Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #611720

Re: ChatGPT

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
> On 5/27/2023 9:40 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Physfitfreak wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/27/2023 8:45 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>> ChatGPT, an online chatbot created by OpenAI, has shown success
> >>> passing several national benchmarking exams, including the SAT, the
> >>> GRE and a bar exam. It has even shown the ability to pass the U.S.
> >>> Medical Licensing Exam...
> >>
> >> Bullshit.
> >>
> >> I gave it a simple but tricky (to some idiots) math question and it
> >> failed!..
> >>
> >
> > What was the "simple but tricky (to some idiots) math question"?... so
> > that others here can confirm if
> > what you say is true or not.
> >
> >
> > If you don't post it here...then that confirms it isn't true.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Hehe :) I can make you interested anytime I wish no matter how you try
> to weasel your way around it.
> 
> Telegram, for a limited period, allowed I believe less than 10 questions
> be asked from ChatGPT4 (latest version back then) free of charge. It
> isn't free anymore.
> 
> I asked it: "If you have 100 pounds of potatoes, knowing that they are
> 99% water (weight percent) and let them dry in air long enough to get
> them down to 98% water, how much do they weigh now?"
> 
> The AI's answer reflected the same mistake that fools make :) Even after
> telling it the answer was wrong, it kept making a slightly different
> mistake. The poor thing was just like Alsing :-))) Couldn't really
> think. It just searched and searched in other areas each time for the
> answer. So about four of my questions got blown for nothing. But I got
> to understand its abilities, what it could really do and what it was
> helplessly not made for.

Maybe your problem is...you need to Learn to Prompt.


Here is the answer ChatGPT ver 3 free version gave:

.................chatgpt........................................................

To solve this problem, we need to calculate the weight of water in the original 100 pounds of potatoes and then determine the weight of potatoes with 98% water content.

Let's start by finding the weight of water in 100 pounds of potatoes with 99% water content:

Weight of water = 99% of 100 pounds
= (99/100) * 100 pounds
= 99 pounds

Now, let's calculate the weight of potatoes (solid matter) in the original 100 pounds:

Weight of potatoes = Total weight - Weight of water
= 100 pounds - 99 pounds
= 1 pound

Since we want to find the weight of potatoes when the water content is reduced to 98%, we can set up the following equation:

Weight of potatoes = (Weight of potatoes + Weight of water) / (1 - 0.98)

Let's calculate the weight of potatoes with 98% water content:

Weight of potatoes = (1 pound + 99 pounds) / (1 - 0.98)
= 100 pounds / 0.02
= 5000 pounds

Therefore, when the potatoes are dried to 98% water content, they would weigh approximately 5000 pounds.






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-05-27 18:45 -0700
  Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-27 21:05 -0500
    Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-05-27 19:40 -0700
      Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-27 22:03 -0500
        Re: ChatGPT The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-05-27 22:22 -0700
          Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 03:31 -0500
            Re: ChatGPT Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 02:09 -0700
            Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-05-28 18:17 -0500
              Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-12 01:13 -0500
                Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:01 -0500
                Re: ChatGPT Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 08:32 -0500
                Re: ChatGPT Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 06:49 -0700
                Re: ChatGPT Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 06:42 -0700
                Re: ChatGPT Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-19 15:51 +0200
                Re: ChatGPT Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 12:05 -0700
                Re: ChatGPT Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 12:12 -0700
  Re: ChatGPT "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-05-27 21:16 -0700

csiph-web