Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #877622 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-07-15 14:37 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-09-27 07:12 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 163 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-15 14:37 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 17:59 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-16 18:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 18:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-16 20:48 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 22:33 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-17 06:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 14:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-17 15:02 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 06:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-04 06:09 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 14:15 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-06 08:33 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 08:34 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 11:15 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 13:25 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-15 10:58 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 15:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 08:23 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-17 14:46 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 22:30 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-17 19:01 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 03:07 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2023-07-17 04:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 04:58 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-17 22:21 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 06:01 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-18 11:56 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 07:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-19 06:37 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-21 16:55 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-22 16:37 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-22 17:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 04:42 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 15:03 -0400
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 16:17 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-25 16:25 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 15:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 05:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:53 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-23 19:46 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 04:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-23 22:00 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 05:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 05:39 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-24 21:44 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 07:38 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-25 08:52 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:02 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:58 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 00:34 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:16 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:30 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:59 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 00:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 00:27 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 18:52 +0200
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:50 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 19:09 +0200
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:53 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 16:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 05:07 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 11:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-27 14:46 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 16:40 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 18:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-27 23:01 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 22:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 08:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 14:19 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:28 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 22:32 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 23:00 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 00:07 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 08:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 17:03 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 14:21 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 12:25 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-30 12:48 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:27 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 15:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:55 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 23:06 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-06 15:08 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 22:59 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-07 10:19 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-06 19:43 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 18:17 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 15:41 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 08:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-10 15:22 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 23:55 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 15:57 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-13 08:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-13 14:57 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 08:45 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 14:26 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 15:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 08:33 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-15 10:52 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 11:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-15 15:37 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 14:37 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-08-15 14:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 16:06 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-08-15 16:32 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 21:34 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-08-16 07:28 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 12:16 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 14:48 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 14:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 19:47 -0400
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 18:12 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 05:24 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 05:10 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 07:21 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 13:41 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 15:24 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 17:35 -0400
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 22:24 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-10 17:36 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 23:53 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 09:10 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 15:09 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 08:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 18:02 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 18:41 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-07 14:14 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 21:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 06:58 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 07:00 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 05:50 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 14:42 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-28 13:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 08:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 12:15 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 16:01 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-02 08:24 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-02 14:16 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 13:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 14:46 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 14:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 16:28 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:32 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 08:50 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 07:10 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 14:13 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 15:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 19:55 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 23:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 15:36 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 18:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 18:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 20:22 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 13:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 08:30 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 18:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 07:12 -0700
Page 2 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-16 22:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b163a3a8-425b-4bfb-a61f-7e4fc4a95a97n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #877673 |
On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 14:46:34 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > >>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > >> > >> Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. > > https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 > > shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. > > (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) > > The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. > > In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. > > In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. > > Then, again and again, with the hits. > > Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. > > > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee > Let's see your mercury based implementation then. Thanks for your interest. Let us see you telling the world loud and clear that I have made a rail gun of totally new design, which is based upon new physics, updating Newtonian laws to accommodate the discoveries of electromagnetic fields and forces. That could help. As things are, I cannot buy nor use mercury. You need permits for that. Then, plenty of machining of parts, great engineering, etc. for the mercury implementation. Wow, when that is done, all jet engines and rockets will become obsolete. Industrial partners are required for me to make those new machines. Now, let us be clear, making a new motor which will make jet engines and rockets obsolete may generate a certain animosity among influential people, the multibillionaires who do not mind polluting the upper atmosphere with CO2 causing high temperatures. As these sort of rich chaps have the physicists and the politicians, the presstitutes and the pimps_allsorts in their pockets, germination time will be unpredictable. At present it seems to extend to infinity, but who knows what can happen the next moment. As and when other rich and also free, clever, clear-thinking good people - hope they exist! - may be interested, they can contact me. My whereabouts are well known to hundreds via Facebook, Instagram, Usenet, email, mobile so that should not be a difficulty. Till then, I will continue with my experiments, following the demonstration in my facebook page. https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 Above was a demonstration, with rough results indicating what was well known before - the force accelerating the armature does not have an equal reaction from electric currents, but there is recoil from the rolling treadmill action which makes the system inefficient. After I return from our trip to Perth, I will continue the work and in bits and pieces, explain in text here what is on my 2017 videos. Any friends around, stay tuned. Others, wail and abuse, as always. Such fun from them, for me! Cheers, Arindam Banerjee > > Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-17 19:01 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <khkebiF1j5qU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #877677 |
On 17-July-23 3:30 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 14:46:34 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: >>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 >>>> >>>> Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. >>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 >>> shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. >>> (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) >>> The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. >>> In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. >>> In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. >>> Then, again and again, with the hits. >>> Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Arindam Banerjee >> Let's see your mercury based implementation then. > > Thanks for your interest. Let us see you telling the world loud and clear that I have made a rail gun of totally new design, which is based upon new physics, updating Newtonian laws to accommodate the discoveries of electromagnetic fields and forces. That could help. > > As things are, I cannot buy nor use mercury. You need permits for that. Then, plenty of machining of parts, great engineering, etc. for the mercury implementation. The bizarre thing is your delusion that this thing will work, when the physics you claim to understand says that what it will do is not what you want. It is, of course, convenient for the maintenance of your delusion, that the things you require "finally to prove that it works" are unavailable to you. There is clearly a disconnect here between the standards of proof that you accept for yourself, and the standards imposed by the world at large. Quite why believe something that you are incapable to proving to other people is a question best left to any psychiatrists who read this group. Sylvia
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-17 03:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ee32d275-48b2-4932-a18a-85fc7511ee98n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #877698 |
On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 19:01:44 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 17-July-23 3:30 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 14:46:34 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > >>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > >>>> > >>>> Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. > >>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 > >>> shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. > >>> (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) > >>> The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. > >>> In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. > >>> In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. > >>> Then, again and again, with the hits. > >>> Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Arindam Banerjee > >> Let's see your mercury based implementation then. > > > > Thanks for your interest. Let us see you telling the world loud and clear that I have made a rail gun of totally new design, which is based upon new physics, updating Newtonian laws to accommodate the discoveries of electromagnetic fields and forces. That could help. Evidently, surliness rules here! > > > > As things are, I cannot buy nor use mercury. You need permits for that. Then, plenty of machining of parts, great engineering, etc. for the mercury implementation. > The bizarre thing is your delusion that this thing will work, when the > physics you claim to understand says that what it will do is not what > you want. The bizarre thing to me is your approach to a new invention. That this low voltage heavy armature is a new invention is undeniable to anyone sane or honest. Yet you and your ilk keep on denying this. If it is not a new invention, where are the links to show that it is not? Who had made this sort of device before? At this stage, may I remind that I did NOT get my PhD vecause in the final viva the academics of RMIT did not believe I had made a working model of a bew design rail gun. Is your insane dishonest hostility more based upon Eurocentric rabid bigotry than colonialist racism? So I worked on my own and made the latest version demonstrated. Which I will keep on improving. It is not my delusion that the reaction is less than the action. My experimental data proves that to me. Naturally this experiment can be improved upon to any level. I am saying that mercury rails will make this new design rail gun far more efficient. That is all. > > It is, of course, convenient for the maintenance of your delusion, that > the things you require "finally to prove that it works" are unavailable > to you. I would like to ask, who is deluded? Myself or those saying that the floor of my shed is sloped and I am pushing the armature with my finger? It is already working as it should. It is showing my new physics about creating momentum from violating inertia and that is happening by third law violation. Whether people like you like it or not, work on this line that I have started will continue. If one wants to debunk this work, better efforts than yours are required. > > There is clearly a disconnect here between the standards of proof that > you accept for yourself, and the standards imposed by the world at > large. What proofs are there about big bang and suchlike theories? Nothing. They are just theories by eminent parasites. I am talking not about theories, but about an invention leading to a discovery that supports my hew theories about the working of the universe. Which will take time for global acceptance, like Copernican theory and plate tectonics, penicillin and x rays. I may not be around when ships without rockets and with developments of my invention go to the planets on a minute by minute basis, like modern jets. Just as I was sure that googling would happen, and that the delays in telecom would go down. Non-researchers react to the original works of creators. The academics in this line are the dullest among them. An inert, hidebound lot. Trapped by wrong knowledge they must uphold for their careers' sake. Forced to lead a life of lies and pettiness. Sucking up, being political, for fundings. Resentful. Surly. Treacherous. Cowardly. Careerist. Ugh. Such are my experiences about the racists and reverse-racists among them that impacted me. But, they can be bypassed with online presentations presenting new revolutionary facts and methods and better theories. I go to the public, avoiding those useless regressive entities and their machinations. And I expect industry to help , when they come to know the potential. > Quite why believe something that you are incapable to proving to > other people is a question best left to any psychiatrists who read this > group. The psychiatrists should treat delusional people like you, whodumbo, moroney, alsing, etc and all e=mcc pseudoscientists who genuinely believe that ridiculous nonsense. A bit of maths learning should help here, like deciding which number is greater, equal or smaller to some other number. With such Grade 1 level of maths, you may learn that action force is greater than the reaction, going by the figures I have given. I am on excellent terms with all the doctors I have known, including those who treat the insane. They, and my family, my friends, my work colleagues, fellow-students, neighbours, etc. numbering in the thousands have no doubts about my sanity. Such had been the case for decades. Their point is that I am doing exactly what I should do, breaking frontiers in diverse areas to their wonderment; and that I keep on, never minding the regressive scum. They all follow my career, as PGW put it, with considerable interest. > > Sylvia
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-17 04:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <32585c9f-6b68-41ff-9d42-5537bad80b57n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #877703 |
poniedziałek, 17 lipca 2023 o 12:07:08 UTC+2 Arindam Banerjee napisał(a): > On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 19:01:44 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > > On 17-July-23 3:30 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 14:46:34 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > > >> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > > >>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > > >>>> > > >>>> Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. > > >>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 > > >>> shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. > > >>> (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) > > >>> The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. > > >>> In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. > > >>> In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. > > >>> Then, again and again, with the hits. > > >>> Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. > > >>> > > >>> Cheers, > > >>> Arindam Banerjee > > >> Let's see your mercury based implementation then. > > > > > > Thanks for your interest. Let us see you telling the world loud and clear that I have made a rail gun of totally new design, which is based upon new physics, updating Newtonian laws to accommodate the discoveries of electromagnetic fields and forces. That could help. > Evidently, surliness rules here! > > > > > > As things are, I cannot buy nor use mercury. You need permits for that. Then, plenty of machining of parts, great engineering, etc. for the mercury implementation. > > The bizarre thing is your delusion that this thing will work, when the > > physics you claim to understand says that what it will do is not what > > you want. > The bizarre thing to me is your approach to a new invention. That this low voltage heavy armature is a new invention is undeniable to anyone sane or honest. Yet you and your ilk keep on denying this. If it is not a new invention, where are the links to show that it is not? Who had made this sort of device before? At this stage, may I remind that I did NOT get my PhD vecause in the final viva the academics of RMIT did not believe I had made a working model of a bew design rail gun. Is your insane dishonest hostility more based upon Eurocentric rabid bigotry than colonialist racism? > > So I worked on my own and made the latest version demonstrated. Which I will keep on improving. > > It is not my delusion that the reaction is less than the action. My experimental data proves that to me. Naturally this experiment can be improved upon to any level. I am saying that mercury rails will make this new design rail gun far more efficient. That is all. > > > > It is, of course, convenient for the maintenance of your delusion, that > > the things you require "finally to prove that it works" are unavailable > > to you. > I would like to ask, who is deluded? Myself or those saying that the floor of my shed is sloped and I am pushing the armature with my finger? > It is already working as it should. It is showing my new physics about creating momentum from violating inertia and that is happening by third law violation. Whether people like you like it or not, work on this line that I have started will continue. If one wants to debunk this work, better efforts than yours are required. > > > > There is clearly a disconnect here between the standards of proof that > > you accept for yourself, and the standards imposed by the world at > > large. > What proofs are there about big bang and suchlike theories? Nothing. They are just theories by eminent parasites. > I am talking not about theories, but about an invention leading to a discovery that supports my hew theories about the working of the universe. Which will take time for global acceptance, like Copernican theory and plate tectonics, penicillin and x rays. I may not be around when ships without rockets and with developments of my invention go to the planets on a minute by minute basis, like modern jets. Just as I was sure that googling would happen, and that the delays in telecom would go down. > Non-researchers react to the original works of creators. The academics in this line are the dullest among them. An inert, hidebound lot. Trapped by wrong knowledge they must uphold for their careers' sake. Forced to lead a life of lies and pettiness. Sucking up, being political, for fundings. Resentful. Surly. Treacherous. Cowardly. Careerist. Ugh. Such are my experiences about the racists and reverse-racists among them that impacted me. But, they can be bypassed with online presentations presenting new revolutionary facts and methods and better theories. I go to the public, avoiding those useless regressive entities and their machinations. And I expect industry to help , when they come to know the potential. > > Quite why believe something that you are incapable to proving to > > other people is a question best left to any psychiatrists who read this > > group. > The psychiatrists should treat delusional people like you, whodumbo, moroney, alsing, etc and all e=mcc pseudoscientists who genuinely believe that ridiculous nonsense. A bit of maths learning should help here, like deciding which number is greater, equal or smaller to some other number. With such Grade 1 level of maths, you may learn that action force is greater than the reaction, going by the figures I have given. > > I am on excellent terms with all the doctors I have known, including those who treat the insane. They, and my family, my friends, my work colleagues, fellow-students, neighbours, etc. numbering in the thousands have no doubts about my sanity. Such had been the case for decades. Their point is that I am doing exactly what I should do, breaking frontiers in diverse areas to their wonderment; and that I keep on, never minding the regressive scum. They all follow my career, as PGW put it, with considerable interest. > > > > > Sylvia Sylvia, have those planets come back yet, that flew out by straight lines when you replaced the Sun for them?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-17 04:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <51218711-3657-4005-9df7-1e1218e22525n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #877704 |
On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 21:19:31 UTC+10, Enes Richard wrote: > poniedziałek, 17 lipca 2023 o 12:07:08 UTC+2 Arindam Banerjee napisał(a): > > On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 19:01:44 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > On 17-July-23 3:30 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 14:46:34 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > >> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > >>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > > > >>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. > > > >>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 > > > >>> shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. > > > >>> (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) > > > >>> The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. > > > >>> In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. > > > >>> In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. > > > >>> Then, again and again, with the hits. > > > >>> Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. > > > >>> > > > >>> Cheers, > > > >>> Arindam Banerjee > > > >> Let's see your mercury based implementation then. > > > > > > > > Thanks for your interest. Let us see you telling the world loud and clear that I have made a rail gun of totally new design, which is based upon new physics, updating Newtonian laws to accommodate the discoveries of electromagnetic fields and forces. That could help. > > Evidently, surliness rules here! > > > > > > > > As things are, I cannot buy nor use mercury. You need permits for that. Then, plenty of machining of parts, great engineering, etc. for the mercury implementation. > > > The bizarre thing is your delusion that this thing will work, when the > > > physics you claim to understand says that what it will do is not what > > > you want. > > The bizarre thing to me is your approach to a new invention. That this low voltage heavy armature is a new invention is undeniable to anyone sane or honest. Yet you and your ilk keep on denying this. If it is not a new invention, where are the links to show that it is not? Who had made this sort of device before? At this stage, may I remind that I did NOT get my PhD vecause in the final viva the academics of RMIT did not believe I had made a working model of a bew design rail gun. Is your insane dishonest hostility more based upon Eurocentric rabid bigotry than colonialist racism? > > > > So I worked on my own and made the latest version demonstrated. Which I will keep on improving. > > > > It is not my delusion that the reaction is less than the action. My experimental data proves that to me. Naturally this experiment can be improved upon to any level. I am saying that mercury rails will make this new design rail gun far more efficient. That is all. > > > > > > It is, of course, convenient for the maintenance of your delusion, that > > > the things you require "finally to prove that it works" are unavailable > > > to you. > > I would like to ask, who is deluded? Myself or those saying that the floor of my shed is sloped and I am pushing the armature with my finger? > > It is already working as it should. It is showing my new physics about creating momentum from violating inertia and that is happening by third law violation. Whether people like you like it or not, work on this line that I have started will continue. If one wants to debunk this work, better efforts than yours are required. > > > > > > There is clearly a disconnect here between the standards of proof that > > > you accept for yourself, and the standards imposed by the world at > > > large. > > What proofs are there about big bang and suchlike theories? Nothing. They are just theories by eminent parasites. > > I am talking not about theories, but about an invention leading to a discovery that supports my hew theories about the working of the universe. Which will take time for global acceptance, like Copernican theory and plate tectonics, penicillin and x rays. I may not be around when ships without rockets and with developments of my invention go to the planets on a minute by minute basis, like modern jets. Just as I was sure that googling would happen, and that the delays in telecom would go down. > > Non-researchers react to the original works of creators. The academics in this line are the dullest among them. An inert, hidebound lot. Trapped by wrong knowledge they must uphold for their careers' sake. Forced to lead a life of lies and pettiness. Sucking up, being political, for fundings. Resentful. Surly. Treacherous. Cowardly. Careerist. Ugh. Such are my experiences about the racists and reverse-racists among them that impacted me. But, they can be bypassed with online presentations presenting new revolutionary facts and methods and better theories. I go to the public, avoiding those useless regressive entities and their machinations. And I expect industry to help , when they come to know the potential. > > > Quite why believe something that you are incapable to proving to > > > other people is a question best left to any psychiatrists who read this > > > group. > > The psychiatrists should treat delusional people like you, whodumbo, moroney, alsing, etc and all e=mcc pseudoscientists who genuinely believe that ridiculous nonsense. A bit of maths learning should help here, like deciding which number is greater, equal or smaller to some other number. With such Grade 1 level of maths, you may learn that action force is greater than the reaction, going by the figures I have given. > > > > I am on excellent terms with all the doctors I have known, including those who treat the insane. They, and my family, my friends, my work colleagues, fellow-students, neighbours, etc. numbering in the thousands have no doubts about my sanity. Such had been the case for decades. Their point is that I am doing exactly what I should do, breaking frontiers in diverse areas to their wonderment; and that I keep on, never minding the regressive scum. They all follow my career, as PGW put it, with considerable interest. > > > > > > > > Sylvia > Sylvia, > have those planets come back yet, that flew out by straight lines when you replaced the Sun for them? Is there any competition among the e=mcc wallahs about who starts the most absurd theories? What are the prizes for the winner? Nobel? Tenure? Promotions?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-17 22:21 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <khkq1oF3d9nU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #877703 |
On 17-July-23 8:07 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 19:01:44 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 17-July-23 3:30 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 14:46:34 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: >>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 >>>>>> >>>>>> Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. >>>>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 >>>>> shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. >>>>> (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) >>>>> The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. >>>>> In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. >>>>> In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. >>>>> Then, again and again, with the hits. >>>>> Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Arindam Banerjee >>>> Let's see your mercury based implementation then. >>> >>> Thanks for your interest. Let us see you telling the world loud and clear that I have made a rail gun of totally new design, which is based upon new physics, updating Newtonian laws to accommodate the discoveries of electromagnetic fields and forces. That could help. > > Evidently, surliness rules here! > >>> >>> As things are, I cannot buy nor use mercury. You need permits for that. Then, plenty of machining of parts, great engineering, etc. for the mercury implementation. >> The bizarre thing is your delusion that this thing will work, when the >> physics you claim to understand says that what it will do is not what >> you want. > > The bizarre thing to me is your approach to a new invention. What new invention? All we've seen is something that throws metal rods around, at considerable expense in hardware, and shoves the rest of the apparatus in the other direction. It's a reaction drive whose reaction mess is metal rods and whose exhaust velocity is perhaps a metre per second. Apply Tsiolkovsky's equation to that and you'll make a rocket scientist cry. The best that can be said for it is that it blows up less often than a Blue Original engine. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-17 06:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3801b8e6-7a1c-4892-9dfa-b3831787577fn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #877707 |
On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 22:21:19 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 17-July-23 8:07 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 19:01:44 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 17-July-23 3:30 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 14:46:34 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > >>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. > >>>>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 > >>>>> shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. > >>>>> (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) > >>>>> The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. > >>>>> In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. > >>>>> In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. > >>>>> Then, again and again, with the hits. > >>>>> Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> Arindam Banerjee > >>>> Let's see your mercury based implementation then. > >>> > >>> Thanks for your interest. Let us see you telling the world loud and clear that I have made a rail gun of totally new design, which is based upon new physics, updating Newtonian laws to accommodate the discoveries of electromagnetic fields and forces. That could help. > > > > Evidently, surliness rules here! > > > >>> > >>> As things are, I cannot buy nor use mercury. You need permits for that. Then, plenty of machining of parts, great engineering, etc. for the mercury implementation. > >> The bizarre thing is your delusion that this thing will work, when the > >> physics you claim to understand says that what it will do is not what > >> you want. > > > > The bizarre thing to me is your approach to a new invention. > What new invention? The low voltage heavy armature rail gun. > All we've seen is something that throws metal rods > around, And how was that, with gravity or my finger? at considerable expense in hardware, and shoves the rest of the > apparatus in the other direction. About $1000 worth of materials, should be affordable in the firstworld and much of the thirdworld especially as the capacitors can be resold. You are saying something like what the most stupid observer of Torricelli's water barometer may have said. "All I saw was a pipe with some water in it." Or a cave man cirsing the inventor of fire, as he had got burnt. There is some charm in being naive, but you don't have it. > It's a reaction drive whose reaction > mess is metal rods and whose exhaust velocity is perhaps a metre per second. Now that is typical einsteinian gibberish. There is no exhaust. This is not a chemical recoilless gun. It is a rail gun that I will modify into a motor. It shoots out a heavy bullet but that is not exhaust. It is called a projectile. In the motor mode the armature does not exit the motor. In the gun mode it has to being a projectile. Here the monentum is significant, but can be very much improved with mercury rails. > > Apply Tsiolkovsky's equation to that and you'll make a rocket scientist cry. Nothing to do with rockets. In the gun mode with high current it will send objects into space. In the motor mode it will in due course exceed the speed of light. You need some minimum wits to follow that. Which I am afraid you do not seem to possess. Unless you are up to something sinister like suppressing new thoughts from unapprovable sources. That seems more like it, for very few could be really as stupid as you. > > The best that can be said for it is that it blows up less often than a > Blue Original engine. From one as stupid or as sinister as you, nothing better can be expected > > Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-18 11:56 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <khm9raFao3bU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #877708 |
On 17-July-23 11:01 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 22:21:19 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 17-July-23 8:07 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 19:01:44 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> On 17-July-23 3:30 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>> On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 14:46:34 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: >>>>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. >>>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 >>>>>>> shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. >>>>>>> (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) >>>>>>> The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. >>>>>>> In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. >>>>>>> In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. >>>>>>> Then, again and again, with the hits. >>>>>>> Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Arindam Banerjee >>>>>> Let's see your mercury based implementation then. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your interest. Let us see you telling the world loud and clear that I have made a rail gun of totally new design, which is based upon new physics, updating Newtonian laws to accommodate the discoveries of electromagnetic fields and forces. That could help. >>> >>> Evidently, surliness rules here! >>> >>>>> >>>>> As things are, I cannot buy nor use mercury. You need permits for that. Then, plenty of machining of parts, great engineering, etc. for the mercury implementation. >>>> The bizarre thing is your delusion that this thing will work, when the >>>> physics you claim to understand says that what it will do is not what >>>> you want. >>> >>> The bizarre thing to me is your approach to a new invention. >> What new invention? > > The low voltage heavy armature rail gun. > >> All we've seen is something that throws metal rods >> around, > > > And how was that, with gravity or my finger? Electromagnetism. I've said more than once that this thing is doing what would be expected of it. > > at considerable expense in hardware, and shoves the rest of the >> apparatus in the other direction. > > About $1000 worth of materials, should be affordable in the firstworld and much of the thirdworld especially as the capacitors can be resold. That's $1000 of materials to achieve almost no thrust. > You are saying something like what the most stupid observer of Torricelli's water barometer may have said. "All I saw was a pipe with some water in it." > Or a cave man cirsing the inventor of fire, as he had got burnt. > > There is some charm in being naive, but you don't have it. > > >> It's a reaction drive whose reaction >> mess is metal rods and whose exhaust velocity is perhaps a metre per second. > > Now that is typical einsteinian gibberish. There is no exhaust. This is not a chemical recoilless gun. It is a rail gun that I will modify into a motor. It shoots out a heavy bullet but that is not exhaust. It is called a projectile. > In the motor mode the armature does not exit the motor. In the gun mode it has to being a projectile. Here the monentum is significant, but can be very much improved with mercury rails. Now you're back to your delusional belief that this thing can operate as a reaction-less drive when you have no experimental evidence that it will. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-18 07:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f4101692-2484-422f-9d2e-e4daad93b8b4n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #877722 |
On Tuesday, 18 July 2023 at 09:57:05 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 17-July-23 11:01 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 22:21:19 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 17-July-23 8:07 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 19:01:44 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>> On 17-July-23 3:30 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>> On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 14:46:34 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>>>> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > >>>>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. > >>>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 > >>>>>>> shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. > >>>>>>> (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) > >>>>>>> The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. > >>>>>>> In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. > >>>>>>> In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. > >>>>>>> Then, again and again, with the hits. > >>>>>>> Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>> Arindam Banerjee > >>>>>> Let's see your mercury based implementation then. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks for your interest. Let us see you telling the world loud and clear that I have made a rail gun of totally new design, which is based upon new physics, updating Newtonian laws to accommodate the discoveries of electromagnetic fields and forces. That could help. > >>> > >>> Evidently, surliness rules here! > >>> > >>>>> > >>>>> As things are, I cannot buy nor use mercury. You need permits for that. Then, plenty of machining of parts, great engineering, etc. for the mercury implementation. > >>>> The bizarre thing is your delusion that this thing will work, when the > >>>> physics you claim to understand says that what it will do is not what > >>>> you want. > >>> > >>> The bizarre thing to me is your approach to a new invention. > >> What new invention? > > > > The low voltage heavy armature rail gun. > > > >> All we've seen is something that throws metal rods > >> around, > > > > > > And how was that, with gravity or my finger? > Electromagnetism. I've said more than once that this thing is doing what > would be expected of it. And who expected that to happen before this demonstration? Was it ever done before? As I said I was failed for my PhD as the learned academics refused to believe that this was actually a working model of a rail gun. So this is a new invention for an even more important discovery. The discovery I had predicted in 2000. At last it is validated by this experiment. Only Maxwelliaan electrodynamics predicts no reaction to the Lorentz force that is Bil. > > > > at considerable expense in hardware, and shoves the rest of the > >> apparatus in the other direction. > > > > About $1000 worth of materials, should be affordable in the firstworld and much of the thirdworld especially as the capacitors can be resold. > That's $1000 of materials to achieve almost no thrust. The projectile has more momentum that the most high powered rifle. With increase in efficiency that will double. Have you understood from the figures I gave that the reaction force is lesser than the action force? Which is the discovery, that the force accelerating the armature has no electrical reaction as it must have from relativistic quantum electrodynamics. Or Newton-Ampere action at a distance electrodynamics. The latter two paradigms must have the reaction taken up by the power source. It is only in this experimental setup that the poeer source is integrated with the gun, and not lying on the floor for ground reaction. > > You are saying something like what the most stupid observer of Torricelli's water barometer may have said. "All I saw was a pipe with some water in it." > > Or a cave man cirsing the inventor of fire, as he had got burnt. > > > > There is some charm in being naive, but you don't have it. > > > > > >> It's a reaction drive whose reaction > >> mess is metal rods and whose exhaust velocity is perhaps a metre per second. > > > > Now that is typical einsteinian gibberish. There is no exhaust. This is not a chemical recoilless gun. It is a rail gun that I will modify into a motor. It shoots out a heavy bullet but that is not exhaust. It is called a projectile. > > > In the motor mode the armature does not exit the motor. In the gun mode it has to being a projectile. Here the monentum is significant, but can be very much improved with mercury rails. > Now you're back to your delusional belief that this thing can operate as > a reaction-less drive when you have no experimental evidence that it will. > > Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-19 06:37 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <khobgjFkrmoU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #877740 |
On 19-July-23 12:05 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Tuesday, 18 July 2023 at 09:57:05 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 17-July-23 11:01 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 22:21:19 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> On 17-July-23 8:07 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>> On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 19:01:44 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>> On 17-July-23 3:30 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>> On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 14:46:34 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. >>>>>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 >>>>>>>>> shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. >>>>>>>>> (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) >>>>>>>>> The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. >>>>>>>>> In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. >>>>>>>>> In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. >>>>>>>>> Then, again and again, with the hits. >>>>>>>>> Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Arindam Banerjee >>>>>>>> Let's see your mercury based implementation then. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for your interest. Let us see you telling the world loud and clear that I have made a rail gun of totally new design, which is based upon new physics, updating Newtonian laws to accommodate the discoveries of electromagnetic fields and forces. That could help. >>>>> >>>>> Evidently, surliness rules here! >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As things are, I cannot buy nor use mercury. You need permits for that. Then, plenty of machining of parts, great engineering, etc. for the mercury implementation. >>>>>> The bizarre thing is your delusion that this thing will work, when the >>>>>> physics you claim to understand says that what it will do is not what >>>>>> you want. >>>>> >>>>> The bizarre thing to me is your approach to a new invention. >>>> What new invention? >>> >>> The low voltage heavy armature rail gun. >>> >>>> All we've seen is something that throws metal rods >>>> around, >>> >>> >>> And how was that, with gravity or my finger? >> Electromagnetism. I've said more than once that this thing is doing what >> would be expected of it. > And who expected that to happen before this demonstration? Was it ever done before? As I said I was failed for my PhD as the learned academics refused to believe that this was actually a working model of a rail gun. So this is a new invention for an even more important discovery. The discovery I had predicted in 2000. At last it is validated by this experiment. Only Maxwelliaan electrodynamics predicts no reaction to the Lorentz force that is Bil. > >>> >>> at considerable expense in hardware, and shoves the rest of the >>>> apparatus in the other direction. >>> >>> About $1000 worth of materials, should be affordable in the firstworld and much of the thirdworld especially as the capacitors can be resold. >> That's $1000 of materials to achieve almost no thrust. > The projectile has more momentum that the most high powered rifle. With increase in efficiency that will double. I've not noticed that high powered rifles are used as a means of propulsion. I have noticed that people hit by rifles bullets are not thrown backwards (other than in Hollywood productions). This is no doubt because the momentum of a rifle bullet is not that great. > Have you understood from the figures I gave that the reaction force is lesser than the action force? You have asserted that it is. You have not provided any evidence. Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-21 16:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <62d13edd-5507-4c82-9753-16e7e3f14565n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #877754 |
On Wednesday, 19 July 2023 at 04:37:46 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 19-July-23 12:05 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Tuesday, 18 July 2023 at 09:57:05 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 17-July-23 11:01 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 22:21:19 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>> On 17-July-23 8:07 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>> On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 19:01:44 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>>>> On 17-July-23 3:30 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>>> On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 14:46:34 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. > >>>>>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 > >>>>>>>>> shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. > >>>>>>>>> (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) > >>>>>>>>> The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. > >>>>>>>>> In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. > >>>>>>>>> In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. > >>>>>>>>> Then, again and again, with the hits. > >>>>>>>>> Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>> Arindam Banerjee > >>>>>>>> Let's see your mercury based implementation then. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks for your interest. Let us see you telling the world loud and clear that I have made a rail gun of totally new design, which is based upon new physics, updating Newtonian laws to accommodate the discoveries of electromagnetic fields and forces. That could help. > >>>>> > >>>>> Evidently, surliness rules here! > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> As things are, I cannot buy nor use mercury. You need permits for that. Then, plenty of machining of parts, great engineering, etc. for the mercury implementation. > >>>>>> The bizarre thing is your delusion that this thing will work, when the > >>>>>> physics you claim to understand says that what it will do is not what > >>>>>> you want. > >>>>> > >>>>> The bizarre thing to me is your approach to a new invention. > >>>> What new invention? > >>> > >>> The low voltage heavy armature rail gun. > >>> > >>>> All we've seen is something that throws metal rods > >>>> around, > >>> > >>> > >>> And how was that, with gravity or my finger? > >> Electromagnetism. I've said more than once that this thing is doing what > >> would be expected of it. > > And who expected that to happen before this demonstration? Was it ever done before? As I said I was failed for my PhD as the learned academics refused to believe that this was actually a working model of a rail gun. So this is a new invention for an even more important discovery. The discovery I had predicted in 2000. At last it is validated by this experiment. Only Maxwelliaan electrodynamics predicts no reaction to the Lorentz force that is Bil. Yes, yes. Sooner aether is back, with electricity and magnetism, protons and electrons, in its space and time infinity, the clearer the universe will become. All charges linked by infinite lines of force. > > > >>> > >>> at considerable expense in hardware, and shoves the rest of the > >>>> apparatus in the other direction. > >>> > >>> About $1000 worth of materials, should be affordable in the firstworld and much of the thirdworld especially as the capacitors can be resold. > >> That's $1000 of materials to achieve almost no thrust. > > The projectile has more momentum that the most high powered rifle. With increase in efficiency that will double. > I've not noticed that high powered rifles are used as a means of > propulsion. True. But rockets are with efficient ejection of mass. When you block the barrel of a rifle so that the bullet cannot escape the result is catastrophic. And the rifle stays put, no change in its centre of gravity. In my reactionless motor, wuth the very heavy bullet arrested, such is not the case. As I have shown in my 2017 and 2022 youtube videos. Inertia gets violated there, with shift in the centreof gravity. Thus physics gets revolutionised. And transport, with repeated velocity addition per hit taking humanity efficiently to the stars. > I have noticed that people hit by rifles bullets are not > thrown backwards (other than in Hollywood productions). This is no doubt > because the momentum of a rifle bullet is not that great. > > Have you understood from the figures I gave that the reaction force is lesser than the action force? > You have asserted that it is. You have not provided any evidence. I do not expect entities like you to accept anything I say. I provide video evidence to the public and state results from data. Whether people believe or not is their business. If anyone is really interested, to understand and to develop my work, they can contact me on a professional business basis. Those worthy enough to absorb the potential of my inventions and discoveries will contact me on their own and I need not care about the rest. If no one bothers, fine for me. Less work, what. Still out of a sense of duty I will contact large companies and hear what they say if they send a representative to my garden shed. Or in my home... While having twice the momentum of a high power rifle, it is not at all dangerous. Cheers, Arindam Banerjee > k > Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-22 16:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <32794ca0-eade-4167-a9a1-311dc0f9a17dn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #877622 |
On Sunday, 16 July 2023 at 05:37:29 UTC+8, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > > > https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > > > > Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. > https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 > shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. > (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) > The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. > In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. > In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. > Then, again and again, with the hits. > Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee The question arises, why out of the hordes of journalists who are there to pounce upon any scandal, not one among them comes to check out my claims. The inevitable conclusion is... ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-22 17:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <424a89c8-baff-40ad-aacd-c6ce639b5bc0n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #877909 |
On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 4:37:44 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > The question arises, why out of the hordes of journalists who are there to pounce upon any scandal, not one among them comes to check out my claims. The inevitable conclusion is... ? It could very be because you are bat-shit crazy and definitely a waste of good air. Have a great day!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-23 04:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3f14efaf-57b1-4dc6-9352-f50225ed5fd7n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #877911 |
On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 08:47:55 UTC+8, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 4:37:44 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > The question arises, why out of the hordes of journalists who are there to pounce upon any scandal, not one among them comes to check out my claims. The inevitable conclusion is... ? > It could very be because you are bat-shit crazy and definitely a waste of good air. If that were really the case, they would be pouncing around me all right. They need bat shit crazy types and wastes of good air for their livelihood. > > Have a great day! I don't need your sarcasm, toxic robot, to lead a wonderful life. All my days are great.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-23 15:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <u9jthd$ajcv$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #877936 |
On 7/23/2023 7:42 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 08:47:55 UTC+8, Paul Alsing wrote: >> On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 4:37:44 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> >>> The question arises, why out of the hordes of journalists who are there to pounce upon any scandal, not one among them comes to check out my claims. The inevitable conclusion is... ? >> It could very be because you are bat-shit crazy and definitely a waste of good air. > If that were really the case, they would be pouncing around me all right. > They need bat shit crazy types and wastes of good air for their livelihood. Being just batshit crazy isn't enough for a good story. It also has to be /interesting/ batshit crazy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-23 16:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7db42368-b15c-44bf-b1ea-2d65f2900ef9n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #877966 |
On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 03:03:14 UTC+8, Volney wrote: > On 7/23/2023 7:42 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 08:47:55 UTC+8, Paul Alsing wrote: > >> On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 4:37:44 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> > >>> The question arises, why out of the hordes of journalists who are there to pounce upon any scandal, not one among them comes to check out my claims. The inevitable conclusion is... ? > > >> It could very be because you are bat-shit crazy and definitely a waste of good air. > > > If that were really the case, they would be pouncing around me all right. > > They need bat shit crazy types and wastes of good air for their livelihood. > Being just batshit crazy isn't enough for a good story. It also has to > be /interesting/ batshit crazy. Then they should all pounce upon you. Please explain your batshit crazy idea that I am making the armature accelerate with one finger.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-25 16:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kiasteFjmsgU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #877966 |
On 7/23/2023 2:03 PM, Volney wrote: > On 7/23/2023 7:42 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 08:47:55 UTC+8, Paul Alsing wrote: >>> On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 4:37:44 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> >>>> The question arises, why out of the hordes of journalists who are >>>> there to pounce upon any scandal, not one among them comes to check >>>> out my claims. The inevitable conclusion is... ? > >>> It could very be because you are bat-shit crazy and definitely a >>> waste of good air. > >> If that were really the case, they would be pouncing around me all right. >> They need bat shit crazy types and wastes of good air for their >> livelihood. > > Being just batshit crazy isn't enough for a good story. It also has to > be /interesting/ batshit crazy. He should probably ask the press for advice on how to make his presentation interesting enough to them for some publicity. His attempts at faking something new obviously haven't been adequate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-25 15:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b54daaab-9c4f-4bc7-ba75-e2ebc7f07c71n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878060 |
On Wednesday, 26 July 2023 at 05:25:09 UTC+8, whodat wrote: > On 7/23/2023 2:03 PM, Volney wrote: > > On 7/23/2023 7:42 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 08:47:55 UTC+8, Paul Alsing wrote: > >>> On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 4:37:44 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> > >>>> The question arises, why out of the hordes of journalists who are > >>>> there to pounce upon any scandal, not one among them comes to check > >>>> out my claims. The inevitable conclusion is... ? > > > >>> It could very be because you are bat-shit crazy and definitely a > >>> waste of good air. > > > >> If that were really the case, they would be pouncing around me all right. > >> They need bat shit crazy types and wastes of good air for their > >> livelihood. > > > > Being just batshit crazy isn't enough for a good story. It also has to > > be /interesting/ batshit crazy. > He should probably ask the press for advice on how to make his > presentation interesting enough to them for some publicity. His > attempts at faking something new obviously haven't been adequate. So what is the slope of my garage floor which caused the armature to roll down by gravity, whodumbo?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-26 05:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b4957133-4901-4091-997f-ae2ade654d5bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878067 |
Whodumbo's halwa is tight. (Constipated now is he.) On Wednesday, 26 July 2023 at 08:54:45 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Wednesday, 26 July 2023 at 05:25:09 UTC+8, whodat wrote: > > On 7/23/2023 2:03 PM, Volney wrote: > > > On 7/23/2023 7:42 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >> On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 08:47:55 UTC+8, Paul Alsing wrote: > > >>> On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 4:37:44 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> The question arises, why out of the hordes of journalists who are > > >>>> there to pounce upon any scandal, not one among them comes to check > > >>>> out my claims. The inevitable conclusion is... ? > > > > > >>> It could very be because you are bat-shit crazy and definitely a > > >>> waste of good air. > > > > > >> If that were really the case, they would be pouncing around me all right. > > >> They need bat shit crazy types and wastes of good air for their > > >> livelihood. > > > > > > Being just batshit crazy isn't enough for a good story. It also has to > > > be /interesting/ batshit crazy. > > He should probably ask the press for advice on how to make his > > presentation interesting enough to them for some publicity. His > > attempts at faking something new obviously haven't been adequate. > So what is the slope of my garage floor which caused the armature to roll down by gravity, whodumbo?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-26 11:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <14717f4c-e72b-4b4d-b6e4-c33aa7c5794cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878094 |
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 5:19:32 AM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > Whodumbo's halwa is tight. > (Constipated now is he.) Weak richie garbage.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web