Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #663404 > unrolled thread

1905

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-07 00:21 -0700
    Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-07 09:16 -0700
      Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-08 12:19 -0700
        Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-13 15:15 -0700
          Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-13 15:38 -0700

#663404 — 1905

Not only was there no mention
of Gravity in Einstein't 1905 relativity paper..

there was no mention of...acceleration either.

dat means the twin never came back!

did the clock got older and died?



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#663420

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Not only was there no mention
> of Gravity in Einstein't 1905 relativity paper..
> 
> there was no mention of...acceleration either.
> 
> dat means the twin never came back!
> 
> did the clock got older and died?
> 

The only thing Albert Einstein got right in his 1905 paper is the formula for the atomic bomb.




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#663440

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Not only was there no mention
> > of Gravity in Einstein't 1905 relativity paper..
> >
> > there was no mention of...acceleration either.
> >
> > dat means the twin never came back!
> >
> > did the clock got older and died?
> >
> 
> The only thing Albert Einstein got right in his 1905 paper is the formula for the atomic bomb.

Now, in the British movie:

You see, we live
in a complex social world.

Einstein put mass and energy together,
we got the atom bomb.

Now, if you were a Russian politician
and had a child with a brain, say...

...ten times more efficient than
Einstein's, would you gaily let her out...

...to any two British scientists
who crawled out of the wood?

Of course I wouldn't.

 

Children of the Damned (1964)




The British know (and the Japanese know) that Albert Einstein is the bomb maker.

It's only these stupid bumbling Americans that think otherwise. (they think what they are told to think) (dats called textbook science)



Did you know, Did You Know...In 1930
Albert Einstein created a secret patent for the FIRST breeder reactor: (with actual parts of the patent were used by the Manhattan project reactor)


https://energyeducation.ca/wiki/images/e/e7/Lmfbr.gif

https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Breeder_reactor

https://archive.nytimes.com/screenshots/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/06/18/world/asia/JAPAN_NUCLEAR.jpg

https://www.base.bund.de/en/nuclear-safety/nuclear-technology/alternative-reactor-concepts/alternative-reactor-concepts.html

https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280696122699778/photo/1

https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148279328121090048/photo/1


In 1930
Albert Einstein filed a secret patent for the FIRST breeder reactor:
https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280108349714434/photo/1

(with actual parts of the patent were used by the Manhattan project reactor)


of course you don't know, you are not ALLOWED to know.


Yous are not even suppose to talk about it...

see no evil, speak no evil, hear no evil..

wat a bunch of monkeys!










-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#663526

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Not only was there no mention
> > > of Gravity in Einstein't 1905 relativity paper..
> > >
> > > there was no mention of...acceleration either.
> > >
> > > dat means the twin never came back!
> > >
> > > did the clock got older and died?
> > >
> >
> > The only thing Albert Einstein got right in his 1905 paper is the formula for the atomic bomb.
> 
> Now, in the British movie:
> 
> You see, we live
> in a complex social world.
> 
> Einstein put mass and energy together,
> we got the atom bomb.
> 
> Now, if you were a Russian politician
> and had a child with a brain, say...
> 
> ...ten times more efficient than
> Einstein's, would you gaily let her out...
> 
> ...to any two British scientists
> who crawled out of the wood?
> 
> Of course I wouldn't.
> 
> 
> 
> Children of the Damned (1964)
> 
> The British know (and the Japanese know) that Albert Einstein is the bomb maker.
> 
> It's only these stupid bumbling Americans that think otherwise. (they think what they are told to think) (dats called textbook science)
> 
> Did you know, Did You Know...In 1930
> Albert Einstein created a secret patent for the FIRST breeder reactor: (with actual parts of the patent were used by the Manhattan project reactor)
> 
> https://energyeducation.ca/wiki/images/e/e7/Lmfbr.gif
> 
> https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Breeder_reactor
> 
> https://archive.nytimes.com/screenshots/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/06/18/world/asia/JAPAN_NUCLEAR.jpg
> 
> https://www.base.bund.de/en/nuclear-safety/nuclear-technology/alternative-reactor-concepts/alternative-reactor-concepts.html
> 
> https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280696122699778/photo/1
> 
> https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148279328121090048/photo/1
> 
> In 1930
> Albert Einstein filed a secret patent for the FIRST breeder reactor:
> https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280108349714434/photo/1
> 
> (with actual parts of the patent were used by the Manhattan project reactor)

I forgot to add:

"Never used in refrigerators, their pump was later adapted for the
circulation of coolants in the controversial fast-breeder nuclear
reactor—
"an irony that would not have been lost on either Einstein or Szilard."
(Bernard Feld, Einstein and Nuclear Weapons, Holton and Elkana, p. 391.)






Of course, the irony was...there was no irony. 








-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#663528

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Not only was there no mention
> > > > of Gravity in Einstein't 1905 relativity paper..
> > > >
> > > > there was no mention of...acceleration either.
> > > >
> > > > dat means the twin never came back!
> > > >
> > > > did the clock got older and died?
> > > >
> > >
> > > The only thing Albert Einstein got right in his 1905 paper is the formula for the atomic bomb.
> >
> > Now, in the British movie:
> >
> > You see, we live
> > in a complex social world.
> >
> > Einstein put mass and energy together,
> > we got the atom bomb.
> >
> > Now, if you were a Russian politician
> > and had a child with a brain, say...
> >
> > ...ten times more efficient than
> > Einstein's, would you gaily let her out...
> >
> > ...to any two British scientists
> > who crawled out of the wood?
> >
> > Of course I wouldn't.
> >
> >
> >
> > Children of the Damned (1964)
> >
> > The British know (and the Japanese know) that Albert Einstein is the bomb maker.
> >
> > It's only these stupid bumbling Americans that think otherwise. (they think what they are told to think) (dats called textbook science)
> >
> > Did you know, Did You Know...In 1930
> > Albert Einstein created a secret patent for the FIRST breeder reactor: (with actual parts of the patent were used by the Manhattan project reactor)
> >
> > https://energyeducation.ca/wiki/images/e/e7/Lmfbr.gif
> >
> > https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Breeder_reactor
> >
> > https://archive.nytimes.com/screenshots/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/06/18/world/asia/JAPAN_NUCLEAR.jpg
> >
> > https://www.base.bund.de/en/nuclear-safety/nuclear-technology/alternative-reactor-concepts/alternative-reactor-concepts.html
> >
> > https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280696122699778/photo/1
> >
> > https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148279328121090048/photo/1
> >
> > In 1930
> > Albert Einstein filed a secret patent for the FIRST breeder reactor:
> > https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280108349714434/photo/1
> >
> > (with actual parts of the patent were used by the Manhattan project reactor)
> 
> I forgot to add:
> 
> "Never used in refrigerators, their pump was later adapted for the
> circulation of coolants in the controversial fast-breeder nuclear
> reactor—
> "an irony that would not have been lost on either Einstein or Szilard."
> (Bernard Feld, Einstein and Nuclear Weapons, Holton and Elkana, p. 391.)
> 
> Of course, the irony was...there was no irony.

Now, since ALL of yous are ignorant of the Manhattan Project History...

Albert Einstein didn't want the money for the (1930) patent, he told
Zilgard to keep any money he got for it.


But the Manhattan Project didn't want to give Zilgard money for it.
(buts yous problabys don'ts knows WHYs eithers)



Beside dat they didn't like him...





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web