Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: age of the Earth Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:40:53 -0700 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 135 Message-ID: <6812ED45.29FF@ix.netcom.com> References: <68049B4B.7353@ix.netcom.com> <68049E47.108D@ix.netcom.com> <68079D66.1F88@ix.netcom.com> <6809EBF8.4C84@ix.netcom.com> <680B255E.112F@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 01 May 2025 05:40:41 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e5a4b58b5743ff90dfd653216063812b"; logging-data="1922566"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+/xFWGxNtW1ghQ4pTdKqWGh5mIyqUXN7I=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:NWk1pe2AetPOrYSS5+1IkiWP8eQ= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 250430-10, 04/30/2025), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:892618 sci.physics.relativity:663214 The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > At Charles Darwin's time the age of the Earth was thought to be about > > > > > 75,000 years old. (you won't believe how someone else came up with that > > > > > number) > > > > > > > > > > He was in a rush to publish his book and noticed the numbers were > > > > > wrong... > > > > > ...he knew > > > > > eventually somebody would have > > > > > figured out you cannot change a fish to a man in 75,000 years. > > > > > > > > > > So he, 'made up a number'! > > > > > > > > > > Then when he published his book, (origin of species 1859) he wrote the > > > > > age of the earth to be > > > > > 306,662,400 years old. > > > > > > > > > > The equiptment he needed to determine the age of the earth wasn't > > > > > invented untill 1905 using radioactive decay. > > > > > > > > > > So, he made up any number to fit the facts of his book. He lied. But how > > > > > come nobody out there sez he lied???? > > > > > > > > > > What else did Charles Darwin make up? the WHOLE book Origin of the > > > > > Species???? > > > > > > > > "Charles Darwin Theory determines what he observes." > > > > > > > > > > Hell, Newton came out with the age of the earth at 50,000.. > > > > > > who knows how he came out with that number? > > > > > > How about that number 75,000???? > > > > > > In 1779 the Comte du Buffon tried to obtain a value for the age of Earth > > > using an experiment: he created a small globe that resembled Earth in > > > composition and then measured its rate of cooling. This led him to > > > estimate that Earth was about 75,000 years old. > > > > > > The age of the earth is the exact number of the age of the > > > universe....eventually it will catch up with it. > > > > > > Somebody is holding you guys back.. > > > > > > > Okay, if you look at the History of the age of the earth, the numbers go up and up and up and up... > > > > and it stops at 4.54 billion. > > > > Why did it stop? and Why did it stop at the year 1956???? > > > > Somebody is holding you guys back..you are not allowed to think...forward. > > > > Yous need permission to ..think. > > > > I don't have that problem. I already know the age of the earth is the same age of the universe. It's irrefutable! > > > > In fact, look up at the Big Dipper, it's the same age of the universe. > > > > Now yous people don't realy understand Stars and it's arrangement.. > > Yes, it is arranged as you see it. > > > > Now, this part you never heard before... > > > > every star you see has a twin.. > > but the twin is at the other side > > of the universe...and that twin has a twin, and that > > twin has a twin at the other side of the universe.. > > and that twin has a twin, and that > > twin has a twin at the other side of the universe. > > > > That's a total of 4 stars. > > > > You can actually find each twin by > > simply > > drawing a straight line and that line will reach' > > directly without any interferences from > > any other star. > > > > All stars have 4 twins. > > > > Each twin is located in the next dimension.. > > 4 dimensions...visible dimensions. > > All 4 stars are twins or copies of each other.. > each one in a different dimension. You can actualy draw a > straight line to each one and it forms a perfect square. > > All stars have a copy of itself in another dimension, and > there are only 4 dimensions. > > Now imagine drawing billons of straight lines that form perfect > squares. You have billons of squares. From a far..the stard appear > to be scattered, but are they? > > If each star has a copy of itself, in another dimension, in the > same 'position' of it's copy in each dimension...then > all stars in the universe are arranged in order. > In one dimension it appears scattered..but the second dimension > contains a mirror reflection of it's first dimension. > 4 reflections, 4 dimensions....all connected. > > There is a center to the 4 dimensions. > > It's a star. One star. No twins. > > It holds all 4 dimensions together. > > The Starmaker i forgot to mention that all these stars in 4 dimensions are located Before the big bang. So, there isn't any fourth dimensions of time. Time didn't exist until After the big bang....t=0 -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.