Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #659548 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-14 20:09 -0800 |
| Last post | 2025-01-19 00:55 -0800 |
| Articles | 17 on this page of 197 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-14 20:09 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-12-15 10:14 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2024-12-15 03:06 -0800
Re: ww2 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-12-16 06:50 +0100
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-16 21:24 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-18 13:42 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-20 09:34 -0800
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 17:16 -0600
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-20 09:48 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-20 10:08 -0800
Re: ww3 % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 11:32 -0700
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-24 00:38 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-27 11:08 -0800
Re: ww3 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 00:14 -0700
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 04:58 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-01 04:56 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 07:21 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-02 06:43 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 22:52 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-01 15:05 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 07:21 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-03 09:12 +0000
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-04 07:38 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-03 23:40 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-05 09:05 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 14:38 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-05 12:26 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-07 06:45 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-07 00:05 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-08 08:33 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:09 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-09 07:55 +0100
Re: ww3 Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-09 08:02 +0100
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-09 10:01 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 01:20 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:05 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-14 08:35 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 08:57 -0500
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-15 10:57 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-15 21:35 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-16 17:17 -0800
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-15 16:28 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-10 08:15 +0100
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-14 08:53 +0000
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-16 08:56 +0100
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-16 08:25 +0000
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-18 08:27 +0100
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-19 10:35 +0000
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:29 -0600
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-20 08:38 +0100
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-20 09:58 +0000
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-16 08:56 +0000
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-18 08:33 +0100
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-18 15:58 +0000
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-19 07:40 +0100
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:35 -0600
Re: ww3 nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-01-20 14:26 +0100
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-21 07:46 +0100
Re: ww3 Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-22 09:19 +0100
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-23 11:54 +0100
Re: ww3 Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-23 14:12 +0100
Re: ww3 nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-01-23 22:15 +0100
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-23 14:15 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-24 09:01 +0100
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-24 10:35 -0800
Re: ww3 Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-24 20:49 +0100
Re: ww3 nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-01-25 10:29 +0100
Re: ww3 Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2025-01-25 14:01 +0000
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-25 12:14 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-08 23:08 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 01:19 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-10 08:32 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:08 -0500
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 22:51 -0600
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-10 08:25 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-09 23:40 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-11 09:29 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-11 11:26 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 14:32 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:25 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:21 -0500
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 16:16 -0600
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:18 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 22:22 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-07 20:12 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:11 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-08 12:14 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 14:00 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-05 11:50 -0800
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-05 11:51 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 22:25 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-07 06:22 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 22:31 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-07 20:33 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-08 09:13 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-08 01:07 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:19 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-11 09:39 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-11 11:39 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:33 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:31 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:21 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-11 09:46 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-11 11:47 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:37 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 14:02 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-07 06:28 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 22:34 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-08 09:00 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-08 01:09 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-09 07:44 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:23 -0500
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-08 16:01 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-11 09:49 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 19:39 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-03 08:49 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 14:39 -0500
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-07 06:46 +0100
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-06 23:59 -0800
Re: ww3 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-01-08 08:30 +0100
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:23 -0500
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-08 16:04 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 16:07 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 01:17 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 01:18 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 01:20 -0800
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-11 11:54 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 18:41 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 20:32 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 21:00 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 17:52 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 17:23 -0800
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-19 19:55 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 22:39 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 22:45 -0800
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-19 23:02 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 00:03 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 00:08 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-22 21:11 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-22 23:13 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-22 23:41 -0800
Re: ww3 Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-01-20 07:04 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 22:51 -0500
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-21 13:33 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-22 21:05 -0500
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-22 20:56 -0800
Re: ww3 Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-01-19 20:49 -0800
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 22:41 -0600
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 01:25 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-09 22:46 -0800
Re: ww3 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 23:18 -0700
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 18:40 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-19 19:44 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 22:56 -0500
Re: ww3 Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-01-07 11:23 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 22:35 -0500
Re: ww3 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 23:42 -0700
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-12 23:06 -0800
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-13 10:46 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-13 15:11 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-14 02:23 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 09:09 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-14 03:15 +0000
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-13 21:27 -0800
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-14 08:26 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 09:25 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-15 15:32 +0000
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 16:57 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-19 02:21 +0000
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-18 19:37 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 18:40 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 09:24 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-15 16:36 +0000
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-15 19:08 -0800
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-01-16 05:21 +0000
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-15 21:44 -0800
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 02:28 -0600
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 17:40 -0500
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 17:36 -0500
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 14:50 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 00:49 -0800
Re: ww3 "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 17:11 -0800
Re: ww3 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 23:12 -0700
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-13 15:00 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-13 12:53 -0800
Re: ww3 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 23:10 -0700
Re: ww3 Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 23:15 -0700
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 18:45 -0500
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-19 19:47 -0800
Re: ww3 Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 22:58 -0500
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-12-21 05:48 +0000
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 14:35 -0600
Re: ww3 bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-12-22 05:39 +0000
Re: ww3 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-22 02:50 -0600
Re: ww3 patdolan@comcast.net (patdolan) - 2025-01-19 03:01 +0000
Re: ww3 Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-18 19:37 -0800
Re: ww3 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 00:55 -0800
Page 10 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 00:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <678CBCAA.5B7F@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #660532 |
Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > > On 1/18/2025 2:36 PM, Governor Swill wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 16:36:57 +0000, bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) > > wrote: > > > >> Putin is very wise. > > > > <laughs and points> > > > >> If any NATO state attacks Russia he will use nukes. > > > > No, he won't. China and India have both told him not to and he knows full well > > if he does, Russia will be a greasy, ashy stain on Asia. > > > > Russia's conventional weapons suck. > > Russia's military doctrines suck. > > Are we to expect Russia's nuclear weapons to be in any better shape? > > > >> He has made this clear. He knows that because Russia will use mukes they > >> will not dare to attack. > > > > He knows that's not the reason the west won't attack. The west has learned that > > being attacked is the path to victory. NATO will not strike first. > > > >> He did not want NATO to put nukes in Ukraine > >> and the way to do that was to invade Ukraine. > > > > He would have been better off dealing with the nukes. His economy is destroyed, > > his military equipment decimated and proven inferior to decades old western > > military tech, his military doctrines utterly discredited. > > > >> No nukes from Ukraine > >> towards Russia, so Russia is safe from that direction. > > > > Russia was safe from Ukrainian nukes in any case. After all, Ukraine gave all > > it's nukes to Russia in exchange for Russian guarantees of Ukrainian security > > > > Ooops! Caught Russians lying again. > > > >> Not to invade > >> would have been incompetent and unpatriotic. > > > > And smart. No weapon strengthens a nation more than a strong economy. Putin > > screwed the pooch when he decided to make Russia dependent on oil revenues > > instead of diversifying a broader and deeper economy. > > > >> Ukraine's military was very powerful. > > > > More powerful than Russia's, apparently. > > > >> The West wanted them to drive out > >> Russians from Ukraine. So they were very well armed indeed and for years > >> had been fighting the Russians in Ukraine, depriving them of their > >> rights, etc. Of course without Western help Ukraine would have > >> collapsed. > > > > All of which is a pack of lies. Putin financed rebels and sent in Russian > > troops in unmarked uniforms, the 'little green men'. > > > >> Putin does not see Finland and Sweden as threats. > > > > LOL! So you admit NATO is no threat to Russia? > > > >> No interest there. > >> Poland yes has historically been an enemy but it was already hostile as > >> part of Nato. > > > > Poland has been an enemy because it has been conquered by Russia twice. > > > > <snip> > >>> Considering Ukraine's GDP *before* the Russian invasion was less than > >>> $200B, your lie becomes quickly evident. > >> > >> Land value from conquest, some 15 percent of the largest country in pure > >> Europe, is what the 12 t is about, nothing to do with GDP of Ukraine. > >> Putin has got the size of the whole of England and more. > > > > 'Wise' Putin has destroyed virtually all of it by leveling city after city. Any > > real estate he might end up with will do him no good without spending trillions > > rebuilding - trillions Russia doesn't have. > > > >> Your stupidity may be ignored for you are but an Einsteinian cretin. > >> Still, we try to put light within dark skills, futile as that effort may > >> be. > > > > Getting desperate, are you? > > > >>>> Not bad. > >>> > >>> Considering what he stole is so heavily damaged it can't produce squat > >>> anymore, > >>> I'd say that far from being a master strategist, Putin is an ill advised > >>> idiot. > >> > >> Unlike Biden and Johnson and other EU leaders he has got what he wanted. > > > > BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA! > > > >> He has stopped the Ukraine army from shelling Russians. > > > > Liar. Two Russian refineries and three air force fuel dumps went up in smoke > > just last week. > > > >> Liberated Crimea. > > > > BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA! Ukraine may get to liberate Crimea following > > Putin's conquest of an unwilling populace. > > > >> Stopped Ukraine from joining Nato. > > > > Delayed, possibly, but it will happen. > > > >> Expanded Russia. > > > > Turned it into a vassal state of China, you mean. > > > >> Made the > >> Western analysts look like absurd fools for their predictions. Has solid > >> support from his own people and China too. Retains support from > >> thirdworld. And now his buddy Trump will be potus and stop supporting > >> Zelensky. > > > > BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA! That's funny! Tell us another one! > > > >> Btw they have already repaired many cities they took. > > > > Liar. They don't have the manpower to do the construction work. Leveled cities > > don't get 'repaired' by magic. > > > >> Hard working lots, the Russians. > > > > Lazy drunks, you mean. > > > >> Fixed up the ruins of WW2, this is nothing by contrast. > > > > Oh, yes! Preach to us the joys of Stalinism! > > > >>>> Made fools > >>>> out of the West, fooled their grabby desires. Now failing there, idea > >>>> for the US is to grab Greenland etc. and should have better luck there. > >>> > >>> Now you're stopped making any sense at all. Russia has been made a fool > >>> of. Its > >>> military is crap, its Navy a laughing stock and its economy collapsing. > >> > >> Wrong on all counts. You Einsteinian cretins are a bad joke. You are > >> habitually programmed to swallow lies from your masters via propaganda > >> media. > > > > In the west, the media is controlled by private organizations who compete and > > operate as checks against each other. This tends to engender mostly facts in > > media. By contrast, in Russia, all media outlets are controlled directly by the > > state and spout only the state line. > > > >> True that the Navy has got hits by new technology rockets but the > >> rest is bullshit. > > > > Bullshit is certainly one word to describe the Russian Navy. Kuznetsov, > > scheduled to be re launched in 2020, is still stuck in drydock with bad engines. > > The Mediterranean fleet is idling off the coast of Syria out of artillery range > > so the Syrians won't fire at them. Their ships are running out of fuel and > > supplies. Turkey won't let them go home through the Bosporus and they don't > > have enough supplies to sail to Murmansk. The relief ships *from* Murmansk > > still haven't sailed. Soon the fleet will be powerless, starving and adrift in > > the sea. > > > >> Russia has made fools out of Nato bullies and EU > >> ninnies. Russian economy has managed not to collapsed and moved on. > >> Russian military has won 15% of Ukraine. > > > > It was 20% but Ukraine has taken a good bit of it back. > > > >> They use far more firepower > >> than Ukraine which means that they are losing far less soldiers. > > > > More lies. Russia is losing three to four soldiers for every one Ukraine loses. > > This, btw, is why Putin is importing tens of thousands of North Koreans in his > > futile attempt to take Kursk back. I guess you know that a recent UA > > counteroffensive has taken even more territory in Kursk. > > > >>>>> Putin has turned Russia into a vassal state of China and eliminated any > >>>>> chance > >>>>> of future greatness for his nation. > >>>> > >>>> Nonsense. Putin is on good terms with China and India and thirdworld, > >>>> Great politician, outsmarted you fools. > >>> > >>> That must be why India has stopped buying Russian weapons. China, > >>> ditto. > >> > >> India is making a fortune buying Russian oil cheap and selling it, > >> thanks to US sanctions on Russia. Indians never had it so good, cheap > >> petrol, huge profits, great distribution to the poor by handouts, very > >> fat salaries for all elites... India always busy weapons from Russia. > >> China is giving them sanctioned stuff. > > > > India has stopped buying weapons from Russia. They're buying from the US, > > France and China now. > > > > > >>> They buy just enough to copy them so they don't have to buy anymore. > >>> Both are getting Russian energy dirt cheap because Putin > >>> can't sell it to anybody else. > >> > >> India's main strike aircraft is Russian Su30mki. Lots of them. > > > > Drink the koolaid! > > > >> China and Russia have terrific trade. > > > > China gets cheap oil and Russia gets whatever drivel the Chinese are willing to > > risk sending them. > > > >> Then rocket launchers, tanks, guns, radars, helicopters, transport > >> aircraft, submarines, > > > > BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! > > > > Too funny! Russia has plenty of submarines. They're all stationed at the > > bottom of the Black Sea! > > > >>> Even that's going away as his shadow tanker fleet sinks, spoiling > >>> beaches, and > >>> get confiscated for incompetence on the sea. > >> > >> No problem for India so far. The war has been a real bonanza for India. > >> Huge tankers coming from all sides. > > > > Absolutely. The west ensured that India would still get the energy it needs and > > New Delhi is thankful for that consideration. > > > > Meanwhile, Russia' shadow fleet of tankers is finding itself banned from more > > and more ports. They're being seized by other nations for violations. > > > >>>>>> The West's strategy is to let the Orthodox > >>>>>> chaps die and make Russia weak; that by using obsolete scrap weaponry > >>>>>> for Ukraine continuing the war, while making money for the elites with > >>>>>> orders for new weapons. > >>>>> > >>>>> The west doesn't even think about religion. > >>>> > >>>> What a lie. Maga chaps are very religious. > >>> > >>> LOL! MAGA isn't running the "west", you moron. > >> > >> Cretin, they elected Trump to power and if US is not part of the West > >> that is news indeed. > > > > The US isn't the West. This is a fundamental misunderstanding that drives your > > misperceptions and therefore failures. > > > > "The West" is composed of the WW II participants who have allied against Russia > > joined by dozens of other nations. Japan, SK, Australia and even the > > Philippines, are hardly in the western hemisphere but are undoubtedly part of > > "the West". > > > >> Anyway the West has lost miserably in Ukraine and the sooner it accepts > >> that the better for all. > > > > Whatever helps you sleep at night. > > > >> To get and keep 15% of Ukraine depending upon foreign help and dud > >> shells is something only a brainwashed Einsteinian cretin can envisage. > > > > Yet it's an incontrovertible fact. > > > >>> How about those heroic (/s) North Korean troops he had to buy because he > >>> can't > >>> get Russians to sign up anymore? > >> > >> If he declares war he can conscript as many millions ss he likes. Till > >> then, he is using mercenaries. > > > > And if he declares war on "The West", those millions won't do him any good. > > > >>> His best friend, Iran, is still using American F-14 Tomcats and Chinook > >>> helicopters built in the 1960s from 1950s designs! > >> > >> They are using more potent and relevant defensive technologies to > >> prevent invasions. > > > > like spitballs and rubber bands? > > Just wondering, has Russia used a lot of it's thermobaric weapons yet, > just to piss people off? > > > > > So, who's trying to invade Iran? > > > > NP: Tina Turner - We Don't Need Another Hero (Live in Arnhem) > > Israel claims to have damaged some of Iran's anti-air capabilities? Answer: Because the air is free. What's the question? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 17:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vmk7r8$2l4td$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #660547 |
On 1/19/2025 12:49 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > Chris M. Thomasson wrote: [...] >> Israel claims to have damaged some of Iran's anti-air capabilities? > > > Answer: Because the air is free. > > > What's the question? > I guess, is what are these strange "mystery" drones flying over some states in the US. Do we have an airspace, or not? ;^)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-18 23:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <vmi547$1hvbk$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #660280 |
Siri Cruise wrote: > Gronk wrote: >> Thomas Heger wrote: >>> Am Sonntag000005, 05.01.2025 um 20:39 schrieb Governor Swill: >>>> On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 08:49:48 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The Russian also have an insane amount of tanks, which are mostly old. >>>>> But the newer 'Armata' tanks are very powerful and certainly difficult >>>>> to defeat. >>>> >>>> Both of them? Or just the one that broke down in Red Square at the >>>> parade? >>> >>> I have heard the Russians have about 12000 tanks. >>> >>> That is about 40 times the number of tanks in Germany. >> >> Russia has lost so many they pulled them out of >> storage. Cold war models. Stuff from the 1950s. > > Russian tactics is to have more tanks than enemy antitank rockets and > more soldiers than enemy bullets. That way after they make their enemy > expend all ammo, Russians can march past them. It's a swarm tactic and works when you don't care about casualties.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-13 15:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vqraojd3au2ottct4kujcv3latouimalub@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #660279 |
On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:42:52 -0700, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote: >Thomas Heger wrote: <snip> >> I have heard the Russians have about 12000 tanks. >> >> That is about 40 times the number of tanks in Germany. > >Russia has lost so many they pulled them out of >storage. Cold war models. Stuff from the 1950s. > >https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/07/07/russia-is-running-low-on-tanks-so-why-are-a-thousand-first-generation-t-72s-still-sitting-in-storage/ > That's the thing. Putin's bootlickers want to count every tank Russia has in storage. Even the gutted rust buckets built as far back as WWII. They have, or had, about 8000 actual usable tanks and few were actually competitive with what the west has been using since the 1980s. Just ask Saddam Hussein how his state of the art Russian tanks fared against American Abrams. Even the best of Russia's weapons are junk compared to what the west has. NP: Rob Thomas - I Am An Illusion
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-13 12:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vm3ufm$21cg1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #660297 |
Governor Swill wrote: > On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:42:52 -0700, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> Thomas Heger wrote: > <snip> >>> I have heard the Russians have about 12000 tanks. >>> >>> That is about 40 times the number of tanks in Germany. >> >> Russia has lost so many they pulled them out of >> storage. Cold war models. Stuff from the 1950s. >> >> https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/07/07/russia-is-running-low-on-tanks-so-why-are-a-thousand-first-generation-t-72s-still-sitting-in-storage/ >> > > That's the thing. Putin's bootlickers want to count every tank Russia has in > storage. Even the gutted rust buckets built as far back as WWII. They have, or > had, about 8000 actual usable tanks and few were actually competitive with what > the west has been using since the 1980s. Just ask Saddam Hussein how his state > of the art Russian tanks fared against American Abrams. > > Even the best of Russia's weapons are junk compared to what the west has. > > NP: Rob Thomas - I Am An Illusion > Eventually Putin will bring out Lend Lease M4s. -- Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @ 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \ of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-18 23:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <vmi506$1i06i$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #660307 |
Siri Cruise wrote: > Governor Swill wrote: >> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:42:52 -0700, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> >>> Thomas Heger wrote: >> <snip> >>>> I have heard the Russians have about 12000 tanks. >>>> >>>> That is about 40 times the number of tanks in Germany. >>> >>> Russia has lost so many they pulled them out of >>> storage. Cold war models. Stuff from the 1950s. >>> >>> https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/07/07/russia-is-running-low-on-tanks-so-why-are-a-thousand-first-generation-t-72s-still-sitting-in-storage/ >> >> That's the thing. Putin's bootlickers want to count every tank Russia >> has in >> storage. Even the gutted rust buckets built as far back as WWII. >> They have, or >> had, about 8000 actual usable tanks and few were actually competitive >> with what >> the west has been using since the 1980s. Just ask Saddam Hussein how >> his state >> of the art Russian tanks fared against American Abrams. >> >> Even the best of Russia's weapons are junk compared to what the west has. > > Eventually Putin will bring out Lend Lease M4s. It's worse than that https://www.businessinsider.com/russian-mosfilm-studio-donated-soviet-tanks-t55-pt76-ukraine-war-2024-11 Russia needed armor so badly that its biggest film studio donated 36 Soviet-era tanks that were used as props
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-18 23:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <vmi59l$1hvbk$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #660297 |
Governor Swill wrote: > On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:42:52 -0700, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> Thomas Heger wrote: > <snip> >>> I have heard the Russians have about 12000 tanks. >>> >>> That is about 40 times the number of tanks in Germany. >> >> Russia has lost so many they pulled them out of >> storage. Cold war models. Stuff from the 1950s. >> >> https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/07/07/russia-is-running-low-on-tanks-so-why-are-a-thousand-first-generation-t-72s-still-sitting-in-storage/ > > That's the thing. Putin's bootlickers want to count every tank Russia has in > storage. Even the gutted rust buckets built as far back as WWII. They have, or > had, about 8000 actual usable tanks and few were actually competitive with what > the west has been using since the 1980s. Just ask Saddam Hussein how his state > of the art Russian tanks fared against American Abrams. > > Even the best of Russia's weapons are junk compared to what the west has. However, they're fond of massed assets in an attack. What we used to call "a target rich environment". You can't get them all and NATO plans, read somewheres, involved resorting to tactical nukes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 18:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0k3rojth8d2jukmsaks0ketmplgdcaincv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #660544 |
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 23:15:16 -0700, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote: >Governor Swill wrote: >> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:42:52 -0700, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>> Thomas Heger wrote: >> <snip> >>>> I have heard the Russians have about 12000 tanks. >>>> >>>> That is about 40 times the number of tanks in Germany. >>> >>> Russia has lost so many they pulled them out of >>> storage. Cold war models. Stuff from the 1950s. >>> >>> https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/07/07/russia-is-running-low-on-tanks-so-why-are-a-thousand-first-generation-t-72s-still-sitting-in-storage/ >> >> That's the thing. Putin's bootlickers want to count every tank Russia has in >> storage. Even the gutted rust buckets built as far back as WWII. They have, or >> had, about 8000 actual usable tanks and few were actually competitive with what >> the west has been using since the 1980s. Just ask Saddam Hussein how his state >> of the art Russian tanks fared against American Abrams. >> >> Even the best of Russia's weapons are junk compared to what the west has. > >However, they're fond of massed assets in an >attack. What we used to call "a target rich >environment". You can't get them all and NATO >plans, read somewheres, involved resorting >to tactical nukes. Russia's version of 'blitzkrieg'. Too bad it hasn't worked out for them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 19:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vmkh1f$2rf9e$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #660579 |
Governor Swill wrote: > On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 23:15:16 -0700, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> Governor Swill wrote: >>> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:42:52 -0700, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>> Thomas Heger wrote: >>> <snip> >>>>> I have heard the Russians have about 12000 tanks. >>>>> >>>>> That is about 40 times the number of tanks in Germany. >>>> >>>> Russia has lost so many they pulled them out of >>>> storage. Cold war models. Stuff from the 1950s. >>>> >>>> https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/07/07/russia-is-running-low-on-tanks-so-why-are-a-thousand-first-generation-t-72s-still-sitting-in-storage/ >>> >>> That's the thing. Putin's bootlickers want to count every tank Russia has in >>> storage. Even the gutted rust buckets built as far back as WWII. They have, or >>> had, about 8000 actual usable tanks and few were actually competitive with what >>> the west has been using since the 1980s. Just ask Saddam Hussein how his state >>> of the art Russian tanks fared against American Abrams. >>> >>> Even the best of Russia's weapons are junk compared to what the west has. >> >> However, they're fond of massed assets in an >> attack. What we used to call "a target rich >> environment". You can't get them all and NATO >> plans, read somewheres, involved resorting >> to tactical nukes. > > Russia's version of 'blitzkrieg'. Too bad it hasn't worked out for them. > It resulted in the best and brightest, young men important to the economy, scamperring over the border. -- Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @ 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \ of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-20 22:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0p6uojtjv7glm2blds9vj41odjp1atiuf2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #660593 |
On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 19:47:59 -0800, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote: >Governor Swill wrote: >> On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 23:15:16 -0700, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Governor Swill wrote: >>>> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:42:52 -0700, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Thomas Heger wrote: >>>> <snip> >>>>>> I have heard the Russians have about 12000 tanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> That is about 40 times the number of tanks in Germany. >>>>> >>>>> Russia has lost so many they pulled them out of >>>>> storage. Cold war models. Stuff from the 1950s. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/07/07/russia-is-running-low-on-tanks-so-why-are-a-thousand-first-generation-t-72s-still-sitting-in-storage/ >>>> >>>> That's the thing. Putin's bootlickers want to count every tank Russia has in >>>> storage. Even the gutted rust buckets built as far back as WWII. They have, or >>>> had, about 8000 actual usable tanks and few were actually competitive with what >>>> the west has been using since the 1980s. Just ask Saddam Hussein how his state >>>> of the art Russian tanks fared against American Abrams. >>>> >>>> Even the best of Russia's weapons are junk compared to what the west has. >>> >>> However, they're fond of massed assets in an >>> attack. What we used to call "a target rich >>> environment". You can't get them all and NATO >>> plans, read somewheres, involved resorting >>> to tactical nukes. >> >> Russia's version of 'blitzkrieg'. Too bad it hasn't worked out for them. >> > >It resulted in the best and brightest, young men important to the >economy, scamperring over the border. Centuries of Czars and Commies executing/imprisoning the best and brightest for loyalty failings have resulted in a general lowering of ability in Russia. Not only are the most intelligent routinely eliminated from the gene pool, culturally it is learned that to excel or have a high profile is dangerous.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 05:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <c485ceb08a6ddfc72c28a0f38aac81ee@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #659645 |
We will eat you alive if you dare to think we are not made of peace
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 14:35 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vk78qt$167ba$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #659710 |
On 12/20/24 11:48 PM, Bertietaylor wrote: > We will eat you alive if you dare to think we are not made of peace Exactly :) That's U.S. government talking to Americans and other people around the world. Great Satan.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 05:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fc5bf3c2959f3964d2e538e6da5a1aa9@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #659720 |
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 20:35:41 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote: > On 12/20/24 11:48 PM, Bertietaylor wrote: >> We will eat you alive if you dare to think we are not made of peace > > > Exactly :) That's U.S. government talking to Americans and other people > around the world. > > Great Satan. Roachie, there are conflicting views about Satan between the Jews and the Christians. For the latter Satan is evil incarnate. The Jews going by what some rabbis say think otherwise. To them Satan is Jehovah's loyal#1 follower who tests God's believers with temptations and when they fail prosecute those miserable creatures. Apparently some bad translation of Jewish ancient texts caused this divergence. What is the Muslim take of Satan?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 02:50 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vk8jsk$16uqq$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #659723 |
On 12/21/24 11:39 PM, Bertietaylor wrote: > What is the Muslim take of Satan? American billionaires.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | patdolan@comcast.net (patdolan) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 03:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <741d0eae3f6fea1f8f6bdb25c83f71e9@www.novabbs.com> |
| In reply to | #659548 |
Is this post actually showing? I might start posting again if it is. Hey Tom (hell, I can't remember his last name) look at what I'm doing over on stackexhange physics. I've battled their two top relativists to a stalemate over the BBP. They are totally confounded. And I if finally did make Kepler 3 frame invariant. They were just too damned dumb to do so, as are the relativists in this forum. Did Bodkin ever show up again? Those stackexchange guys have an exhaustive list of all the invariant quantities for the Riemann tensor. You can read about them here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carminati–McLenaghan_invariants What a victory for Trump, huh.. Looks like Trump is going to force rotchm to become American. It will be good for him. I might try living in the 52nd State, Greenland, for a while if the opportunity arises. Wonder if anyone can read this.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-18 19:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vmhs0t$1fgfj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #660539 |
patdolan wrote: > Is this post actually showing? I might start posting again if it > is. Hey Tom (hell, I No, I did not see it. -- Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @ 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \ of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-19 00:55 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <678CBE11.50D0@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #660540 |
Siri Cruise wrote:
>
> patdolan wrote:
> > Is this post actually showing? I might start posting again if it
> > is. Hey Tom (hell, I
>
> No, I did not see it.
She doesn't know you read the braille version of Usenet...
Here, you can see it better now
,is ? po/ actu,y %{+8
. . .
.. .
........
.
..
.
.
....
..
...
..
.
.
.
....
...
....
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web