Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #892598
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) |
| Date | 2025-04-27 12:11 -0500 |
| Organization | Modern Human |
| Message-ID | <vulog2$i8jn$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <vq8jho$12o5t$1@solani.org> <67C80130.547A@ix.netcom.com> <b6cgsjdd02rkpe0ns4hp6thfume08a15jl@4ax.com> <vuljhp$i6jb$1@solani.org> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 4/27/25 10:47 AM, Physfitfreak wrote: > > > > The careless handling of safety measures at one of the largest ports in > the region, that of Bandar Abbas, has led to explosion of chemical > material and a huge fire that is still going after 36 hours. > > This will definitely impact the degree of confidence China will have in > the future to have the Silk Road pass through Iran. > > A good lesson for the managers involved in the port, but at a great cost > to Iranians. > > Some say there's been sabotage, but there are a few survivors who > eyewitnessed how the fire started and got worse and worse, and ran away > in time before the huge explosion. > > The whole safety design of the port has flaws. The safety measures were > likely that of a much smaller sized port. They allowed the port to get > larger and larger without adjusting the safety precautions to the new > dangers. Now they're a bunch of sorry asses and nothing else. > > It is the best that could happen for enemies of Iran and competitors in > the coming Silk Road businesses. > > We'll see how Iran handles the consequences, especially what options > they have with China that are still left intact. What a shame. > > > And people learn a bit of physics too, from such explosions: Ground waves travel faster than air waves :) This office is located at a whopping 5 km distance from the site of yesterday's explosion: https://streamable.com/enluw5
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 10:47 -0500
Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 12:11 -0500
Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 13:45 -0500
Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 18:46 -0500
Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 18:55 -0500
csiph-web