Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #887305
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: Scalar waves |
| Date | 2024-05-08 08:09 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <la0j96Fug9cU4@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <l9r8grF5u6tU3@mid.individual.net> <1qt4uxw.1icli2gavbqz1N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <v1b3v6$3rcev$2@paganini.bofh.team> <l9u4qbFj3inU4@mid.individual.net> <v1ctcu$31j7$1@paganini.bofh.team> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Am Dienstag000007, 07.05.2024 um 11:48 schrieb Parkis Escarrà: >>>>> Therefore the Ampere measures the strength of electrical current, >>>>> which is therefore the dimension, to which the unit Ampere belongs. >>>> DO look up what physicists mean when they use the word 'dimension' >>>> in the context of unit systems. It is not your fantasy meaning, >>> >>> both wrong, the strength is actually the Intensity, which is directly >>> related to space and time. The coulomb is related to space and the >>> second to time. These physicists are unable to translate units! >> >> Apparently you mean 'current density'. >> But that is something else, because that quantity contains 'space' and >> measures the current through an area-unit. >> The usual interpretation of 'current' ignores that quantity and sums up >> the current over the entire wire in question, while the term current >> density does not. > > "entire wire"?? you must be kidding, this usenet user doesn't know what a > current is in physics. But that's also related to time, said above, and you > cannot "ignore" anything, once directly not related, but connected. Just as > a translation of pig from engilsh to swine in gearmon. It's the same pig, > you eat alot. How many pigs did you eat along your journey? Well, actually I mean: the Ampere addresses the current in a conductor, which is usually a wire. There Ampere does not say, whether the wire is thick or thin, or whether or not the current distributes evenly within the wire. If you have a wire with a current of 1 A, you don't mean the distribution of the current within the conductor, but the sum of all small partial currents within that wire. TH
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Scalar waves Ollis Kalakos <asala@asakoias.gr> - 2024-05-06 17:28 +0000
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-07 09:50 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Parkis Escarrà <acr@aaase.es> - 2024-05-07 09:48 +0000
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-08 08:09 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Tamerlane Oldfart Lefévre <elell@trnvffmar.fr> - 2024-05-08 08:20 +0000
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-11 08:12 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 06:59 -0700
Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-12 10:40 -0700
csiph-web