Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #892618

Re: age of the Earth

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > At Charles Darwin's time the age of the Earth was thought to be about
> > > > > 75,000 years old.  (you won't believe how someone else came up with that
> > > > > number)
> > > > >
> > > > > He was in a rush to publish his book and noticed the numbers were
> > > > > wrong...
> > > > > ...he knew
> > > > > eventually somebody would have
> > > > > figured out you cannot change a fish to a man in 75,000 years.
> > > > >
> > > > > So he, 'made up a number'!
> > > > >
> > > > > Then when he published his book, (origin of species 1859) he wrote the
> > > > > age of the earth to be
> > > > > 306,662,400 years old.
> > > > >
> > > > > The equiptment he needed to determine the age of the earth wasn't
> > > > > invented untill 1905 using radioactive decay.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, he made up any number to fit the facts of his book. He lied. But how
> > > > > come nobody out there sez he lied????
> > > > >
> > > > > What else did Charles Darwin make up? the WHOLE book Origin of the
> > > > > Species????
> > > >
> > > > "Charles Darwin Theory determines what he observes."
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hell, Newton came out with the age of the earth at 50,000..
> > >
> > > who knows how he came out with that number?
> > >
> > > How about that number 75,000????
> > >
> > > In 1779 the Comte du Buffon tried to obtain a value for the age of Earth
> > > using an experiment: he created a small globe that resembled Earth in
> > >  composition and then measured its rate of cooling. This led him to
> > > estimate that Earth was about 75,000 years old.
> > >
> > > The age of the earth is the exact number of the age of the
> > > universe....eventually it will catch up with it.
> > >
> > > Somebody is holding you guys back..
> > >
> >
> > Okay, if you look at the History of the age of the earth, the numbers go up and up and up and up...
> >
> > and it stops at  4.54 billion.
> >
> > Why did it stop? and Why did it stop at the year 1956????
> >
> > Somebody is holding you guys back..you are not allowed to think...forward.
> >
> > Yous need permission to ..think.
> >
> > I don't have that problem. I already know the age of the earth is the same age of the universe. It's irrefutable!
> >
> > In fact, look up at the Big Dipper, it's the same age of the universe.
> >
> > Now yous people don't realy understand Stars and it's arrangement..
> > Yes, it is arranged as you see it.
> >
> > Now, this part you never heard before...
> >
> > every star you see has a twin..
> > but the twin is at the other side
> > of the universe...and that twin has a twin, and that
> > twin has a twin at the other side of the universe..
> > and that twin has a twin, and that
> > twin has a twin at the other side of the universe.
> >
> > That's a total of 4 stars.
> >
> > You can actually find each twin by
> > simply
> > drawing a straight line and that line will reach'
> > directly without any interferences from
> > any other star.
> >
> > All stars have 4 twins.
> >
> > Each twin is located in the next dimension..
> > 4 dimensions...visible dimensions.
> 
> All 4 stars are twins or copies of each other..
> each one in a different dimension. You can actualy draw a
> straight line to each one and it forms a perfect square.
> 
> All stars have a copy of itself in another dimension, and
> there are only 4 dimensions.
> 
> Now imagine drawing billons of straight lines that form perfect
> squares. You have billons of squares. From a far..the stard appear
>  to be scattered, but are they?
> 
> If each star has a copy of itself, in another dimension, in the
> same 'position' of it's copy in each dimension...then
> all stars in the universe are arranged in order.
> In one dimension it appears scattered..but the second dimension
> contains a mirror reflection of it's first dimension.
> 4 reflections, 4 dimensions....all connected.
> 
> There is a center to the 4 dimensions.
> 
> It's a star. One star. No twins.
> 
> It holds all 4 dimensions together.
> 
>     The Starmaker



i forgot to mention that all these stars in 4 dimensions are located
Before the big bang.

So, there isn't any fourth dimensions of time.

Time didn't exist until After the big bang....t=0



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

age of the Earth The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-19 23:59 -0700
  Re: age of the Earth The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-20 00:12 -0700
    Re: age of the Earth The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-22 06:45 -0700
      Re: age of the Earth bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-22 22:14 +0000
      Re: age of the Earth nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-04-23 09:47 +0200
        Re: age of the Earth bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-23 11:56 +0000
      Re: age of the Earth The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-24 00:44 -0700
        Re: age of the Earth The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-24 22:35 -0700
        Re: age of the Earth The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-24 23:02 -0700
          Re: age of the Earth The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-30 20:40 -0700
            Re: age of the Earth The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-30 20:47 -0700
              Re: age of the Earth bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-01 06:34 +0000
                Re: age of the Earth The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-02 08:58 -0700
                Re: age of the Earth bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-04 02:29 +0000
  Re: age of the Earth nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-04-20 14:53 +0200
    Re: age of the Earth bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-20 13:45 +0000
      Re: age of the Earth Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-20 13:53 -0500
        Re: age of the Earth bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-21 00:43 +0000
      Re: age of the Earth nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-04-20 22:10 +0200
        Re: age of the Earth bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-20 23:06 +0000
          Re: age of the Earth nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-04-21 11:43 +0200
            Re: age of the Earth bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-21 10:27 +0000
              Re: age of the Earth nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-04-21 13:06 +0200
                Re: age of the Earth bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-21 14:24 +0000
            Re: age of the Earth Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-21 12:50 -0500
              Re: age of the Earth nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-04-22 11:03 +0200
                Re: age of the Earth bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-04-22 10:36 +0000
      Re: age of the Earth nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-04-20 22:10 +0200
        Re: age of the Earth Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-20 20:44 -0500
          Re: age of the Earth nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-04-21 11:43 +0200
            Re: age of the Earth Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-04-21 13:49 -0500
    Re: age of the Earth The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-04-20 11:27 -0700
  Re: age of the Earth Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-04-21 12:35 +0200
    Re: age of the Earth bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-05-01 06:36 +0000

csiph-web