Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #659278 > unrolled thread

IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC?

Started byGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
First post2024-11-30 20:23 -0500
Last post2024-12-20 09:21 -0800
Articles 20 on this page of 101 — 11 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity


Contents

  IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-11-30 20:23 -0500
    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 04:49 -0500
      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-01 15:34 -0800
        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 23:35 -0500
        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-01 21:17 -0800
          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-02 23:48 -0500
            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-02 22:43 -0800
              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? x <x@x.org> - 2024-12-03 19:31 -0800
              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-04 09:12 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2024-12-04 18:50 +0000
                  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 09:23 -0500
                    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 08:43 -0800
                      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 09:18 -0800
                        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? x <x@x.org> - 2024-12-05 16:04 -0800
                          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 16:34 -0800
                            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 19:40 -0800
                              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-05 19:55 -0800
                        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-07 09:56 -0800
                    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-05 16:33 -0800
    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-01 21:12 -0800
      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-03 08:52 -0500
        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-03 17:37 -0800
          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 17:52 -0800
            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 06:54 -0500
              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 13:12 -0800
                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 19:12 -0500
                  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 21:17 -0800
                    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 21:38 -0500
                      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 18:53 -0800
                        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 01:53 -0500
                          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 02:01 -0800
                            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 01:14 -0800
                      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-13 09:28 +0100
                        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 12:34 -0500
                          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 11:45 -0800
                          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-14 15:18 +0100
                            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-14 21:04 -0800
                              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-12-15 05:23 +0000
                            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 09:56 -0500
                              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-16 17:54 +0100
                                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 13:28 -0800
                                  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Python <jpierre.messager@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 22:45 +0000
                                    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 22:10 -0800
                                    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 13:03 -0500
                                      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Python <coin@python.invalid> - 2024-12-17 18:06 +0000
                                        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 21:28 -0800
                                          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 21:31 -0800
                                            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 02:24 -0500
                                              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 13:09 -0800
                                                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 20:57 -0500
                                                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 20:52 -0500
                                                  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 15:49 -0800
                                                    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 02:40 -0500
                                                      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 00:51 -0800
                                                        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 00:53 -0800
                                                          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 13:51 -0500
                                                            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 12:37 -0800
                                                              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 05:21 -0500
                                                                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-15 10:02 -0800
                                                                  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 17:37 -0500
                                                                  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:29 -0500
                                                                    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 16:37 -0800
                                                                  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:34 -0500
                                                                  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:41 -0500
                                                                  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:46 -0500
                                                                  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-16 05:51 -0500
                                                                  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-16 10:56 -0800
                                                                    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? x <x@x.org> - 2025-01-16 14:40 -0800
                                                                      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 17:05 -0500
                                                                        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-17 14:17 -0800
                                                                          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-17 22:44 -0800
                                                                            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 13:55 -0800
                                                                              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 18:19 -0500
                                                                            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 18:23 -0500
                                                                            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:21 -0600
                                                                              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 17:28 -0500
                                                                          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 18:51 -0500
                                                                            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-18 16:14 -0800
                                                                              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 00:58 -0800
                                                                                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 17:06 -0800
                                                                              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:15 -0500
                                                                                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 14:42 -0600
                                                                                  Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 16:19 -0800
                                                                                    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 18:57 -0600
                                                                                      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:07 -0800
                                                                                        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:45 -0800
                                                                                          Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 22:46 -0800
                                                                                            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-20 15:58 -0600
                                                                                              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-21 11:55 -0500
                                                                                                Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-21 12:48 -0600
                                                                                    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 19:01 -0600
                                                                                      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 19:03 -0600
                                                                                      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:05 -0800
                                                                                        Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-19 17:15 -0800
                                                                              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:02 -0500
                                                            Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 21:18 -0800
                                                              Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 04:50 -0500
                                    Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 12:47 -0500
                                      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? Python <jp@python.invalid> - 2024-12-17 19:04 +0000
                                      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 15:49 -0800
                                      Re: IS THE AFTERLIFE RELATIVISTIC? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-12-20 09:21 -0800

Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →


#659591

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-16 13:28 -0800
Message-ID<vjq616$1abpp$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#659588
On 12/16/2024 8:54 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
> On 2024-12-16 14:56:39 +0000, George Hammond said:
>> .
>> A FACSIMILE COPY OF THE HAMMOND PAPER POSTED HERE:---
>> .
>> https://www.academia.edu/33773402/ 
>> The_Cartesian_theory_Unification_of_Eysenck_and_Gray
>> .
>> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>> So please take notice Dr. ATHEL CORNIH BOWDEN; you have asked reviously:
>> "scientifically acceptable"? Which reputable scientific journal has 
>> accepted it?" and there you have your answer......New Ideas In 
>> Psychology. Vol. 12(2), 1994 pp. 153-167, Pergamon Press unamously 
>> accepted and published the paper !
>> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> 
> Hmm. "In addition the author has researched the notion that the Four 
> Gospel Canon of the Bible is in fact the theological identification of 
> the Structural Model. Indeed, the Cross of Christianity itself is quite 
> likely the symbolic representation of the Cartesian structure of the 
> mind (Hammond, 1988, 1989). The effects of this discovery on science, 
> religion and government can be expected to be far reaching."
> 
> No comment
> 

;^) My kook detector is going off the charts! lol. ;^)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#659592

FromPython <jpierre.messager@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-16 22:45 +0000
Message-ID<sP1J87cek9oz1DNxlakrG4JOCM0@jntp>
In reply to#659591
Le 16/12/2024 à 22:28, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :
> On 12/16/2024 8:54 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
>> On 2024-12-16 14:56:39 +0000, George Hammond said:
>>> .
>>> A FACSIMILE COPY OF THE HAMMOND PAPER POSTED HERE:---
>>> .
>>> https://www.academia.edu/33773402/ 
>>> The_Cartesian_theory_Unification_of_Eysenck_and_Gray
>>> .
>>> 
>>> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>>> So please take notice Dr. ATHEL CORNIH BOWDEN; you have asked reviously:
>>> "scientifically acceptable"? Which reputable scientific journal has 
>>> accepted it?" and there you have your answer......New Ideas In 
>>> Psychology. Vol. 12(2), 1994 pp. 153-167, Pergamon Press unamously 
>>> accepted and published the paper !
>>> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>> 
>> Hmm. "In addition the author has researched the notion that the Four 
>> Gospel Canon of the Bible is in fact the theological identification of 
>> the Structural Model. Indeed, the Cross of Christianity itself is quite 
>> likely the symbolic representation of the Cartesian structure of the 
>> mind (Hammond, 1988, 1989). The effects of this discovery on science, 
>> religion and government can be expected to be far reaching."
>> 
>> No comment
>> 
> 
> ;^) My kook detector is going off the charts! lol. ;^)

It's in your pocket, right?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#659597

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-16 22:10 -0800
Message-ID<vjr4l6$1j1g9$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#659592
On 12/16/2024 2:45 PM, Python wrote:
> Le 16/12/2024 à 22:28, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :
>> On 12/16/2024 8:54 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
>>> On 2024-12-16 14:56:39 +0000, George Hammond said:
>>>> .
>>>> A FACSIMILE COPY OF THE HAMMOND PAPER POSTED HERE:---
>>>> .
>>>> https://www.academia.edu/33773402/ 
>>>> The_Cartesian_theory_Unification_of_Eysenck_and_Gray
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>>>> So please take notice Dr. ATHEL CORNIH BOWDEN; you have asked 
>>>> reviously:
>>>> "scientifically acceptable"? Which reputable scientific journal has 
>>>> accepted it?" and there you have your answer......New Ideas In 
>>>> Psychology. Vol. 12(2), 1994 pp. 153-167, Pergamon Press unamously 
>>>> accepted and published the paper !
>>>> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>>>
>>> Hmm. "In addition the author has researched the notion that the Four 
>>> Gospel Canon of the Bible is in fact the theological identification 
>>> of the Structural Model. Indeed, the Cross of Christianity itself is 
>>> quite likely the symbolic representation of the Cartesian structure 
>>> of the mind (Hammond, 1988, 1989). The effects of this discovery on 
>>> science, religion and government can be expected to be far reaching."
>>>
>>> No comment
>>>
>>
>> ;^) My kook detector is going off the charts! lol. ;^)
> 
> It's in your pocket, right?
> 
> 

Right next some other things in my pocket. lol. Touche. Humm... Well, 
for some reason, people that say that they know exactly what happens 
after we die make my "detectors" go off, tilt... Fair enough? :^)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#659616

FromGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-17 13:03 -0500
Message-ID<27a27678-06a7-460c-894f-73b2393ab181@gmail.com>
In reply to#659592
On 12/16/2024 5:45 PM, Python wrote:
> Le 16/12/2024 à 22:28, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :
..
[George Hammond] MS Physics
.
Hi Python,
Do you have any scientific credentials (BS-MS-Phd)?
Would you know what the Schrödinger eqn. is?
.
Thomasson is a famous computer graphics Artist
(Fractal graphics) but has a nasty habit of
harassing graduate scientists on S.P.R.  !
.
Geo. Hammond MS Physics Hyannis 12/17/24>>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#659618

FromPython <coin@python.invalid>
Date2024-12-17 18:06 +0000
Message-ID<DeFiyL1bNJ1Nm0nSSzi55m1xPvA@jntp>
In reply to#659616
Le 17/12/2024 à 19:03, George Hammond a écrit :
> On 12/16/2024 5:45 PM, Python wrote:
>> Le 16/12/2024 à 22:28, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :
> ..
> [George Hammond] MS Physics
> .
> Hi Python,
> Do you have any scientific credentials (BS-MS-Phd)?
> Would you know what the Schrödinger eqn. is?
> .
> Thomasson is a famous computer graphics Artist
> (Fractal graphics) but has a nasty habit of
> harassing graduate scientists on S.P.R.  !

He is making fun of you. You deserve it, you are an insufferable kook.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#659834

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-25 21:28 -0800
Message-ID<vkiph4$2qe5i$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#659618
On 12/17/2024 10:06 AM, Python wrote:
> Le 17/12/2024 à 19:03, George Hammond a écrit :
>> On 12/16/2024 5:45 PM, Python wrote:
>>> Le 16/12/2024 à 22:28, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :
>> ..
>> [George Hammond] MS Physics
>> .
>> Hi Python,
>> Do you have any scientific credentials (BS-MS-Phd)?
>> Would you know what the Schrödinger eqn. is?
>> .
>> Thomasson is a famous computer graphics Artist
>> (Fractal graphics) but has a nasty habit of
>> harassing graduate scientists on S.P.R.  !
> 
> He is making fun of you. You deserve it, you are an insufferable kook.
> 
> 

Humm... Well, yeah. Shit. Well, I don't mean to me mean. Shit happens.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#659835

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-25 21:31 -0800
Message-ID<vkipo6$2qe5i$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#659834
On 12/25/2024 9:28 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 12/17/2024 10:06 AM, Python wrote:
>> Le 17/12/2024 à 19:03, George Hammond a écrit :
>>> On 12/16/2024 5:45 PM, Python wrote:
>>>> Le 16/12/2024 à 22:28, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :
>>> ..
>>> [George Hammond] MS Physics
>>> .
>>> Hi Python,
>>> Do you have any scientific credentials (BS-MS-Phd)?
>>> Would you know what the Schrödinger eqn. is?
>>> .
>>> Thomasson is a famous computer graphics Artist
>>> (Fractal graphics) but has a nasty habit of
>>> harassing graduate scientists on S.P.R.  !
>>
>> He is making fun of you. You deserve it, you are an insufferable kook.
>>
>>
> 
> Humm... Well, yeah. Shit. Well, I don't mean to me mean. Shit happens.

Multiple detectors going off in a row, well, I notice them... And, have 
to align to context... Ahhh! I see, something to do with God, perhaps in 
a round about way, kind of? I do not know what happens after we die, 
ect, ... Shit like that. So, when I read about somebody writing that 
they claim to know for sure (that main fact, after death), there are 
some detectors that stating chiming in, so to speak. I need to follow 
them. It's not about being mean to you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#660089

FromGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-04 02:24 -0500
Message-ID<a6aee09e-c666-42ec-9292-d830bdd66c96@gmail.com>
In reply to#659835
On 12/26/2024 12:31 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>  I do not know what happens after we die, 
> 
[George Hammond] MS Physics
.
Beginning in ancient Egypt, the world has speculated
that there is "Life After Death";  for 50 Centuries !
.
No one knows if this is true !
.
But for the first time in recorded history a physicist
GEORGE HAMMOND has actually shown that Stuart Hameroff's
discovery of the ultraviolet MICROTUBULE transmission system
inside the neurons of the brain makes it:
.
THEORETICALLY POSSIBLE
.
for a years long AFTERLIFE to exist
.
even if the human brain is DESTROYED IN A MICRO-SECOND
.
BY, LIGHTENING, TNT, OR EVEN AN ATOMIC BOMB
.
.
.
What the probability of an Afterlife is, we don't know,
.... but NOW,  WE DO KNOW IT'S PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE...
IN FACT IT'S EVEN SCIENTIFICALLY PROBABLE  !!
.
Geo. Hammond,  MS Physics

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#660102

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-04 13:09 -0800
Message-ID<vlc82d$k8s5$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#660089
On 1/3/2025 11:24 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> On 12/26/2024 12:31 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>  I do not know what happens after we die,
> [George Hammond] MS Physics
> .
> Beginning in ancient Egypt, the world has speculated
> that there is "Life After Death";  for 50 Centuries !
> .
> No one knows if this is true !
> .
> But for the first time in recorded history a physicist
> GEORGE HAMMOND has actually shown that Stuart Hameroff's
> discovery of the ultraviolet MICROTUBULE transmission system
> inside the neurons of the brain makes it:
> .
> THEORETICALLY POSSIBLE
> .
> for a years long AFTERLIFE to exist
> .
> even if the human brain is DESTROYED IN A MICRO-SECOND
> .
> BY, LIGHTENING, TNT, OR EVEN AN ATOMIC BOMB
> .
> .
> .
> What the probability of an Afterlife is, we don't know,
> .... but NOW,  WE DO KNOW IT'S PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE...
> IN FACT IT'S EVEN SCIENTIFICALLY PROBABLE  !!
> .
> Geo. Hammond,  MS Physics

Are you trying to suggest that our brains are entangled with another 
brain in a higher dimension? Just kidding, having fun.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#660104

FromGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-04 20:57 -0500
Message-ID<2b0ac944-8a97-4a0e-a78c-b85dfc741233@gmail.com>
In reply to#660102
On 1/4/2025 4:09 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> 
> Are you trying to suggest that our brains are entangled with another 
> brain in a higher dimension? Just kidding.
.
.
[George Hammond] MS physics
.
    All EXISTING scientific theories of  "Life after Death" (LAD) that 
have ever been proposed-----  A R E  A B S O L U T E  N O N S E N S E
.
  H A M M O N D  I S  T H E  O N L Y  E X C E P T I O N   ! ! !
.
Competent PHYSICS tells us:---
.
1.   If LAD exists, it must happen in the BRAIN not in "outer space",
      "another Galaxy". "another World",  etc, etc, etc,  ! !
.
2.   If LAD exists it must be able to occur in micro-seconds since
      explosives and common lightening can obliterate the brain that fast
.
2.   Since we expect the Afterlife to last for months or years... it is
      obvious that a few microc-seconds must somehow be scientifically
      "time dilated" into months or years subjectively !
.
WELL GUESS WHAT- - - - Physicist HAMMOND has accidentally discovered
how the human brain does EXACTLY THAT ..... ..
.
LONG STORY SHORT---
    At the moment of death.... the MICRTUBULE system operating on
UV light ten trillion times faster than ordinary neuronal firing...
makes this POSSIBLE ... and the (simple) details are straight
forward, and published by HAMMOND ...
SEE:...
.
https://www.academia.edu/44527322/A_Simple_Car_Airbag_Model_of_Life_After_Death
.
and
.
https://www.academia.edu/35735589/Calculating_the_Duration_of_the_Afterlife
,
.
And we might add that Science is indebted to STUART HAMEROFF for
discovering the MICROTUBULE SYSTEM which makes all this possible !
.
Regards,  G. Hammond MS Physics
.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#660107

FromGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-04 20:52 -0500
Message-ID<0e87587b-f72f-48a4-872c-46172eed0d32@gmail.com>
In reply to#660102
On 1/4/2025 4:09 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> 
> Are you trying to suggest that our brains are entangled with another 
> brain in a higher dimension? Just kidding.
.
.
[George Hammond] MS physics
.
    All EXISTING scientific theories of  "Life after Death" (LAD) that 
have ever been proposed-----  A R E  A B S O L U T E  N O N S E N S E
.
  H A M M O N D  I S  T H E  O N L Y  E X C E P T I O N   ! ! !
.
Competent PHYSICS tells us:---
.
1.   If LAD exists, it must happen in the BRAIN not in "outer space",
      "another Galaxy". "another World",  etc, etc, etc,  ! !
.
2.   If LAD exists it must be able to occur in micro-seconds since
      explosives and common lightening can obliterate the brain that fast
.
2.   Since we expect the Afterlife to last for months or years... it is
      obvious that a few microc-seconds must somehow be scientifically
      "time dilated" into months or years subjectively !
.
WELL GUESS WHAT- - - - Physicist HAMMOND has accidentally discovered
how the human brain does EXACTLY THAT ..... ..
.
LONG STORY SHORT---
    At the moment of death.... the MICRTUBULE system operating on
UV light ten trillion times faster than ordinary neuronal firing...
makes this POSSIBLE ... and the (simple) details are straight
forward, and published by HAMMOND ...
SEE:...
.
https://www.academia.edu/44527322/A_Simple_Car_Airbag_Model_of_Life_After_Death
.
and
.
https://www.academia.edu/35735589/Calculating_the_Duration_of_the_Afterlife
,
.
And we might add that Science is indebted to STUART HAMEROFF for
discovering the MICROTUBULE SYSTEM which makes all this possible !
.
Regards,  G. Hammond MS Physics
.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#660212

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-10 15:49 -0800
Message-ID<vlsbn1$9hji$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#660107
On 1/4/2025 5:52 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> On 1/4/2025 4:09 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>
>> Are you trying to suggest that our brains are entangled with another 
>> brain in a higher dimension? Just kidding.
> .
> .
> [George Hammond] MS physics
> .
>     All EXISTING scientific theories of  "Life after Death" (LAD) that 
> have ever been proposed-----  A R E  A B S O L U T E  N O N S E N S E
> .
>   H A M M O N D  I S  T H E  O N L Y  E X C E P T I O N   ! ! !
> .
> Competent PHYSICS tells us:---
> .
> 1.   If LAD exists, it must happen in the BRAIN not in "outer space",
>       "another Galaxy". "another World",  etc, etc, etc,  ! !
> .
> 2.   If LAD exists it must be able to occur in micro-seconds since
>       explosives and common lightening can obliterate the brain that fast
> .
> 2.   Since we expect the Afterlife to last for months or years... it is
>       obvious that a few microc-seconds must somehow be scientifically
>       "time dilated" into months or years subjectively !
> .
> WELL GUESS WHAT- - - - Physicist HAMMOND has accidentally discovered
> how the human brain does EXACTLY THAT ..... ..

So you say no "afterlife" for somebody who has a nuclear bomb duct taped 
to their head, and it goes off? lol. ;^D



> .
> LONG STORY SHORT---
>     At the moment of death.... the MICRTUBULE system operating on
> UV light ten trillion times faster than ordinary neuronal firing...
> makes this POSSIBLE ... and the (simple) details are straight
> forward, and published by HAMMOND ...
> SEE:...
> .
> https://www.academia.edu/44527322/ 
> A_Simple_Car_Airbag_Model_of_Life_After_Death
> .
> and
> .
> https://www.academia.edu/35735589/Calculating_the_Duration_of_the_Afterlife
> ,
> .
> And we might add that Science is indebted to STUART HAMEROFF for
> discovering the MICROTUBULE SYSTEM which makes all this possible !
> .
> Regards,  G. Hammond MS Physics
> .

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#660216

FromGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-11 02:40 -0500
Message-ID<59e8de9a-c817-4b3f-a14e-0773267cfeca@gmail.com>
In reply to#660212
On 1/10/2025 6:49 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> 
> 
> So you say no "afterlife" for somebody who has a nuclear bomb duct taped 
> to their head, and it goes off?
> 
> 
> 
 > [George Hammond] MS Physics
.
WRONG - - -
    I am telling you that IF the "CZAR BOMBA" the Russian's biggest
nuclear bomb in the world (50 megatons) went off while "DUCT TAPED"
to your head - - - you could still: - - - GO TO HEAVEN FOR 10 YEARS !
Even though your brain would disappear in microseconds !!!!
.
    The reason for this, is that the brain has
.
"TWO IDENTICAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS" (one inside the other)
.
1.  The NEURONAL system operating at (1 kiloHertz. ionization)
and
2.  The MICROTUBULE system operating at (10^15 Hertz. UV light)
.
UV light not only travels at the speed of light, it has a frequency of
10^15 Hertz
.
This causes an enormous "TIME DILATION" between neuronal
transmission and microtubule transmission
.
In other words, a "one microsecond microtubule dream" becomes
dilated to a "one year neuronal dream dream" because of the
ENORMOUS FREQUENCY RATIO !.
.
IOW the microtubule system reads out a 10 year afterlife dream
from the walls of the microtubules in which brain memory is encoded
and then transmits it to the REST OF THE MICROTUBULE BRAIN,
so that the dying person actually EXPERIENCES a
.
10 YEAR AFTERLIFE but it is experienced in 10 MICROSECONDS .
.
It's as simple as that !
.
And once again, we can thank Prof. STUART HAMEROFF for
discovering the microtubule system – which makes all of this possible !
.
George Hammond, MS Physics, Hyannis MA USA
.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#660221

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-11 00:51 -0800
Message-ID<vltbf1$h8ou$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#660216
On 1/10/2025 11:40 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> On 1/10/2025 6:49 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>
>>
>> So you say no "afterlife" for somebody who has a nuclear bomb duct 
>> taped to their head, and it goes off?
>>
>>
>>
>  > [George Hammond] MS Physics
> .
> WRONG - - -
>     I am telling you that IF the "CZAR BOMBA" the Russian's biggest
> nuclear bomb in the world (50 megatons) went off while "DUCT TAPED"
> to your head - - - you could still: - - - GO TO HEAVEN FOR 10 YEARS !

Why not 11?


> Even though your brain would disappear in microseconds !!!!
> .
>     The reason for this, is that the brain has
> .
> "TWO IDENTICAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS" (one inside the other)
> .
> 1.  The NEURONAL system operating at (1 kiloHertz. ionization)
> and
> 2.  The MICROTUBULE system operating at (10^15 Hertz. UV light)
> .
> UV light not only travels at the speed of light, it has a frequency of
> 10^15 Hertz
> .
> This causes an enormous "TIME DILATION" between neuronal
> transmission and microtubule transmission
> .
> In other words, a "one microsecond microtubule dream" becomes
> dilated to a "one year neuronal dream dream" because of the
> ENORMOUS FREQUENCY RATIO !.
> .
> IOW the microtubule system reads out a 10 year afterlife dream
> from the walls of the microtubules in which brain memory is encoded
> and then transmits it to the REST OF THE MICROTUBULE BRAIN,
> so that the dying person actually EXPERIENCES a
> .
> 10 YEAR AFTERLIFE but it is experienced in 10 MICROSECONDS .
> .
> It's as simple as that !
> .
> And once again, we can thank Prof. STUART HAMEROFF for
> discovering the microtubule system – which makes all of this possible !
> .
> George Hammond, MS Physics, Hyannis MA USA
> .

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#660222

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-11 00:53 -0800
Message-ID<vltbie$h8ou$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#660221
On 1/11/2025 12:51 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 1/10/2025 11:40 PM, George Hammond wrote:
>> On 1/10/2025 6:49 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> So you say no "afterlife" for somebody who has a nuclear bomb duct 
>>> taped to their head, and it goes off?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>  > [George Hammond] MS Physics
>> .
>> WRONG - - -
>>     I am telling you that IF the "CZAR BOMBA" the Russian's biggest
>> nuclear bomb in the world (50 megatons) went off while "DUCT TAPED"
>> to your head - - - you could still: - - - GO TO HEAVEN FOR 10 YEARS !
> 
> Why not 11?

Lets say you are wrong, and its 12.666 years, then what? Then just, 
kaput after that? ;^)



> 
> 
>> Even though your brain would disappear in microseconds !!!!
>> .
>>     The reason for this, is that the brain has
>> .
>> "TWO IDENTICAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS" (one inside the other)
>> .
>> 1.  The NEURONAL system operating at (1 kiloHertz. ionization)
>> and
>> 2.  The MICROTUBULE system operating at (10^15 Hertz. UV light)
>> .
>> UV light not only travels at the speed of light, it has a frequency of
>> 10^15 Hertz
>> .
>> This causes an enormous "TIME DILATION" between neuronal
>> transmission and microtubule transmission
>> .
>> In other words, a "one microsecond microtubule dream" becomes
>> dilated to a "one year neuronal dream dream" because of the
>> ENORMOUS FREQUENCY RATIO !.
>> .
>> IOW the microtubule system reads out a 10 year afterlife dream
>> from the walls of the microtubules in which brain memory is encoded
>> and then transmits it to the REST OF THE MICROTUBULE BRAIN,
>> so that the dying person actually EXPERIENCES a
>> .
>> 10 YEAR AFTERLIFE but it is experienced in 10 MICROSECONDS .
>> .
>> It's as simple as that !
>> .
>> And once again, we can thank Prof. STUART HAMEROFF for
>> discovering the microtubule system – which makes all of this possible !
>> .
>> George Hammond, MS Physics, Hyannis MA USA
>> .
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#660235

FromGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-11 13:51 -0500
Message-ID<6bea0dc3-c92f-4bcc-ba77-69d4b570275d@gmail.com>
In reply to#660222
On 1/11/2025 3:53 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 1/11/2025 12:51 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>
>>>  > [George Hammond] MS Physics
>>> .
>>> WRONG - - -
>>>     I am telling you that IF the "CZAR BOMBA" the Russian's biggest
>>> nuclear bomb in the world (50 megatons) went off while "DUCT TAPED"
>>> to your head - - - you could still: - - - GO TO HEAVEN FOR 10 YEARS !
>>
>> Why not 11?
> 
> Lets say you are wrong, and its 12.666 years, then what? Then just, 
> kaput after that? 
> 
>
[George Hammond] MS Physics, Cape Cod USA
.
Look Chris - - - it is known that the theoretical lifespan of a
human being is somewhere around "80 years", more or less !
.
Furthermore, it is known that the world average adult is only
about "85% fully grown" (WHO, UNESCO, data)
.
And since 100% - 85% = 15%, and since (.15) (80yrs)=12 years
we see that the "AVERAGE AFTERLIFE" is around 12 years
since the Afterlife represents the amount of time we were
"short changed" in actual life !
    Whether it is 10, 11, 12.666 .. years, etc. doesn't make any 
difference for this discussion !.
.
BUT THE REAL BONER YOU HAVE MADE .... Is the assumption
that after the Afterlife, "life is KAPUT"...
.
This is a stupid presumption, made by people who DON'T KNOW
that : - - -
.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
     E  T  E  R  N  A  L   -----    L  I  F  E-
.
I S     A     T I M E      (D- I -L -A -T -I- O- N)
.
N O T   A     T I M E      (D- U- R- A- T -I -O -N)
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
.
Of course people cannot LIVE FOREVER --- DON'T BE STUPID
---- how could there be progressive evolution of the human body
if people lived forever ===== DON'T BE RIDICULOUS !!!
.
ETERNAL LIFE refers to "reaching 100% full growth" in which case
we see "true 100% time, and true 100% speed" because there is no
"mental time dilation" in our brains due to less than "full growth" !
.
ETERNAL LIFE refers to living life at "full biological speed",
meaning "full biological growth"... Which the human race has yet
to achieve !
.
George Hammond MS Physics Cape Cod MA USA 1/11/25
.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#660244

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2025-01-11 12:37 -0800
Message-ID<6782D67C.425C@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#660235
George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On 1/11/2025 3:53 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > On 1/11/2025 12:51 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>>>
> >>> Â > [George Hammond] MS Physics
> >>> .
> >>> WRONG - - -
> >>> Â Â Â  I am telling you that IF the "CZAR BOMBA" the Russian's biggest
> >>> nuclear bomb in the world (50 megatons) went off while "DUCT TAPED"
> >>> to your head - - - you could still: - - - GO TO HEAVEN FOR 10 YEARS !
> >>
> >> Why not 11?
> >
> > Lets say you are wrong, and its 12.666 years, then what? Then just,
> > kaput after that?
> >
> >
> [George Hammond] MS Physics, Cape Cod USA
> .
> Look Chris - - - it is known that the theoretical lifespan of a
> human being is somewhere around "80 years", more or less !
> .
> Furthermore, it is known that the world average adult is only
> about "85% fully grown" (WHO, UNESCO, data)
> .
> And since 100% - 85% = 15%, and since (.15) (80yrs)=12 years
> we see that the "AVERAGE AFTERLIFE" is around 12 years
> since the Afterlife represents the amount of time we were
> "short changed" in actual life !
>     Whether it is 10, 11, 12.666 .. years, etc. doesn't make any
> difference for this discussion !.
> .
> BUT THE REAL BONER YOU HAVE MADE .... Is the assumption
> that after the Afterlife, "life is KAPUT"...
> .
> This is a stupid presumption, made by people who DON'T KNOW
> that : - - -
> .
> ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
>      E  T  E  R  N  A  L   -----    L  I  F  E-
> .
> I S     A     T I M E      (D- I -L -A -T -I- O- N)
> .
> N O T   A     T I M E      (D- U- R- A- T -I -O -N)
> ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
> .
> Of course people cannot LIVE FOREVER --- DON'T BE STUPID
> ---- how could there be progressive evolution of the human body
> if people lived forever ===== DON'T BE RIDICULOUS !!!
> .
> ETERNAL LIFE refers to "reaching 100% full growth" in which case
> we see "true 100% time, and true 100% speed" because there is no
> "mental time dilation" in our brains due to less than "full growth" !
> .
> ETERNAL LIFE refers to living life at "full biological speed",
> meaning "full biological growth"... Which the human race has yet
> to achieve !
> .
> George Hammond MS Physics Cape Cod MA USA 1/11/25
> .

Coming from a guy who graduated from Physics skool and automaticall got
a ten year degree in...homeleness!

a lot of good your phd did...

it is the road of all physics phds.




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#660390

FromGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-15 05:21 -0500
Message-ID<f6827212-9ae9-4c43-abb9-6bf0e9fa28f6@gmail.com>
In reply to#660244
On 1/11/2025 3:37 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> George Hammond wrote:
>>
>> ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
>>       E  T  E  R  N  A  L   -----    L  I  F  E-
>> .
>> I S     A     T I M E      (D- I -L -A -T -I- O- N)
>> .
>> N O T   A     T I M E      (D- U- R- A- T -I -O -N)
>> ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
>> .
.
> (STARMAKER)
> Coming from a guy who graduated from Physics skool and automaticall got
> a ten year degree in...homeleness!
> 
> a lot of good your phd did...
> 
> it is the road of all physics phds.
> 
> 
> 
> 
[George Hammond]  MS Physics
      Hey Starmaker--- you missed the fact that I built a 40
foot 2 masted concrete (Ferrocement) Schooner and sailed
all over the Caribbean and E. US for 10 years--- living
on a 40 foot yacht for 10 years with my Mexican girlfriend
was not exactly what you call "homeless"  !

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#660408

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2025-01-15 10:02 -0800
Message-ID<6787F84E.28CE@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#660390
George Hammond wrote:
> 
> On 1/11/2025 3:37 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > George Hammond wrote:
> >>
> >> ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
> >>       E  T  E  R  N  A  L   -----    L  I  F  E-
> >> .
> >> I S     A     T I M E      (D- I -L -A -T -I- O- N)
> >> .
> >> N O T   A     T I M E      (D- U- R- A- T -I -O -N)
> >> ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
> >> .
> .
> > (STARMAKER)
> > Coming from a guy who graduated from Physics skool and automaticall got
> > a ten year degree in...homeleness!
> >
> > a lot of good your phd did...
> >
> > it is the road of all physics phds.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> [George Hammond]  MS Physics
>       Hey Starmaker--- you missed the fact that I built a 40
> foot 2 masted concrete (Ferrocement) Schooner and sailed
> all over the Caribbean and E. US for 10 years--- living
> on a 40 foot yacht for 10 years with my Mexican girlfriend
> was not exactly what you call "homeless"  !

"40 foot yacht"???? Don't you mean 40 years living in homeless shelters? 


Mr. George, I can only go by what You say...and here is what you said:



"[George E Hammond MS physics]
Huh ! So that's it? After I got my degrees in physics I could never get a job, they kept telling me I was "overqualified", so 
I spent 40 years living in homeless shelters on welfare and on the streets searching for the world's first scientific proof of God. 
Guess what, I actually found it !
... I wonder what happened to Jesus ? He must've gotten a PhD !
George"



but you could say a boat is a kind of homeless shelter..like a saddlebum.


So you begin by saying: "After I got my degrees in physics I could never get a job..."

then you go on and said: "...I spent 40 years living in homeless shelters"


I WOULD NEVER SUGGEST TO ANY KID TO GET A Phd in Physics! 


IT'S A COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME!


You're PROOF of dat!



There is no God! Where did you get the idea there is a God? You made it up??


Jesus is only a Story somebody invented 50 years after Jesus died. FIFTY YEARS!!!


Are you Jesus Christ? The son of God??


'40 years living in homeless shelters' is a great audience for your...Proof of God.


a lot of those guys are...nutty.


They heard you talking and they said..."I must be in Hell!"


I see, you have found PROOF OF GOD ...	living on a yacht for 10 years with a Mexican girl. 



don't drink the water, Senoir George












-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#660438

FromGeorge Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-15 17:37 -0500
Message-ID<43ab4296-d131-447c-9c8e-ea79f99b61a9@gmail.com>
In reply to#660408
On 1/15/2025 1:02 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> 
> I see, you have found PROOF OF GOD ...	living on a yacht for 10 years with a Mexican girl.

> don't drink the water, Senoir George
> 
> 
>
[George Hammond]
MS Physics, Cape Cod MA USA
.
Hey STARMAKER, I'm not here to engage in ad hominem gossip!
.
This is a PHYSICS discussion list, and I am an MS PHYSICIST  !
.
Are you a scientist?  Do you have ANY EXPERTISEs in science?
.
If you're not a  scientist, you're wasting your time trying to
talk to me.... And my presumption is you're just another
HECKLER ?
.
SO  - - -  ARE YOU SOME KIND OF A  SCIENTIST,  YES OR NO ?
.
George

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity


csiph-web