Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #892598

Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)

From Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, sci.math
Subject Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-)
Date 2025-04-27 12:11 -0500
Organization Modern Human
Message-ID <vulog2$i8jn$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References <vq8jho$12o5t$1@solani.org> <67C80130.547A@ix.netcom.com> <b6cgsjdd02rkpe0ns4hp6thfume08a15jl@4ax.com> <vuljhp$i6jb$1@solani.org>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 4/27/25 10:47 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> The careless handling of safety measures at one of the largest ports in 
> the region, that of Bandar Abbas, has led to explosion of chemical 
> material and a huge fire that is still going after 36 hours.
> 
> This will definitely impact the degree of confidence China will have in 
> the future to have the Silk Road pass through Iran.
> 
> A good lesson for the managers involved in the port, but at a great cost 
> to Iranians.
> 
> Some say there's been sabotage, but there are a few survivors who 
> eyewitnessed how the fire started and got worse and worse, and ran away 
> in time before the huge explosion.
> 
> The whole safety design of the port has flaws. The safety measures were 
> likely that of a much smaller sized port. They allowed the port to get 
> larger and larger without adjusting the safety precautions to the new 
> dangers. Now they're a bunch of sorry asses and nothing else.
> 
> It is the best that could happen for enemies of Iran and competitors in 
> the coming Silk Road businesses.
> 
> We'll see how Iran handles the consequences, especially what options 
> they have with China that are still left intact. What a shame.
> 
> 
> 



And people learn a bit of physics too, from such explosions: Ground 
waves travel faster than air waves :)

This office is located at a whopping 5 km distance from the site of 
yesterday's explosion:


https://streamable.com/enluw5



Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 10:47 -0500
  Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 12:11 -0500
    Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 13:45 -0500
      Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 18:46 -0500
        Re: Poor "Jim Pennino" :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-28 18:55 -0500

csiph-web