Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #588748 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2022-07-26 10:41 -0700 |
| Last post | 2022-07-28 01:09 -0230 |
| Articles | 8 on this page of 28 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity
Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-26 10:41 -0700
Re: Multiverse???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-07-26 13:07 -0500
Re: Multiverse???? patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-07-26 15:24 -0700
Re: Multiverse???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-07-26 17:37 -0500
Re: Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-26 20:02 -0700
Re: Multiverse???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-07-27 00:04 -0500
Re: Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-27 11:09 -0700
Re: Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-27 20:30 -0700
Re: Multiverse???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-07-28 00:22 -0500
Re: Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-27 11:34 -0700
Re: Multiverse???? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-07-27 11:52 -0700
Re: Multiverse???? patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-07-27 11:56 -0700
Re: Multiverse???? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-07-27 18:28 -0700
Re: Multiverse???? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-28 01:38 -0400
Re: Multiverse???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-07-27 16:19 -0500
Re: Multiverse???? patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-07-27 15:54 -0700
Re: Multiverse???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-07-27 18:35 -0500
Re: Multiverse???? patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-07-27 17:12 -0700
Re: Multiverse???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-07-27 19:28 -0500
Re: Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-27 20:25 -0700
Re: Multiverse???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-07-28 00:21 -0500
Re: Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-27 22:27 -0700
Re: Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-28 10:21 -0700
Re: Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-28 10:25 -0700
Re: Multiverse???? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-28 01:41 -0400
Re: Multiverse???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-07-28 10:43 -0500
Re: Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-28 10:18 -0700
Re: Multiverse???? David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> - 2022-07-28 01:09 -0230
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-07-28 00:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jkekmuF73m9U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #588812 |
On 7/27/2022 10:25 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > whodat wrote: >> >> On 7/27/2022 7:12 PM, patdolan wrote: >>> On Wednesday, July 27, 2022 at 4:35:34 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>> On 7/27/2022 5:54 PM, patdolan wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, July 27, 2022 at 2:19:37 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>>>> On 7/27/2022 1:34 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>> whodat wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7/26/2022 10:02 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Multiverse???? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Another religious word, right? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Fake science has no end. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Multiverse???? What does that word mean? Xerox Universes? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Excuse me, I have to go to Office Depot to make a copy of this >>>>>>>>>> universe... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Staples Universes? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> MultiDeadCats. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> All of yous have no idea what Multiverse means..it means, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> unobservable universes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> An unobservable universe is self-contradictory. You appear to have a >>>>>>>> propensity for making self-contradictory postings. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is no such thing as a ...contradiction. >>>>>> Are you, by any chance, a mental patient? >>>>> >>>>> To whom is this question addressed, whomaker? >>>> The answer is clear to anyone familiar with the format of this/these >>>> discussion group(s). As someone who has been participating here for >>>> some time are you now making it clear that you don't understand what >>>> is going on in Usenet discussion groups? >>> >>> You have answered my question with another question, Stardat. >> >> Once again, "The answer is clear to anyone familiar with the format >> of this/these discussion group(s)." That, requoted, is not a question. >> >> You have now made it clear that you do not understand the format of >> this/these discussion group(s). Why are you attempting to participate >> in a discussion group where you do not understand how the format is >> statement--reply in a common sequence? Dunning-Kruger got your tongue? >> >> Or is the present situation even worse? If you're attempting to be >> a troll, you're working far too hard, indicating that you're a >> failure even at trolling. >> > > > Pat Dolan was simply asking an ...innocent question. > > > But you're a little too close to the trees.. > > > Pat Dolan simply wanted to know...whodat who said whodat when i say whodat? Do you "interpret" for everyone? -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-07-27 22:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <62E21E56.3867@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #588822 |
whodat wrote: > > On 7/27/2022 10:25 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > whodat wrote: > >> > >> On 7/27/2022 7:12 PM, patdolan wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, July 27, 2022 at 4:35:34 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > >>>> On 7/27/2022 5:54 PM, patdolan wrote: > >>>>> On Wednesday, July 27, 2022 at 2:19:37 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > >>>>>> On 7/27/2022 1:34 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>> whodat wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 7/26/2022 10:02 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Multiverse???? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Another religious word, right? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Fake science has no end. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Multiverse???? What does that word mean? Xerox Universes? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Excuse me, I have to go to Office Depot to make a copy of this > >>>>>>>>>> universe... > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Staples Universes? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> MultiDeadCats. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> All of yous have no idea what Multiverse means..it means, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> unobservable universes. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> An unobservable universe is self-contradictory. You appear to have a > >>>>>>>> propensity for making self-contradictory postings. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> There is no such thing as a ...contradiction. > >>>>>> Are you, by any chance, a mental patient? > >>>>> > >>>>> To whom is this question addressed, whomaker? > >>>> The answer is clear to anyone familiar with the format of this/these > >>>> discussion group(s). As someone who has been participating here for > >>>> some time are you now making it clear that you don't understand what > >>>> is going on in Usenet discussion groups? > >>> > >>> You have answered my question with another question, Stardat. > >> > >> Once again, "The answer is clear to anyone familiar with the format > >> of this/these discussion group(s)." That, requoted, is not a question. > >> > >> You have now made it clear that you do not understand the format of > >> this/these discussion group(s). Why are you attempting to participate > >> in a discussion group where you do not understand how the format is > >> statement--reply in a common sequence? Dunning-Kruger got your tongue? > >> > >> Or is the present situation even worse? If you're attempting to be > >> a troll, you're working far too hard, indicating that you're a > >> failure even at trolling. > >> > > > > > > Pat Dolan was simply asking an ...innocent question. > > > > > > But you're a little too close to the trees.. > > > > > > Pat Dolan simply wanted to know...whodat who said whodat when i say whodat? > > Do you "interpret" for everyone? ain't i here to explain? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-07-28 10:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <62E2C5AF.1C65@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #588824 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > whodat wrote: > > > > On 7/27/2022 10:25 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > whodat wrote: > > >> > > >> On 7/27/2022 7:12 PM, patdolan wrote: > > >>> On Wednesday, July 27, 2022 at 4:35:34 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > > >>>> On 7/27/2022 5:54 PM, patdolan wrote: > > >>>>> On Wednesday, July 27, 2022 at 2:19:37 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > > >>>>>> On 7/27/2022 1:34 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>> whodat wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On 7/26/2022 10:02 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Multiverse???? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Another religious word, right? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Fake science has no end. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Multiverse???? What does that word mean? Xerox Universes? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Excuse me, I have to go to Office Depot to make a copy of this > > >>>>>>>>>> universe... > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Staples Universes? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> MultiDeadCats. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> All of yous have no idea what Multiverse means..it means, > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> unobservable universes. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> An unobservable universe is self-contradictory. You appear to have a > > >>>>>>>> propensity for making self-contradictory postings. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> There is no such thing as a ...contradiction. > > >>>>>> Are you, by any chance, a mental patient? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> To whom is this question addressed, whomaker? > > >>>> The answer is clear to anyone familiar with the format of this/these > > >>>> discussion group(s). As someone who has been participating here for > > >>>> some time are you now making it clear that you don't understand what > > >>>> is going on in Usenet discussion groups? > > >>> > > >>> You have answered my question with another question, Stardat. > > >> > > >> Once again, "The answer is clear to anyone familiar with the format > > >> of this/these discussion group(s)." That, requoted, is not a question. > > >> > > >> You have now made it clear that you do not understand the format of > > >> this/these discussion group(s). Why are you attempting to participate > > >> in a discussion group where you do not understand how the format is > > >> statement--reply in a common sequence? Dunning-Kruger got your tongue? > > >> > > >> Or is the present situation even worse? If you're attempting to be > > >> a troll, you're working far too hard, indicating that you're a > > >> failure even at trolling. > > >> > > > > > > > > > Pat Dolan was simply asking an ...innocent question. > > > > > > > > > But you're a little too close to the trees.. > > > > > > > > > Pat Dolan simply wanted to know...whodat who said whodat when i say whodat? > > > > Do you "interpret" for everyone? > > ain't i here to explain? I interpret the universe and everything in it... dat is why we are here to give the universe a ...voice. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-07-28 10:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <62E2C692.74C3@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #588841 |
The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > whodat wrote: > > > > > > On 7/27/2022 10:25 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > whodat wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On 7/27/2022 7:12 PM, patdolan wrote: > > > >>> On Wednesday, July 27, 2022 at 4:35:34 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > > > >>>> On 7/27/2022 5:54 PM, patdolan wrote: > > > >>>>> On Wednesday, July 27, 2022 at 2:19:37 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > > > >>>>>> On 7/27/2022 1:34 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>>>>>> whodat wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On 7/26/2022 10:02 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Multiverse???? > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Another religious word, right? > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Fake science has no end. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Multiverse???? What does that word mean? Xerox Universes? > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Excuse me, I have to go to Office Depot to make a copy of this > > > >>>>>>>>>> universe... > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Staples Universes? > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> MultiDeadCats. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> All of yous have no idea what Multiverse means..it means, > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> unobservable universes. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> An unobservable universe is self-contradictory. You appear to have a > > > >>>>>>>> propensity for making self-contradictory postings. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> There is no such thing as a ...contradiction. > > > >>>>>> Are you, by any chance, a mental patient? > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> To whom is this question addressed, whomaker? > > > >>>> The answer is clear to anyone familiar with the format of this/these > > > >>>> discussion group(s). As someone who has been participating here for > > > >>>> some time are you now making it clear that you don't understand what > > > >>>> is going on in Usenet discussion groups? > > > >>> > > > >>> You have answered my question with another question, Stardat. > > > >> > > > >> Once again, "The answer is clear to anyone familiar with the format > > > >> of this/these discussion group(s)." That, requoted, is not a question. > > > >> > > > >> You have now made it clear that you do not understand the format of > > > >> this/these discussion group(s). Why are you attempting to participate > > > >> in a discussion group where you do not understand how the format is > > > >> statement--reply in a common sequence? Dunning-Kruger got your tongue? > > > >> > > > >> Or is the present situation even worse? If you're attempting to be > > > >> a troll, you're working far too hard, indicating that you're a > > > >> failure even at trolling. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Pat Dolan was simply asking an ...innocent question. > > > > > > > > > > > > But you're a little too close to the trees.. > > > > > > > > > > > > Pat Dolan simply wanted to know...whodat who said whodat when i say whodat? > > > > > > Do you "interpret" for everyone? > > > > ain't i here to explain? > > I interpret the universe and everything in it... > > dat is why we are here > > to give the universe a ...voice. and the Universe asked..."Whodat?" -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-07-28 01:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <tbt7if$2sdge$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #588806 |
On 7/27/2022 8:28 PM, whodat wrote: > On 7/27/2022 7:12 PM, patdolan wrote: >> On Wednesday, July 27, 2022 at 4:35:34 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>> On 7/27/2022 5:54 PM, patdolan wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, July 27, 2022 at 2:19:37 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>>> On 7/27/2022 1:34 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>> whodat wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 7/26/2022 10:02 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Multiverse???? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Another religious word, right? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Fake science has no end. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Multiverse???? What does that word mean? Xerox Universes? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Excuse me, I have to go to Office Depot to make a copy of this >>>>>>>>> universe... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Staples Universes? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> MultiDeadCats. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All of yous have no idea what Multiverse means..it means, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> unobservable universes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> An unobservable universe is self-contradictory. You appear to have a >>>>>>> propensity for making self-contradictory postings. >>>>>> >>>>>> There is no such thing as a ...contradiction. >>>>> Are you, by any chance, a mental patient? >>>> >>>> To whom is this question addressed, whomaker? >>> The answer is clear to anyone familiar with the format of this/these >>> discussion group(s). As someone who has been participating here for >>> some time are you now making it clear that you don't understand what >>> is going on in Usenet discussion groups? >> >> You have answered my question with another question, Stardat. > > Once again, "The answer is clear to anyone familiar with the format > of this/these discussion group(s)." That, requoted, is not a question. > > You have now made it clear that you do not understand the format of > this/these discussion group(s). Why are you attempting to participate > in a discussion group where you do not understand how the format is > statement--reply in a common sequence? Dunning-Kruger got your tongue? > > Or is the present situation even worse? If you're attempting to be > a troll, you're working far too hard, indicating that you're a > failure even at trolling. > I think he's waving his hands and shouting "Me! Look at me!! I'm a mental patient, too!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-07-28 10:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jkfp4uFcquqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #588827 |
On 7/28/2022 12:41 AM, Volney wrote: > On 7/27/2022 8:28 PM, whodat wrote: >> On 7/27/2022 7:12 PM, patdolan wrote: >>> On Wednesday, July 27, 2022 at 4:35:34 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>> On 7/27/2022 5:54 PM, patdolan wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, July 27, 2022 at 2:19:37 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: >>>>>> On 7/27/2022 1:34 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>> whodat wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7/26/2022 10:02 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Multiverse???? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Another religious word, right? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Fake science has no end. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Multiverse???? What does that word mean? Xerox Universes? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Excuse me, I have to go to Office Depot to make a copy of this >>>>>>>>>> universe... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Staples Universes? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> MultiDeadCats. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> All of yous have no idea what Multiverse means..it means, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> unobservable universes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> An unobservable universe is self-contradictory. You appear to >>>>>>>> have a >>>>>>>> propensity for making self-contradictory postings. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is no such thing as a ...contradiction. >>>>>> Are you, by any chance, a mental patient? >>>>> >>>>> To whom is this question addressed, whomaker? >>>> The answer is clear to anyone familiar with the format of this/these >>>> discussion group(s). As someone who has been participating here for >>>> some time are you now making it clear that you don't understand what >>>> is going on in Usenet discussion groups? >>> >>> You have answered my question with another question, Stardat. >> >> Once again, "The answer is clear to anyone familiar with the format >> of this/these discussion group(s)." That, requoted, is not a question. >> >> You have now made it clear that you do not understand the format of >> this/these discussion group(s). Why are you attempting to participate >> in a discussion group where you do not understand how the format is >> statement--reply in a common sequence? Dunning-Kruger got your tongue? >> >> Or is the present situation even worse? If you're attempting to be >> a troll, you're working far too hard, indicating that you're a >> failure even at trolling. >> > I think he's waving his hands and shouting "Me! Look at me!! I'm a > mental patient, too!" Agreed. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-07-28 10:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <62E2C4FB.5EF8@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #588827 |
Volney wrote: > > On 7/27/2022 8:28 PM, whodat wrote: > > On 7/27/2022 7:12 PM, patdolan wrote: > >> On Wednesday, July 27, 2022 at 4:35:34 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > >>> On 7/27/2022 5:54 PM, patdolan wrote: > >>>> On Wednesday, July 27, 2022 at 2:19:37 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote: > >>>>> On 7/27/2022 1:34 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>> whodat wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 7/26/2022 10:02 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Multiverse???? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Another religious word, right? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Fake science has no end. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Multiverse???? What does that word mean? Xerox Universes? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Excuse me, I have to go to Office Depot to make a copy of this > >>>>>>>>> universe... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Staples Universes? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> MultiDeadCats. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> All of yous have no idea what Multiverse means..it means, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> unobservable universes. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> An unobservable universe is self-contradictory. You appear to have a > >>>>>>> propensity for making self-contradictory postings. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> There is no such thing as a ...contradiction. > >>>>> Are you, by any chance, a mental patient? > >>>> > >>>> To whom is this question addressed, whomaker? > >>> The answer is clear to anyone familiar with the format of this/these > >>> discussion group(s). As someone who has been participating here for > >>> some time are you now making it clear that you don't understand what > >>> is going on in Usenet discussion groups? > >> > >> You have answered my question with another question, Stardat. > > > > Once again, "The answer is clear to anyone familiar with the format > > of this/these discussion group(s)." That, requoted, is not a question. > > > > You have now made it clear that you do not understand the format of > > this/these discussion group(s). Why are you attempting to participate > > in a discussion group where you do not understand how the format is > > statement--reply in a common sequence? Dunning-Kruger got your tongue? > > > > Or is the present situation even worse? If you're attempting to be > > a troll, you're working far too hard, indicating that you're a > > failure even at trolling. > > > I think he's waving his hands and shouting "Me! Look at me!! I'm a > mental patient, too!" and have taken over the Asylum. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2022-07-28 01:09 -0230 |
| Message-ID | <0001HW.28923C740052947970000B04B38F@88.198.57.247> |
| In reply to | #588748 |
On Jul 26, 2022, The Starmaker wrote (in article <62E02766.4CC1@ix.netcom.com>): > Multiverse???? > > Another religious word, right? > > Fake science has no end. > > Multiverse???? What does that word mean? Xerox Universes? > > Excuse me, I have to go to Office Depot to make a copy of this > universe... > > Staples Universes? > > MultiDeadCats. Obviously if you believe in a multiverse then you do not define the universe as all/everything but as that which most modern cosmologists believe began with the Big Bang, which I believe is a subset of all/everything. -- David Dalton dalton@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page) https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page) “Mary walks down to the water’s edge and there she hangs Her head to find herself faded a shadow of what she once was" (Sarah McLachlan)
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity
csiph-web