Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #891449

Re: 1905

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> 
> W dniu 20.02.2025 o 17:55, The Starmaker pisze:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> In Albert Einstein's 1905 paper,  he didn't even 'mentioned' Gravity once.
> >>>>
> >>>> Why do you suppose that was????
> >>>>
> >>>> The answer is very simple...
> >>>>
> >>>> Albert Einstein HATED Isaac Newton with a PASSION!
> >>>>
> >>>> (including all his friends)
> >>>>
> >>>> You know how these religious gangsters behave, they got together and
> >>>>
> >>>> said..."LET'S FUCK UP THIS NEWTON MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"
> >>>>
> >>>> So, In Albert Einstein's 1905 paper,  he didn't even 'mentioned' Gravity once...not even once!
> >>>>
> >>>> But the PASSION continued...
> >>>>
> >>>> Albert Einstein created a new theory of relativity that all it did was contained Gravity, with one little
> >>>> difference...the goal only was to FUCK UP DAT NEWTON GUY!!!
> >>>>
> >>>> Albert Einstein spent 10 years tearing everything he could to fuck up Isaac Newton gravity.
> >>>>
> >>>> (and all his religious gangster friends backed him up to this day)
> >>>>
> >>>> anti-Newtonianism they all were...
> >>>>
> >>>> For only one reason...Isaac Newton was a CHRISTIAN with a IQ of 190...
> >>>>
> >>>> and Einstein IQ was 160.
> >>>>
> >>>> His religious gangster community want Einstein on top of the totem pole..
> >>>>
> >>>> goal, to knock off Isaac Newton.
> >>>>
> >>>> and the beat goes on...
> >>>
> >>> Not only is there no MENTION on Gravity in Albert's Einstien's 1905 paper, but no one gives
> >>> any explaination...WHY!
> >>>
> >>> The Answer IS, they didn't want to give Newton the time of day. He wasn't Jewish! They blackballed him!
> >>>
> >>> You know how these religious gangsters are...religious fanatics.
> >>>
> >>> The WORD was out! Don't even mention Newton's name...
> >>>
> >>> But, how could Abert Einstein continue on...
> >>>
> >>> so he struggled for ten years to come out with a complete opposite
> >>> of Newton's Gravity, and called it General Relativity!
> >>>
> >>> It's all about Gravity but you're not suppose to say that.
> >>>
> >>> General Relativity is just an anti-Newtonian paper.
> >>>
> >>> 1905 paper, 1915 paper are both anti-Newtonian.
> >>>
> >>> One doesn't mention anything at all, and they other he tore his ass apart!
> >>>
> >>> DESPICABLE!
> >>
> >> So, Albert Einstein put a Secret Code in General Relativity...
> >>
> >> General
> >> Gravity
> >>
> >> Both contain 7 letters
> >>
> >> General=Gravity
> >>
> >> Both start with the letter G
> >>
> >> Both have 4 consonants
> >>
> >> Both have 4 vowels
> >
> >
> > WAIT A MINUTE!!! Don'ts tells mes yous alls   believe these similarities
> > are just a...COINCIDENCE????
> 
> As he thaught and wrote German - rather yes.


Okay, you need more insight...

"Newton's law of universal gravitation states that all objects in the
universe attract each other due to gravity."

Look closely at these two words (just as albert einstein did)

"universal gravitation"

The word "universal" in German is...general.


Universal Gravity
General Gravity
General Relativity is all about...Gravity.

Albert Einstein STOLED the title idea from Isacc Newton!



Is it still just a...COINCIDENCE????




'none are so blind as those who refuse to see'














-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-19 09:42 -0800
  Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-19 10:24 -0800
    Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-19 22:49 -0800
      Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 08:37 -0800
      Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 08:55 -0800
        Re: 1905 Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-20 18:14 +0100
          Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 10:21 -0800
            Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 14:56 -0800
              Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 21:13 -0800
                Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 21:17 -0800
                Re: 1905 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-21 09:35 +0100
                Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-21 10:59 -0800
                Re: 1905 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-02-21 23:39 +0000
                Re: 1905 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-21 09:33 +0100
                Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-21 10:42 -0800
                Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-21 23:11 -0800
                Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-22 10:57 -0800
                Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-22 11:11 -0800
                Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-23 12:15 -0800
                Re: 1905 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-03-15 09:13 +0100
  Re: 1905 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-02-21 09:23 +0000

csiph-web