565977593 > > Explanation to the above, in my latest facebook posting (eally what better visual method is there for free and fast and for-all information transmission!) > > Moving the centre of gravity forward with internal force. Details will be provided on a 30 millisecond basis later. Please observe that the force on the armature of 3kg mass is not pushing back the gun very much but the rolling action is doing that reducing the efficiency. However this backward motion may be causing the notion that it is acting as a reaction to the electrical force pushing the armature. I think that the rolling treadmill effect is pushing it back. If it was sliding this pushback should not happen. Unfortunately the sliding causes too much friction on one handand welding effect on another as huge currents are involved. Please note that after the stops are hit the backward motion is arrested and the whole apparatus moves forward until stopped by ground friction. In free space it will go on indefinitely violating the inertia principle so sacred to physicists. This is the power stroke of the 2 stroke Internal Force Engine which will replace rockets and jet engines in the future. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee "Don't you have something better to do?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-26 18:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <acedb491-7569-4779-8390-cbef7afbb1e6n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #877622 |
On Sunday, 16 July 2023 at 07:37:29 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > > > https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > > > > Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. > https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 > shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. > (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) > The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. > In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. > In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. > Then, again and again, with the hits. > Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee Busting inertial also busts the law of conservation of energy On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 22:06:51 UTC+10, bozo de niro wrote: > Dear Arindam Banerjee: I respectfully have one question for you regarding your compulsive off-topic rant here on physics ~ not that I'm not somewhat interested in your personal wheelhouse of competence and achievement in physics, but realistically it is somewhat if not conspicuously far afield here and thus glaringly must be serving you some psychological benefit and relief, and I can't help but wonder if you've ever thought about that issue and would you care to expand and explore it here if it's not too painful? You are right, it does give my relief if not any benefit (as yet) to post my physics ideas here. This is an open forum, very rare now with universal headings open to all bypassed with other online media. Which I also use, despite apparent lack of views. Usenet thus is like a public house, great thing here is that the topics are focussed on a global basis, and uniquely. There is thus no excuse for not knowing the latest rant or idea, for anyone with integrity. Too bad my physics posts appear as rants to you. I merely repost some links, at times, to defend and cheer myself up and just maybe influence some dynamic and intelligent non-career persons like say a potential Steve Jobs. I know, these people are very rare, but what chance other than Usenet online posts do I have? The buy one get one, two for the price of one, the bigJew-gujJew Einstein-Gandhi bunny-ah combo pack do their best to suppress me, with stunning success. No one can say I have NOT tried to disseminate my new ideas, which I believe are of the greatest benefit to posterity. It is sad that the establishments have no use for posterity. Posterity be damned for them. They care for their egos, careers and snobberies, prejudices and petty personal interests. Robots, after all, they are. As for the pains involved, they have been very great, especially for my family for they did not know why I was being ignored and ridiculed. I suffered because they suffered. For many years. Now, as I have lost all regard for all the dominant establishments involving professors, politicians, physicists, pimps, presstitutes and prostitutes, there is no suffering - one does not suffer from what one despises. Just see them as hindrances and potential evils, like viruses. Hope I made it clear enough, by the above expansion. ~ but getting back to your Newtonian physics and any of its possible justification here, does ANY of its exploration here (i.e. PHYSICS) have any potential or effect on making the public utility meter at my personal domicile ACTUALLY RUN BACKWARDS? Which would mean DOES ANY OF IT ACTUALLY TRANSLATE to me delivering energy back to my power company so that I can get paid for the power I'm delivering to PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC rather than the other way around? IF SO THEN PLEASE PLEASE CONTINUE INDEED and tell me why I am not seeing the benefit and/or making the connection pedagogically? THANK YOU. In my case, as I have solar on top of the house, I do get rebate at 66c per unit for the surplus power fed back to the grid. So it is already happening for me, and as far as I can tell, for many americans as well. Now the point is, can you generate more power locally with the wheel of Bhaskaracharya, and add that to the solar power to make more money. Or if you make enough power with solar/wind/wheel can you dispense with power bills? Or if your car is electric, fuel bills? Evidently solar is not enough. You need constant power 7*24 at some steady pace, say 5KW for unending joy thanks to the wheel of Bhaskara, and the gravity of Mother Earth. Let us see if that can happen. The power is 5KW, or 5000 W. In the video of the wheel, the angular velocity is about 2 radians/sec Now power = moment of inertia times angular velocity or 5000 = I * 2 or I = 2500 MKS units. Let us say that the moment of inertia of the motor armature (come to that later) is 500. So for the rest (wheel, masses, spokes, shaft) it is 2000. Let there be 10 wheels welded to a central shaft. So per wheel, the Inertia is 200. I is very roughly mass times the square of the radius, with some constant dependent upon the geometry. Let us say the diameter of the bicyle wheel is 0.6m Then the mass of the whole thing is some constant times 20/.6^2 = 20/.36 * K = 55*K Put K = 1, (should be different) then mass of one wheel with bottles containing oil and lead pellets/steel stuff = 55Kg. Say the rim and spokes make up 5KG, so the ten bottles will weigh 50Kg. One bottle 5 Kg, easy with an al pipe, lead and oil. Overall it should weigh, with motor, some 55*10 + weight of motor = 600Kg. Of course, by now the design is clear. You mount ten wheels on a shaft, weld them to the shaft, mount on two good bearings. Then connect to a generator. Now give it a whirl manually, maybe some people required for that! And get 5 KW max power till the end of time PROVIDED - you keep up the angular velocity going steady, for external forces like dust on bearings, gusts of wind will slow it all down over time - bearings do not wear out - keep free from dust. Ideal in a basement, the only problem is noise pollution. And remote areas. So in future versions, make double walled bottles, or some sound insulation. Also, automatic change from generator to motor, to keep up the angular velocity. Note: The above calculations are very rough, back on envelope type. But if indeed the wheel works as shown in several youtube videos, this is one way of commercialisng. Overall mass is some 600Kg to get 5KW. It is DIY stuff for anyone with some skills, but my guess is (taking metal price as $3.5 per Kg) could be sold for $2000 to $3000 if mass produced. Or $500 per KW, $500,000 per Mw, of totally green power, that could be either localised or grouped wherever. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-27 07:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6db19841-15be-4a20-a2e4-ab42d2df50e2n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #881167 |
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 9:19:32 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Sunday, 16 July 2023 at 07:37:29 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > > > > https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > > > > > > Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. > > https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 > > shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. > > (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) > > The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. > > In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. > > In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. > > Then, again and again, with the hits. > > Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. > > > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee > Busting inertial also busts the law of conservation of energy > > > On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 22:06:51 UTC+10, bozo de niro wrote: > > Dear Arindam Banerjee: I respectfully have one question for you regarding your compulsive off-topic rant here on physics ~ not that I'm not somewhat interested in your personal wheelhouse of competence and achievement in physics, but realistically it is somewhat if not conspicuously far afield here and thus glaringly must be serving you some psychological benefit and relief, and I can't help but wonder if you've ever thought about that issue and would you care to expand and explore it here if it's not too painful? > > You are right, it does give my relief if not any benefit (as yet) to post my physics ideas here. > This is an open forum, very rare now with universal headings open to all bypassed with other online media. Which I also use, despite apparent lack of views. > Usenet thus is like a public house, great thing here is that the topics are focussed on a global basis, and uniquely. There is thus no excuse for not knowing the latest rant or idea, for anyone with integrity. > Too bad my physics posts appear as rants to you. I merely repost some links, at times, to defend and cheer myself up and just maybe influence some dynamic and intelligent non-career persons like say a potential Steve Jobs. I know, these people are very rare, but what chance other than Usenet online posts do I have? The buy one get one, two for the price of one, the bigJew-gujJew Einstein-Gandhi bunny-ah combo pack do their best to suppress me, with stunning success. > No one can say I have NOT tried to disseminate my new ideas, which I believe are of the greatest benefit to posterity. It is sad that the establishments have no use for posterity. Posterity be damned for them. They care for their egos, careers and snobberies, prejudices and petty personal interests. Robots, after all, they are. > As for the pains involved, they have been very great, especially for my family for they did not know why I was being ignored and ridiculed. I suffered because they suffered. For many years. Now, as I have lost all regard for all the dominant establishments involving professors, politicians, physicists, pimps, presstitutes and prostitutes, there is no suffering - one does not suffer from what one despises. Just see them as hindrances and potential evils, like viruses. > > Hope I made it clear enough, by the above expansion. > > > > ~ but getting back to your Newtonian physics and any of its possible justification here, does ANY of its exploration here (i.e. PHYSICS) have any potential or effect on making the public utility meter at my personal domicile ACTUALLY RUN BACKWARDS? Which would mean DOES ANY OF IT ACTUALLY TRANSLATE to me delivering energy back to my power company so that I can get paid for the power I'm delivering to PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC rather than the other way around? IF SO THEN PLEASE PLEASE CONTINUE INDEED and tell me why I am not seeing the benefit and/or making the connection pedagogically? THANK YOU. > > In my case, as I have solar on top of the house, I do get rebate at 66c per unit for the surplus power fed back to the grid. > > So it is already happening for me, and as far as I can tell, for many americans as well. > > Now the point is, can you generate more power locally with the wheel of Bhaskaracharya, and add that to the solar power to make more money. > Or if you make enough power with solar/wind/wheel can you dispense with power bills? > Or if your car is electric, fuel bills? > Evidently solar is not enough. You need constant power 7*24 at some steady pace, say 5KW for unending joy thanks to the wheel of Bhaskara, and the gravity of Mother Earth. > > Let us see if that can happen. > > > The power is 5KW, or 5000 W. In the video of the wheel, the angular velocity is about 2 radians/sec > Now power = moment of inertia times angular velocity > or 5000 = I * 2 > or I = 2500 MKS units. > Let us say that the moment of inertia of the motor armature (come to that later) is 500. > So for the rest (wheel, masses, spokes, shaft) it is 2000. > Let there be 10 wheels welded to a central shaft. > So per wheel, the Inertia is 200. > I is very roughly mass times the square of the radius, with some constant dependent upon the geometry. > Let us say the diameter of the bicyle wheel is 0.6m > Then the mass of the whole thing is some constant times 20/.6^2 = 20/.36 * K = 55*K > Put K = 1, (should be different) then mass of one wheel with bottles containing oil and lead pellets/steel stuff = 55Kg. > Say the rim and spokes make up 5KG, so the ten bottles will weigh 50Kg. One bottle 5 Kg, easy with an al pipe, lead and oil. > > Overall it should weigh, with motor, some 55*10 + weight of motor = 600Kg. > > Of course, by now the design is clear. You mount ten wheels on a shaft, weld them to the shaft, mount on two good bearings. > Then connect to a generator. > Now give it a whirl manually, maybe some people required for that! > And get 5 KW max power till the end of time Oops. > > PROVIDED > > - you keep up the angular velocity going steady, for external forces like dust on bearings, gusts of wind will slow it all down over time > - bearings do not wear out > - keep free from dust. > > Ideal in a basement, the only problem is noise pollution. > And remote areas. > So in future versions, make double walled bottles, or some sound insulation. > Also, automatic change from generator to motor, to keep up the angular velocity. > > Note: The above calculations are very rough, back on envelope type. But if indeed the wheel works as shown in several youtube videos, this is one way of commercialisng. Overall mass is some 600Kg to get 5KW. It is DIY stuff for anyone with some skills, but my guess is (taking metal price as $3.5 per Kg) could be sold for $2000 to $3000 if mass produced. > > Or $500 per KW, $500,000 per Mw, of totally green power, that could be either localised or grouped wherever. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web