Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #602685 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-03-02 07:07 -0800 |
| Last post | 2023-03-15 09:30 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 240 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Tachyons paper published Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-02 07:07 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-02 18:34 +0100
Re: Tachyons paper published Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-02 11:39 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-02 20:00 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-02 20:32 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 09:42 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-03 10:01 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 10:18 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 17:44 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-03 19:25 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 21:04 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-04 07:09 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published Jedadiah Sultana <dija@juaadade.en> - 2023-03-04 17:13 +0000
Re: Tachyons paper published Jedadiah Sultana <dija@juaadade.en> - 2023-03-04 17:19 +0000
Re: Tachyons paper published "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-04 09:32 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2023-03-03 18:36 +0000
Re: Tachyons paper published "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 10:42 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-03 14:30 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2023-03-03 22:37 +0000
Re: Tachyons paper published "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 18:55 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 10:16 +0100
Re: Tachyons paper published Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-03 06:54 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-03 08:03 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-05 19:40 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-06 11:32 +0100
Re: Tachyons paper published Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-06 06:53 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-03-07 01:26 -0500
Re: Tachyons paper published Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-07 10:10 +0100
Re: Tachyons paper published Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-07 06:14 -0800
Crank Garry Harnagel deep delusions "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-07 08:10 -0800
Re: Crank Garry Harnagel deep delusions Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-07 08:20 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-07 08:08 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-07 08:44 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-07 10:26 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-07 10:34 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-07 15:42 -0800
Crank Gary Harnagel perseveres "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-07 16:18 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel perseveres Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-07 18:20 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel perseveres "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-07 18:34 -0800
Re: Dono can't support his assertions Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-07 20:44 -0800
Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-07 21:06 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-08 04:44 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-08 06:30 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-08 06:38 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-08 07:41 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-08 13:56 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-08 14:05 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-08 16:15 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-08 16:25 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-09 05:31 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-09 06:47 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-09 06:52 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-09 07:15 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-09 07:33 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-09 11:13 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-10 15:46 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 16:24 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-10 16:47 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper Woodruff Cavallo <rodr@duaorl.na> - 2023-03-11 01:10 +0000
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 19:26 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper Woodruff Cavallo <rodr@duaorl.na> - 2023-03-11 03:55 +0000
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 19:57 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper Woodruff Cavallo <rodr@duaorl.na> - 2023-03-11 04:05 +0000
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 20:07 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper Woodruff Cavallo <rodr@duaorl.na> - 2023-03-11 04:11 +0000
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 20:18 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper Woodruff Cavallo <rodr@duaorl.na> - 2023-03-11 04:42 +0000
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-11 11:04 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-10 17:00 -0800
Re: Horsethief Dono displays his incompetence Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-11 13:36 -0800
Re: Horsethief Dono displays his incompetence Woodruff Cavallo <rodr@duaorl.na> - 2023-03-11 21:55 +0000
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-11 15:42 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-11 22:24 -0800
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-12 08:09 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-12 08:24 -0700
Re: Dono proves his lack of understanding Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-13 06:00 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-13 07:49 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-13 10:24 -0700
Re: Dono reveals his ignorance Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-15 08:11 -0700
Hardened crank Gary Harnagel confirms his ignorance "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 08:32 -0700
Re: Hardened ignoramus Dono confirms his ignorance and petulance again Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-15 09:11 -0700
Re: Hardened ignoramus Gary Harnagel confirms his ignorance and petulance again "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 09:21 -0700
Re: Hardened ignoramus Gary Harnagel confirms his ignorance and petulance again "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 09:26 -0700
Re: Dishonest ignoramus Dunno confirms his ignorance and petulance again Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-15 12:53 -0700
Re: Dishonest ignoramus Dunno confirms his ignorance and petulance again Carmine Benedetti <iart@aatnen.ei> - 2023-03-15 19:57 +0000
Re: Dishonest ignoramus Gary Harnagel confirms his agnorrance "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 16:39 -0700
Re: Dishonest ignoramus Gary Harnagel confirms his agnorrance Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-03-16 00:32 +0000
Re: Dishonest ignoramus Dunno Nuthinl confirms his dishonesty Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-15 20:37 -0700
Re: Dishonest ignoramus Gary Harnagel confirms his dishonesty "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 21:08 -0700
Re: Dishonest ignoramus Dono confirms his dishonesty Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-16 07:16 -0700
Re: Dishonest ignoramus Gary Harnagel confirms his dishonesty "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-16 09:03 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-16 09:42 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel in desperation mode "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-16 09:52 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-16 10:22 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel reduced to the standard crank rant aginst Einstein "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-16 10:27 -0700
Re: Dono is a lily-livered coward Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-16 11:31 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel digs himsel even deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-16 11:53 -0700
Re: Dono denigrates competent physicists Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-16 12:41 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel keeps digging himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-16 13:10 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-16 14:39 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel keeps digging himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-16 16:06 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-17 07:19 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel keeps digging himself deeper. Into shit. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-17 07:41 -0700
Re: Dono has coprophagia Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-17 10:05 -0700
Re: Dono has coprophagia "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-17 18:27 -0700
Re: Dono has coprophagia Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-17 21:04 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel keeps squirming "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-17 21:25 -0700
Re: Little Mind cranks with foolish consistency Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-18 04:32 -0700
Gary Harnagel cranks himself up "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-18 06:15 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel cranks himself up Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-18 07:02 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel cranks himself up "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-18 16:21 -0700
Re: Dono Valev doubles down on his dishonesty Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-18 20:31 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel doubles down on his dishonesty "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-19 06:51 -0700
Re: Despicable Dono doubles down of his scurrilous defamation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-19 07:36 -0700
Crank Garty Harnagel reduced to frothing at the mouth "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-19 08:22 -0700
Re: Despicable Dono doubles down of his scurrilous defamation Carmine Benedetti <iart@aatnen.ei> - 2023-03-19 16:55 +0000
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel doubles down on his dishonesty Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-19 15:47 +0100
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel doubles down on his dishonesty Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-19 08:12 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel doubles down on his dishonesty Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-19 17:09 +0100
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel doubles down on his dishonesty Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-19 09:55 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel doubles down on his dishonesty "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-19 10:12 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel doubles down on his dishonesty Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-19 13:45 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel doubles down on his dishonesty "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-19 14:10 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-19 17:41 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-19 18:46 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-19 21:12 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel reduced to frothing at the mouth "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-19 21:20 -0700
Re: Dishonest ignoramus confirms his dishonesty Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-03-16 20:05 +0200
Re: Dishonest ignoramus confirms his dishonesty Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-16 11:48 -0700
Re: Dishonest ignoramus confirms his dishonesty Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-03-17 11:54 +0200
Re: Dishonest ignoramus confirms his dishonesty Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-17 06:34 -0700
Re: Dishonest ignoramus confirms his dishonesty Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-03-17 18:53 +0200
Re: Dishonest ignoramus confirms his dishonesty Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-17 10:12 -0700
Re: Dishonest ignoramus confirms his dishonesty Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2023-03-18 17:47 +0200
Re: Dishonest ignoramus confirms his dishonesty Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-18 09:15 -0700
Re: Hardened ignoramus Dono confirms his ignorance and petulance again Carmine Benedetti <iart@aatnen.ei> - 2023-03-15 19:27 +0000
Re: Dono reveals his ignorance Carmine Benedetti <iart@aatnen.ei> - 2023-03-15 22:56 +0000
Re: Dono reveals his ignorance "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 18:32 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-19 19:00 -0700
Re: Dono proves he hasn't understood my paper Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-19 21:28 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel is made to realize that his " paper" is pure garbage "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-19 21:58 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-20 04:24 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself in deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-20 07:11 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself in deeper Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-20 07:51 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself in deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-20 08:02 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-20 08:15 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself in deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-20 08:15 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself in deeper Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-20 08:21 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself in deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-20 08:32 -0700
Re: Dono doesn't know why he believes my Minkowski diagrams are wrong Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-20 09:44 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel will never admit to being wrong "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-20 10:16 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel will never admit to being wrong Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-20 14:38 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel will never admit to being wrong "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-20 14:55 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel will never admit to being wrong Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-20 19:24 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel will never admit to being wrong "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-20 19:57 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel will never admit to being wrong Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-20 21:33 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel will never admit to being wrong "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-20 22:18 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel will never admit to being wrong Prokaryotic Capase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2023-03-21 00:35 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel will never admit to being wrong Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-21 02:50 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel will never admit to being wrong Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-21 05:49 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel will never admit to being wrong "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-21 06:20 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel will never admit to being wrong "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-21 06:28 -0700
Re: Mathematically-incompetent Dono will never admit to being wrong Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-22 05:13 -0700
Con-man Gary Harnagel gets exposed once again "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-22 08:19 -0700
Re: Cumb-man Dono gets feet in mouth once again Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-22 11:10 -0700
Conman Gaery Harnagel digs himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-22 11:35 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel gets stuffed , again "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-22 11:58 -0700
Re: Clueless Dono stuffs his feet in his mouth , again Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-22 13:06 -0700
Re: Clueless Crank Gary Harnagel stuffs his feet in his mouth , again "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-22 15:04 -0700
Re: Clueless ifnoramus Dono stuffs his feet in his mouth , again Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-22 15:16 -0700
Re: Clueless ignoramus Gary Harnagel stuffs his feet in his mouth , again "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-22 15:25 -0700
Re: Clueless ignoramus Dono stuffs his feet in his mouth , again Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-22 16:23 -0700
Re: Clueless ignoramus Gary Harnagel keeps digging himserlf deeper with every post. "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-22 16:28 -0700
Re: Clueless ignoramus Dono preaches to the choir again :-)). Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-22 19:47 -0700
Re: Clueless ignoramus Gary Harnagel going off the deep end "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-22 19:53 -0700
Re: Dono fails the baloney detection test Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-23 04:11 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel keeps piling up imbecilities "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-23 04:21 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-23 04:48 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel reaches new lows "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-23 08:20 -0700
Re: Desperate Dono reaches new lows Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-23 11:18 -0700
Re: Desperate crank Gary harnagel reaches new lows "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-23 11:47 -0700
Re: Desperate Dono reaches new lows Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-23 13:16 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel laughs at his own imbecility "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-23 13:38 -0700
Re: Dishonest Dono laughs at his own imbecility Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-23 16:15 -0700
Re: Dishonest Dono laughs at his own imbecility "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-23 16:42 -0700
Lying piece of shit Gary Harnagel takes it in pants "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-23 16:45 -0700
Re: Dono's lies are contemptible Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-24 07:04 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel treaches a new low "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-24 07:35 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel attains new highs Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-24 08:04 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel attains new lows "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-24 08:18 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel attains new highs Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-24 13:19 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel attains new crankery lows "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-24 13:54 -0700
Re: Dono attains new crankery lows Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-24 15:57 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel attains new crankery lows "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-24 16:12 -0700
Re: Dishonest Dono attains new dissembling lows Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-24 17:11 -0700
Re: Dishonest Dono attains new dissembling lows Benaventura Bellandini <vvrr@vbbtulti.el> - 2023-03-25 00:33 +0000
Re: Dishonest Gary Harnagel goes down "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-24 17:39 -0700
Re: Dishonest Dono fails physics 101 Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-24 21:18 -0700
Crackpot Gary Harnagel goes off the deep end "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-24 21:58 -0700
Re: dono makes stuff up Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-25 06:05 -0700
Crank Gary harnagel digs himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-25 08:04 -0700
Re: Clueless Donol digs himself deeper Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-25 08:54 -0700
Re: Clueless crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-25 09:00 -0700
Re: Clueless crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-25 11:18 -0700
Re: Clueless crank Gary Harnagel digs himself deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-25 11:29 -0700
Re: Clueless ignoramus Dono displays his incompetence Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-25 15:46 -0700
Re: Clueless ignoramus agnorrant crank Gary Harnagel displays his incompetence "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-25 15:58 -0700
Re: Clueless ignoramus agnorrant crank Dono displays his incompetence Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-25 19:21 -0700
Re: Clueless ignoramus agnorrant crank Gary Harnagel displays his incompetence "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-25 20:36 -0700
Re: Poor Dono puts both feet in his mouth Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-26 07:18 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel beyond redemption "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-26 08:09 -0700
Re: Gono's incompetence in math and physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-26 08:37 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel continues to post from his residence: the lunatic asylum "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-26 09:43 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-26 10:05 -0700
Re: Rayford Vicario Gannucce <vivi@lcafcccf.fi> - 2023-03-26 17:12 +0000
Inpatient Gary Harnagel needs his meds "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-26 10:13 -0700
Re: Poor Dono, denier of math and physics Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-26 15:07 -0700
Lunatic asylum Gary Harnagel ready for his daily meds "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-26 15:49 -0700
Re: Lunatic asylum Gary Harnagel ready for his daily meds "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-26 16:24 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-26 17:30 -0700
Re: Dono plugs his ears when Saint Albert speaks an inconvenient truth Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-26 17:22 -0700
Crank Gary Harnagel plugs his ears in characteristic crank fashion "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-26 18:02 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-26 19:16 -0700
Pathetic crank Gary Harnagel keeps digging himself lower and lower "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-26 19:31 -0700
Re: Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-27 04:04 -0700
Re: Rayford Vicario Gannucce <vivi@lcafcccf.fi> - 2023-03-29 21:07 +0000
Crank Gary Harnagel hides his head in the sand "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-25 08:13 -0700
Re: Dishonest Dono fails physics 101 Rayford Vicario Gannucce <vivi@lcafcccf.fi> - 2023-03-25 15:17 +0000
Re: Dishonest Dono attains new dissembling lows Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-03-25 08:56 +0100
Re: Dishonest Dono attains new dissembling lows Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-25 01:26 -0700
Re: Dishonest Dono attains new dissembling lows Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-25 06:21 -0700
Re: Dono attains new crankery lows Benaventura Bellandini <vvrr@vbbtulti.el> - 2023-03-24 23:30 +0000
Re: Desperate Dono reaches new lows Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2023-03-23 21:39 +0000
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel will never admit to being wrong "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-20 15:13 -0700
Re: Crank Gary Harnagel digs himself in deeper "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-20 10:27 -0700
Re: Tachyons paper published "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-16 13:16 -0700
Re: Tachyons paper published "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-02 21:03 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-03 09:02 -0800
Re: Tachyons paper published Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2023-03-04 09:05 -0800
Crank Gary Harnagel crows about publishing his imbecilities. In a predatory journal, no less "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-03-15 09:30 -0700
Page 2 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 12 Next page →
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-03 10:16 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k6ds6nFjlrU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #602701 |
On 2023-03-02 19:39:06 +0000, Gary Harnagel said: > On Thursday, March 2, 2023 at 10:34:45 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: >> >> On 2023-03-02 15:07:52 +0000, Gary Harnagel said:>> > Tachyons, the >> four-momentum formalism and simultaneity> >> > Journal issue appeared >> 2/28/23. >> >> Which journal? > > A peer-reviewed online journal. I found it with an easy search. You're still being coy about which journal it is. > >> Some vanity journal for cranks? > > Not quite that bad. I'm really not sure how good it is in the theoretical > physics area, they only have a half-dozen reviewers listed. But it's > certainly better than viXra :-) > > They have a whole panoply of journals in a wide variety of fields. You > might evaluate their Journal on Cancer and Oncology Research. > >> You don't seem to have published anything in a serious physics journal >> since 1988, > > That depends on what you call a "serious physics journal. The last > publication was actually in 1996 in the proceedings of the SPIE. > >> and even then it was applied electronics, not theoretical physics. > > Applied physics, actually. > >> Somehow "Performance and reliability of high power multi-mode >> lasers between 0.8 mu m and 1 mu m" doesn't suggest qualifications >> for writing about tachyons. (Before you say so, I don't either, but I >> don't pretend to have such qualifications.) > > After '96 I was working on a classified program, still on laser diodes. > My interest in relativity goes all the way back to high school. Physics > and English classes both required term papers, so both of them were > on relativity (as you might expect, fairly naive). I have undergraduate > degrees in engineering and mathematics and a graduate degree in solid > state and mathematical physics. > > My "qualifications" in relativity come from many years studying it on > the side. About 10 to 15 years ago I learned a lot by arguing with > relativity-deniers on the yahoo relativity board. They would make > false claims about relativity and I would have to study to come up with > a rebuttal. The LTE for time always captivated me, particularly the -vx/c^2 > term in the context of FTL phenomena. > > When the yahoo board fizzled out I came here to a tougher group and > learned a lot more, particularly from people like Tom Roberts. I mostly > lurked for a while and then someone posted that tachyons were impossible > and that got me to thinking about the c^2/v again. So I went from neophyte > to publishing on viXra to trying twice on AJP (where I learned much more) > to finally growing to where I am now. The c^2/v limitation on FTL velocity > is central to causality conservation, and it has taken the last four years to > reach a satisfactory justification of why that limit should > theoretically exist. >> If Web of Science can be believed your Hirsch index is 10. > > Interesting, never heard of them. Is 10 good or bad? :-) It means that you have ten publications that have been cited ten or more times. It's not particularly impressive for someone of your experience. My h is 51, but there are others in my field who have done a lot better. Alan Fersht, for example, is almost exactly my age and has been working as a scientist for exactly the same number of years with some overlap in interest, and has h = 135. That's _very_ impressive. It's dangerous to compare across fields, but I'd expect a lot more than 10 in electronics. > > I received an email from Academia that informed me that someone > just searched for me on google. May have been you since you have > a lot of information about my sordid past. Not on Google, I didn't, but at Web of Science. -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-03 06:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8d7dc02f-18b9-46dd-80be-45ee7ab5d87en@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #602751 |
On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 2:16:11 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > On 2023-03-02 19:39:06 +0000, Gary Harnagel said: > ? > > On Thursday, March 2, 2023 at 10:34:45 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > > > > > On 2023-03-02 15:07:52 +0000, Gary Harnagel said:>> > Tachyons, the > > > four-momentum formalism and simultaneity> >> > Journal issue appeared > > > 2/28/23. > > > > > > Which journal? > > > > A peer-reviewed online journal. I found it with an easy search. > > You're still being coy about which journal it is. I'm sorry, it was meant to deter the trollish ones. I searched on yahoo using my last name and the title of the paper and it popped right up. Let me try google ... interesting, it doesn't show up there no matter what I do. I guess the barrier was a bit too high :-( This will work on google: search hrpub and select it, select Universal Journal of Physics and Application, select Archive. select Vol 17 No. 1. You'll have to scroll down to see the papers therein. > >> Some vanity journal for cranks? > > > > Not quite that bad. I'm really not sure how good it is in the theoretical > > physics area, they only have a half-dozen reviewers listed. But it's > > certainly better than viXra :-) > > > > They have a whole panoply of journals in a wide variety of fields. You > > might evaluate their Journal on Cancer and Oncology Research. > > > >> You don't seem to have published anything in a serious physics journal > > > since 1988, > > > > That depends on what you call a "serious physics journal. The last > > publication was actually in 1996 in the proceedings of the SPIE. > > > >> and even then it was applied electronics, not theoretical physics. > > > > Applied physics, actually. > > > > > Somehow "Performance and reliability of high power multi-mode > > > lasers between 0.8 mu m and 1 mu m" doesn't suggest qualifications > > > for writing about tachyons. (Before you say so, I don't either, but I > > > don't pretend to have such qualifications.) > > > > After '96 I was working on a classified program, still on laser diodes. > > My interest in relativity goes all the way back to high school. Physics > > and English classes both required term papers, so both of them were > > on relativity (as you might expect, fairly naive). I have undergraduate > > degrees in engineering and mathematics and a graduate degree in solid > > state and mathematical physics. > > > > My "qualifications" in relativity come from many years studying it on > > the side. About 10 to 15 years ago I learned a lot by arguing with > > relativity-deniers on the yahoo relativity board. They would make > > false claims about relativity and I would have to study to come up with > > a rebuttal. The LTE for time always captivated me, particularly the -vx/c^2 > > term in the context of FTL phenomena. > > > > When the yahoo board fizzled out I came here to a tougher group and > > learned a lot more, particularly from people like Tom Roberts. I mostly > > lurked for a while and then someone posted that tachyons were impossible > > and that got me to thinking about the c^2/v again. So I went from neophyte > > to publishing on viXra to trying twice on AJP (where I learned much more) > > to finally growing to where I am now. The c^2/v limitation on FTL velocity > > is central to causality conservation, and it has taken the last four years to > > reach a satisfactory justification of why that limit should theoretically exist. > > > > > If Web of Science can be believed your Hirsch index is 10. > > > > Interesting, never heard of them. Is 10 good or bad? :-) > > It means that you have ten publications that have been cited ten or > more times. It's not particularly impressive for someone of your > experience. I only wrote two or three of them myself. I spent the first 25 years of my career in the Physics group of General Dynamics. I wrote IRAD reports which definitely weren't published in the journals :-) > My h is 51, but there are others in my field who have done a lot better. Alan Fersht, > for example, is almost exactly my age and has been working as a scientist for > exactly the same number of years with some overlap in interest, and has h = 135. > That's _very_impressive. It's dangerous to compare across fields, but I'd expect a > lot more than 10 in electronics. Physics, and a bit covert at that. 1986 was my first published paper in the light of day (unless you count patents -- had several of them at GD and a few more at Xerox and SDL). > > I received an email from Academia that informed me that someone just searched > > for me on google. May have been you since you have a lot of information about my > > sordid past. > > Not on Google, I didn't, but at Web of Science. > -- > athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-03 08:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c9ece1ad-148d-4f5e-a322-17206e68c33cn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #602765 |
On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 7:54:44 AM UTC-7, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > 1986 was my first published paper in the light of day Correction, 1985
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-05 19:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <11ac5cce-07fa-4b01-85f3-33f78ea76c13n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #602751 |
On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 2:16:11 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > On 2023-03-02 19:39:06 +0000, Gary Harnagel said: > > > > On Thursday, March 2, 2023 at 10:34:45 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > > > > > On 2023-03-02 15:07:52 +0000, Gary Harnagel said:>> > Tachyons, the > > > four-momentum formalism and simultaneity> >> > Journal issue appeared > > > 2/28/23. > > > > > > Which journal? > > > > A peer-reviewed online journal. I found it with an easy search. > > > You're still being coy about which journal it is. "This will work on google: search hrpub and select it, select Universal Journal of Physics and Application, select Archive. select Vol 17 No. 1. You'll have to scroll down to see the papers therein." Hi Athel, Were you able to access it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-06 11:32 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k6ltqaF7tasU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #603068 |
On 2023-03-06 03:40:07 +0000, Gary Harnagel said: > On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 2:16:11 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: >> >> On 2023-03-02 19:39:06 +0000, Gary Harnagel said:> > >>> On Thursday, March 2, 2023 at 10:34:45 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden >>> wrote:> > >> > > On 2023-03-02 15:07:52 +0000, Gary Harnagel said:>> > >>> Tachyons, the> > > four-momentum formalism and simultaneity> >> > >>> Journal issue appeared> > > 2/28/23.> > >> > > Which journal?> >> > A >>> peer-reviewed online journal. I found it with an easy search. >>> >> You're still being coy about which journal it is. > > "This will work on google: search hrpub and select it, select Universal > Journal of > Physics and Application, select Archive. select Vol 17 No. 1. You'll > have to scroll > down to see the papers therein." > > Hi Athel, Were you able to access it? After all this playing at hard to get I've lost interest. -- Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 36 years; mainly in England until 1987.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-06 06:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a77d9c3c-7a1a-4240-8faa-d55489549d59n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #603095 |
On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 3:32:46 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > On 2023-03-06 03:40:07 +0000, Gary Harnagel said: > > > > "This will work on google: search hrpub and select it, select Universal > > Journal of > > Physics and Application, select Archive. select Vol 17 No. 1. You'll > > have to scroll > > down to see the papers therein." > > > > Hi Athel, Were you able to access it? > After all this playing at hard to get I've lost interest. > > Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 36 years; mainly > in England until 1987. Sorry about that. Just checked this out and it also works: DOI: 10.13189/ujpa.2023.170101
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-07 01:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <tu6lep$a35d$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #603095 |
On 3/6/2023 5:32 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2023-03-06 03:40:07 +0000, Gary Harnagel said: > >> On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 2:16:11 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden >> wrote: >>> >>> On 2023-03-02 19:39:06 +0000, Gary Harnagel said:> > >>>> On Thursday, March 2, 2023 at 10:34:45 AM UTC-7, Athel >>>> Cornish-Bowden wrote:> > >> > > On 2023-03-02 15:07:52 +0000, Gary >>>> Harnagel said:>> > Tachyons, the> > > four-momentum formalism and >>>> simultaneity> >> > Journal issue appeared> > > 2/28/23.> > >> > > >>>> Which journal?> >> > A peer-reviewed online journal. I found it with >>>> an easy search. >>>> >>> You're still being coy about which journal it is. >> >> "This will work on google: search hrpub and select it, select >> Universal Journal of >> Physics and Application, select Archive. select Vol 17 No. 1. You'll >> have to scroll >> down to see the papers therein." >> >> Hi Athel, Were you able to access it? > > After all this playing at hard to get I've lost interest. > > It's a "journal" calling itself "Horizon Research Publishing" (hrpub.org). Never heard of them. The site looks nicer than other vanity journals, perhaps they are a step up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-07 10:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k6odc0FjoaeU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #603188 |
On 2023-03-07 06:26:34 +0000, Volney said: > On 3/6/2023 5:32 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: >> On 2023-03-06 03:40:07 +0000, Gary Harnagel said: >> >>> On Friday, March 3, 2023 at 2:16:11 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: >>>> >>>> On 2023-03-02 19:39:06 +0000, Gary Harnagel said:> > >>>>> On Thursday, March 2, 2023 at 10:34:45 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden >>>>> wrote:> > >> > > On 2023-03-02 15:07:52 +0000, Gary Harnagel said:>> > >>>>> Tachyons, the> > > four-momentum formalism and simultaneity> >> > >>>>> Journal issue appeared> > > 2/28/23.> > >> > > Which journal?> >> > A >>>>> peer-reviewed online journal. I found it with an easy search. >>>>> >>>> You're still being coy about which journal it is. >>> >>> "This will work on google: search hrpub and select it, select Universal >>> Journal of >>> Physics and Application, select Archive. select Vol 17 No. 1. You'll >>> have to scroll >>> down to see the papers therein." >>> >>> Hi Athel, Were you able to access it? >> >> After all this playing at hard to get I've lost interest. >> >> > It's a "journal" calling itself "Horizon Research Publishing" > (hrpub.org). Never heard of them. The site looks nicer than other > vanity journals, perhaps they are a step up. OK, I looked at it, but I didn't try to read it. However, one thing surprised me. It says "Cite This Paper in the following Citation Styles" and offers tow possibilities. But surely even the most ignorant researcher knows that the original publisher doesn't get to decide the reference style; the citing journal does. However, in this case that may not make any difference. Incidentally, Horizon Research Publishing is listed at https://predatoryreports.org/the-predatory-publishers. -- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-07 06:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b98a1e67-19de-477e-8b36-a34b63849c06n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #603207 |
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 2:10:28 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > On 2023-03-07 06:26:34 +0000, Volney said: > > > > On 3/6/2023 5:32 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > > > > > On 2023-03-06 03:40:07 +0000, Gary Harnagel said: > > > > > > > > Hi Athel, Were you able to access it? > > > > > > After all this playing at hard to get I've lost interest. > > > > It's a "journal" calling itself "Horizon Research Publishing" > > (hrpub.org). Never heard of them. The site looks nicer than other > > vanity journals, perhaps they are a step up. They have a lot of "journals" and they seem to publish intermittently, at least in the engineering and science journals. A lot of authors seem to be from the Middle and Far East. One author in the physics journal is a prof from Portugal and has a paper called, "Criticism to the Twin's Paradox": https://www.hrpub.org/download/20210330/UJPA1-18422749.pdf I read it and I think I know where he went wrong but I haven't studied it in sufficient detail. That indicates to me that their reviewers may not be as careful as perhaps they ought to be. OTOH, the titles of papers in other journals seem to inspire a little more ... confidence. > OK, I looked at it, but I didn't try to read it. > > However, one thing surprised me. It says "Cite This Paper in the > following Citation Styles" and offers tow possibilities. But surely > even the most ignorant researcher knows that the original publisher > doesn't get to decide the reference style; the citing journal does. > However, in this case that may not make any difference. > > Incidentally, Horizon Research Publishing is listed at > https://predatoryreports.org/the-predatory-publishers. > -- > athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots Interesting. Looking at their home page: https://predatoryreports.org/ they characterize "predatory" as: "Accepting articles quickly with little or no peer review or quality control, including hoax and nonsensical papers." My paper wasn't accepted quickly nor do published papers look hoax or nonsensical, and they DO have peer review. I was a bit nonplussed by the reviewer's report. It was a mixture of text copied from my paper with a rewrite of other parts by the reviewer. It recommended publishing with minor revisions but didn't specify what they would be. I got much better feedback form submissions to AJP, and the first time rejection was justified. The second time rejection was justified only because I didn't back up my claim that tachyon energy cannot be negative. My hrpub paper has a conclusive argument to support my assertion. "Notifying academics of article fees only after papers are accepted." They say they MAY charge fees but they didn't charge me. I have a friend who has two papers published by hrpub who was charged a nominal fee for one and none for the other. "Aggressively campaigning for academics to submit articles or serve on editorial boards." Neither I nor my friend have been approached. I can't speak authoritatively to the rest of these: "Listing academics as members of editorial boards without their permission, and not allowing academics to resign from editorial boards." "Appointing fake academics to editorial boards." "Mimicking the name or web site style of more established journals." "Making misleading claims about the publishing operation, such as a false location." "Using ISSNs improperly." "Citing fake or non-existent impact factors." "Boasting about being "indexed" by academic social networking sites (like ResearchGate) and standard identifiers (like ISSNs and DOIs) as if they were prestigious or reputable bibliographic databases." My friend has another paper accepted for publishing, but then some disharmony over formatting a table arose. Some back and forth went on and then they stopped talking with him even though he has tried to get them to respond, and his paper hasn't been published. That seems very unprofessional to me, but they've treated me very well (probably because they recognize the (ahem) seminal nature of my contribution :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-07 08:10 -0800 |
| Subject | Crank Garry Harnagel deep delusions |
| Message-ID | <ff44161f-beec-4964-a388-d4de9d1456fan@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #603234 |
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 6:14:40 AM UTC-8, Gary Harnagel wrote: > (probably because they recognize the (ahem) seminal nature of my contribution :-) Delusions, delusions
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-07 08:20 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Crank Garry Harnagel deep delusions |
| Message-ID | <66fd5b67-26e9-4de6-8273-69119667b21en@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #603242 |
On Tuesday, 7 March 2023 at 17:11:01 UTC+1, Dono. wrote: > On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 6:14:40 AM UTC-8, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > (probably because they recognize the (ahem) seminal nature of my contribution :-) > Delusions, delusions Kookfight!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-07 08:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7b16d754-8974-488c-abd3-0d31009306b3n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #603207 |
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 1:10:28 AM UTC-8, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > Incidentally, Horizon Research Publishing is listed at > https://predatoryreports.org/the-predatory-publishers. > -- This is the only type of journal that Gary could manage to publish his crankeries
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-07 08:44 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5edc583f-e380-4c9a-a70e-76262c852820n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #603207 |
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 1:10:28 AM UTC-8, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > Incidentally, Horizon Research Publishing is listed at > https://predatoryreports.org/the-predatory-publishers. They suspended charging for this year, most likely they are desperate for contributions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-07 10:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63b5b29f-165d-4eb8-990c-4a009655a7den@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #603245 |
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 9:44:56 AM UTC-7, Dono. wrote: > > On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 1:10:28 AM UTC-8, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > > > Incidentally, Horizon Research Publishing is listed at > > https://predatoryreports.org/the-predatory-publishers. > > This is the only type of journal that Gary could manage to publish his crankeries The only reason I didn't submit to AJP was that I proved that the reason for rejecting it the last time was incorrect at the most elemental mathematical level. I didn't want to rub the reviewer's nose in his egregious mistake. Actually, everyone has been making the same mistake for 60 years. The problem is that the four-momentum formalism assumes that the argument inside parentheses will be >= 0. which is correct for bradyons and luxons but not for tachyons. > > > (probably because they recognize the (ahem) seminal nature of my contribution :-) > > > > Delusions, delusions Dono seems incapable of true humor. His derisive laughter appears to come forth only when someone falls over a cliff, or when he pretends that they do. > They suspended charging for this year, most likely they are desperate for contributions. Three posts from Dono to my one. Most likely he is getting desperate about the success of my compelling and pivotal paper :-) Alfred North Whitehead wrote, "Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations which we can perform without thinking of them." That's the case with the four-momentum formalism; however, when considering a new domain, one should confirm that the tools are still appropriate. No one did that!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-07 10:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a42204eb-0a45-49c6-9903-6da896293262n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #603252 |
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 10:26:48 AM UTC-8, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 9:44:56 AM UTC-7, Dono. wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 1:10:28 AM UTC-8, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > > > > > Incidentally, Horizon Research Publishing is listed at > > > https://predatoryreports.org/the-predatory-publishers. > > > > This is the only type of journal that Gary could manage to publish his crankeries > The only reason I didn't submit to AJP was that I proved that the reason for rejecting > it the last time was incorrect at the most elemental mathematical level. I didn't want > to rub the reviewer's nose in his egregious mistake. > LOL, it is your nose that gets rubbed . In your crankeries. > Actually, everyone has been making the same mistake for 60 years. The problem is > that the four-momentum formalism assumes that the argument inside parentheses > will be >= 0. which is correct for bradyons and luxons but not for tachyons. > > > > (probably because they recognize the (ahem) seminal nature of my contribution :-) > > > > > > Delusions, delusions > Dono seems incapable of true humor. Well, I do have a sense of humor, I laughed at all your "papers:, including the one you managed to publish (in a predatory journal, no less).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-07 15:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <eedc98ae-1734-480b-bda9-2ce60d02e9bcn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #603254 |
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 11:34:12 AM UTC-7, Dono. wrote: > > On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 10:26:48 AM UTC-8, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 9:44:56 AM UTC-7, Dono. wrote: > > > > > > This is the only type of journal that Gary could manage to publish his crankeries ?? > > The only reason I didn't submit to AJP was that I proved that the reason for rejecting > > it the last time was incorrect at the most elemental mathematical level. I didn't want > > to rub the reviewer's nose in his egregious mistake. > > > LOL, it is your nose that gets rubbed . Strange that you would say that since YOUR nose sustains a lot of friction :-) > In your crankeries. A typical unsupported assertion. > > Actually, everyone has been making the same mistake for 60 years. The problem is > > that the four-momentum formalism assumes that the argument inside parentheses > > will be >= 0. which is correct for bradyons and luxons but not for tachyons. No comment, Dono? When there's something that could lead to a rational discussion, you avoid it like the plague. > > Dono seems incapable of true humor. > > Well, I do have a sense of humor, I laughed at all your "papers: Exactly my point: > > His derisive laughter appears to come forth only when someone falls over a cliff, > > or when he pretends that they do. Your "humor is derisive and mean-spirited. > including the one you managed to publish (in a predatory journal, no less). Doesn't appear to be "predatory" according to the criteria on the predatoryreports page, which I went through for everyone to see. Where were YOU? Anyway reviewed and published is reviewed and published. You're just jealous because of your amateurish status.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-07 16:18 -0800 |
| Subject | Crank Gary Harnagel perseveres |
| Message-ID | <4c5d4556-ba3d-443b-91c6-bd7f40019ae6n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #603283 |
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 3:42:14 PM UTC-8, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > Actually, everyone has been making the same mistake for 60 years. Typical crank assertion" "Every scientist has been wrong for the past 60 years" >The problem is > > > that the four-momentum formalism assumes that the argument inside parentheses > > > will be >= 0. which is correct for bradyons and luxons but not for tachyons. The enormity of the above idiocy is beyond something that is worth discussing. Bottom line is that you do not understand four vectors, leading to the fact that you are clueless about momentum-energy four vector. What makes it even more hilarious is the belief, in your paper that the derivation of the momentum-energy transformation between inertial frames is based on the velocity composition. > Your "humor is derisive and mean-spirited. Well, it is what you deserve being a hard core crank. > > including the one you managed to publish (in a predatory journal, no less). > Doesn't appear to be "predatory" according to the criteria on the predatory reports page, Well, the list says that you are lying. > which I went through for everyone to see. Where were YOU? Anyway reviewed and > published is reviewed and published. ...in a predatory journal, a deserved place for a crank >You're just jealous because of your amateurish status. Why would I be jealous of a hardened crank?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-07 18:20 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Crank Gary Harnagel perseveres |
| Message-ID | <9dc481aa-a325-4600-b138-04592f8f4984n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #603284 |
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 5:18:40 PM UTC-7, Dono. wrote: > > On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 3:42:14 PM UTC-8, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > > > Actually, everyone has been making the same mistake for 60 years. > > Typical crank assertion" "Every scientist has been wrong for the past 60 years" But sometimes it' s true. If it's not true, it's incumbent on you to explain why it's wrong rather than making the same tired crank assertion. > > > > The problem is that the four-momentum formalism assumes that the > > > > argument inside parentheses will be >= 0. which is correct for bradyons > > > > and luxons but not for tachyons. > > The enormity of the above idiocy is beyond something that is worth discussing. That's a cop out, Dono. You hide from honest discussion by screaming idiocy and crankery. > Bottom line is that you do not understand four vectors, Perhaps it's YOU that lacks understanding. Of course, you NEVER think of THAT :-) > leading to the fact that you are clueless about momentum-energy four vector. Ah, but I DO understand. If you bothered to read the paper, you would know that. > What makes it even more hilarious is the belief, in your paper that the derivation > of the momentum-energy transformation between inertial frames is based on the > velocity composition. Wow! That vacuous assertion is what would be expected only from a rank amateur! You really, really need to READ the paper instead of shooting blindly. The first paragraph in the Conclusions section refutes your uninformed allegation. > > Your "humor is derisive and mean-spirited. > > Well, it is what you deserve being a hard core crank. Typical Donoism, personal attack so you don't have to deal with the message. > > > including the one you managed to publish (in a predatory journal, no less). > > > > Doesn't appear to be "predatory" according to the criteria on the predatory reports page, > Well, the list says that you are lying. Another Donoism: Screams "Lying" but doesn't specify where I lied. > > which I went through for everyone to see. Where were YOU? Anyway reviewed and > > published is reviewed and published. > > ...in a predatory journal, You haven't specified which point in predatoryreports hrpub deserves that designation. > a deserved place for a crank Another Donoism: Personal attack rather than addressing the case. > >You're just jealous because of your amateurish status. > > Why would I be jealous of a hardened crank? Because you know deep down inside that I'm not a crank and that your house-of-cards accusations will come eventually tumbling down. But you can still redeem yourself by reading the Conclusions and explaining clearly and specifically what you find wrong and then having an honest discussion. I'm waiting for you to do that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-07 18:34 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Crank Gary Harnagel perseveres |
| Message-ID | <117a3ee0-09ec-4bc2-a1ad-133dc5bca0b9n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #603293 |
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 6:20:13 PM UTC-8, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 5:18:40 PM UTC-7, Dono. wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 3:42:14 PM UTC-8, Gary Harnagel wrote: > > > > > > > > Actually, everyone has been making the same mistake for 60 years. > > > > Typical crank assertion" "Every scientist has been wrong for the past 60 years" > But sometimes it' s true. Not in your case, hardened crank. You have started sounding like Richard Hertz. > > > > > The problem is that the four-momentum formalism assumes that the > > > > > argument inside parentheses will be >= 0. which is correct for bradyons > > > > > and luxons but not for tachyons. > > > > The enormity of the above idiocy is beyond something that is worth discussing. > That's a cop out, Dono. You hide from honest discussion by screaming idiocy and > crankery. > > Bottom line is that you do not understand four vectors, > > leading to the fact that you are clueless about momentum-energy four vector. > Ah, but I DO understand. If you bothered to read the paper, you would know that. I read the "paper" and all its prior crankish incarnations, this is how I know that you have no idea what you are talking about. > > What makes it even more hilarious is the belief, in your paper that the derivation > > of the momentum-energy transformation between inertial frames is based on the > > velocity composition. > Wow! That vacuous assertion is what would be expected only from a rank amateur! Actually, dumfuck , it is based on your incorrect derivation of the energy momentum transformation in your "Tachyon Dynamics" paragraph. > You really, really need to READ the paper instead of shooting blindly. The first > paragraph in the Conclusions section refutes your uninformed allegation. Well, you "conclusion" is based on your errors in the "Tachyon Dynamics" paragraph. The correct alternative conclusion is that "Energy-momentum transformation invalidates tachyon existence". Coupled with the fact that no tachyons have been discovered in the 60 years since the Feinberg paper, this closes the issue. > > > Your "humor is derisive and mean-spirited. > > > > Well, it is what you deserve being a hard core crank. > Typical Donoism, personal attack so you don't have to deal with the message. I did, see above. You are digging yourself deeper and deeper. > > > > including the one you managed to publish (in a predatory journal, no less). > > > > > > Doesn't appear to be "predatory" according to the criteria on the predatory reports page, > > Well, the list says that you are lying. > Another Donoism: Screams "Lying" but doesn't specify where I lied. By claiming that the journal you published in is not predatory in the context of the journal being listed as predatory. > > > which I went through for everyone to see. Where were YOU? Anyway reviewed and > > > published is reviewed and published. > > > > ...in a predatory journal, > You haven't specified which point in predatoryreports hrpub deserves that designation. The list of predatory journals that lists hrpub should explain that to you. Don't be like Pat Dolan, go ahead and read. > > Why would I be jealous of a hardened crank? > Because you know deep down inside that I'm not a crank Your papers in vixra show that you are a crank. > But you can still redeem yourself by > reading the Conclusions and explaining clearly and specifically what you find wrong I already did. See above. > and then having an honest discussion. I'm waiting for you to do that. I cannot have a honest discussion with a hardened crank (you). You will go to your deathbed defending your crankeries.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-03-07 20:44 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Dono can't support his assertions |
| Message-ID | <684b43a1-5abe-45b7-ac39-e85b09a66b58n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #603294 |
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 7:34:25 PM UTC-7, Dono. wrote: > > [Semantic content zero, typical for Dono] 1. Dono NEVER explained what's wrong with the Minkowski diagrams on viXra 2. Dono automatically believes a website that agrees with his prejudices but refuses to explain how their points apply to hrpub 3. Dono claimed I derived the 4-momentum transform incorrectly, but once again failed to explain what is wrong. Does he believe that E is NOT equal to mc^2/sqrt(1 - u^2/c^2)? If not, why? Does he not believe in the Principle of Relativity? Does he not know that E = mc^2/sqrt(1 - u^2/c^2) and PoR is all that's needed to derive the transformation matrix, eta, in P' = eta P? One can only conclude that he doesn't understand 4-vector physics but is pretending that he does. Perhaps he should move to China where he can fill up surveillance balloons with his hot air. It gets really tiresome seeing his interminable amateur lies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web