Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #863721 > unrolled thread

Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Buddie Fiore <inbe@iieuedi.du> - 2022-10-31 15:50 +0000
    Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-08 17:50 +0000
    Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-08 20:19 +0000
      Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 14:33 -0800
        Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-09 17:07 -0800
        Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Everly Segreti <ille@leysgsei.re> - 2022-11-10 07:42 +0000
          Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-11-10 21:15 -0800

#863721 — Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God

George Hammond wrote:

>>[Starmaker]
>> Tell Prof. Athel Bowden that I said he can go fuck his mother!
>> --
> [Hammond]
> Easy for you to say

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#864273

George Hammond wrote:

> [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> .... Above I have written down my discovery of the GOD METRIC: –
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. |   =   THE METRIC OF GOD |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> And have cited its SIMPLE DERIVATION.

what kind of tensor is that? That's not even a matrix, let alone a tensor. 
You don't undrestand your tensors, my friend. Nor did Einstine, so you are 
equal.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#864280

George Hammond wrote:

> Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first Scientific Proof
> of God (SPOG) and that: –
> GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME

I would not be that sure. What on earth is a *subjective_spacetime*, as 
different from *objective*??    ?

Western media praise Ukrainian Azov soldier known for promoting Nazism 
http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/EjWlgrHw0NUe/

Pentagon terrorists admit direct involvement in war in Ukraine
http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/J8jktlZzc3YS/

American Instructors Train AFU To ＂Nato Standards＂ (How To Die Like 
Cowards)
http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/21OlRL7tvRA2/

AFU Racist Ukrainian Nazi's Beat Black American Mercenary On Their Own Side 
http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/sPw7rZKVyJ2x/

American tiktok brigade 
http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/yyYFis82zvjo/

The United States is giving Ukraine almost $2.5 million an hour, 
http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/L8vugAnuB30H/

Footage emerges of Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) DETAINING 9 
Ukrainian saboteurs 
http://%62%69%74%63%68%75%74%65.com/%76%69%64%65%6f/jeFPGiyEiLVG/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#864369

Everly Segreti wrote:
> 
> George Hammond wrote:
> 
> > Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first Scientific Proof
> > of God (SPOG) and that: –
> > GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
> 
> I would not be that sure. What on earth is a *subjective_spacetime*, as
> different from *objective*??    ?


*subjective_spacetime* is Philosophy not physics. George Hammond is more into ...Philosophy, which is a dead science field.


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#864370

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 5:33:31 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > *subjective_spacetime* is Philosophy not physics. George Hammond is more into ...Philosophy, which is a dead science field.
> > --
> >
> [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA]
> .
> WRONG: – – STARMAKER –  "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" can be measured
> to 2 decimal point accuracy in SI units (MKS units).
> .
> That means "Subjective Space-Time" is a PHYSICS MEASUREMENT,
> and not a "Philosophical Quantity".
> .
> George

Maybe you no speaky good inglish...so let's start wit de furst werd...

Subjective...
have you ever looked up the meaning?

Subjective:


based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.
"his views are highly subjective"
synonyms: personal, personalized, individual, internal, emotional, instinctive, intuitive, impressionistic, biased, prejudiced, bigoted, idiosyncratic, irrational, gut, gut reaction

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gbv=2&sxsrf=ALiCzsa6VcWdmdeJ-cjoKm7_vq90b8UyKA%3A1668040636721&q=define+subjective

1 -  philosophy : relating to the way a person experiences things in his or her own mind

    subjective reality
    Dreaming is a subjective experience.

https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/subjective


You're dreaming. WAKEUP WAKEUP! TECH SUPPORT, TECH SUPPORT!!



Physics, in general, can define, explain and measure only the objective component. The subjective component is not a subject of physics and similar sciences.

Subjective means making assumptions, making interpretations based on personal opinions without any verifiable facts.

Subjective measurement is more of an opinion.

In other words, you need to take your "Subjective Space-Time" and throw it where it belongs...in the garbage can. It's garbage!










-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#864388

The Starmaker wrote:
> Everly Segreti wrote:
>> George Hammond wrote:
>> > Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first Scientific
>> > Proof of God (SPOG) and that: – GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN
>> > CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
>> 
>> I would not be that sure. What on earth is a *subjective_spacetime*, as
>> different from *objective*??    ?
> 
> *subjective_spacetime* is Philosophy not physics. George Hammond is more
> into ...Philosophy, which is a dead science field.

sure. The WEF’s Stakeholder Capitalism Is Just Global Fascism By Another Name
https://%7a%65%72%6f%68%65%64%67%65.com/geopolitical/wefs-stakeholder-capitalism-just-global-fascism-another-name

Mussolini’s fascism is at the root of the very corporate governance that leftists applaud and lust after today. They have far more in common with fascists than they realize.

The Allied Holocaust in Dresden
https://%76%65%74%65%72%61%6e%73%74%6f%64%61%79.com/2022/11/08/the-allied-holocaust-in-dresden/

Revealed: Documents Show Bill Gates Has Given $319 Million to Media Outlets
https://%74%68%65%74%72%75%74%68%73%65%65%6b%65r.co.uk/?p=260949

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#864437

George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, November 10, 2022 at 2:42:57 AM UTC-5, Everly Segreti wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > Everly Segreti wrote:
> > >> George Hammond wrote:
> > >> > Hence it turns out I have discovered the world's first Scientific
> > >> > Proof of God (SPOG) and that: – GOD IS A (large) EINSTEINIAN
> > >> > CURVATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME
> > >>
> > >> I would not be that sure. What on earth is a *subjective_spacetime*, as
> > >> different from *objective*?? ?
> > >
> > > *subjective_spacetime* is Philosophy not physics. George Hammond is more
> > > into ...Philosophy, which is a dead science field.
> >
> >
> >
> [George E Hammond MS physics]
> .
> Okay, we have  (above) 2 comments: –
> .
> one comment by – EVERLY SEGRETI
> and
> one comment by – STARMAKER
> .
> ... Note that Srgreti's comment is "Scientific"
> while Starmaker's comment is "Philosophical"
> .
> To be noted here is that "Starmaker" takes his Pseudonym
> from Olaf Stapledon's famous 1937 Science-Fiction Bible
> entitled "Star Maker" – so he's a Science-Fiction buff
> and not a scientist !
> .... On the other hand Segreti's question indicates that he
> has some classical Scientific education !
> .
> So let me scientifically answer Segreti's question: –
> .
> WHAT ON EARTH IS "SUBJFECTIVE SPACETIME" ?
> .
> ..... And I have already illustrated what "SUBJECTIVE SPACE"
> is by pointing out the difference between a 6 month old child
> looking up at the BOTTOM of a kitchen table as compared to
> an 18-year-old looking down at the TOP of the table !
> .... Obviously – the TABLE looks 3 or 4 times LARGER to the
> 6-month-old than it does to the 18-year-old ! That is an
> illustration of "Subjective Space".
> .
> Okay – so much for "Subjective Space: – now we turn to
> "Subjective Time".
> .... Subjective time was first measured by Thomas Edison
> a 120 years ago when he invented the Movie Projector !
> He first discovered that the average adult of average intelligence
> required a "frame rate" of 16 frames/sec – proving that the
> "perceptual speed" of the average adult is 16 bits/sec.
> .... He also discovered that the speed is "age-dependent"
> for children under 20 years of age.  And like INTELLIGENCE
> it has to be "divided by age" for people under 20 !
> .... This was the first scientific proof that "SUBJECTIVE TIME"
> is age-dependent under 20 years of age – IOW just like
> SUBJECTIVE SPACE time "contracts" or "slows" with age
> just like SPACE does – up until the age of 20 !
> .
> OKAY – there you have an explanation, a measurement, and
> a SCIENTIFIC PROOF of what "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME"
> actually is !
> .
> I HOPE THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION !
> .
> And as a further final note, I point out that NO ONE EVER
> REACHES FULL GROWTH – in fact the world average for
> adults is only about 85% full growth (according to WHO,
> UNESCO, and many other world health organizations).
> .
> Now: 1/.85 = 1.18 which means that the AVERAGE ADULT
> actually SEES a World that is 18% LARGER and 18% FASTER
> then it ACTUALLY IS – –
> And it is this effect that causes the universal FEAR, TERROR,
> and ANXIETY universally experienced by every person in the
> World !
> .
> and this phenomenon is historically
> referred to as "GOD" – therefore we have now discovered the
> world's first scientific proof of God !.
> .
> George


This reeks of confirmation bias.


i'm under a kitchen...


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web