Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #600437 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-01-29 11:57 -0800 |
| Last post | 2023-02-02 00:16 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 22 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
What is the speed of light???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-29 11:57 -0800
Re: What is the speed of light???? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-01-29 12:29 -0800
Re: What is the speed of light???? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-29 13:08 -0800
Re: What is the speed of light???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-29 14:22 -0800
Re: What is the speed of light???? Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-29 14:58 -0800
Re: What is the speed of light???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-29 16:20 -0800
Re: What is the speed of light???? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-30 01:18 -0500
Re: What is the speed of light???? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-29 15:05 -0800
Re: What is the speed of light???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-29 16:23 -0800
Re: What is the speed of light???? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-29 20:30 -0800
Re: What is the speed of light???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-29 18:42 -0600
Re: What is the speed of light???? Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> - 2023-01-29 17:20 -0800
Re: What is the speed of light???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-29 20:10 -0600
Re: What is the speed of light???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-31 09:56 -0800
Re: What is the speed of light???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-31 12:53 -0600
Re: What is the speed of light???? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-01-31 12:16 -0800
Re: What is the speed of light???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-31 16:58 -0800
Re: What is the speed of light???? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-01-31 18:00 -0800
Re: What is the speed of light???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-31 20:21 -0600
Pathetic Starmaker *was Re: What is the speed of light????) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-31 20:20 -0600
Re: What is the speed of light???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-01 20:39 -0800
Re: What is the speed of light???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-02-02 00:16 -0600
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-29 11:57 -0800 |
| Subject | What is the speed of light???? |
| Message-ID | <63D6CFA3.3C66@ix.netcom.com> |
I know you're not suppose to ask this question...
worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it..
But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,...
What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe
is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light?
That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask?
Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see????
What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum?
Oh, I forgot..most of yous don't know what the definition of a "vacuum" is...
so for your convenience I'll post it here...(maybes yous forgots)
vac·u·um
/'vak?yo?om/
noun
a space entirely devoid of matter.
synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy, voidness, nihility
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum
What is the speed of light, anyway?
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-29 12:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <74b912fa-8e04-4181-b9ce-1cd51a64d540n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600437 |
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 11:57:08 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > I know you're not suppose to ask this question... > worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it.. > > But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,... > > > What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe > is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light? > > That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask? > > Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see???? > > > What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? > > > > > Oh, I forgot..most of yous don't know what the definition of a "vacuum" is... > so for your convenience I'll post it here...(maybes yous forgots) > > > vac·u·um > /'vak?yo?om/ > noun > > a space entirely devoid of matter. > synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy, voidness, nihility > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum > > > What is the speed of light, anyway? > > > > > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. God speed.... the vacuum does not make a difference...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-29 13:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3s3jaj-u72c.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #600437 |
In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > I know you're not suppose to ask this question... > worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it.. > > But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,... > > > What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe > is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light? > > That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask? > > Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see???? > > > What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? > Analyses of the above text by ChatGPT: The text is asking a question about the speed of light and questioning why it is not possible to know or ask about it. However, the speed of light is a well-established scientific fact and is widely accepted to be 299,792,458 meters per second in a vacuum. The text also seems to suggest that it is forbidden to test or publish information about the speed of light, which is not true. The speed of light can be measured and studied through various experiments and the results are widely available in scientific literature. The text could be improved by providing more accurate information and avoiding statements that suggest a conspiracy or lack of knowledge. It would seem to me that if ChatGPT weren't programmed to be polite, it would say "Google it, idiot". <snip remaining nonsense>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-29 14:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63D6F1AC.350C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #600441 |
Jim Pennino wrote: > > In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > I know you're not suppose to ask this question... > > worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it.. > > > > But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,... > > > > > > What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe > > is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light? > > > > That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask? > > > > Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see???? > > > > > > What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? > > > > Analyses of the above text by ChatGPT: > > The text is asking a question about the speed of light and > questioning why it is not possible to know or ask about it. However, > the speed of light is a well-established scientific fact and is > widely accepted to be 299,792,458 meters per second in a vacuum. > The text also seems to suggest that it is forbidden to test or > publish information about the speed of light, which is not true. > The speed of light can be measured and studied through various > experiments and the results are widely available in scientific > literature. The text could be improved by providing more accurate > information and avoiding statements that suggest a conspiracy or > lack of knowledge. > > It would seem to me that if ChatGPT weren't programmed to be polite, it > would say "Google it, idiot". > > <snip remaining nonsense> Okay, I see someone with an imglish problem here... What is the speed of light NOT in a vacuum??? I'll repeat the question but add... What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light NOT NOT NOT in a vacuum???? comprendere? capice? verstehe? What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? comprendere? capice? verstehe? guinea? wop? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-29 14:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a60c1c0f-0564-4a6b-86f6-16a9347f02bdn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600445 |
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 2:22:12 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > What is the speed of light NOT in a vacuum??? Are you incapable of just looking this up for yourself? The answer is very easy to find, at least for people with normal intelligence...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-29 16:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63D70D46.628A@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #600448 |
Paul Alsing wrote: > > On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 2:22:12 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > > What is the speed of light NOT in a vacuum??? > > Are you incapable of just looking this up for yourself? The answer is very easy to find, at least for people with normal intelligence... I understand perfectly well, you simply don't know. The Starmaker wrote: > > Jim Pennino wrote: > > > > In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > I know you're not suppose to ask this question... > > > worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it.. > > > > > > But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,... > > > > > > > > > What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe > > > is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light? > > > > > > That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask? > > > > > > Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see???? > > > > > > > > > What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? > > > > > > > Analyses of the above text by ChatGPT: > > > > The text is asking a question about the speed of light and > > questioning why it is not possible to know or ask about it. However, > > the speed of light is a well-established scientific fact and is > > widely accepted to be 299,792,458 meters per second in a vacuum. > > The text also seems to suggest that it is forbidden to test or > > publish information about the speed of light, which is not true. > > The speed of light can be measured and studied through various > > experiments and the results are widely available in scientific > > literature. The text could be improved by providing more accurate > > information and avoiding statements that suggest a conspiracy or > > lack of knowledge. > > > > It would seem to me that if ChatGPT weren't programmed to be polite, it > > would say "Google it, idiot". > > > > <snip remaining nonsense> > > Okay, I see someone with an imglish problem here... > > What is the speed of light NOT in a vacuum??? > > I'll repeat the question but add... > > What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the > universe > is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light NOT NOT NOT in a > vacuum???? > > comprendere? capice? verstehe? > > What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? > > comprendere? capice? verstehe? guinea? wop? > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-30 01:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <tr7neh$35p29$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #600451 |
On 1/29/2023 7:20 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > Paul Alsing wrote: >> >> On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 2:22:12 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: >> >>> What is the speed of light NOT in a vacuum??? >> >> Are you incapable of just looking this up for yourself? The answer is very easy to find, at least for people with normal intelligence... > > I understand perfectly well, you simply don't know. > Why should Jim or anyone else google that for you? Hint: That was a polite way of saying "just fucking google it, idiot!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-29 15:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <jnajaj-10cc.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #600445 |
In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > Jim Pennino wrote: >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> > I know you're not suppose to ask this question... >> > worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it.. >> > >> > But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,... >> > >> > >> > What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe >> > is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light? >> > >> > That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask? >> > >> > Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see???? >> > >> > >> > What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? >> > >> >> Analyses of the above text by ChatGPT: >> >> The text is asking a question about the speed of light and >> questioning why it is not possible to know or ask about it. However, >> the speed of light is a well-established scientific fact and is >> widely accepted to be 299,792,458 meters per second in a vacuum. >> The text also seems to suggest that it is forbidden to test or >> publish information about the speed of light, which is not true. >> The speed of light can be measured and studied through various >> experiments and the results are widely available in scientific >> literature. The text could be improved by providing more accurate >> information and avoiding statements that suggest a conspiracy or >> lack of knowledge. >> >> It would seem to me that if ChatGPT weren't programmed to be polite, it >> would say "Google it, idiot". >> >> <snip remaining nonsense> > > Okay, I see someone with an imglish problem here... > > > What is the speed of light NOT in a vacuum??? > > > I'll repeat the question but add... > > What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the > universe > is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light NOT NOT NOT in a > vacuum???? Google it, idiot. What is the speed of light in air? About 1,060,000,000 results... <snip idiot babble>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-29 16:23 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63D70E18.786C@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #600449 |
Jim Pennino wrote: > > In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > Jim Pennino wrote: > >> > >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> > I know you're not suppose to ask this question... > >> > worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it.. > >> > > >> > But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,... > >> > > >> > > >> > What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe > >> > is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light? > >> > > >> > That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask? > >> > > >> > Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see???? > >> > > >> > > >> > What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? > >> > > >> > >> Analyses of the above text by ChatGPT: > >> > >> The text is asking a question about the speed of light and > >> questioning why it is not possible to know or ask about it. However, > >> the speed of light is a well-established scientific fact and is > >> widely accepted to be 299,792,458 meters per second in a vacuum. > >> The text also seems to suggest that it is forbidden to test or > >> publish information about the speed of light, which is not true. > >> The speed of light can be measured and studied through various > >> experiments and the results are widely available in scientific > >> literature. The text could be improved by providing more accurate > >> information and avoiding statements that suggest a conspiracy or > >> lack of knowledge. > >> > >> It would seem to me that if ChatGPT weren't programmed to be polite, it > >> would say "Google it, idiot". > >> > >> <snip remaining nonsense> > > > > Okay, I see someone with an imglish problem here... > > > > > > What is the speed of light NOT in a vacuum??? > > > > > > I'll repeat the question but add... > > > > What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the > > universe > > is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light NOT NOT NOT in a > > vacuum???? > > Google it, idiot. > > What is the speed of light in air? > > About 1,060,000,000 results... > > <snip idiot babble> I understand, you simply don't know. You're too embarassed to post a number... I didn't ask 'What is the speed of light at McDonald's resturant.' The Starmaker wrote: > > Jim Pennino wrote: > > > > In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > I know you're not suppose to ask this question... > > > worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it.. > > > > > > But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,... > > > > > > > > > What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe > > > is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light? > > > > > > That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask? > > > > > > Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see???? > > > > > > > > > What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? > > > > > > > Analyses of the above text by ChatGPT: > > > > The text is asking a question about the speed of light and > > questioning why it is not possible to know or ask about it. However, > > the speed of light is a well-established scientific fact and is > > widely accepted to be 299,792,458 meters per second in a vacuum. > > The text also seems to suggest that it is forbidden to test or > > publish information about the speed of light, which is not true. > > The speed of light can be measured and studied through various > > experiments and the results are widely available in scientific > > literature. The text could be improved by providing more accurate > > information and avoiding statements that suggest a conspiracy or > > lack of knowledge. > > > > It would seem to me that if ChatGPT weren't programmed to be polite, it > > would say "Google it, idiot". > > > > <snip remaining nonsense> > > Okay, I see someone with an imglish problem here... > > What is the speed of light NOT in a vacuum??? > > I'll repeat the question but add... > > What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the > universe > is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light NOT NOT NOT in a > vacuum???? > > comprendere? capice? verstehe? > > What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? > > comprendere? capice? verstehe? guinea? wop? > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-29 20:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <cntjaj-rlrc.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #600452 |
In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > Jim Pennino wrote: >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> > Jim Pennino wrote: >> >> >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> >> > I know you're not suppose to ask this question... >> >> > worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it.. >> >> > >> >> > But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,... >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe >> >> > is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light? >> >> > >> >> > That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask? >> >> > >> >> > Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see???? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? >> >> > >> >> >> >> Analyses of the above text by ChatGPT: >> >> >> >> The text is asking a question about the speed of light and >> >> questioning why it is not possible to know or ask about it. However, >> >> the speed of light is a well-established scientific fact and is >> >> widely accepted to be 299,792,458 meters per second in a vacuum. >> >> The text also seems to suggest that it is forbidden to test or >> >> publish information about the speed of light, which is not true. >> >> The speed of light can be measured and studied through various >> >> experiments and the results are widely available in scientific >> >> literature. The text could be improved by providing more accurate >> >> information and avoiding statements that suggest a conspiracy or >> >> lack of knowledge. >> >> >> >> It would seem to me that if ChatGPT weren't programmed to be polite, it >> >> would say "Google it, idiot". >> >> >> >> <snip remaining nonsense> >> > >> > Okay, I see someone with an imglish problem here... >> > >> > >> > What is the speed of light NOT in a vacuum??? >> > >> > >> > I'll repeat the question but add... >> > >> > What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the >> > universe >> > is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light NOT NOT NOT in a >> > vacuum???? >> >> Google it, idiot. >> >> What is the speed of light in air? >> >> About 1,060,000,000 results... >> >> <snip idiot babble> > > > I understand, you simply don't know. You understand nothing, idiot. > You're too embarassed to post a number... I'm embarassed that I bothered with your idiotic nonsense in the first place. <snip idiotic reposting of what is above>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-29 18:42 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k3oi30FnrnuU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #600449 |
On 1/29/2023 5:05 PM, Jim Pennino wrote: > In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> Jim Pennino wrote: >>> >>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>> I know you're not suppose to ask this question... >>>> worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it.. >>>> >>>> But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,... >>>> >>>> >>>> What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe >>>> is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light? >>>> >>>> That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask? >>>> >>>> Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see???? >>>> >>>> >>>> What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? >>>> >>> >>> Analyses of the above text by ChatGPT: >>> >>> The text is asking a question about the speed of light and >>> questioning why it is not possible to know or ask about it. However, >>> the speed of light is a well-established scientific fact and is >>> widely accepted to be 299,792,458 meters per second in a vacuum. >>> The text also seems to suggest that it is forbidden to test or >>> publish information about the speed of light, which is not true. >>> The speed of light can be measured and studied through various >>> experiments and the results are widely available in scientific >>> literature. The text could be improved by providing more accurate >>> information and avoiding statements that suggest a conspiracy or >>> lack of knowledge. >>> >>> It would seem to me that if ChatGPT weren't programmed to be polite, it >>> would say "Google it, idiot". >>> >>> <snip remaining nonsense> >> >> Okay, I see someone with an imglish problem here... >> >> >> What is the speed of light NOT in a vacuum??? >> >> >> I'll repeat the question but add... >> >> What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the >> universe >> is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light NOT NOT NOT in a >> vacuum???? > > Google it, idiot. > > What is the speed of light in air? > > About 1,060,000,000 results... > > <snip idiot babble> Readers of these sci newsgroups see this all too frequently, a clear demonstration of the dunning-kruger effect where the idiot doesn't realize just how much of an idiot he is being. One of the possible answers to the question as asked is 38 mph. https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=99111&page=1 "Starmaker" doesn't understand the question he is asking. That's really bad form.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Hertz <hertz778@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-29 17:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ca38ac5c-6b9e-46ea-8233-285972bc2ff7n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600454 |
On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 9:42:11 PM UTC-3, whodat wrote: > On 1/29/2023 5:05 PM, Jim Pennino wrote: > > In sci.physics The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >> Jim Pennino wrote: > >>> > >>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > >>>> I know you're not suppose to ask this question... > >>>> worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it.. > >>>> > >>>> But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,... > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe > >>>> is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light? > >>>> > >>>> That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask? > >>>> > >>>> Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see???? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? > >>>> > >>> > >>> Analyses of the above text by ChatGPT: > >>> > >>> The text is asking a question about the speed of light and > >>> questioning why it is not possible to know or ask about it. However, > >>> the speed of light is a well-established scientific fact and is > >>> widely accepted to be 299,792,458 meters per second in a vacuum. > >>> The text also seems to suggest that it is forbidden to test or > >>> publish information about the speed of light, which is not true. > >>> The speed of light can be measured and studied through various > >>> experiments and the results are widely available in scientific > >>> literature. The text could be improved by providing more accurate > >>> information and avoiding statements that suggest a conspiracy or > >>> lack of knowledge. > >>> > >>> It would seem to me that if ChatGPT weren't programmed to be polite, it > >>> would say "Google it, idiot". > >>> > >>> <snip remaining nonsense> > >> > >> Okay, I see someone with an imglish problem here... > >> > >> > >> What is the speed of light NOT in a vacuum??? > >> > >> > >> I'll repeat the question but add... > >> > >> What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the > >> universe > >> is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light NOT NOT NOT in a > >> vacuum???? > > > > Google it, idiot. > > > > What is the speed of light in air? > > > > About 1,060,000,000 results... > > > > <snip idiot babble> > Readers of these sci newsgroups see this all too frequently, a clear > demonstration of the dunning-kruger effect where the idiot doesn't > realize just how much of an idiot he is being. > > One of the possible answers to the question as asked is 38 mph. > > https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=99111&page=1 > > "Starmaker" doesn't understand the question he is asking. That's > really bad form. Don't under-estimate him. His question is going deeper than it seems at first sight. He's asking, very clearly: WHAT IS THE SPEED OF LIGHT, and nobody here understood what he possibly meant. WHAT is different from WHICH. Are you going to deliver explanations using photons or waves? Anyone?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-29 20:10 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k3on9dFodf3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #600457 |
On 1/29/2023 7:20 PM, Richard Hertz wrote: > On Sunday, January 29, 2023 at 9:42:11 PM UTC-3, whodat wrote: >> On 1/29/2023 5:05 PM, Jim Pennino wrote: >>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>> Jim Pennino wrote: >>>>> >>>>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>>>>> I know you're not suppose to ask this question... >>>>>> worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it.. >>>>>> >>>>>> But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe >>>>>> is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light? >>>>>> >>>>>> That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask? >>>>>> >>>>>> Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see???? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Analyses of the above text by ChatGPT: >>>>> >>>>> The text is asking a question about the speed of light and >>>>> questioning why it is not possible to know or ask about it. However, >>>>> the speed of light is a well-established scientific fact and is >>>>> widely accepted to be 299,792,458 meters per second in a vacuum. >>>>> The text also seems to suggest that it is forbidden to test or >>>>> publish information about the speed of light, which is not true. >>>>> The speed of light can be measured and studied through various >>>>> experiments and the results are widely available in scientific >>>>> literature. The text could be improved by providing more accurate >>>>> information and avoiding statements that suggest a conspiracy or >>>>> lack of knowledge. >>>>> >>>>> It would seem to me that if ChatGPT weren't programmed to be polite, it >>>>> would say "Google it, idiot". >>>>> >>>>> <snip remaining nonsense> >>>> >>>> Okay, I see someone with an imglish problem here... >>>> >>>> >>>> What is the speed of light NOT in a vacuum??? >>>> >>>> >>>> I'll repeat the question but add... >>>> >>>> What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the >>>> universe >>>> is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light NOT NOT NOT in a >>>> vacuum???? >>> >>> Google it, idiot. >>> >>> What is the speed of light in air? >>> >>> About 1,060,000,000 results... >>> >>> <snip idiot babble> >> Readers of these sci newsgroups see this all too frequently, a clear >> demonstration of the dunning-kruger effect where the idiot doesn't >> realize just how much of an idiot he is being. >> >> One of the possible answers to the question as asked is 38 mph. >> >> https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=99111&page=1 >> >> "Starmaker" doesn't understand the question he is asking. That's >> really bad form. > > Don't under-estimate him. His question is going deeper than it seems at first sight. > > He's asking, very clearly: WHAT IS THE SPEED OF LIGHT, and nobody here understood what he possibly meant. Any medium like this one is based on the use of language, not based on guesswork related to "what he possibly meant." If you're not familiar with Strunk & White a classical work on English usage I commend it to you and anyone else who would appreciate achieving an excellent grasp on what is meant in writings by normal sentient reading level of 7th grade or better authors. I use 7th grade reading level because that used to be the reading level to which the New York Times wrote. Good enough for the NYT, good enough for me. > WHAT is different from WHICH. Are you going to deliver explanations using photons or waves? The question asked was, "What is the speed of light NOT in a vacuum??" As asked, the question seeks a single velocity which is an impossible mission because in reality it varies all over the place from 38 mph upwards depending on conditions. That 38mph is what has been achieved and it is likely that some lower speed could be demonstrated by experiment in the future. Given the question he specifically asked, we cannot get to the photon/wave issue you bring to the fore. This is discussions about science newsgroup, not a discussions about creative writing newsgroup, something that "Starmaker" ignores with great regularity if not alarming frequency. I hope you're not joining with him is such deviations from the intent (see the charter) of this newsgroup.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-31 09:56 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63D9566B.3C4F@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #600437 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > I know you're not suppose to ask this question... > worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it.. > > But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,... > > What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe > is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light? > > That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask? > > Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see???? > > What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? > > Oh, I forgot..most of yous don't know what the definition of a "vacuum" is... > so for your convenience I'll post it here...(maybes yous forgots) > > vac·u·um > /'vak?yo?om/ > noun > > a space entirely devoid of matter. > synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy, voidness, nihility > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum > > What is the speed of light, anyway? > I mean, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", nobody does. And I understand yous have been 'conditioned'/indoctrinated/mandated to only think in terms of..."in a vacuum" whenever refering to the speed of light. Maybe because this hangup yous people have to always desire to know what is constant. Yous don't like uncertaintly. So you want a same number ALL the time. Yous sleep better. And Einstein sleeps better if he conditions yous to only think in his box. But, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", so what is the speed of light? Does anything else travel faster in the universe, or does light travel faster in the universe? I mean, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", nobody does. I don't trust anyone who keeps repeating...",in a vacuum" all the time. Yous sound brainwashed. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-31 12:53 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k3t6e8Ff1npU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #600553 |
On 1/31/2023 11:56 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > The Starmaker wrote: >> >> I know you're not suppose to ask this question... >> worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it.. >> >> But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,... >> >> What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe >> is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light? >> >> That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask? >> >> Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see???? >> >> What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? >> >> Oh, I forgot..most of yous don't know what the definition of a "vacuum" is... >> so for your convenience I'll post it here...(maybes yous forgots) >> >> vac·u·um >> /'vak?yo?om/ >> noun >> >> a space entirely devoid of matter. >> synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy, voidness, nihility >> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum >> >> What is the speed of light, anyway? >> > > I mean, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", nobody > does. > > And I understand yous have been 'conditioned'/indoctrinated/mandated > to only think in terms of..."in a vacuum" whenever refering to the speed > of light. > > Maybe because this hangup yous people have to always desire to know what > is constant. > > Yous don't like uncertaintly. So you want a same number ALL the time. > Yous sleep better. > And Einstein sleeps better if he conditions yous to only think in his > box. > > > But, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", so what is the > speed of light? Asked and answered, but apparently you are too stupid to read what has been provided. There is no answer to "what is the speed of light" since it varies with conditions. There is a "maximum speed of light" and there is a so far established minimum speed of light. Both of those, as well as all intermediate speeds detected, are conditional. The question you have been asking repeatedly is similar to "what is the IQ?" That too is conditional. Or "What is the drowning depth?" Conditional also. > Does anything else travel faster in the universe, or does light travel > faster in the universe? > > > I mean, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", nobody > does. Repeating yourself as you do in this article is one of the signs of old age dementia. Congratulations on achieving that milestone. > I don't trust anyone who keeps repeating...",in a vacuum" all the time. > Yous sound brainwashed. Your ability or inability to trust has no bearing on anything. Your inability to understand the answer provided explains your status in the pecking order around here. There are moments when Mitch makes more sense than you do. If you cannot understand the answer given here (and given before) then even considering the very liberal nature of the charters of these newsgroups you should not be attempting to participate here. At this point you are a strong candidate for the 2023 Darwin Award. You can easily win if you just hang in there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-31 12:16 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <bcec2c70-2416-4c89-8cdc-8a89c31bd8d6n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #600559 |
On Tuesday, January 31, 2023 at 10:54:04 AM UTC-8, whodat wrote: > On 1/31/2023 11:56 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >> I know you're not suppose to ask this question... > >> worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it.. > >> > >> But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,... > >> > >> What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe > >> is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light? > >> > >> That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask? > >> > >> Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see???? > >> > >> What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? > >> > >> Oh, I forgot..most of yous don't know what the definition of a "vacuum" is... > >> so for your convenience I'll post it here...(maybes yous forgots) > >> > >> vac·u·um > >> /'vak?yo?om/ > >> noun > >> > >> a space entirely devoid of matter. > >> synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy, voidness, nihility > >> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum > >> > >> What is the speed of light, anyway? > >> > > > > I mean, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", nobody > > does. > > > > And I understand yous have been 'conditioned'/indoctrinated/mandated > > to only think in terms of..."in a vacuum" whenever refering to the speed > > of light. > > > > Maybe because this hangup yous people have to always desire to know what > > is constant. > > > > Yous don't like uncertaintly. So you want a same number ALL the time. > > Yous sleep better. > > > And Einstein sleeps better if he conditions yous to only think in his > > box. > > > > > > But, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", so what is the > > speed of light? > Asked and answered, but apparently you are too stupid to read what has > been provided. There is no answer to "what is the speed of light" since > it varies with conditions. There is a "maximum speed of light" and there > is a so far established minimum speed of light. Both of those, as well > as all intermediate speeds detected, are conditional. > > The question you have been asking repeatedly is similar to "what is the > IQ?" That too is conditional. Or "What is the drowning depth?" > Conditional also. > > Does anything else travel faster in the universe, or does light travel > > faster in the universe? > > > > > > I mean, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", nobody > > does. > Repeating yourself as you do in this article is one of the signs of > old age dementia. Congratulations on achieving that milestone. > > I don't trust anyone who keeps repeating...",in a vacuum" all the time. > > Yous sound brainwashed. > Your ability or inability to trust has no bearing on anything. Your > inability to understand the answer provided explains your status in the > pecking order around here. There are moments when Mitch makes more sense > than you do. > > If you cannot understand the answer given here (and given before) then > even considering the very liberal nature of the charters of these > newsgroups you should not be attempting to participate here. > > At this point you are a strong candidate for the 2023 Darwin Award. You > can easily win if you just hang in there. EM aether heat speed shares the universal speed limit with other light
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-31 16:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <63D9B925.218B@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #600559 |
whodat wrote: > > On 1/31/2023 11:56 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > >> > >> I know you're not suppose to ask this question... > >> worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it.. > >> > >> But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,... > >> > >> What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe > >> is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light? > >> > >> That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask? > >> > >> Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see???? > >> > >> What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? > >> > >> Oh, I forgot..most of yous don't know what the definition of a "vacuum" is... > >> so for your convenience I'll post it here...(maybes yous forgots) > >> > >> vac·u·um > >> /'vak?yo?om/ > >> noun > >> > >> a space entirely devoid of matter. > >> synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy, voidness, nihility > >> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum > >> > >> What is the speed of light, anyway? > >> > > > > I mean, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", nobody > > does. > > > > And I understand yous have been 'conditioned'/indoctrinated/mandated > > to only think in terms of..."in a vacuum" whenever refering to the speed > > of light. > > > > Maybe because this hangup yous people have to always desire to know what > > is constant. > > > > Yous don't like uncertaintly. So you want a same number ALL the time. > > Yous sleep better. > > > And Einstein sleeps better if he conditions yous to only think in his > > box. > > > > > > But, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", so what is the > > speed of light? > > Asked and answered, but apparently you are too stupid to read what has > been provided. There is no answer to "what is the speed of light" since > it varies with conditions. There is a "maximum speed of light" and there > is a so far established minimum speed of light. Both of those, as well > as all intermediate speeds detected, are conditional. > > The question you have been asking repeatedly is similar to "what is the > IQ?" That too is conditional. Or "What is the drowning depth?" > Conditional also. > > > Does anything else travel faster in the universe, or does light travel > > faster in the universe? > > > > > > I mean, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", nobody > > does. > > Repeating yourself as you do in this article is one of the signs of > old age dementia. Congratulations on achieving that milestone. > > > I don't trust anyone who keeps repeating...",in a vacuum" all the time. > > Yous sound brainwashed. > > Your ability or inability to trust has no bearing on anything. Your > inability to understand the answer provided explains your status in the > pecking order around here. There are moments when Mitch makes more sense > than you do. > > If you cannot understand the answer given here (and given before) then > even considering the very liberal nature of the charters of these > newsgroups you should not be attempting to participate here. > > At this point you are a strong candidate for the 2023 Darwin Award. You > can easily win if you just hang in there. another one who don't know what the speed of light is...a mind entirely devoid of answers. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-31 18:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <hmtoaj-bonh.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> |
| In reply to | #600575 |
In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > whodat wrote: >> >> On 1/31/2023 11:56 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >> > The Starmaker wrote: >> >> >> >> I know you're not suppose to ask this question... >> >> worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it.. >> >> >> >> But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,... >> >> >> >> What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe >> >> is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light? >> >> >> >> That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask? >> >> >> >> Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see???? >> >> >> >> What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? >> >> >> >> Oh, I forgot..most of yous don't know what the definition of a "vacuum" is... >> >> so for your convenience I'll post it here...(maybes yous forgots) >> >> >> >> vac·u·um >> >> /'vak?yo?om/ >> >> noun >> >> >> >> a space entirely devoid of matter. >> >> synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy, voidness, nihility >> >> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum >> >> >> >> What is the speed of light, anyway? >> >> >> > >> > I mean, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", nobody >> > does. >> > >> > And I understand yous have been 'conditioned'/indoctrinated/mandated >> > to only think in terms of..."in a vacuum" whenever refering to the speed >> > of light. >> > >> > Maybe because this hangup yous people have to always desire to know what >> > is constant. >> > >> > Yous don't like uncertaintly. So you want a same number ALL the time. >> > Yous sleep better. >> >> > And Einstein sleeps better if he conditions yous to only think in his >> > box. >> > >> > >> > But, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", so what is the >> > speed of light? >> >> Asked and answered, but apparently you are too stupid to read what has >> been provided. There is no answer to "what is the speed of light" since >> it varies with conditions. There is a "maximum speed of light" and there >> is a so far established minimum speed of light. Both of those, as well >> as all intermediate speeds detected, are conditional. >> >> The question you have been asking repeatedly is similar to "what is the >> IQ?" That too is conditional. Or "What is the drowning depth?" >> Conditional also. >> >> > Does anything else travel faster in the universe, or does light travel >> > faster in the universe? >> > >> > >> > I mean, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", nobody >> > does. >> >> Repeating yourself as you do in this article is one of the signs of >> old age dementia. Congratulations on achieving that milestone. >> >> > I don't trust anyone who keeps repeating...",in a vacuum" all the time. >> > Yous sound brainwashed. >> >> Your ability or inability to trust has no bearing on anything. Your >> inability to understand the answer provided explains your status in the >> pecking order around here. There are moments when Mitch makes more sense >> than you do. >> >> If you cannot understand the answer given here (and given before) then >> even considering the very liberal nature of the charters of these >> newsgroups you should not be attempting to participate here. >> >> At this point you are a strong candidate for the 2023 Darwin Award. You >> can easily win if you just hang in there. > > another one who don't know what the speed of light is...a mind entirely > devoid of answers. Bugs Bunny said it best, "What a maroon."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-31 20:21 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <k3u0lvFiqbhU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #600579 |
On 1/31/2023 8:00 PM, Jim Pennino wrote: > In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >> whodat wrote: >>> >>> On 1/31/2023 11:56 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I know you're not suppose to ask this question... >>>>> worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it.. >>>>> >>>>> But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,... >>>>> >>>>> What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe >>>>> is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light? >>>>> >>>>> That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask? >>>>> >>>>> Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see???? >>>>> >>>>> What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? >>>>> >>>>> Oh, I forgot..most of yous don't know what the definition of a "vacuum" is... >>>>> so for your convenience I'll post it here...(maybes yous forgots) >>>>> >>>>> vac·u·um >>>>> /'vak?yo?om/ >>>>> noun >>>>> >>>>> a space entirely devoid of matter. >>>>> synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy, voidness, nihility >>>>> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum >>>>> >>>>> What is the speed of light, anyway? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I mean, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", nobody >>>> does. >>>> >>>> And I understand yous have been 'conditioned'/indoctrinated/mandated >>>> to only think in terms of..."in a vacuum" whenever refering to the speed >>>> of light. >>>> >>>> Maybe because this hangup yous people have to always desire to know what >>>> is constant. >>>> >>>> Yous don't like uncertaintly. So you want a same number ALL the time. >>>> Yous sleep better. >>> >>>> And Einstein sleeps better if he conditions yous to only think in his >>>> box. >>>> >>>> >>>> But, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", so what is the >>>> speed of light? >>> >>> Asked and answered, but apparently you are too stupid to read what has >>> been provided. There is no answer to "what is the speed of light" since >>> it varies with conditions. There is a "maximum speed of light" and there >>> is a so far established minimum speed of light. Both of those, as well >>> as all intermediate speeds detected, are conditional. >>> >>> The question you have been asking repeatedly is similar to "what is the >>> IQ?" That too is conditional. Or "What is the drowning depth?" >>> Conditional also. >>> >>>> Does anything else travel faster in the universe, or does light travel >>>> faster in the universe? >>>> >>>> >>>> I mean, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", nobody >>>> does. >>> >>> Repeating yourself as you do in this article is one of the signs of >>> old age dementia. Congratulations on achieving that milestone. >>> >>>> I don't trust anyone who keeps repeating...",in a vacuum" all the time. >>>> Yous sound brainwashed. >>> >>> Your ability or inability to trust has no bearing on anything. Your >>> inability to understand the answer provided explains your status in the >>> pecking order around here. There are moments when Mitch makes more sense >>> than you do. >>> >>> If you cannot understand the answer given here (and given before) then >>> even considering the very liberal nature of the charters of these >>> newsgroups you should not be attempting to participate here. >>> >>> At this point you are a strong candidate for the 2023 Darwin Award. You >>> can easily win if you just hang in there. >> >> another one who don't know what the speed of light is...a mind entirely >> devoid of answers. > > Bugs Bunny said it best, "What a maroon." He doesn't understand that either.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-31 20:20 -0600 |
| Subject | Pathetic Starmaker *was Re: What is the speed of light????) |
| Message-ID | <k3u0jsFiqbhU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #600575 |
On 1/31/2023 6:58 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > whodat wrote: >> >> On 1/31/2023 11:56 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>> >>>> I know you're not suppose to ask this question... >>>> worse yet, you're not even suppose to answer it.. >>>> >>>> But since I question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable,... >>>> >>>> What is the speed of light, since I don't live in a vacuum..and the universe >>>> is not in a vacuum...so What is the speed of light? >>>> >>>> That number doesn't appear to be anywhere. Are you not suppose to know, ...or even ask? >>>> >>>> Or even test it to find the answer because it is forbidden to test it and publish it for others to see???? >>>> >>>> What is the speed of light, since I don't 'live in' a vacuum? >>>> >>>> Oh, I forgot..most of yous don't know what the definition of a "vacuum" is... >>>> so for your convenience I'll post it here...(maybes yous forgots) >>>> >>>> vac·u·um >>>> /'vak?yo?om/ >>>> noun >>>> >>>> a space entirely devoid of matter. >>>> synonyms: empty space, emptiness, void, nothingness, vacuity, vacancy, voidness, nihility >>>> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+vacuum >>>> >>>> What is the speed of light, anyway? >>>> >>> >>> I mean, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", nobody >>> does. >>> >>> And I understand yous have been 'conditioned'/indoctrinated/mandated >>> to only think in terms of..."in a vacuum" whenever refering to the speed >>> of light. >>> >>> Maybe because this hangup yous people have to always desire to know what >>> is constant. >>> >>> Yous don't like uncertaintly. So you want a same number ALL the time. >>> Yous sleep better. >> >>> And Einstein sleeps better if he conditions yous to only think in his >>> box. >>> >>> >>> But, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", so what is the >>> speed of light? >> >> Asked and answered, but apparently you are too stupid to read what has >> been provided. There is no answer to "what is the speed of light" since >> it varies with conditions. There is a "maximum speed of light" and there >> is a so far established minimum speed of light. Both of those, as well >> as all intermediate speeds detected, are conditional. >> >> The question you have been asking repeatedly is similar to "what is the >> IQ?" That too is conditional. Or "What is the drowning depth?" >> Conditional also. >> >>> Does anything else travel faster in the universe, or does light travel >>> faster in the universe? >>> >>> >>> I mean, I don't live in "a space entirely devoid of matter", nobody >>> does. >> >> Repeating yourself as you do in this article is one of the signs of >> old age dementia. Congratulations on achieving that milestone. >> >>> I don't trust anyone who keeps repeating...",in a vacuum" all the time. >>> Yous sound brainwashed. >> >> Your ability or inability to trust has no bearing on anything. Your >> inability to understand the answer provided explains your status in the >> pecking order around here. There are moments when Mitch makes more sense >> than you do. >> >> If you cannot understand the answer given here (and given before) then >> even considering the very liberal nature of the charters of these >> newsgroups you should not be attempting to participate here. >> >> At this point you are a strong candidate for the 2023 Darwin Award. You >> can easily win if you just hang in there. > > another one who don't know what the speed of light is...a mind entirely > devoid of answers. I told you twice. You're simply too stupid to understand that the speed of light depends on conditions, different for all cases of "not in a vacuum." It is really pathetic when someone asks a question but they're too stupid to understand the simple answer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web