Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #887305

Re: Scalar waves

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.math
Subject Re: Scalar waves
Date 2024-05-08 08:09 +0200
Message-ID <la0j96Fug9cU4@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <l9r8grF5u6tU3@mid.individual.net> <1qt4uxw.1icli2gavbqz1N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <v1b3v6$3rcev$2@paganini.bofh.team> <l9u4qbFj3inU4@mid.individual.net> <v1ctcu$31j7$1@paganini.bofh.team>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Am Dienstag000007, 07.05.2024 um 11:48 schrieb Parkis Escarrà:

>>>>> Therefore the Ampere measures the strength of electrical current,
>>>>> which is therefore the dimension, to which the unit Ampere belongs.
>>>> DO look up what physicists mean when they use the word 'dimension'
>>>> in the context of unit systems. It is not your fantasy meaning,
>>>
>>> both wrong, the strength is actually the Intensity, which is directly
>>> related to space and time. The coulomb is related to space and the
>>> second to time. These physicists are unable to translate units!
>>
>> Apparently you mean 'current density'.
>> But that is something else, because that quantity contains 'space' and
>> measures the current through an area-unit.
>> The usual interpretation of 'current' ignores that quantity and sums up
>> the current over the entire wire in question, while the term current
>> density does not.
> 
> "entire wire"?? you must be kidding, this usenet user doesn't know what a
> current is in physics. But that's also related to time, said above, and you
> cannot "ignore" anything, once directly not related, but connected. Just as
> a translation of pig from engilsh to swine in gearmon. It's the same pig,
> you eat alot. How many pigs did you eat along your journey?

Well, actually I mean:

the Ampere addresses the current in a conductor, which is usually a wire.

There Ampere does not say, whether the wire is thick or thin, or whether 
or not the current distributes evenly within the wire.

If you have a wire with a current of 1 A, you don't mean the 
distribution of the current within the conductor, but the sum of all 
small partial currents within that wire.

TH

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Scalar waves Ollis Kalakos <asala@asakoias.gr> - 2024-05-06 17:28 +0000
  Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-07 09:50 +0200
    Re: Scalar waves Parkis Escarrà <acr@aaase.es> - 2024-05-07 09:48 +0000
      Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-08 08:09 +0200
        Re: Scalar waves Tamerlane Oldfart Lefévre <elell@trnvffmar.fr> - 2024-05-08 08:20 +0000
          Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-11 08:12 +0200
            Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 06:59 -0700
              Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-12 10:40 -0700

csiph-web