Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #892680

Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)

From Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, sci.math
Subject Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)
Date 2025-05-04 19:57 -0500
Organization Modern Human
Message-ID <vv92e5$889v$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References <vq8jho$12o5t$1@solani.org> <67C80130.547A@ix.netcom.com> <b6cgsjdd02rkpe0ns4hp6thfume08a15jl@4ax.com> <vv8mn0$838a$1@solani.org> <vv8sc4$81nv$1@solani.org>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 5/4/25 6:14 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
> 
> In a show of force, today, against Hegseth's nasty anti-Iranian remarks 
> and threats, Iran unveiled her newest most advanced missile :-)
> 
> Action in response to words! I like that :)
> 
> But guess what, this one, cannot be stopped by your THAAD system. It'll 
> fly through it in a manner impossible for your systems to really know 
> where it's going, what the path is, what its target is, almost like it's 
> not even there. Do you have anything better than THAAD, Her Hegseth?
> 
> No, you can't defend your crews and equipment against Iran's counter 
> attacks after you make that nice mistake.
> 
> Range is 1200 km. Super fast. Ask Japan to help you make something 
> better than your THAAD system now.
> 
> I'm wondering whether Iran reverse engineered Russians' Oreshnik 
> missiles and improved upon them, or it is the next generation type of 
> one of Iran's existing hypersonics. Literature on it is very scarce.
> 
> If THAAD cannot stop it then it is definitely more advanced than the 
> Oreshnik. Even Oreshnik is the main fear of NATO, let alone this new 
> missile unveiled today.
> 
> Precision? It hits within _one meter_ - that's about 1 yard for you 
> Bozos - of designated target! It is capable of finding the target 
> despite any and all efforts available to you to conceal targets and 
> confuse the incoming missiles.
> 
> "Every lesson we learned in testing our missiles on Israel, we have 
> implemented in this missile", said Iran's defense minister today.
> 
> The minister directly named Hegseth and the threats he made the other 
> day, and warned him what will follow if any aggression against anything 
> Iranian is made.
> 
> So, don't let your THAAD systems fool ya! Kiss them goodbye, if you want 
> to hear the truth. Sell'em to Arabs :) Israelis won't buy them anymore :-))
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



Ok, some more information about the new missile has come out. No it's 
not based on Oreshnik, but is an upgrade of the Kheybarshekan, so I'd 
say soon Houthis will have them made also cause they've already building 
models based on Kheybarshekan for more than two years.

Could it be that it was these new missiles that gave hell to Americans 
bombing Houthis? That "suddenly accuracy of what they use has greatly 
increased" comment..? Was this fact what Hegseth was referring to when 
he said, "We know what you have been doing with Houthis".. 
Hahhahhahhahhh :-)))

Poor CIA. I guess those thieves are only there to absorb Americans tax 
money, and when it comes to provide intelligence, Hegseth and military 
has to find the needed facts right inside the battle ground by getting 
hit with them in their asses!..

So is he pissed more at the CIA or at Iran? .. Hahhahhahhahahh :-))

Ok, now I see at least the sense in what Hegseth said. I thought he was 
just being a Nazi. But he threatened to retaliate, so ... you're welcome 
to it! I like to see the outcome. Been waiting for it for a long, long 
time. Stuff need to get settled, right?

The fact that the missiles were unveiled right after Hegseth hinted at 
knowing their existence, also, points to Hegseth meaning these missiles 
cause there'd be no point for Iran to keep their existence hidden anymore.

So looks like Houthis also have them!.. None of what Houthis have hit 
Israel with have been very accurate, so I doubt they've used this new 
ones on them yet. But the way Truman ran away from Yemen so quickly sure 
indicates it got a good taste of them :) It could've been the force of 
explosion that threw the jet (or jets) in the waters.

Another piece of news in Telegram channel is that the probability of 
stopping these new missiles is only 2.5% for the best of air defense 
that Israeli and Americans can muster. So if Iran launches 200 of them, 
only 5 of them will get intercepted. The rest will meet their targets 
within one meter of them! This is a force to reckon with. I like that. 
It could, by itself, keep the region safe from Nazis of all sorts.

And the last bit of news I found about this is that Iran's defense 
minister today informed all neighboring countries of Iran emphasizing 
that although Iran is 100% behind them and considers them her brothers, 
in case of American aggression against Iran the American bases in their 
lands and ports will be primary targets of Iran, and will be attacked 
and destroyed without meaning any animosity from Iran towards those 
neighbors themselves. He made this fact very clear for them.

Ok, so now things are beginning to make sense. Now Trump might have a 
chance to continue the talk because the military option is a bit less 
favored. Don't forget that if the Nazis say bullshit in the news media 
about Iran it is to keep Israelis temporarily at bay (and deposit the 
handouts). It won't mean much other than that.








Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-05-04 16:37 -0500
  Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-05-04 18:14 -0500
    Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-05-04 19:57 -0500
      Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-05-04 23:56 -0500
        Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 12:15 -0500
          Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 12:34 -0500
            Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 20:07 -0500
              Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-06 03:37 +0000

csiph-web