Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #864437
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God |
| Date | 2022-11-10 21:15 -0800 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <636DDA63.36C5@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | (19 earlier) <1e4b4542-3ab2-4f97-afe4-807f999f4d75n@googlegroups.com> <tkedla$3vq68$2@dont-email.me> <636C2AD1.2F91@ix.netcom.com> <tkia1u$gjlr$1@dont-email.me> <9b8b8ea1-37c9-4950-a2d1-8c5ba8fbe993n@googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
George Hammond wrote: > > On Thursday, November 10, 2022 at 2:42:57 AM UTC-5, Everly Segreti wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > Everly Segreti wrote: > > >> George Hammond wrote: > > >> > Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first Scientific > > >> > Proof of God (SPOG) and that: – GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN > > >> > CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME > > >> > > >> I would not be that sure. What on earth is a *subjective_spacetime*, as > > >> different from *objective*?? ? > > > > > > *subjective_spacetime* is Philosophy not physics. George Hammond is more > > > into ...Philosophy, which is a dead science field. > > > > > > > [George E Hammond MS physics] > . > Okay, we have (above) 2 comments: – > . > one comment by – EVERLY SEGRETI > and > one comment by – STARMAKER > . > ... Note that Srgreti's comment is "Scientific" > while Starmaker's comment is "Philosophical" > . > To be noted here is that "Starmaker" takes his Pseudonym > from Olaf Stapledon's famous 1937 Science-Fiction Bible > entitled "Star Maker" – so he's a Science-Fiction buff > and not a scientist ! > .... On the other hand Segreti's question indicates that he > has some classical Scientific education ! > . > So let me scientifically answer Segreti's question: – > . > WHAT ON EARTH IS "SUBJFECTIVE SPACETIME" ? > . > ..... And I have already illustrated what "SUBJECTIVE SPACE" > is by pointing out the difference between a 6 month old child > looking up at the BOTTOM of a kitchen table as compared to > an 18-year-old looking down at the TOP of the table ! > .... Obviously – the TABLE looks 3 or 4 times LARGER to the > 6-month-old than it does to the 18-year-old ! That is an > illustration of "Subjective Space". > . > Okay – so much for "Subjective Space: – now we turn to > "Subjective Time". > .... Subjective time was first measured by Thomas Edison > a 120 years ago when he invented the Movie Projector ! > He first discovered that the average adult of average intelligence > required a "frame rate" of 16 frames/sec – proving that the > "perceptual speed" of the average adult is 16 bits/sec. > .... He also discovered that the speed is "age-dependent" > for children under 20 years of age. And like INTELLIGENCE > it has to be "divided by age" for people under 20 ! > .... This was the first scientific proof that "SUBJECTIVE TIME" > is age-dependent under 20 years of age – IOW just like > SUBJECTIVE SPACE time "contracts" or "slows" with age > just like SPACE does – up until the age of 20 ! > . > OKAY – there you have an explanation, a measurement, and > a SCIENTIFIC PROOF of what "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" > actually is ! > . > I HOPE THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION ! > . > And as a further final note, I point out that NO ONE EVER > REACHES FULL GROWTH – in fact the world average for > adults is only about 85% full growth (according to WHO, > UNESCO, and many other world health organizations). > . > Now: 1/.85 = 1.18 which means that the AVERAGE ADULT > actually SEES a World that is 18% LARGER and 18% FASTER > then it ACTUALLY IS – – > And it is this effect that causes the universal FEAR, TERROR, > and ANXIETY universally experienced by every person in the > World ! > . > and this phenomenon is historically > referred to as "GOD" – therefore we have now discovered the > world's first scientific proof of God !. > . > George This reeks of confirmation bias. i'm under a kitchen... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Buddie Fiore <inbe@iieuedi.du> - 2022-10-31 15:50 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-08 17:50 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-08 20:19 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 14:33 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 17:07 -0800
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-10 07:42 +0000
Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:15 -0800
csiph-web