Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #895156

Re: energy and mass

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 21:41:50 +0100, nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
> Lodder) wrote:
> 
> >john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 20:52:48 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On 19/02/2026 7:49 am, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> >> >> On 02/18/2026 12:43 PM, Python wrote:
> >> >>> Le 18/02/2026 à 20:13, Ross Finlayson a écrit :
> >> >>> ..
> >> >>>> and, you know, magnetic monopoles, is widely employed
> >> >>>> in medical imaging and the like.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> No.
> >> >>
> >> >> Resonance imaging (NMR) is a thoroughly different mechanism
> >> >> than Roentgen rays.
> >> >
> >> >But as the name implies, it's nuclei of the atoms involved that exhibit
> >> >the resonance. It's a remarkably low energy effect, and you need
> >> >remarkably high magnetic fields to get it to give you a detectable signal.
> >>
> >> The earth's field is enough. The hydrogen resonance is about 4
> >> KHz/gauss.
> >
> ><https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-amateur-scientist-1959-04/>
> >
> >(paywalled, unfortunately)
> >
> >Jan
> 
> https://www.jstor.org/stable/26172037
> 
> This link will give you a automatic download of the FULL PDF file:
> 
> https://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/files.php?pid=89590&aid=2617
> 
> A wall is to keep 'other' people out...
> 
> i'm a quantum...i go through walls.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QK7IVpvGai4

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: energy and mass The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-02-20 01:35 -0800

csiph-web