Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #891492
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: 1905 |
| Date | 2025-02-23 12:15 -0800 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <67BB81EC.3A31@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <m1qs1lFu6qdU6@mid.individual.net> <67B8C90E.3093@ix.netcom.com> <67B97897.76A6@ix.netcom.com> <67BA1E33.14CE@ix.netcom.com> <67BA214A.958@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
The Starmaker wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thomas Heger wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Am Freitag000021, 21.02.2025 um 06:13 schrieb The Starmaker:
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> W dniu 20.02.2025 o 17:55, The Starmaker pisze:
> > > > > >>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> In Albert Einstein's 1905 paper, he didn't even 'mentioned' Gravity once.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Why do you suppose that was????
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> The answer is very simple...
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Albert Einstein HATED Isaac Newton with a PASSION!
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> (including all his friends)
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> You know how these religious gangsters behave, they got together and
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> said..."LET'S FUCK UP THIS NEWTON MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> So, In Albert Einstein's 1905 paper, he didn't even 'mentioned' Gravity once...not even once!
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> But the PASSION continued...
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Albert Einstein created a new theory of relativity that all it did was contained Gravity, with one little
> > > > > >>>>>>>> difference...the goal only was to FUCK UP DAT NEWTON GUY!!!
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> Albert Einstein spent 10 years tearing everything he could to fuck up Isaac Newton gravity.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> (and all his religious gangster friends backed him up to this day)
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> anti-Newtonianism they all were...
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> For only one reason...Isaac Newton was a CHRISTIAN with a IQ of 190...
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> and Einstein IQ was 160.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> His religious gangster community want Einstein on top of the totem pole..
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> goal, to knock off Isaac Newton.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>>> and the beat goes on...
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> Not only is there no MENTION on Gravity in Albert's Einstien's 1905 paper, but no one gives
> > > > > >>>>>>> any explaination...WHY!
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> The Answer IS, they didn't want to give Newton the time of day. He wasn't Jewish! They blackballed him!
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> You know how these religious gangsters are...religious fanatics.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> The WORD was out! Don't even mention Newton's name...
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> But, how could Abert Einstein continue on...
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> so he struggled for ten years to come out with a complete opposite
> > > > > >>>>>>> of Newton's Gravity, and called it General Relativity!
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> It's all about Gravity but you're not suppose to say that.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> General Relativity is just an anti-Newtonian paper.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> 1905 paper, 1915 paper are both anti-Newtonian.
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> One doesn't mention anything at all, and they other he tore his ass apart!
> > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>> DESPICABLE!
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> So, Albert Einstein put a Secret Code in General Relativity...
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> General
> > > > > >>>>>> Gravity
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Both contain 7 letters
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> General=Gravity
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Both start with the letter G
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Both have 4 consonants
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Both have 4 vowels
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> WAIT A MINUTE!!! Don'ts tells mes yous alls believe these similarities
> > > > > >>>>> are just a...COINCIDENCE????
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> As he thaught and wrote German - rather yes.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Okay, you need more insight...
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> "Newton's law of universal gravitation states that all objects in the
> > > > > >>> universe attract each other due to gravity."
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Look closely at these two words (just as albert einstein did)
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> "universal gravitation"
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> The word "universal" in German is...general.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Universal Gravity
> > > > > >>> General Gravity
> > > > > >>> General Relativity is all about...Gravity.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Albert Einstein STOLED the title idea from Isacc Newton!
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Is it still just a...COINCIDENCE????
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> 'none are so blind as those who refuse to see'
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The word "general" translates to German is allgemein , and
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> the German word allgemein translates to "universal" in English.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> https://www.google.com/search?q=what+does+general+translate+in+German+mean+universally
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Universal Gravity
> > > > > >> General Gravity
> > > > > >> General Relativity is all about...Gravity.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> General Relativity means universal gravity
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> "Newton's law of universal gravitation..
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > general
> > > > > > 'jen(?)r?l
> > > > > > allgemein
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Translations of general
> > > > > > noun
> > > > > > der General
> > > > > > general
> > > > > > der Heerführer
> > > > > > army commander, general
> > > > > > adjective
> > > > > > allgemein
> > > > > > general, common, universal, overall, public, broad
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Many German words have several meanings.
> > > > >
> > > > > But the part 'Allgemeine' ('general') is not related to the military,
> > > > > but means a feature called 'general' (in the sense of 'valid in general').
> > > > >
> > > > > GR ist meant as a general form of SRT ('special theory of relativity'),
> > > > > which included accelerations and forces.
> > > > >
> > > > > The term 'special' (of 'special relativity') was meant as a certain
> > > > > restriction of SRT.
> > > > >
> > > > > SRT does not include accelerations, while GR does.
> > > > >
> > > > > TH
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > adjective
> > > > > > allgemein
> > > > > > general, common, universal, overall, public, broad
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Strange you don't seem to understand the German language?
> > > >
> > > > > > adjective
> > > > > > allgemein
> > > > > > general, common, universal, overall, public, broad
> > > >
> > > > allgemein means: common, universal, overall, public, broad
> > >
> > > Besides Albert Einstein agenda is to tear Newton apart...
> > >
> > > the title General Relativity is incorrect.
> > >
> > > "General" means 'universal', and Relativity is NOT universal, it's
> > > ...local.
> > >
> > > It's not in the 'very small' or 'very big', but only in the
> > > ...nearby...local.
> > >
> >
> > Then, Einstein begins his GR with taking Newton's equation designed for
> > a
> > Space separate from Time and tries to convert it to his
> > imaginary linked space-time.
>
> Newton's Space and Time are separate entities.
>
> Einstien's space-time are linked, entwined..
>
> Why insert Newton's equation unto Eisntein's imaginary equations?? dats stupid, or sabotage.
>
> "... under arbitrary substitutions of space-time variables. Historically they evolved in the following sequence. First, I found equations that contain the Newtonian theory as an approximation..."
>
Eisntein's only goal was to tear down Newton's Universe...completely!
Then Einstein went about with a GRAND Unified Theory! What does the word
GRAND mean? Look it up...
it's bigger than General!!!
Einstein is saying...I'M FUCKING GOD!!!!
You think JanB would've told Einstein..."Get a hobby." grand gooblydook
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-19 09:42 -0800
Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-19 10:24 -0800
Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-19 22:49 -0800
Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 08:37 -0800
Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 08:55 -0800
Re: 1905 Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-20 18:14 +0100
Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 10:21 -0800
Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 14:56 -0800
Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 21:13 -0800
Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 21:17 -0800
Re: 1905 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-21 09:35 +0100
Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-21 10:59 -0800
Re: 1905 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-02-21 23:39 +0000
Re: 1905 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-21 09:33 +0100
Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-21 10:42 -0800
Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-21 23:11 -0800
Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-22 10:57 -0800
Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-22 11:11 -0800
Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-23 12:15 -0800
Re: 1905 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-03-15 09:13 +0100
Re: 1905 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2025-02-21 09:23 +0000
csiph-web