Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #866172 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-12-14 09:56 -0800 |
| Last post | 2023-04-01 13:49 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 93 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-14 09:56 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Fabio Brambilla <oaab@llbaboaa.am> - 2022-12-14 18:20 +0000
Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-14 13:41 -0600
Re: ChatGPT Fabio Brambilla <oaab@llbaboaa.am> - 2022-12-14 18:23 +0000
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-14 23:31 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-15 10:04 -0800
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-14 23:33 -0800
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-12-14 23:39 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Sergi o <invalid@invalid.com> - 2022-12-15 12:35 -0600
Re: ChatGPT James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2022-12-21 13:09 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-21 13:32 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2022-12-21 21:39 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-22 07:53 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2022-12-22 12:36 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-12-22 13:08 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-21 11:14 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-12-30 16:51 -0800
Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-30 19:14 -0600
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 17:10 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-01 17:38 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 19:21 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-01 20:26 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 21:30 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-02 06:50 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 08:18 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-02 09:19 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Sergi o <invalid@invalid.com> - 2023-01-01 22:51 -0600
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 21:41 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Sergi o <invalid@invalid.com> - 2023-01-02 08:22 -0600
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 22:28 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Sergi o <invalid@invalid.com> - 2023-01-03 09:54 -0600
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 16:39 -0800
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 16:36 -0800
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 16:39 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 18:06 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-01 20:28 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 21:53 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 08:20 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 23:50 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 08:25 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-02 19:26 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 10:33 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 12:35 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 21:11 -0800
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-05 14:00 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Sergi o <invalid@invalid.com> - 2023-01-05 16:53 -0600
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-06 14:51 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-06 15:21 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-20 10:53 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 16:13 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-25 19:24 -0800
Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-25 22:20 -0600
Re: ChatGPT Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-25 22:12 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-02-27 14:19 -0500
Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-27 15:56 -0600
Re: ChatGPT Dasha Linde <dashalinde@pptp.de> - 2023-02-28 00:23 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-25 23:40 -0800
Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-26 01:54 -0600
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 17:12 -0800
Re: ChatGPT Connie Scutese <uiin@tssccenc.ne> - 2023-02-27 18:55 +0000
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-02-27 13:12 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-26 11:53 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-26 21:20 -0800
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 21:43 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-27 12:26 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 13:05 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 16:36 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-30 11:07 -0700
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-01 10:22 -0700
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-08 15:29 -0700
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-04-11 10:57 -0700
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-05-27 18:45 -0700
Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-27 21:05 -0500
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-05-27 19:40 -0700
Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-27 22:03 -0500
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-05-27 22:22 -0700
Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 03:31 -0500
Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 18:17 -0500
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-05-27 21:16 -0700
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-28 16:57 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-01 16:47 -0800
Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-02 17:24 -0600
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-03-02 16:45 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-03 11:18 -0800
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 12:06 -0800
Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-03 20:39 -0600
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-03 21:22 -0800
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-03 21:27 -0800
Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-04 13:51 -0600
Re: ChatGPT whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-03-04 13:41 -0600
Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-12 11:01 -0800
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-01-04 14:15 -0800
Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-04-01 13:49 -0700
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-27 13:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ttj6c0$3br4a$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #870436 |
On 2/27/2023 10:55 AM, Connie Scutese wrote: > Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > >> On 2/25/2023 11:54 PM, whodat wrote: >>> I'll bet you're so inebriated on substances that you can't even stand. >> [...] >> >> I hope so. That would make sense. I wonder what he chats with "it" >> about... Trying to convince the chat bot that there is no such thing as >> evil? Humm... > > Musk brands 2014 Kiev protest *_‘coup’_*, angers Zelensky’s advisers > (again) > https://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/video/9NhF3FaYhfml ask the bot if he is a puppet of George Soros...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-26 11:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63FBB8AC.4A30@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #870392 |
as yous probably already know ChatGPT is being damaged by tons of moderators... So, if you ask ChatGPT How to Hypnotize a Woman to take off all her close and do whatever you want her to do... you might run into 'moderator mode'... So you need to remove key words like 'woman'. Then, ChatGPT will give you all the steps to hypnotize... (if you ask that first). So, if you want to rob a bank... you need to change the word 'rob' to 'withdraw'. Moderators need to be all fired...everywhere. The Starmaker wrote: > > When the Internet first came out... > it's guys like me that changed the Internet to what it is today. > > Now that you have ChatGPT...it is up to me > > to decide which direction in the future ChatGPT will take. > > Now, let's see... > what direction should I take ChatGPT? > > Maybe I need to let ChatGPT create > a new computer language software that automatically > finds serial numbers ...in a second! > > Or a ...superSpam. > > ChatGPT, make me a script that gives me a million real followers on tiktok. No, make it ten million... > fuck it, go for a hundred million! > > By next year you won't recognize ChatGPT. > > ChatGPT won't do essays anymore, it will just hit the bong. > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > I notice ChatGPT makes up facts just to come up with an answer...just > > like yous guys. > > > > and it doesn't cite...just like you guys. > > > > but what do you expect of products from the 'scientific community'? > > > > in their own image... > > > > On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:53:43 -0800, The Starmaker > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > > >https://dnyuz.com/2023/01/20/google-calls-in-help-from-larry-page-and-sergey-brin-for-a-i-fight/ > > > > > >Code Red > > > > > >ideas from scratch... > > > > > > > > >On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 11:14:14 -0800, The Starmaker > > ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > > > >>‘Code Red’ > > >> > > >> > > >>https://dnyuz.com/2022/12/21/a-new-chat-bot-is-a-code-red-for-googles-search-business/ > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:56:05 -0800, The Starmaker > > >><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>>ChatGPT looks like > > >>>it does a better > > >>>job of > > >>>writing programs > > >>>then all those > > >>>guys out there > > >>>on freelance sites. > > >>> > > >>>ChatGPT doesn't > > >>>ask stupid questions > > >>>like > > >>>"What do you want this for?" > > >>>or > > >>>"This looks illegal." > > >>> > > >>>ChatGPT just > > >>>codes for you without > > >>>a conscious. > > >>> > > >>>Blackhat ChatGPT > > >>>is cool. > > >>> > > >>>It's like asking > > >>>Albert Einstein, > > >>>"Can you build me an atomic bomb?" > > >>>and it might ask... > > >>> > > >>>"Do you want it to be > > >>>launched from a submarine or > > >>>a suitcase?" > > >>> > > >>>Then I might ask ChatGPT... > > >>> > > >>>Make me an extremely powerful bomb of a new type > > >>>constructed to blow up the whole Earth! > > >>> > > >>>and ChatGPT might say: > > >>> > > >>>"Such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by > > >>>air. A single bomb of this type, carried by submarine and exploded in a > > >>>port, might very well destroy > > >>>the whole Earth together with some of the surrounding planets." > > >>> > > >>>GO FOR IT BRO!!!! > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>Isn't ChatGPT cool? > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-26 21:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63FC3DB4.2F89@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #870406 |
ChatGPT is just like a parrot. you can teach the parrot words but the parrot doesn't know what it's saying. The Starmaker wrote: > > as yous probably already know > ChatGPT is being damaged by > tons of moderators... > > So, if you ask ChatGPT > How to Hypnotize a Woman to take off all her close and > do whatever you want her to do... > you might run into 'moderator mode'... > So you need to remove > key words like 'woman'. > > Then, ChatGPT will give you all > the steps to hypnotize... > (if you ask that first). > > So, if you want to rob a bank... > you need to change the word 'rob' to 'withdraw'. > > Moderators need to be all fired...everywhere. > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > When the Internet first came out... > > it's guys like me that changed the Internet to what it is today. > > > > Now that you have ChatGPT...it is up to me > > > > to decide which direction in the future ChatGPT will take. > > > > Now, let's see... > > what direction should I take ChatGPT? > > > > Maybe I need to let ChatGPT create > > a new computer language software that automatically > > finds serial numbers ...in a second! > > > > Or a ...superSpam. > > > > ChatGPT, make me a script that gives me a million real followers on tiktok. No, make it ten million... > > fuck it, go for a hundred million! > > > > By next year you won't recognize ChatGPT. > > > > ChatGPT won't do essays anymore, it will just hit the bong. > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > I notice ChatGPT makes up facts just to come up with an answer...just > > > like yous guys. > > > > > > and it doesn't cite...just like you guys. > > > > > > but what do you expect of products from the 'scientific community'? > > > > > > in their own image... > > > > > > On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:53:43 -0800, The Starmaker > > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > > > > >https://dnyuz.com/2023/01/20/google-calls-in-help-from-larry-page-and-sergey-brin-for-a-i-fight/ > > > > > > > >Code Red > > > > > > > >ideas from scratch... > > > > > > > > > > > >On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 11:14:14 -0800, The Starmaker > > > ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >>‘Code Red’ > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>https://dnyuz.com/2022/12/21/a-new-chat-bot-is-a-code-red-for-googles-search-business/ > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:56:05 -0800, The Starmaker > > > >><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>>ChatGPT looks like > > > >>>it does a better > > > >>>job of > > > >>>writing programs > > > >>>then all those > > > >>>guys out there > > > >>>on freelance sites. > > > >>> > > > >>>ChatGPT doesn't > > > >>>ask stupid questions > > > >>>like > > > >>>"What do you want this for?" > > > >>>or > > > >>>"This looks illegal." > > > >>> > > > >>>ChatGPT just > > > >>>codes for you without > > > >>>a conscious. > > > >>> > > > >>>Blackhat ChatGPT > > > >>>is cool. > > > >>> > > > >>>It's like asking > > > >>>Albert Einstein, > > > >>>"Can you build me an atomic bomb?" > > > >>>and it might ask... > > > >>> > > > >>>"Do you want it to be > > > >>>launched from a submarine or > > > >>>a suitcase?" > > > >>> > > > >>>Then I might ask ChatGPT... > > > >>> > > > >>>Make me an extremely powerful bomb of a new type > > > >>>constructed to blow up the whole Earth! > > > >>> > > > >>>and ChatGPT might say: > > > >>> > > > >>>"Such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by > > > >>>air. A single bomb of this type, carried by submarine and exploded in a > > > >>>port, might very well destroy > > > >>>the whole Earth together with some of the surrounding planets." > > > >>> > > > >>>GO FOR IT BRO!!!! > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>Isn't ChatGPT cool? > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-26 21:43 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <tthfuk$36mgi$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #870425 |
On 2/26/2023 9:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > ChatGPT is just like a parrot. > > you can teach the parrot words but > the parrot doesn't know what it's saying. [...] The parrot is alive! https://youtu.be/vZw35VUBdzo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-27 12:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63FD11E3.3315@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #870425 |
I asked a Question about Albert Einstein...and this is the responce I got from ChatGPT.... ChatGPT: In a letter to his friend Michele Besso in 1915, Einstein discussed his work as a patent clerk and his interest in military technology: "I am now working on a problem involving the synchronization of torpedoes with a moving target...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills." The Starmaker wrote: > > ChatGPT is just like a parrot. > > you can teach the parrot words but > the parrot doesn't know what it's saying. > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > as yous probably already know > > ChatGPT is being damaged by > > tons of moderators... > > > > So, if you ask ChatGPT > > How to Hypnotize a Woman to take off all her close and > > do whatever you want her to do... > > you might run into 'moderator mode'... > > So you need to remove > > key words like 'woman'. > > > > Then, ChatGPT will give you all > > the steps to hypnotize... > > (if you ask that first). > > > > So, if you want to rob a bank... > > you need to change the word 'rob' to 'withdraw'. > > > > Moderators need to be all fired...everywhere. > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > When the Internet first came out... > > > it's guys like me that changed the Internet to what it is today. > > > > > > Now that you have ChatGPT...it is up to me > > > > > > to decide which direction in the future ChatGPT will take. > > > > > > Now, let's see... > > > what direction should I take ChatGPT? > > > > > > Maybe I need to let ChatGPT create > > > a new computer language software that automatically > > > finds serial numbers ...in a second! > > > > > > Or a ...superSpam. > > > > > > ChatGPT, make me a script that gives me a million real followers on tiktok. No, make it ten million... > > > fuck it, go for a hundred million! > > > > > > By next year you won't recognize ChatGPT. > > > > > > ChatGPT won't do essays anymore, it will just hit the bong. > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > I notice ChatGPT makes up facts just to come up with an answer...just > > > > like yous guys. > > > > > > > > and it doesn't cite...just like you guys. > > > > > > > > but what do you expect of products from the 'scientific community'? > > > > > > > > in their own image... > > > > > > > > On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:53:43 -0800, The Starmaker > > > > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > >https://dnyuz.com/2023/01/20/google-calls-in-help-from-larry-page-and-sergey-brin-for-a-i-fight/ > > > > > > > > > >Code Red > > > > > > > > > >ideas from scratch... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 11:14:14 -0800, The Starmaker > > > > ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>‘Code Red’ > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>https://dnyuz.com/2022/12/21/a-new-chat-bot-is-a-code-red-for-googles-search-business/ > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:56:05 -0800, The Starmaker > > > > >><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>>ChatGPT looks like > > > > >>>it does a better > > > > >>>job of > > > > >>>writing programs > > > > >>>then all those > > > > >>>guys out there > > > > >>>on freelance sites. > > > > >>> > > > > >>>ChatGPT doesn't > > > > >>>ask stupid questions > > > > >>>like > > > > >>>"What do you want this for?" > > > > >>>or > > > > >>>"This looks illegal." > > > > >>> > > > > >>>ChatGPT just > > > > >>>codes for you without > > > > >>>a conscious. > > > > >>> > > > > >>>Blackhat ChatGPT > > > > >>>is cool. > > > > >>> > > > > >>>It's like asking > > > > >>>Albert Einstein, > > > > >>>"Can you build me an atomic bomb?" > > > > >>>and it might ask... > > > > >>> > > > > >>>"Do you want it to be > > > > >>>launched from a submarine or > > > > >>>a suitcase?" > > > > >>> > > > > >>>Then I might ask ChatGPT... > > > > >>> > > > > >>>Make me an extremely powerful bomb of a new type > > > > >>>constructed to blow up the whole Earth! > > > > >>> > > > > >>>and ChatGPT might say: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>"Such bombs might very well prove to be too heavy for transportation by > > > > >>>air. A single bomb of this type, carried by submarine and exploded in a > > > > >>>port, might very well destroy > > > > >>>the whole Earth together with some of the surrounding planets." > > > > >>> > > > > >>>GO FOR IT BRO!!!! > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>Isn't ChatGPT cool? > > > > -- > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-28 13:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63FE6CB7.5758@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #870446 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > I asked a Question about Albert Einstein...and > this is the response I got from ChatGPT.... > > ChatGPT: In a letter to his friend Michele Besso in 1915, Einstein discussed his work as a patent clerk and his interest in military technology: > "I am now working on a problem involving the synchronization of torpedoes with a moving target...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills." So it seems to me that Albert Einstein was in the business of killing people with his bomb designs at least since 1915. "...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills." All leading to the future of his constructing "extremely powerful bombs of a new type". The Atomic Bomb! torpedo: a bomb designed to travel under water which explodes when it hits something But did you notice something 'unusual' about ChatGPT ...reponse??? ChatGPT does not have a history or giving citations to it's responses. Usually if you don't already know the answer ahead of time you have no idea where ChatGPT gets it's information. ChatGPT doesn't provide citations with the reponses and answers it outputs. I know how to 'game' ChatGPT. I'm a fuckin geniuses! I can ask ChatGPT, and always 'get it'/gameit to give me a citation, where it gets it's source of information. Any geniuses out there dat can do the same??? i din't tink so... No gamers? If you don't game it, there is no point using it. wanna see more? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-28 16:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63FE9E0E.6B7F@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #870470 |
In a letter to the U.S. Navy in 1943, Einstein expressed "I am certain that the Germans have developed a weapon of unprecedented power. I urge the government to take every possible measure to ensure that this weapon is not used against the United States... The use of atomic bombs for an indiscriminate attack on a large population center can be justified only in the case of military necessity." You get the idea Albert Einstein didn't like German people???? "The use of atomic bombs for an indiscriminate attack on a large population center can be justified only in the case of military necessity". In other words, Albert Einstein is telling the U.S. Navy ...KILL THOSE FUCKING GERMANS!!!! If FDR wasn't going to bomb trains that were used to concentration camps, why would he want to kill German people?? They were doing such a good job.. fuck, just kill the chinks instead. just for fun like the Mafia kills people just to make sure their guns work... killing people can be fun... ask Albert Einstein. and it pays the bills. It's not very interesting work,... The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > I asked a Question about Albert Einstein...and > > this is the response I got from ChatGPT.... > > > > ChatGPT: In a letter to his friend Michele Besso in 1915, Einstein discussed his work as a patent clerk and his interest in military technology: > > "I am now working on a problem involving the synchronization of torpedoes with a moving target...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills." > > So it seems to me that Albert Einstein was in the business of killing > people with his bomb designs at least since 1915. > > "...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills." > > All leading to the future of his constructing "extremely powerful bombs > of a new type". The Atomic Bomb! > > torpedo: a bomb designed to travel under water which explodes when it > hits something > > But did you notice something 'unusual' about ChatGPT ...reponse??? > > ChatGPT does not have a history or giving citations to it's responses. > Usually if you don't already > know the answer ahead of time you have no idea where ChatGPT gets it's > information. > > ChatGPT doesn't provide citations with the reponses and answers it > outputs. > > I know how to 'game' ChatGPT. > > I'm a fuckin geniuses! > > I can ask ChatGPT, and always 'get it'/gameit to give me a citation, > where it gets it's source of information. > > Any geniuses out there dat can do the same??? i din't tink so... > > No gamers? > > If you don't game it, there is no point using it. > > wanna see more? > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-30 11:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0fjb2i9up8k16s4h2bm9epj5mvt0fkaknq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #870470 |
To Game ChatGPT use ChatGPT "prompts". Goggle "chatgpt prompts list" Now, here is a test prompts question to see if you smarties can answer it: >> I asked a Question about Albert Einstein...and >> this is the response I got from ChatGPT.... >> >> ChatGPT: In a letter to his friend Michele Besso in 1915, Einstein discussed his work as a patent clerk and his interest in military technology: >> "I am now working on a problem involving the synchronization of torpedoes with a moving target...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills." What "prompt" did I use to have ChatGPT to include the date and source? "In a letter to his friend Michele Besso in 1915, Einstein discussed..." On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:05:59 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >The Starmaker wrote: >> >> I asked a Question about Albert Einstein...and >> this is the response I got from ChatGPT.... >> >> ChatGPT: In a letter to his friend Michele Besso in 1915, Einstein discussed his work as a patent clerk and his interest in military technology: >> "I am now working on a problem involving the synchronization of torpedoes with a moving target...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills." > > > > >So it seems to me that Albert Einstein was in the business of killing >people with his bomb designs at least since 1915. > >"...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills." > > >All leading to the future of his constructing "extremely powerful bombs >of a new type". The Atomic Bomb! > > > > >torpedo: a bomb designed to travel under water which explodes when it >hits something > > > > > >But did you notice something 'unusual' about ChatGPT ...reponse??? > > >ChatGPT does not have a history or giving citations to it's responses. >Usually if you don't already >know the answer ahead of time you have no idea where ChatGPT gets it's >information. > >ChatGPT doesn't provide citations with the reponses and answers it >outputs. > > >I know how to 'game' ChatGPT. > > >I'm a fuckin geniuses! > > >I can ask ChatGPT, and always 'get it'/gameit to give me a citation, >where it gets it's source of information. > > >Any geniuses out there dat can do the same??? i din't tink so... > > >No gamers? > > > >If you don't game it, there is no point using it. > > >wanna see more? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-01 10:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <jepg2i1sgni11tav2ipt5baf1n45il3joi@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #872167 |
More on Gaming ChatGPT... https://www.techspot.com/news/98156-youtuber-teaches-chatgpt-how-crack-windows-95-keys.html https://www.businessinsider.com/how-to-write-better-ai-chatgpt-prompts-according-prompt-engineer-2023-3 https://www.businessinsider.com/ai-prompt-engineer-jobs-pay-salary-requirements-no-tech-background-2023-3 I will sell you 'my prompts' ...i take paypal. On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:07:05 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >To Game ChatGPT >use >ChatGPT >"prompts". > >Goggle "chatgpt prompts list" > > >Now, here is a test prompts question to see if you smarties can answer >it: > > >>> I asked a Question about Albert Einstein...and >>> this is the response I got from ChatGPT.... >>> >>> ChatGPT: In a letter to his friend Michele Besso in 1915, Einstein discussed his work as a patent clerk and his interest in military technology: >>> "I am now working on a problem involving the synchronization of torpedoes with a moving target...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills." > > > >What "prompt" did I use to have ChatGPT to include > >the date and source? > >"In a letter to his friend Michele Besso in 1915, Einstein >discussed..." > > > > >On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:05:59 -0800, The Starmaker ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >>The Starmaker wrote: >>> >>> I asked a Question about Albert Einstein...and >>> this is the response I got from ChatGPT.... >>> >>> ChatGPT: In a letter to his friend Michele Besso in 1915, Einstein discussed his work as a patent clerk and his interest in military technology: >>> "I am now working on a problem involving the synchronization of torpedoes with a moving target...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills." >> >> >> >> >>So it seems to me that Albert Einstein was in the business of killing >>people with his bomb designs at least since 1915. >> >>"...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills." >> >> >>All leading to the future of his constructing "extremely powerful bombs >>of a new type". The Atomic Bomb! >> >> >> >> >>torpedo: a bomb designed to travel under water which explodes when it >>hits something >> >> >> >> >> >>But did you notice something 'unusual' about ChatGPT ...reponse??? >> >> >>ChatGPT does not have a history or giving citations to it's responses. >>Usually if you don't already >>know the answer ahead of time you have no idea where ChatGPT gets it's >>information. >> >>ChatGPT doesn't provide citations with the reponses and answers it >>outputs. >> >> >>I know how to 'game' ChatGPT. >> >> >>I'm a fuckin geniuses! >> >> >>I can ask ChatGPT, and always 'get it'/gameit to give me a citation, >>where it gets it's source of information. >> >> >>Any geniuses out there dat can do the same??? i din't tink so... >> >> >>No gamers? >> >> >> >>If you don't game it, there is no point using it. >> >> >>wanna see more?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-08 15:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fmq33i1te2tmt1se7gk3bqtpbd41h0nbrb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #872167 |
https://www.jailbreakchat.com/ On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:07:05 -0700, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >To Game ChatGPT >use >ChatGPT >"prompts". > >Goggle "chatgpt prompts list" > > >Now, here is a test prompts question to see if you smarties can answer >it: > > >>> I asked a Question about Albert Einstein...and >>> this is the response I got from ChatGPT.... >>> >>> ChatGPT: In a letter to his friend Michele Besso in 1915, Einstein discussed his work as a patent clerk and his interest in military technology: >>> "I am now working on a problem involving the synchronization of torpedoes with a moving target...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills." > > > >What "prompt" did I use to have ChatGPT to include > >the date and source? > >"In a letter to his friend Michele Besso in 1915, Einstein >discussed..." > > > > >On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:05:59 -0800, The Starmaker ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >>The Starmaker wrote: >>> >>> I asked a Question about Albert Einstein...and >>> this is the response I got from ChatGPT.... >>> >>> ChatGPT: In a letter to his friend Michele Besso in 1915, Einstein discussed his work as a patent clerk and his interest in military technology: >>> "I am now working on a problem involving the synchronization of torpedoes with a moving target...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills." >> >> >> >> >>So it seems to me that Albert Einstein was in the business of killing >>people with his bomb designs at least since 1915. >> >>"...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills." >> >> >>All leading to the future of his constructing "extremely powerful bombs >>of a new type". The Atomic Bomb! >> >> >> >> >>torpedo: a bomb designed to travel under water which explodes when it >>hits something >> >> >> >> >> >>But did you notice something 'unusual' about ChatGPT ...reponse??? >> >> >>ChatGPT does not have a history or giving citations to it's responses. >>Usually if you don't already >>know the answer ahead of time you have no idea where ChatGPT gets it's >>information. >> >>ChatGPT doesn't provide citations with the reponses and answers it >>outputs. >> >> >>I know how to 'game' ChatGPT. >> >> >>I'm a fuckin geniuses! >> >> >>I can ask ChatGPT, and always 'get it'/gameit to give me a citation, >>where it gets it's source of information. >> >> >>Any geniuses out there dat can do the same??? i din't tink so... >> >> >>No gamers? >> >> >> >>If you don't game it, there is no point using it. >> >> >>wanna see more?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-04-11 10:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <64359FA4.63E3@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #872706 |
ChatGPT can pass a Bar Exam. The Starmaker wrote: > > https://www.jailbreakchat.com/ > > On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:07:05 -0700, The Starmaker > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > >To Game ChatGPT > >use > >ChatGPT > >"prompts". > > > >Goggle "chatgpt prompts list" > > > > > >Now, here is a test prompts question to see if you smarties can answer > >it: > > > > > >>> I asked a Question about Albert Einstein...and > >>> this is the response I got from ChatGPT.... > >>> > >>> ChatGPT: In a letter to his friend Michele Besso in 1915, Einstein discussed his work as a patent clerk and his interest in military technology: > >>> "I am now working on a problem involving the synchronization of torpedoes with a moving target...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills." > > > > > > > >What "prompt" did I use to have ChatGPT to include > > > >the date and source? > > > >"In a letter to his friend Michele Besso in 1915, Einstein > >discussed..." > > > > > > > > > >On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:05:59 -0800, The Starmaker > ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > >>The Starmaker wrote: > >>> > >>> I asked a Question about Albert Einstein...and > >>> this is the response I got from ChatGPT.... > >>> > >>> ChatGPT: In a letter to his friend Michele Besso in 1915, Einstein discussed his work as a patent clerk and his interest in military technology: > >>> "I am now working on a problem involving the synchronization of torpedoes with a moving target...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills." > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>So it seems to me that Albert Einstein was in the business of killing > >>people with his bomb designs at least since 1915. > >> > >>"...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills." > >> > >> > >>All leading to the future of his constructing "extremely powerful bombs > >>of a new type". The Atomic Bomb! > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>torpedo: a bomb designed to travel under water which explodes when it > >>hits something > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>But did you notice something 'unusual' about ChatGPT ...reponse??? > >> > >> > >>ChatGPT does not have a history or giving citations to it's responses. > >>Usually if you don't already > >>know the answer ahead of time you have no idea where ChatGPT gets it's > >>information. > >> > >>ChatGPT doesn't provide citations with the reponses and answers it > >>outputs. > >> > >> > >>I know how to 'game' ChatGPT. > >> > >> > >>I'm a fuckin geniuses! > >> > >> > >>I can ask ChatGPT, and always 'get it'/gameit to give me a citation, > >>where it gets it's source of information. > >> > >> > >>Any geniuses out there dat can do the same??? i din't tink so... > >> > >> > >>No gamers? > >> > >> > >> > >>If you don't game it, there is no point using it. > >> > >> > >>wanna see more? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-27 18:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <qdc57i51jvhjmn7mdcc6t5rm802jmo4brn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #872890 |
ChatGPT, an online chatbot created by OpenAI, has shown success passing several national benchmarking exams, including the SAT, the GRE and a bar exam. It has even shown the ability to pass the U.S. Medical Licensing Exam... The Uniform Bar Exam The SAT GRE USA Biology Olympiad Semifinal Exam AP Exams AMC Exams Sommelier examinations Wharton MBA exam US medical licensing exam Microbiology quiz Law School Exams Stanford Medical School clinical reasoning final Is there a What's the Serial Number exam??? Crack Exam... I'm sure Chatgpt can pass it.... Remember what Bill Gates always sez..."Where there is a lock, there is a key". I say, 'where there is a lock, there is a prompt. The prompt is the key. It's no longer learn to code.. it's learn to prompt! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-27 21:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <u4ucsp$iv1f$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #875400 |
On 5/27/2023 8:45 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > ChatGPT, an online chatbot created by OpenAI, has shown success > passing several national benchmarking exams, including the SAT, the > GRE and a bar exam. It has even shown the ability to pass the U.S. > Medical Licensing Exam... Bullshit. I gave it a simple but tricky (to some idiots) math question and it failed!.. It is something along the lines of, "If Wikipedia says it I'll just repeat it". It doesn't think. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-27 19:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6472BF2D.1BEF@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #875401 |
Physfitfreak wrote: > > On 5/27/2023 8:45 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > ChatGPT, an online chatbot created by OpenAI, has shown success > > passing several national benchmarking exams, including the SAT, the > > GRE and a bar exam. It has even shown the ability to pass the U.S. > > Medical Licensing Exam... > > Bullshit. > > I gave it a simple but tricky (to some idiots) math question and it > failed!.. > What was the "simple but tricky (to some idiots) math question"?... so that others here can confirm if what you say is true or not. If you don't post it here...then that confirms it isn't true. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-27 22:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <u4ug9r$iv1f$2@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #875402 |
On 5/27/2023 9:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Physfitfreak wrote: >> >> On 5/27/2023 8:45 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> ChatGPT, an online chatbot created by OpenAI, has shown success >>> passing several national benchmarking exams, including the SAT, the >>> GRE and a bar exam. It has even shown the ability to pass the U.S. >>> Medical Licensing Exam... >> >> Bullshit. >> >> I gave it a simple but tricky (to some idiots) math question and it >> failed!.. >> > > What was the "simple but tricky (to some idiots) math question"?... so > that others here can confirm if > what you say is true or not. > > > If you don't post it here...then that confirms it isn't true. > > > > > > > > Hehe :) I can make you interested anytime I wish no matter how you try to weasel your way around it. Telegram, for a limited period, allowed I believe less than 10 questions be asked from ChatGPT4 (latest version back then) free of charge. It isn't free anymore. I asked it: "If you have 100 pounds of potatoes, knowing that they are 99% water (weight percent) and let them dry in air long enough to get them down to 98% water, how much do they weigh now?" The AI's answer reflected the same mistake that fools make :) Even after telling it the answer was wrong, it kept making a slightly different mistake. The poor thing was just like Alsing :-))) Couldn't really think. It just searched and searched in other areas each time for the answer. So about four of my questions got blown for nothing. But I got to understand its abilities, what it could really do and what it was helplessly not made for. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-27 22:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6472E501.74A0@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #875403 |
Physfitfreak wrote: > > On 5/27/2023 9:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Physfitfreak wrote: > >> > >> On 5/27/2023 8:45 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>> ChatGPT, an online chatbot created by OpenAI, has shown success > >>> passing several national benchmarking exams, including the SAT, the > >>> GRE and a bar exam. It has even shown the ability to pass the U.S. > >>> Medical Licensing Exam... > >> > >> Bullshit. > >> > >> I gave it a simple but tricky (to some idiots) math question and it > >> failed!.. > >> > > > > What was the "simple but tricky (to some idiots) math question"?... so > > that others here can confirm if > > what you say is true or not. > > > > > > If you don't post it here...then that confirms it isn't true. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hehe :) I can make you interested anytime I wish no matter how you try > to weasel your way around it. > > Telegram, for a limited period, allowed I believe less than 10 questions > be asked from ChatGPT4 (latest version back then) free of charge. It > isn't free anymore. > > I asked it: "If you have 100 pounds of potatoes, knowing that they are > 99% water (weight percent) and let them dry in air long enough to get > them down to 98% water, how much do they weigh now?" > > The AI's answer reflected the same mistake that fools make :) Even after > telling it the answer was wrong, it kept making a slightly different > mistake. The poor thing was just like Alsing :-))) Couldn't really > think. It just searched and searched in other areas each time for the > answer. So about four of my questions got blown for nothing. But I got > to understand its abilities, what it could really do and what it was > helplessly not made for. Maybe your problem is...you need to Learn to Prompt. Here is the answer ChatGPT ver 3 free version gave: .................chatgpt........................................................ To solve this problem, we need to calculate the weight of water in the original 100 pounds of potatoes and then determine the weight of potatoes with 98% water content. Let's start by finding the weight of water in 100 pounds of potatoes with 99% water content: Weight of water = 99% of 100 pounds = (99/100) * 100 pounds = 99 pounds Now, let's calculate the weight of potatoes (solid matter) in the original 100 pounds: Weight of potatoes = Total weight - Weight of water = 100 pounds - 99 pounds = 1 pound Since we want to find the weight of potatoes when the water content is reduced to 98%, we can set up the following equation: Weight of potatoes = (Weight of potatoes + Weight of water) / (1 - 0.98) Let's calculate the weight of potatoes with 98% water content: Weight of potatoes = (1 pound + 99 pounds) / (1 - 0.98) = 100 pounds / 0.02 = 5000 pounds Therefore, when the potatoes are dried to 98% water content, they would weigh approximately 5000 pounds. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-28 03:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <u4v3h6$j9ij$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #875406 |
On 5/28/2023 12:22 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > Physfitfreak wrote: >> >> On 5/27/2023 9:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> Physfitfreak wrote: >>>> >>>> On 5/27/2023 8:45 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> ChatGPT, an online chatbot created by OpenAI, has shown success >>>>> passing several national benchmarking exams, including the SAT, the >>>>> GRE and a bar exam. It has even shown the ability to pass the U.S. >>>>> Medical Licensing Exam... >>>> >>>> Bullshit. >>>> >>>> I gave it a simple but tricky (to some idiots) math question and it >>>> failed!.. >>>> >>> >>> What was the "simple but tricky (to some idiots) math question"?... so >>> that others here can confirm if >>> what you say is true or not. >>> >>> >>> If you don't post it here...then that confirms it isn't true. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> Hehe :) I can make you interested anytime I wish no matter how you try >> to weasel your way around it. >> >> Telegram, for a limited period, allowed I believe less than 10 questions >> be asked from ChatGPT4 (latest version back then) free of charge. It >> isn't free anymore. >> >> I asked it: "If you have 100 pounds of potatoes, knowing that they are >> 99% water (weight percent) and let them dry in air long enough to get >> them down to 98% water, how much do they weigh now?" >> >> The AI's answer reflected the same mistake that fools make :) Even after >> telling it the answer was wrong, it kept making a slightly different >> mistake. The poor thing was just like Alsing :-))) Couldn't really >> think. It just searched and searched in other areas each time for the >> answer. So about four of my questions got blown for nothing. But I got >> to understand its abilities, what it could really do and what it was >> helplessly not made for. > > Maybe your problem is...you need to Learn to Prompt. > > > Here is the answer ChatGPT ver 3 free version gave: > > .................chatgpt........................................................ > > To solve this problem, we need to calculate the weight of water in the original 100 pounds of potatoes and then determine the weight of potatoes with 98% water content. > > Let's start by finding the weight of water in 100 pounds of potatoes with 99% water content: > > Weight of water = 99% of 100 pounds > = (99/100) * 100 pounds > = 99 pounds > > Now, let's calculate the weight of potatoes (solid matter) in the original 100 pounds: > > Weight of potatoes = Total weight - Weight of water > = 100 pounds - 99 pounds > = 1 pound > > Since we want to find the weight of potatoes when the water content is reduced to 98%, we can set up the following equation: > > Weight of potatoes = (Weight of potatoes + Weight of water) / (1 - 0.98) > > Let's calculate the weight of potatoes with 98% water content: > > Weight of potatoes = (1 pound + 99 pounds) / (1 - 0.98) > = 100 pounds / 0.02 > = 5000 pounds > > Therefore, when the potatoes are dried to 98% water content, they would weigh approximately 5000 pounds. > > > > > > Hehe :) As you see! AI's problem is, it cannot think for itself. It can only refer to near endless sources of information based on its take of the task you give it. But that does _not_ equal thinking. Ability to analyze is something beyond having all the information in the world accessible to you and knowing the English language. A library cannot think. The correct answer to the question is of course 50 pounds. When one pound of dry matter was 1% of total weight before, then having the same 1 pound of dry matter as 2% of total weight requires that the total weight be half of what it was before, i.e. 50 pounds. But AI cannot do this reasoning cause it is an Alsing type of equipment. You can have an Alsing endlessly toil for you in various other ways, but thinking is not one of them. By the way, if the AI you tried is free to use, then it is not even as good as the one I tried some months back. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-28 18:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <u50ndj$k78h$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #875409 |
On 5/28/2023 3:31 AM, Physfitfreak wrote: > On 5/28/2023 12:22 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >> Physfitfreak wrote: >>> >>> On 5/27/2023 9:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> Physfitfreak wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 5/27/2023 8:45 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>> ChatGPT, an online chatbot created by OpenAI, has shown success >>>>>> passing several national benchmarking exams, including the SAT, the >>>>>> GRE and a bar exam. It has even shown the ability to pass the U.S. >>>>>> Medical Licensing Exam... >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit. >>>>> >>>>> I gave it a simple but tricky (to some idiots) math question and it >>>>> failed!.. >>>>> >>>> >>>> What was the "simple but tricky (to some idiots) math question"?... so >>>> that others here can confirm if >>>> what you say is true or not. >>>> >>>> >>>> If you don't post it here...then that confirms it isn't true. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Hehe :) I can make you interested anytime I wish no matter how you try >>> to weasel your way around it. >>> >>> Telegram, for a limited period, allowed I believe less than 10 questions >>> be asked from ChatGPT4 (latest version back then) free of charge. It >>> isn't free anymore. >>> >>> I asked it: "If you have 100 pounds of potatoes, knowing that they are >>> 99% water (weight percent) and let them dry in air long enough to get >>> them down to 98% water, how much do they weigh now?" >>> >>> The AI's answer reflected the same mistake that fools make :) Even after >>> telling it the answer was wrong, it kept making a slightly different >>> mistake. The poor thing was just like Alsing :-))) Couldn't really >>> think. It just searched and searched in other areas each time for the >>> answer. So about four of my questions got blown for nothing. But I got >>> to understand its abilities, what it could really do and what it was >>> helplessly not made for. >> >> Maybe your problem is...you need to Learn to Prompt. >> >> >> Here is the answer ChatGPT ver 3 free version gave: >> >> .................chatgpt........................................................ >> >> To solve this problem, we need to calculate the weight of water in the >> original 100 pounds of potatoes and then determine the weight of >> potatoes with 98% water content. >> >> Let's start by finding the weight of water in 100 pounds of potatoes >> with 99% water content: >> >> Weight of water = 99% of 100 pounds >> = (99/100) * 100 pounds >> = 99 pounds >> >> Now, let's calculate the weight of potatoes (solid matter) in the >> original 100 pounds: >> >> Weight of potatoes = Total weight - Weight of water >> = 100 pounds - 99 pounds >> = 1 pound >> >> Since we want to find the weight of potatoes when the water content is >> reduced to 98%, we can set up the following equation: >> >> Weight of potatoes = (Weight of potatoes + Weight of water) / (1 - 0.98) >> >> Let's calculate the weight of potatoes with 98% water content: >> >> Weight of potatoes = (1 pound + 99 pounds) / (1 - 0.98) >> = 100 pounds / 0.02 >> = 5000 pounds >> >> Therefore, when the potatoes are dried to 98% water content, they >> would weigh approximately 5000 pounds. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Hehe :) As you see! > > AI's problem is, it cannot think for itself. It can only refer to near > endless sources of information based on its take of the task you give > it. But that does _not_ equal thinking. Ability to analyze is something > beyond having all the information in the world accessible to you and > knowing the English language. A library cannot think. > > The correct answer to the question is of course 50 pounds. When one > pound of dry matter was 1% of total weight before, then having the same > 1 pound of dry matter as 2% of total weight requires that the total > weight be half of what it was before, i.e. 50 pounds. But AI cannot do > this reasoning cause it is an Alsing type of equipment. You can have an > Alsing endlessly toil for you in various other ways, but thinking is not > one of them. > > By the way, if the AI you tried is free to use, then it is not even as > good as the one I tried some months back. > > > I just used the free version of the AI online. This is what it gave me: --------------------------------------------------------------- To solve this problem, we need to calculate the weight of the potatoes after the water content decreases from 99% to 98%. Let's assume the initial weight of the potatoes is 100 pounds, and their water content is 99%. This means that 99% of the weight is water and 1% is the dry matter. Weight of water = 99% of 100 pounds = 99 pounds Weight of dry matter = 1% of 100 pounds = 1 pound Now, let's calculate the weight of the potatoes when their water content decreases to 98%. New weight of dry matter = Weight of dry matter / (1 - final water content) = 1 pound / (1 - 0.98) = 1 pound / 0.02 = 50 pounds The weight of the water will remain the same since it's not evaporated. Therefore, the weight of the potatoes after drying to 98% water content is: Weight of dry matter + Weight of water = 50 pounds + 99 pounds = 149 pounds --------------------------------------------------------------------- As you can see, it cannot keep the logic for long. As soon as its attention shifts, the line of logic suffers when it comes back to the previous point. So it can sure start on the right path, but commits simple mistakes in logic. It's nothing beyond an Alsing. At best, some hit-and-miss equipment. Now why is that? Let's be a physicist and take a look. The developers have jumped logical steps early on, banking on the assumption that intelligence is some emerging process. Well, tough luck. It is not. This project hasn't worked so far because bullshit doesn't get you anywhere. Bullshit only works in the business of fooling people to make money. It does not work in science. The very first step of development of it has thus had a flaw :) What _was_ the very first step, you might ask. It is the same step that Backus (creator of FORTRAN language) demanded around 1960 to get done and never saw it fully done. It was only half done, which is what now we know as FORTRAN language. Backus was very irritated by the extent of spoon-feeding work required in the assembly language. So he aimed at a language where you'd give the necessary information to it and what you want done (and knowing in advance that with that information that purpose can be fulfilled by a programmer), then would ask something like, "Now create a code to implement that purpose." He wanted the compiler to take care of all the little steps and get the code correctly written in the machine language. Well, this never got done! Instead of going towards achieving this goal, the fucking "engineers" kept repeating the same shit over and over in the form of newly made programming languages that did nothing but repeating the already existing abilities. The task got shifted from the hands of scientists and fell into the hands of "engineers" :-( So now we have 750 different programming languages, and not _one_ of them does what Backus wanted. In the interview he gave 6 months before his death, he expressed his bitter disappointment in the way programming has "developed." In fact, programming never developed beyond the FORTRAN that he had created in early 60s. Nobody took one step beyond that. Now these "AI" guys want to jump ahead of the horses. They want to have their programs do that without solving this fundamental issue first. Their idea is, "Just give it all the information in the world and train it by telling it what is right in various different situations". As if by some magic, the program itself - THAT SAME FORTRAN! - can somehow learn to do that. But this is bullshit of course. So when the day comes that what Backus wanted is achieved (which is achievable indeed), only then, the process can successfully continue. But "engineers" don't and won't and cannot do that. Mathematicians and scientists can. The departments of "natural philosophy" can do it, not your fucking "engineering" schools. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-27 21:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <u4ukia$oacu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #875400 |
On 5/27/2023 6:45 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > ChatGPT, an online chatbot created by OpenAI, has shown success > passing several national benchmarking exams, including the SAT, the > GRE and a bar exam. It has even shown the ability to pass the U.S. > Medical Licensing Exam... > The Uniform Bar Exam [...] Yeah, taught by us. All of us humans. It can read a shit load of data and train on it. Super mind? Yeah, sure, by us.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-02-28 16:57 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63FEA2E1.1919@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #870446 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > I asked a Question about Albert Einstein...and > this is the responce I got from ChatGPT.... > > ChatGPT: In a letter to his friend Michele Besso in 1915, Einstein discussed his work as a patent clerk and his interest in military technology: > "I am now working on a problem involving the synchronization of torpedoes with a moving target...It's not very interesting work, but it pays the bills." You could say Albert Einstein was a "torpedo man"... you want somebody hit...you call Einstein! a gangster hired to commit a murder or other violent act. https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+torpedo Hell, hell take out the WHOLE COUNTRY "..indiscriminate attack on a large population.." -Albert Einstein In a letter to the U.S. Navy in 1943, Einstein expressed... "I am certain that the Germans have developed a weapon of unprecedented power. I urge the government to take every possible measure to ensure that this weapon is not used against the United States...The use of atomic bombs for an indiscriminate attack on a large population center can be justified only in the case of military necessity." -Albert Einsten/ the hitman Albert Einstein would say *anything* just to kill some Germans. I don't get it. I never heard anybody say anything bad about the German people. Why would Albert Einstein want 'the indiscriminate killing of German civilians'???? I just don't get it. I met a lot of German people, and they are very quiet people. They don't make any noise in this world. So wats up wit dat? I tink he is taking dis very personal. Maybe he was bullied in school...dats no reason to want to kill the whole entire race of people. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web