Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #877622 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-07-15 14:37 -0700 |
| Last post | 2023-09-27 07:12 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 163 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-15 14:37 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 17:59 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-16 18:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 18:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-16 20:48 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 22:33 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-17 06:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 14:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-17 15:02 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 06:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-04 06:09 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 14:15 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-06 08:33 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 08:34 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 11:15 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 13:25 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-15 10:58 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 15:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 08:23 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-17 14:46 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-16 22:30 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-17 19:01 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 03:07 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Enes Richard <pies_na_teorie@vp.pl> - 2023-07-17 04:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 04:58 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-17 22:21 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-17 06:01 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-18 11:56 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-18 07:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-19 06:37 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-21 16:55 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-22 16:37 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-22 17:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 04:42 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-07-23 15:03 -0400
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 16:17 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-25 16:25 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 15:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 05:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:53 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-23 19:46 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 04:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-23 22:00 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 05:29 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-23 05:39 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-24 21:44 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 07:38 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-07-25 08:52 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:02 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:58 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 00:34 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:16 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:30 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-24 17:59 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 00:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 00:27 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 18:52 +0200
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 11:50 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 19:09 +0200
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:53 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 16:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 05:07 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 11:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-27 14:46 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 16:40 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 18:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-27 23:01 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 22:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 08:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 14:19 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:28 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 22:32 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-07-27 23:00 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-28 00:07 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 08:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-29 17:03 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-07-30 14:21 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 12:25 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-07-30 12:48 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:27 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-25 15:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-07-26 11:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-30 14:55 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-07-31 23:06 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-06 15:08 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 22:59 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-07 10:19 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-06 19:43 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 18:17 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-08 15:41 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 08:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-10 15:22 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 23:55 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 15:57 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-13 08:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-13 14:57 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <rehashedrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 08:45 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 14:26 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-14 15:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 08:33 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-15 10:52 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 11:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-15 15:37 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 14:37 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-08-15 14:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 16:06 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-08-15 16:32 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 21:34 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-08-16 07:28 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 12:16 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 14:48 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 14:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-17 19:47 -0400
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 18:12 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 05:24 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 05:10 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 07:21 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 13:41 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 15:24 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-18 13:05 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-18 17:35 -0400
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 22:24 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-08-10 17:36 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-10 23:53 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 09:10 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-11 15:09 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 08:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 18:02 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 18:41 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-08-07 14:14 +1000
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-06 21:52 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 06:58 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 07:00 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 05:50 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-22 14:42 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-08-28 13:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 08:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 12:15 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-01 16:01 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-02 08:24 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-02 14:16 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 13:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 14:46 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <jeffreydanielrubard@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 14:54 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 16:28 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:32 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 08:50 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 07:10 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 14:13 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 15:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 19:55 -0500
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 23:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 15:36 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 18:47 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 18:51 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-08-05 20:22 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 13:35 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 08:30 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 18:19 -0700
Re: Reactionless motors for space travel, with mercury rails Timothy Golden <timbandtech@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 07:12 -0700
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-26 11:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9e555799-4616-4551-a788-d87541ace393n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878067 |
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 3:54:45 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Wednesday, 26 July 2023 at 05:25:09 UTC+8, whodat wrote: > > On 7/23/2023 2:03 PM, Volney wrote: > > > On 7/23/2023 7:42 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >> On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 08:47:55 UTC+8, Paul Alsing wrote: > > >>> On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 4:37:44 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> The question arises, why out of the hordes of journalists who are > > >>>> there to pounce upon any scandal, not one among them comes to check > > >>>> out my claims. The inevitable conclusion is... ? > > > > > >>> It could very be because you are bat-shit crazy and definitely a > > >>> waste of good air. > > > > > >> If that were really the case, they would be pouncing around me all right. > > >> They need bat shit crazy types and wastes of good air for their > > >> livelihood. > > > > > > Being just batshit crazy isn't enough for a good story. It also has to > > > be /interesting/ batshit crazy. > > He should probably ask the press for advice on how to make his > > presentation interesting enough to them for some publicity. His > > attempts at faking something new obviously haven't been adequate. > So what is the slope of my garage floor which caused the armature to roll down by gravity, whodumbo? There's another word than "wog" for the kind of idiot you are, right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-23 19:46 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ki4b8jFiclgU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #877909 |
On 23-July-23 9:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Sunday, 16 July 2023 at 05:37:29 UTC+8, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: >>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 >>> >>> Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. >> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 >> shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. >> (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) >> The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. >> In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. >> In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. >> Then, again and again, with the hits. >> Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. >> >> Cheers, >> Arindam Banerjee > The question arises, why out of the hordes of journalists who are there to pounce upon any scandal, not one among them comes to check out my claims. The inevitable conclusion is... ? There's not much of a story in "Device that claims to violate the laws of physics turns out not to work." Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-23 04:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <226b2d78-091e-4a86-ae85-98159175c656n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #877928 |
On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 17:47:06 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 23-July-23 9:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Sunday, 16 July 2023 at 05:37:29 UTC+8, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > >>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > >>> > >>> Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. > >> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 > >> shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. > >> (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) > >> The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. > >> In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. > >> In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. > >> Then, again and again, with the hits. > >> Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Arindam Banerjee > > The question arises, why out of the hordes of journalists who are there to pounce upon any scandal, not one among them comes to check out my claims. The inevitable conclusion is... ? > There's not much of a story in "Device that claims to violate the laws > of physics turns out not to work." But it does work, as a rail gun showing a momentum imbalance, unless you ridiculously take the whodat-Moroney line that the table is on a sloped floor and I am pushing the armature with my finger. Evidently the press is controlled by powers who do not want this invention and discovery to be told to the public through mainstream media. Free speech is thus restricted to online, as the powers that be have not managed to destroy it so far. They have succeeded with the usenet newsgroup soc.culture.indian, destroying it using spammers. So far that has not been tried in this ng. > > Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-23 22:00 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ki4j2jFjiiaU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #877948 |
On 23-July-23 9:52 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 17:47:06 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 23-July-23 9:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Sunday, 16 July 2023 at 05:37:29 UTC+8, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: >>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 >>>>> >>>>> Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. >>>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 >>>> shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. >>>> (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) >>>> The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. >>>> In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. >>>> In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. >>>> Then, again and again, with the hits. >>>> Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Arindam Banerjee >>> The question arises, why out of the hordes of journalists who are there to pounce upon any scandal, not one among them comes to check out my claims. The inevitable conclusion is... ? >> There's not much of a story in "Device that claims to violate the laws >> of physics turns out not to work." > > But it does work, as a rail gun showing a momentum imbalance, unless you ridiculously take the whodat-Moroney line that the table is on a sloped floor and I am pushing the armature with my finger. > > Evidently the press is controlled by powers who do not want this invention and discovery to be told to the public through mainstream media. > > Free speech is thus restricted to online, as the powers that be have not managed to destroy it so far. They have succeeded with the usenet newsgroup soc.culture.indian, destroying it using spammers. > So far that has not been tried in this ng. >> >> Sylvia. I've seen the video. It's not inconsistent with the law of conservation of momentum. A detailed analysis of the masses and velocities might conceivably[*] say otherwise, but you haven't provided that. At this point your credibility is completely shot, so any analysis that you provide will be taken with a pinch of salt if it says that momentum is not conserved. Sylvia [*] That is, it can be conceived. I consider it extremely unlikely, verging on completely impossible.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-23 05:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <85cdf63a-70f3-4dd3-a668-89c667bc1971n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #877957 |
On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 20:00:26 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 23-July-23 9:52 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 17:47:06 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 23-July-23 9:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Sunday, 16 July 2023 at 05:37:29 UTC+8, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > >>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > >>>>> > >>>>> Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. > >>>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 > >>>> shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. > >>>> (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) > >>>> The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. > >>>> In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. > >>>> In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. > >>>> Then, again and again, with the hits. > >>>> Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Arindam Banerjee > >>> The question arises, why out of the hordes of journalists who are there to pounce upon any scandal, not one among them comes to check out my claims. The inevitable conclusion is... ? > >> There's not much of a story in "Device that claims to violate the laws > >> of physics turns out not to work." > > > > But it does work, as a rail gun showing a momentum imbalance, unless you ridiculously take the whodat-Moroney line that the table is on a sloped floor and I am pushing the armature with my finger. > > > > Evidently the press is controlled by powers who do not want this invention and discovery to be told to the public through mainstream media. > > > > Free speech is thus restricted to online, as the powers that be have not managed to destroy it so far. They have succeeded with the usenet newsgroup soc.culture.indian, destroying it using spammers. > > So far that has not been tried in this ng. > >> > >> Sylvia. > I've seen the video. It's not inconsistent with the law of conservation > of momentum. It is. Momentum is getting created. No doubt about it. > A detailed analysis of the masses and velocities might > conceivably[*] say otherwise, but you haven't provided that. First of all let it be said loud and clear for all to hear that the floor of my shed is not sloped such that the armature is moving by gravity, and that I am not pushing it by my finger. In short, let the Whodat-Moroney theory be debunked once and for all. When you support that above view as scientific criticism you are as much a joke as they are, and as all physicists are, by extension. Detailed force and momentum and energy analysis has already been done in my 2017 and 2022 rail gun experiments presented in youtube video, both in gun and motor modes. > At this > point your credibility is completely shot, so any analysis that you > provide will be taken with a pinch of salt if it says that momentum is > not conserved. Your credibility is zero as you support the whodat-Moroney line. > > Sylvia > > [*] That is, it can be conceived. I consider it extremely unlikely, > verging on completely impossible. You can be as ridiculous as you please.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-23 05:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <059b3869-d6a0-4bbf-8c7d-bdc8118fd360n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #877958 |
On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 20:29:50 UTC+8, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 20:00:26 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > > On 23-July-23 9:52 pm, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 17:47:06 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > > >> On 23-July-23 9:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >>> On Sunday, 16 July 2023 at 05:37:29 UTC+8, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > > >>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Rockets are for fireworks. These are reverse-racist apists of Western trash. Internal Force Engines are the way to become aliens in outer space. > > >>>> https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/videos/1028532314980688 > > >>>> shows the power stroke, key to reactionless motors for unlimited speeds without rocket action that must throw out mass yet only reach limited speeds. > > >>>> (The mechanical reaction in the video is caused from rolling, MERCURY RAILS ARE NEEDED for the heavy armature to slide without pushing back the motor with treadmill action.) And this is the point. Mercury rails will permit sliding and much better contact as opposed to the rolling action I am forced to do, in order to prevent welding. The treadmill action makes for backward reaction, making this inefficient as a motor, but still potent as a gun. > > >>>> The arrested armature will give its momentum to the whole motor and the vehicle with it. > > >>>> In outer space, nothing to stop it! It will gain a velocity v with every hit with the power stroke. After N hits the speed will be Nv. > > >>>> In the second stroke, the armature has to be brought back to the original position. > > >>>> Then, again and again, with the hits. > > >>>> Millions of amperes of current are needed. For that, fuel cells are required powered by hydrogen and oxygen. > > >>>> > > >>>> Cheers, > > >>>> Arindam Banerjee > > >>> The question arises, why out of the hordes of journalists who are there to pounce upon any scandal, not one among them comes to check out my claims. The inevitable conclusion is... ? > > >> There's not much of a story in "Device that claims to violate the laws > > >> of physics turns out not to work." > > > > > > But it does work, as a rail gun showing a momentum imbalance, unless you ridiculously take the whodat-Moroney line that the table is on a sloped floor and I am pushing the armature with my finger. > > > > > > Evidently the press is controlled by powers who do not want this invention and discovery to be told to the public through mainstream media. > > > > > > Free speech is thus restricted to online, as the powers that be have not managed to destroy it so far. They have succeeded with the usenet newsgroup soc.culture.indian, destroying it using spammers. > > > So far that has not been tried in this ng. > > >> > > >> Sylvia. > > I've seen the video. It's not inconsistent with the law of conservation > > of momentum. > It is. Momentum is getting created. No doubt about it. > > A detailed analysis of the masses and velocities might > > conceivably[*] say otherwise, but you haven't provided that. > First of all let it be said loud and clear for all to hear that the floor of my shed is not sloped such that the armature is moving by gravity, and that I am not pushing it by my finger. In short, let the Whodat-Moroney theory be debunked once and for all. > > When you support that above view as scientific criticism you are as much a joke as they are, and as all physicists are, by extension. > > Detailed force and momentum and energy analysis has already been done in my 2017 and 2022 rail gun experiments presented in youtube video, both in gun and motor modes. > > At this > > point your credibility is completely shot, so any analysis that you > > provide will be taken with a pinch of salt if it says that momentum is > > not conserved. > Your credibility is zero as you support the whodat-Moroney line. > > > > Sylvia > > > > [*] That is, it can be conceived. I consider it extremely unlikely, > > verging on completely impossible. > You can be as ridiculous as you please.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-24 21:44 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ki76gsF1s09U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #877622 |
On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: >>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 >> How will the mercury stay in place in space? What will the mercury do when large currents pass through it? Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-24 07:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6035c2c5-5c3c-4b8a-820c-43d6e41fd5f4n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #877981 |
On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 19:44:35 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > >>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > >> > How will the mercury stay in place in space? Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that. Mercury is highly cohesive and that will help in far outer space. My insight is that this will work extremely well in far outer space. On high altitude say at 100 Km gravity will work. > > What will the mercury do when large currents pass through it? Conduct nicely. (No oxidation will be allowed in the evacuated spaces where the engine will be kept.) Let us agree that I have at least made a new invention. Unless I lead a team with access to mercury I can only predict. > > Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-25 08:52 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <ki8dlgF7rucU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #877983 |
On 25-July-23 12:38 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 19:44:35 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: >>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 >>>> >> How will the mercury stay in place in space? > > Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that. You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for someone else to solve. > Mercury is highly cohesive and that will help in far outer space. > My insight is that this will work extremely well in far outer space. > On high altitude say at 100 Km gravity will work. >> >> What will the mercury do when large currents pass through it? > > Conduct nicely. (No oxidation will be allowed in the evacuated spaces where the engine will be kept.) You miss the point. Your apparatus uses the interaction between electric currents and magnetic fields. What makes you think that the mercury won't become involved in that? > > Let us agree that I have at least made a new invention. > > Unless I lead a team with access to mercury I can only predict. >> Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-24 17:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <789ca906-243e-4f3b-bd0f-8cd7b035c09fn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878003 |
On Tuesday, 25 July 2023 at 06:52:38 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 25-July-23 12:38 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 19:44:35 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > >>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > >>>> > >> How will the mercury stay in place in space? > > > > Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that. > You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for > someone else to solve. That is what experts are for. To take up the works of blessed pioneers like myself. Create trillions and quintillions, of dollar worth, providing satisfaction and coveniences to all animal, mineral and vegetable, over the centuries and millenia. I continue this engineering trend, by revising physics. To the extent I am personally involved in such engineering, the faster, safer, comfortable, healthy the outcomes and most economically too. > > Mercury is highly cohesive and that will help in far outer space. > > > > > > My insight is that this will work extremely well in far outer space. > > On high altitude say at 100 Km gravity will work. > > > >> > >> What will the mercury do when large currents pass through it? > > > > Conduct nicely. (No oxidation will be allowed in the evacuated spaces where the engine will be kept.) > You miss the point. Your apparatus uses the interaction between electric > currents and magnetic fields. What makes you think that the mercury > won't become involved in that? > > > > Let us agree that I have at least made a new invention. So much meanness I find! They will squeal about global warming but ignore genuine efforts for cure. Like not polluting upper atmosphere with CO2 as is the case now with jet engine exhausts. My reactionless motors will not pollute. > > > > > Unless I lead a team with access to mercury I can only predict. > >> > > Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-24 17:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <dc09c9bf-e7f9-4cec-b14c-813c5316c556n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878005 |
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:02:30 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Tuesday, 25 July 2023 at 06:52:38 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > > >> How will the mercury stay in place in space? > > > > > > Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that. > > You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for > > someone else to solve. > That is what experts are for. To take up the works of blessed pioneers like myself. Create trillions and quintillions, of dollar worth, providing satisfaction and coveniences to all animal, mineral and vegetable, over the centuries and millennia. So, Arindam, what do the experts have to say about your claim that the cores of stars are frozen? Hmmmmm? Methinks that you are completely full of crap, with zero evidence to provide in support of your claims... just another wannabe troll in search of a fat pig to poke.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-25 00:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <37f0ef70-33ea-422c-aa4e-13750bc48bffn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878008 |
On Tuesday, 25 July 2023 at 08:58:03 UTC+8, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:02:30 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Tuesday, 25 July 2023 at 06:52:38 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > >> How will the mercury stay in place in space? > > > > > > > > Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that. > > > > You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for > > > someone else to solve. > > That is what experts are for. To take up the works of blessed pioneers like myself. Create trillions and quintillions, of dollar worth, providing satisfaction and coveniences to all animal, mineral and vegetable, over the centuries and millennia. > > So, Arindam, what do the experts have to say about your claim that the cores of stars are frozen? One does not need experts to understand that. One needs sane, honest and intelligent beings. Not corrupt craven careerists pretending to be scientists, nor their badly programmed toxic pea soup emitting robots like Alsing, for whom understanding anything original is impossible.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-25 11:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0dcd0fc3-a9a8-42b6-a202-e7bcafb986bdn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878029 |
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 12:34:28 AM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Tuesday, 25 July 2023 at 08:58:03 UTC+8, Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:02:30 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 25 July 2023 at 06:52:38 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > > > > >> How will the mercury stay in place in space? > > > > > > > > > > Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that. > > > > > > You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for > > > > someone else to solve. > > > That is what experts are for. To take up the works of blessed pioneers like myself. Create trillions and quintillions, of dollar worth, providing satisfaction and coveniences to all animal, mineral and vegetable, over the centuries and millennia. > > > > So, Arindam, what do the experts have to say about your claim that the cores of stars are frozen? > One does not need experts to understand that. One needs sane, honest and intelligent beings. Not corrupt craven careerists pretending to be scientists, nor their badly programmed toxic pea soup emitting robots like Alsing, for whom understanding anything original is impossible. "Pre-Enlightenment mentality"? Or is that racist?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-24 17:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e18b856f-85d9-4f3f-9862-b5c79ba918e8n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878003 |
On Tuesday, 25 July 2023 at 06:52:38 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 25-July-23 12:38 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 19:44:35 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > >>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > >>>> > >> How will the mercury stay in place in space? > > > > Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that. > You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for > someone else to solve. > > Mercury is highly cohesive and that will help in far outer space. > > > > > > My insight is that this will work extremely well in far outer space. > > On high altitude say at 100 Km gravity will work. > > > >> > >> What will the mercury do when large currents pass through it? > > > > Conduct nicely. (No oxidation will be allowed in the evacuated spaces where the engine will be kept.) > You miss the point. You have no point except denial of the obvious, that I have invented a new kind of electric linear motor. > Your apparatus uses the interaction between electric > currents and magnetic fields. Yes. It works on the rail gun principle, about which theory I have updated and presented in my 2017 videos. > What makes you think that the mercury > won't become involved in that? It is an engineering issue for efficiency increase drastically, via sliding and not rolling. Not much basic physics involved, here, like the discovery of no reaction electrically to the Lorentz force accelerating the armature. There are many complexities involved in this work, which will get resolved when I am paid due attention from worthy people. That may not happen, given the extremely low moral temper of our craven, corrupt times. Sad. But, who knows how the Divine will proceed! As things are, I will keep on posting videos to facebook and youtube, with my comments. > > > > Let us agree that I have at least made a new invention. > > > > > Unless I lead a team with access to mercury I can only predict. > >> > > Sylvia.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-24 17:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <98b609a4-4129-4e03-b9a4-93af2faf57c4n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878006 |
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:16:52 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Tuesday, 25 July 2023 at 06:52:38 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > > On 25-July-23 12:38 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 19:44:35 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > > >> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > > >>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > > >>>> > > >> How will the mercury stay in place in space? > > > > > > Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that. > > You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for > > someone else to solve. > > > Mercury is highly cohesive and that will help in far outer space. > > > > > > > > > > > My insight is that this will work extremely well in far outer space. > > > On high altitude say at 100 Km gravity will work. > > > > > > >> > > >> What will the mercury do when large currents pass through it? > > > > > > Conduct nicely. (No oxidation will be allowed in the evacuated spaces where the engine will be kept.) > > You miss the point. > You have no point except denial of the obvious, that I have invented a new kind of electric linear motor. > > Your apparatus uses the interaction between electric > > currents and magnetic fields. > Yes. It works on the rail gun principle, about which theory I have updated and presented in my 2017 videos. > > What makes you think that the mercury > > won't become involved in that? > It is an engineering issue for efficiency increase drastically, via sliding and not rolling. Not much basic physics involved, here, like the discovery of no reaction electrically to the Lorentz force accelerating the armature. > > There are many complexities involved in this work, which will get resolved when I am paid due attention from worthy people. > > That may not happen, given the extremely low moral temper of our craven, corrupt times. Sad. > > But, who knows how the Divine will proceed! As things are, I will keep on posting videos to facebook and youtube, with my comments. > > > > > > Let us agree that I have at least made a new invention. > > > > > > > > Unless I lead a team with access to mercury I can only predict. > > >> > > > > Sylvia. "Is there any actual science in any of this?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-24 17:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <35a9d0c1-0ec3-4d6e-adc1-bc3423f0c6cen@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878007 |
On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:30:05 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > "Is there any actual science in any of this?" Not even a scintilla of science... after all, it is from Arindam, who just makes it up as he goes along, with no evidence, ever...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-25 00:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8f1f0b8b-ad13-442d-98f9-d363edfa5d12n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878009 |
On Tuesday, 25 July 2023 at 08:59:33 UTC+8, Paul Alsing wrote: > On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:30:05 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > > "Is there any actual science in any of this?" > Not even a scintilla of science... after all, it is from Arindam, who just makes it up as he goes along, with no evidence, ever... Nice answer, from toxic robot to headless chook. No brains involved on either side!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Rubard <theleasthappyfella@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-25 11:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c9347c4c-b0c1-4f65-96ee-97089eadbcdan@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878030 |
On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 12:54:32 AM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Tuesday, 25 July 2023 at 08:59:33 UTC+8, Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:30:05 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > > > > > "Is there any actual science in any of this?" > > Not even a scintilla of science... after all, it is from Arindam, who just makes it up as he goes along, with no evidence, ever... > Nice answer, from toxic robot to headless chook. No brains involved on either side! "Your slang confuses me, but not much. The pseudo-science you're slinging around is obvious enough."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-25 00:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7c211280-0795-4aa3-89b9-76166bd36567n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #878007 |
On Tuesday, 25 July 2023 at 08:30:05 UTC+8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > On Monday, July 24, 2023 at 5:16:52 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > On Tuesday, 25 July 2023 at 06:52:38 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > On 25-July-23 12:38 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > > On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 19:44:35 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > >> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > >>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > > > >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: > > > >>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 > > > >>>> > > > >> How will the mercury stay in place in space? > > > > > > > > Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that. > > > You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for > > > someone else to solve. > > > > Mercury is highly cohesive and that will help in far outer space. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My insight is that this will work extremely well in far outer space. > > > > On high altitude say at 100 Km gravity will work. > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> What will the mercury do when large currents pass through it? > > > > > > > > Conduct nicely. (No oxidation will be allowed in the evacuated spaces where the engine will be kept.) > > > You miss the point. > > You have no point except denial of the obvious, that I have invented a new kind of electric linear motor. > > > Your apparatus uses the interaction between electric > > > currents and magnetic fields. > > Yes. It works on the rail gun principle, about which theory I have updated and presented in my 2017 videos. > > > What makes you think that the mercury > > > won't become involved in that? > > It is an engineering issue for efficiency increase drastically, via sliding and not rolling. Not much basic physics involved, here, like the discovery of no reaction electrically to the Lorentz force accelerating the armature. > > > > There are many complexities involved in this work, which will get resolved when I am paid due attention from worthy people. > > > > That may not happen, given the extremely low moral temper of our craven, corrupt times. Sad. > > > > But, who knows how the Divine will proceed! As things are, I will keep on posting videos to facebook and youtube, with my comments. > > > > > > > > Let us agree that I have at least made a new invention. > > > > > > > > > > > Unless I lead a team with access to mercury I can only predict. > > > >> > > > > > > Sylvia. > "Is there any actual science in any of this?" Are you gonna start your headless chook perambulations here as well?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-07-25 18:52 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <kiacudFhktoU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #878003 |
On 2023-07-24 22:52:32 +0000, Sylvia Else said: > On 25-July-23 12:38 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >> On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 19:44:35 UTC+8, Sylvia Else wrote: >>> On 16-July-23 7:37 am, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 20:45:18 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, 15 July 2023 at 18:43:05 UTC+10, corella wrote: >>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/india-to-launch-moon-rocket-chandrayaan-3/102583926 >>>>>> >>>>> >>> How will the mercury stay in place in space? >> >> Experts will devise appropriate methods. Technical issue, that. > > You're presupposing that a solution exists - inventing a problem for > someone else to solve. > >> Mercury is highly cohesive and that will help in far outer space. > > > > >> My insight is that this will work extremely well in far outer space. >> On high altitude say at 100 Km gravity will work. > > >>> >>> What will the mercury do when large currents pass through it? >> >> Conduct nicely. (No oxidation will be allowed in the evacuated spaces >> where the engine will be kept.) > > You miss the point. Your apparatus uses the interaction between > electric currents and magnetic fields. What makes you think that the > mercury won't become involved in that? > >> >> Let us agree that I have at least made a new invention. Why would Sylvia (or any other sane person) agree with that? It's a matter between you and the Australian patent office. > >> >> Unless I lead a team with access to mercury I can only predict. >>> > > Sylvia. -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web