Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #663528

Re: 1905

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Not only was there no mention
> > > > of Gravity in Einstein't 1905 relativity paper..
> > > >
> > > > there was no mention of...acceleration either.
> > > >
> > > > dat means the twin never came back!
> > > >
> > > > did the clock got older and died?
> > > >
> > >
> > > The only thing Albert Einstein got right in his 1905 paper is the formula for the atomic bomb.
> >
> > Now, in the British movie:
> >
> > You see, we live
> > in a complex social world.
> >
> > Einstein put mass and energy together,
> > we got the atom bomb.
> >
> > Now, if you were a Russian politician
> > and had a child with a brain, say...
> >
> > ...ten times more efficient than
> > Einstein's, would you gaily let her out...
> >
> > ...to any two British scientists
> > who crawled out of the wood?
> >
> > Of course I wouldn't.
> >
> >
> >
> > Children of the Damned (1964)
> >
> > The British know (and the Japanese know) that Albert Einstein is the bomb maker.
> >
> > It's only these stupid bumbling Americans that think otherwise. (they think what they are told to think) (dats called textbook science)
> >
> > Did you know, Did You Know...In 1930
> > Albert Einstein created a secret patent for the FIRST breeder reactor: (with actual parts of the patent were used by the Manhattan project reactor)
> >
> > https://energyeducation.ca/wiki/images/e/e7/Lmfbr.gif
> >
> > https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Breeder_reactor
> >
> > https://archive.nytimes.com/screenshots/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/06/18/world/asia/JAPAN_NUCLEAR.jpg
> >
> > https://www.base.bund.de/en/nuclear-safety/nuclear-technology/alternative-reactor-concepts/alternative-reactor-concepts.html
> >
> > https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280696122699778/photo/1
> >
> > https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148279328121090048/photo/1
> >
> > In 1930
> > Albert Einstein filed a secret patent for the FIRST breeder reactor:
> > https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280108349714434/photo/1
> >
> > (with actual parts of the patent were used by the Manhattan project reactor)
> 
> I forgot to add:
> 
> "Never used in refrigerators, their pump was later adapted for the
> circulation of coolants in the controversial fast-breeder nuclear
> reactor—
> "an irony that would not have been lost on either Einstein or Szilard."
> (Bernard Feld, Einstein and Nuclear Weapons, Holton and Elkana, p. 391.)
> 
> Of course, the irony was...there was no irony.

Now, since ALL of yous are ignorant of the Manhattan Project History...

Albert Einstein didn't want the money for the (1930) patent, he told
Zilgard to keep any money he got for it.


But the Manhattan Project didn't want to give Zilgard money for it.
(buts yous problabys don'ts knows WHYs eithers)



Beside dat they didn't like him...





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-07 00:21 -0700
  Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-07 09:16 -0700
    Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-08 12:19 -0700
      Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-13 15:15 -0700
        Re: 1905 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-05-13 15:38 -0700

csiph-web