Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #659278 > unrolled thread
| Started by | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-11-30 20:23 -0500 |
| Last post | 2024-12-20 09:21 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 101 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-11-30 20:23 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 04:49 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-01 15:34 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 23:35 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-01 21:17 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 23:48 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-02 22:43 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? x <x@x.org> - 2024-12-03 19:31 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-04 09:12 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2024-12-04 18:50 +0000
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 09:23 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 08:43 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 09:18 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? x <x@x.org> - 2024-12-05 16:04 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 16:34 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 19:40 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 19:55 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-07 09:56 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 16:33 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 21:12 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-03 08:52 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-03 17:37 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 17:52 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 06:54 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 13:12 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 19:12 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 21:17 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 21:38 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 18:53 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 01:53 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 02:01 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 01:14 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-13 09:28 +0100
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 12:34 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 11:45 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-14 15:18 +0100
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-14 21:04 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-12-15 05:23 +0000
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 09:56 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-16 17:54 +0100
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 13:28 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Python <jpierre.messager@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 22:45 +0000
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 22:10 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 13:03 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Python <coin@python.invalid> - 2024-12-17 18:06 +0000
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 21:28 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 21:31 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 02:24 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 13:09 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 20:57 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 20:52 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 15:49 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 02:40 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 00:51 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 00:53 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 13:51 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 12:37 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 05:21 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-15 10:02 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 17:37 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:29 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 16:37 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:34 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:41 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:46 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:51 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-16 10:56 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? x <x@x.org> - 2025-01-16 14:40 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 17:05 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 14:17 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-17 22:44 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 13:55 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 18:19 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 18:23 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:21 -0600
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 17:28 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 18:51 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 16:14 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 00:58 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 17:06 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:15 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 14:42 -0600
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 16:19 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 18:57 -0600
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:07 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:45 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 22:46 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 15:58 -0600
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-21 11:55 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-21 12:48 -0600
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 19:01 -0600
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 19:03 -0600
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:05 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:15 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:02 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 21:18 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 04:50 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 12:47 -0500
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2024-12-17 19:04 +0000
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 15:49 -0800
Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-20 09:21 -0800
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 15:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <60efc9a4-e91c-4fa4-af6e-d43a16a64aa6@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #660537 |
On 1/18/2025 7:14 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>
>> https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond\
>> Followers 187
>> Public Views 12,737 Top 4%
>
> How many of them say you know 100% exactly what happens after we die?
.
[George Hammond] MS Physics, Hyannis Cape Cod
.
Hi Chris Thomasson,
You and S T A R M A K E R are the only 2 people on S.P.R. who
are still talking to H A M M O N D !
.
You have mastered computer programming and the extensive
mathematics all of the well known FRACTAL EQUATION !
.
This makes you a BS in mathematics at least - possibly an MS !
.
STARMAKER on the other hand seems POLITICALLY ORIENTED
and is LIKELY the ONLY PERSON on SPR who actually KNOWS that
"ANTI-SEMITISM SO CALLED " is 300,000 years old simply because
it ORIGINATES in the elementary difference between the (northern
Lo-Sun white) species, and the (southern Hi-Sun brown) species,
whereby the "JEWS" so called, are biologically HALFWAY BETWEEN
the two because Tel Aviv Israel is located at 32° North latitude and
the Jews have been living there since the beginning of the world
and have become famous as the world's "race lawyers" and they
wrote the book on it – called the King James Bible !!
.
Because STARMAKERs is the only one on SPR who KNOWS this –
besides me, no one suggests that he should leave SPR simply
because he doesn't know DIDDLEY Physics !!
.
.
MEANWHILE, it's high time that SOMEONE discovered what
"GOD" actually is SCIENTIFICALLY SPEAKING !.
.
It turns out that there are many people in the world who actually
scientifically know what God is – but because it is so controversial
that if you can't PROVE IT --- no one dares to SAY IT !!
.
It turns out that "GOD" is simply a FULLY GROWN HUMAN BEING
... And science has discovered that there IS NO SUCH THING ...
There is no 100% fully grown person walking the Earth, and there
never has been.
.
But SOME PEOPLE are a lot more fully grown than others.... Which
means that:--
.
SOME PEOPLE ARE CLOSER TO GOD THAN OTHERS
.
AND IN FACT maybe 50,000 years in the future, everybody on Earth
will be fully grown... Assuming the standard of living gets high enough
we don't blow ourselves up !.
.
BUT IN THE MEANTIME --- in this scientific age, it is essential that
the average person become aware that "God" is a REAL PHYSICAL
PHENOMENON which refers to the fact that NO ONE IS FULLY GROWN
and that the word "God" refers to the hypothetically FULLY GROWN
PERSON .
.
Once you know that, you can understand what "God" actually is
since if the average (adult) person is only 85% fully grown
(WHO, UNESCO data) that means that 15% of the average
adult person's BRAIN is actually MISSING --- some more, some less !
.
And this is the world's number one problem .... And this is why the
physical effect of it it is called "GOD" !
.
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
NOW MISTER THOMASSON - - - you have questioned how anyone could
tell what "people were doing after they died" - - - -
.
Chris... I'm only here to point out to you, that it is ABSOLUTELY CLEAR
that the average adult human body is only 85% fully grown when it DIES !.
.
NOW BEEN.. It is clearly obvious that if there IS IN AFTERLIFE .... That
the purpose of such a thing is OBVIOUSLY to obtained the OTHER 15%
of our bodies that have been missing all our life, so that we can SEE
WHAT WE ACTUALLY MISSED during life !
This immediately tells us how to figure out what the AFTERLIFE
ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE !
.
AND IT IS THIS FACT that is you put it "tells us what people are doing
in the afterlife" !
.
George Hammond MS Physics Cape Cod 1/19/25
,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 14:42 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vmjo4i$6hm2$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #660566 |
On 1/19/25 2:15 PM, George Hammond wrote: > George Hammond MS Physics Cape Cod 1/19/25 No, give the date of graduation so I'd know how soon you'll fucking die. You have a bag of pinto beans in my fridge with your name written on it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 16:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <678D967A.45C7@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #660567 |
Physfitfreak wrote: > > On 1/19/25 2:15 PM, George Hammond wrote: > > George Hammond MS Physics Cape Cod 1/19/25 > > No, give the date of graduation so I'd know how soon you'll fucking die. > You have a bag of pinto beans in my fridge with your name written on it. the date of graduation?? 1960 from high school Can anybody here explain to me what the word "Canidate" means???? Phd 'Canidate'? https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond/CurriculumVitae -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 18:57 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vmk712$6o49$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #660581 |
On 1/19/25 6:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Physfitfreak wrote: >> >> On 1/19/25 2:15 PM, George Hammond wrote: >>> George Hammond MS Physics Cape Cod 1/19/25 >> >> No, give the date of graduation so I'd know how soon you'll fucking die. >> You have a bag of pinto beans in my fridge with your name written on it. > > > the date of graduation?? 1960 from high school > > > Can anybody here explain to me what the word "Canidate" means???? > > Phd 'Canidate'? > > https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond/CurriculumVitae > > > Oh he's almost kicking the bucket. I'll leave the pinto beans bag where it is. It won't stay there too long. Relf was just 64 and kicked the bucket (inside which he also defecated) last month. But with these funky "credentials" this one has, I'm thinking what if he keeps on posting to sci.physics after dying! He is in cahoots with "God" after all.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 17:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <678DA1B4.5CC@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #660582 |
Physfitfreak wrote: > > On 1/19/25 6:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Physfitfreak wrote: > >> > >> On 1/19/25 2:15 PM, George Hammond wrote: > >>> George Hammond MS Physics Cape Cod 1/19/25 > >> > >> No, give the date of graduation so I'd know how soon you'll fucking die. > >> You have a bag of pinto beans in my fridge with your name written on it. > > > > > > the date of graduation?? 1960 from high school > > > > > > Can anybody here explain to me what the word "Canidate" means???? > > > > Phd 'Canidate'? > > > > https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond/CurriculumVitae > > > > > > > > Oh he's almost kicking the bucket. I'll leave the pinto beans bag where > it is. It won't stay there too long. > > Relf was just 64 and kicked the bucket (inside which he also defecated) > last month. But with these funky "credentials" this one has, I'm > thinking what if he keeps on posting to sci.physics after dying! He is > in cahoots with "God" after all. https://cosmosmagazine.com/people/society/is-this-one-of-the-worst-scientific-scandals-of-all-time/ you wake up with fleas... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 17:45 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <678DAAB4.E54@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #660587 |
The Starmaker wrote: > https://cosmosmagazine.com/people/society/is-this-one-of-the-worst-scientific-scandals-of-all-time/ > > you wake up with fleas... It appears that Richmond Hammon was corrupted by this guy named Hans Eysenck: https://cosmosmagazine.com/people/society/is-this-one-of-the-worst-scientific-scandals-of-all-time/ https://www.academia.edu/33773402/The_Cartesian_theory_Unification_of_Eysenck_and_Gray Acknowledgements- The author wishes to thank Professors Hans Eysenck, in other words, garbage in garbage out. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 22:46 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <678DF14E.4B02@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #660591 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > https://cosmosmagazine.com/people/society/is-this-one-of-the-worst-scientific-scandals-of-all-time/ > > > > you wake up with fleas... > > It appears that George Hammond was corrupted by this guy named Hans Eysenck: > > https://cosmosmagazine.com/people/society/is-this-one-of-the-worst-scientific-scandals-of-all-time/ > > https://www.academia.edu/33773402/The_Cartesian_theory_Unification_of_Eysenck_and_Gray > > Acknowledgements- The author wishes to thank Professors Hans Eysenck, > > in other words, garbage in garbage out. > In fact, Hammond FIRST whole paper is based on Hans Eysenck! https://www.academia.edu/33773402/The_Cartesian_theory_Unification_of_Eysenck_and_Gray George E. Hammond must have fallen for Hans Eysenck cult. too late to deprogramme George E. Hammond maybe in the after life.. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-20 15:58 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vmmgu4$80no$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #660600 |
On 1/20/25 12:46 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: >> >> The Starmaker wrote: >>> https://cosmosmagazine.com/people/society/is-this-one-of-the-worst-scientific-scandals-of-all-time/ >>> >>> you wake up with fleas... >> >> It appears that George Hammond was corrupted by this guy named Hans Eysenck: >> >> https://cosmosmagazine.com/people/society/is-this-one-of-the-worst-scientific-scandals-of-all-time/ >> >> https://www.academia.edu/33773402/The_Cartesian_theory_Unification_of_Eysenck_and_Gray >> >> Acknowledgements- The author wishes to thank Professors Hans Eysenck, >> >> in other words, garbage in garbage out. >> > > > In fact, Hammond FIRST whole paper is based on Hans Eysenck! > > > https://www.academia.edu/33773402/The_Cartesian_theory_Unification_of_Eysenck_and_Gray > > George E. Hammond must have fallen for Hans Eysenck cult. > > > too late to deprogramme George E. Hammond > > > maybe in the after life.. > > Probably Alzheimer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-21 11:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <963c88fa-73f7-433a-9d82-9cf13489c501@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #660619 |
On 1/20/2025 4:58 PM, Physfitfreak wrote: > <SNIP TRASH> . . . [HAMMOND] MS Physics . Hey "PHYSICS FREAK", It is a known fact that the average World Adult human is only about 85% fully grown, some more some less, (WHO, UNESCO, etc. worldwide data) ! . And the word "GOD" is used to describe the (nonexistant) 100% fully grown Man. . That is a scientifically PROVEN FACT discovered by Hammond. . Are you aware of that ? - that there now exists a S C I E N T I F I C P R O O F OF GOD - - ? . . George Hammond
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-21 12:48 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vmoq6n$9f7j$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #660645 |
On 1/21/25 10:55 AM, George Hammond wrote: > Are you aware of that ? - that there now exists a > S C I E N T I F I C P R O O F OF GOD Are you aware that one day, soon indeed, I will fart you out? Pinto beans has "proven" benefits, but you need to buy them loose from Mexican stores to get them. The ones in cro-magnon stores are genetically modified to reduce the fart after effect. You're really a fucked up soul. God wants you to be farted out.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 19:01 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vmk78e$6o49$2@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #660581 |
On 1/19/25 6:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Can anybody here explain to me what the word "Canidate" means???? > > Phd 'Canidate'? > > https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond/CurriculumVitae They guy's fast too, for his age. As soon as he saw your question he corrected it on the internet. Which means, he can put any damn thing he wants in that bogus CV. Hehe :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 19:03 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vmk7c5$6o49$3@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #660583 |
On 1/19/25 7:01 PM, Physfitfreak wrote: > On 1/19/25 6:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> Can anybody here explain to me what the word "Canidate" means???? >> >> Phd 'Canidate'? >> >> https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond/CurriculumVitae > > > They guy's fast too, for his age. As soon as he saw your question he > corrected it on the internet. > > Which means, he can put any damn thing he wants in that bogus CV. Hehe :) > > Could it be that he's the one behind alias "Whodat"? I wonder. Same type of crook.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 17:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <678DA16E.7C2@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #660583 |
Physfitfreak wrote: > > On 1/19/25 6:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > Can anybody here explain to me what the word "Candidate" means???? > > > > Phd 'Candidate'? > > > > https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond/CurriculumVitae > > They guy's fast too, for his age. As soon as he saw your question he > corrected it on the internet. > > Which means, he can put any damn thing he wants in that bogus CV. Hehe :) I still se Phd 'Candidate' there... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 17:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <678DA3C0.44A9@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #660585 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > Physfitfreak wrote: > > > > On 1/19/25 6:19 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > Can anybody here explain to me what the word "Candidate" means???? > > > > > > Phd 'Candidate'? > > > > > > https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond/CurriculumVitae > > > > They guy's fast too, for his age. As soon as he saw your question he > > corrected it on the internet. > > > > Which means, he can put any damn thing he wants in that bogus CV. Hehe :) > > I still se Phd 'Candidate' there... It seems to me he was a "possiblly" getting a PhD, doesn't mean he ever got one... IS EVERYBODY A FRAUD HERE???? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 15:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <78888b00-c5e1-4b07-9371-f3302a404e8f@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #660537 |
On 1/18/2025 7:14 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 1/18/2025 3:51 PM, George Hammond wrote:
>>>
>> https://independent.academia.edu/GeorgeHammond\
>> Followers 187
>> Public Views 12,737 Top 4%
>
> How many of them say you know 100% exactly what happens after we die?
.
[George Hammond] MS Physics, Hyannis Cape Cod
.
Hi Chris Thomasson,
You and S T A R M A K E R are the only 2 people on S.P.R. who
are still talking to H A M M O N D !
.
You have mastered computer programming and the extensive
mathematics all of the well known FRACTAL EQUATION !
.
This makes you a BS in mathematics at least - possibly an MS !
.
STARMAKER on the other hand seems POLITICALLY ORIENTED
and is LIKELY the ONLY PERSON on SPR who actually KNOWS that
"ANTI-SEMITISM SO CALLED " is 300,000 years old simply because
it ORIGINATES in the elementary difference between the (northern
Lo-Sun white) species, and the (southern Hi-Sun brown) species,
whereby the "JEWS" so called, are biologically HALFWAY BETWEEN
the two because Tel Aviv Israel is located at 32° North latitude and
the Jews have been living there since the beginning of the world
and have become famous as the world's "race lawyers" and they
wrote the book on it – called the King James Bible !!
.
Because STARMAKERs is the only one on SPR who KNOWS this –
besides me, no one suggests that he should leave SPR simply
because he doesn't know DIDDLEY Physics !!
.
.
MEANWHILE, it's high time that SOMEONE discovered what
"GOD" actually is SCIENTIFICALLY SPEAKING !.
.
It turns out that there are many people in the world who actually
scientifically know what God is – but because it is so controversial
that if you can't PROVE IT --- no one dares to SAY IT !!
.
It turns out that "GOD" is simply a FULLY GROWN HUMAN BEING
... And science has discovered that there IS NO SUCH THING ...
There is no 100% fully grown person walking the Earth, and there
never has been.
.
But SOME PEOPLE are a lot more fully grown than others.... Which
means that:--
.
SOME PEOPLE ARE CLOSER TO GOD THAN OTHERS
.
AND IN FACT maybe 50,000 years in the future, everybody on Earth
will be fully grown... Assuming the standard of living gets high enough
we don't blow ourselves up !.
.
BUT IN THE MEANTIME --- in this scientific age, it is essential that
the average person become aware that "God" is a REAL PHYSICAL
PHENOMENON which refers to the fact that NO ONE IS FULLY GROWN
and that the word "God" refers to the hypothetically FULLY GROWN
PERSON .
.
Once you know that, you can understand what "God" actually is
since if the average (adult) person is only 85% fully grown
(WHO, UNESCO data) that means that 15% of the average
adult person's BRAIN is actually MISSING --- some more, some less !
.
And this is the world's number one problem .... And this is why the
physical effect of it it is called "GOD" !
.
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
NOW MISTER THOMASSON - - - you have questioned how anyone could
tell what "people were doing after they died" - - - -
.
Chris... I'm only here to point out to you, that it is ABSOLUTELY CLEAR
that the average adult human body is only 85% fully grown when it DIES !.
.
NOW BEEN.. It is clearly obvious that if there IS IN AFTERLIFE .... That
the purpose of such a thing is OBVIOUSLY to obtained the OTHER 15%
of our bodies that have been missing all our life, so that we can SEE
WHAT WE ACTUALLY MISSED during life !
This immediately tells us how to figure out what the AFTERLIFE
ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE !
.
AND IT IS THIS FACT that is you put it "tells us what people are doing
in the afterlife" !
.
George Hammond MS Physics Cape Cod 1/19/25
,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-11 21:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlvjau$11gmb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #660235 |
On 1/11/2025 10:51 AM, George Hammond wrote: [...] Try to relax? https://youtu.be/8GW6sLrK40k ;^)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-15 04:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6718dc2a-fd56-4c66-b693-cfb2cbcbe30e@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #660270 |
On 1/12/2025 12:18 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 1/11/2025 10:51 AM, George Hammond wrote:
> [...]
>
> relax?
>
T H E B I O L O G I C A L C A U S E
O F T H E A F T E R L I F E
George Hammond MS Physics Jan 2025
I think it's logically apparent that the reason that
nocturnal dreaming exists, is the fact that no
human being is "fully grown" – – – in fact we can
point out that the average world adult is apparently
only around 85% fully grown (WHO, UNESCO etc.).
I presume, that a fully grown human being, if such
a thing existed, would NOT dream at night.
45 centuries ago the Egyptians believed that
Dreaming was evidence of Life After Death.
I therefore conclude that the REASON for
Life After Death is likewise, the fact that no one is
fully grown !
If this is true, we see that Life After Death
is simply the last and final stage of the
lifelong human growth process, and that
the Life After Death mechanism is simply the
"Final Stage of Growth" of the human body !!
100% of "Full Consciousness" apparently is
sufficient for the body to assume that it has
finally reached "Full Grown" !
Note: this theory presumes that the microtubule
system contains a "complete map" of the body
whereas the neuronal system does not !
That this is possible is demonstrated by the fact
that the "genetic" mechanism that begins the body
is essentially 100% complete – – whereas as the
growth mechanism becomes higher and more
sophisticated – – shortfalls in the completeness
of the mechanism begin to show up – it is merely
assumed here that the microtubule system is
capable of completing the full growth of
consciousness, while the neuronal system alone
would not be able to.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-17 12:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <7a884e03-3505-4904-9f5e-fa1a5d76e8b2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #659592 |
On 12/16/2024 5:45 PM, Python wrote: > Le 16/12/2024 à 22:28, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit : >> >> ;^) My kook detector is going off the charts! lol. ;^) > > It's in your pocket, right? > > [George Hammond] MS Physics . Hi Python, Do you have any academic credentials (BS, MS, Phd)? Would you know what the Schrödinger equation is? . Thomasson is a renowned computer graphics Artist (Fractal graphics) but as a result has adopted the nasty habit of harassing credentialed scientists on S.P.R. ! . Geo. Hammond MS Physics Hyannis 12/17/24
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Python <jp@python.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-17 19:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <BQyJgu7TAx888efEVjL5QrfUGSI@jntp> |
| In reply to | #659622 |
Le 17/12/2024 à 19:51, George Hammond a écrit : > On 12/16/2024 5:45 PM, Python wrote: >> Le 16/12/2024 à 22:28, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit : >>> >>> ;^) My kook detector is going off the charts! lol. ;^) >> >> It's in your pocket, right? >> >> > [George Hammond] MS Physics > . > Hi Python, > Do you have any academic credentials (BS, MS, Phd)? > Would you know what the Schrödinger equation is? > . > Thomasson is a renowned computer graphics Artist > (Fractal graphics) but as a result has adopted the nasty > habit of harassing credentialed scientists on S.P.R. ! I don't think so. You are a well known demented crank though.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-17 15:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vjt2n5$1uv8v$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #659622 |
On 12/17/2024 9:47 AM, George Hammond wrote: > On 12/16/2024 5:45 PM, Python wrote: >> Le 16/12/2024 à 22:28, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit : >>> >>> ;^) My kook detector is going off the charts! lol. ;^) >> >> It's in your pocket, right? >> >> > [George Hammond] MS Physics > . > Hi Python, > Do you have any academic credentials (BS, MS, Phd)? > Would you know what the Schrödinger equation is? > . > Thomasson is a renowned computer graphics Artist > (Fractal graphics) but as a result has adopted the nasty > habit of harassing credentialed scientists on S.P.R. ! Am I harassing you? Sorry for that. It's just strange to me when somebody claims to know what happens after we die. It makes some of my "detectors" go off, so to speak. ;^o > . > Geo. Hammond MS Physics Hyannis 12/17/24
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web