Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #588824

Re: Multiverse????

Show all headers | View raw

whodat wrote:
> 
> On 7/27/2022 10:25 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > whodat wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/27/2022 7:12 PM, patdolan wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, July 27, 2022 at 4:35:34 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
> >>>> On 7/27/2022 5:54 PM, patdolan wrote:
> >>>>> On Wednesday, July 27, 2022 at 2:19:37 PM UTC-7, whodat wrote:
> >>>>>> On 7/27/2022 1:34 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>>>> whodat wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 7/26/2022 10:02 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Multiverse????
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Another religious word, right?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Fake science has no end.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Multiverse???? What does that word mean? Xerox Universes?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Excuse me, I have to go to Office Depot to make a copy of this
> >>>>>>>>>> universe...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Staples Universes?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> MultiDeadCats.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> All of yous have no idea what Multiverse means..it means,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> unobservable universes.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> An unobservable universe is self-contradictory. You appear to have a
> >>>>>>>> propensity for making self-contradictory postings.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> There is no such thing as a ...contradiction.
> >>>>>> Are you, by any chance, a mental patient?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To whom is this question addressed, whomaker?
> >>>> The answer is clear to anyone familiar with the format of this/these
> >>>> discussion group(s). As someone who has been participating here for
> >>>> some time are you now making it clear that you don't understand what
> >>>> is going on in Usenet discussion groups?
> >>>
> >>> You have answered my question with another question, Stardat.
> >>
> >> Once again, "The answer is clear to anyone familiar with the format
> >> of this/these discussion group(s)." That, requoted, is not a question.
> >>
> >> You have now made it clear that you do not understand the format of
> >> this/these discussion group(s). Why are you attempting to participate
> >> in a discussion group where you do not understand how the format is
> >> statement--reply in a common sequence? Dunning-Kruger got your tongue?
> >>
> >> Or is the present situation even worse? If you're attempting to be
> >> a troll, you're working far too hard, indicating that you're a
> >> failure even at trolling.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Pat Dolan was simply asking an ...innocent question.
> >
> >
> > But you're a little too close to the trees..
> >
> >
> > Pat Dolan simply wanted to know...whodat who said whodat when i say whodat?
> 
>   Do you "interpret" for everyone?


ain't i here to explain?


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-26 10:41 -0700
  Re: Multiverse???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-07-26 13:07 -0500
    Re: Multiverse???? patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-07-26 15:24 -0700
      Re: Multiverse???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-07-26 17:37 -0500
  Re: Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-26 20:02 -0700
    Re: Multiverse???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-07-27 00:04 -0500
      Re: Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-27 11:09 -0700
        Re: Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-27 20:30 -0700
          Re: Multiverse???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-07-28 00:22 -0500
      Re: Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-27 11:34 -0700
        Re: Multiverse???? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-07-27 11:52 -0700
          Re: Multiverse???? patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-07-27 11:56 -0700
            Re: Multiverse???? "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-07-27 18:28 -0700
              Re: Multiverse???? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-28 01:38 -0400
        Re: Multiverse???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-07-27 16:19 -0500
          Re: Multiverse???? patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-07-27 15:54 -0700
            Re: Multiverse???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-07-27 18:35 -0500
              Re: Multiverse???? patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-07-27 17:12 -0700
                Re: Multiverse???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-07-27 19:28 -0500
                Re: Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-27 20:25 -0700
                Re: Multiverse???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-07-28 00:21 -0500
                Re: Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-27 22:27 -0700
                Re: Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-28 10:21 -0700
                Re: Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-28 10:25 -0700
                Re: Multiverse???? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-07-28 01:41 -0400
                Re: Multiverse???? whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-07-28 10:43 -0500
                Re: Multiverse???? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-28 10:18 -0700
  Re: Multiverse???? David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> - 2022-07-28 01:09 -0230

csiph-web