Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #588190 > unrolled thread

Dark Matter

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics.relativity

Contents

  Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-09 22:50 -0700
    Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-09 23:05 -0700
      Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-10 11:38 -0700
      Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-10 12:02 -0700
    Re: Dark Matter "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 13:57 -0700
      Re: Dark Matter Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2022-07-21 13:13 +0000
    Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-15 22:48 -0700
      Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-18 14:36 -0700
        Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-18 14:48 -0700
        Re: Dark Matter Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-07-18 15:48 -0700
          Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-18 16:36 -0700
            Re: Dark Matter Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-07-18 17:40 -0700
              Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-18 19:15 -0700
                Re: Dark Matter Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 23:11 -0500
                Re: Dark Matter Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-07-18 21:11 -0700
                  Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-19 00:06 -0700
                    Re: Dark Matter Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-07-19 06:31 -0700
                      Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-19 10:22 -0700
        Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-19 16:01 -0700
          Re: Dark Matter Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-07-19 16:28 -0700
            Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-19 21:10 -0700
          Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-19 20:50 -0700
      Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-21 15:52 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#588190 — Dark Matter

There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...

I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
not in terms that you can understand.

For one...it's dark.  


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#588191

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
> haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
> 
> I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
> not in terms that you can understand.
> 
> For one...it's dark.


Now, the difference between it being all dark, and it being dark and
stars is just an 'exact number'.


Above that number, it's all dark, no stars.


Below dat number, no stars. no dark.














-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588217

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
> > haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
> >
> > I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
> > not in terms that you can understand.
> >
> > For one...it's dark.
> 
> Now, the difference between it being all dark, and it being dark and
> stars is just an 'exact number'.
> 
> Above that number, it's all dark, no stars.


That doesn't mean that above that 'exact number' the stars don't exist,
...just means it is no longer visible.


zero-zero vision?




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588220

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
> > haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
> >
> > I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
> > not in terms that you can understand.
> >
> > For one...it's dark.
> 
> Now, the difference between it being all dark, and it being dark and
> stars is just an 'exact number'.
> 
> Above that number, it's all dark, no stars.
> 
> Below dat number, no stars. no dark.
> 

below dat number, it will be just a static grey looking universe. no
stars, no dark.



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588226

On Saturday, July 9, 2022 at 10:49:47 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community' 
> haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is... 
> 
> I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but 
> not in terms that you can understand. 
> 
> For one...it's dark. 
> 
> 
> -- 
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, 
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
> and challenge 
> the unchallengeable.

Dark matter doesn't exist... it doesn't work.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588619

On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 13:57:20 -0700 (PDT), mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Saturday, July 9, 2022 at 10:49:47 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
>> There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
>> haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
>> 
>> I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but not in terms
>> that you can understand.
>> 
>> For one...it's dark.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>> and challenge the unchallengeable.
> 
> Dark matter doesn't exist... it doesn't work.

Doesn't matter.

-- 
Reinhardt

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588463

On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 22:50:01 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
>haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
>
>I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
>not in terms that you can understand.
>
>For one...it's dark.  



Now, I have no idea where the 'scientific community' gots it's idea of
a ...Dark Energy, but Dark Matter and Dark Energy has both gots to be
the same thing!


--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588536

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 22:50:01 -0700, The Starmaker
> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> >There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
> >haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
> >
> >I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
> >not in terms that you can understand.
> >
> >For one...it's dark.
> 
> Now, I have no idea where the 'scientific community' gots it's idea of
> a ...Dark Energy, but Dark Matter and Dark Energy has both gots to be
> the same thing!

Now, here are some...'internet facts'?


According to the very first sentence in...wikipedia, it reads:
approximately 85% of the matter in the universe
"Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter thought to account for
approximately 85% of the matter in the universe."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter


and, according to britannica.com:

Dark matter makes up 30.1 percent of the matter
https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter


30 percent and 80 percent are two big differences. One of them is lying. 












-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588537

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 22:50:01 -0700, The Starmaker
> > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> > >There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
> > >haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
> > >
> > >I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
> > >not in terms that you can understand.
> > >
> > >For one...it's dark.
> >
> > Now, I have no idea where the 'scientific community' gots it's idea of
> > a ...Dark Energy, but Dark Matter and Dark Energy has both gots to be
> > the same thing!
> 
> Now, here are some...'internet facts'?
> 
> According to the very first sentence in...wikipedia, it reads:
> approximately 85% of the matter in the universe
> "Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter thought to account for
> approximately 85% of the matter in the universe."
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
> 
> and, according to britannica.com:
> 
> Dark matter makes up 30.1 percent of the matter
> https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter
> 
> 30 percent and 80 percent are two big differences. One of them is lying.

Of course, it goes without saying between the two,  wikipedia is the MOST UNTRUSTED source for any kind of information.


garbage in, garbage out, and garbage in again...that is the extent of your knowldege, the garbage that goes in.



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588538

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>> 
>> On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 22:50:01 -0700, The Starmaker
>> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> 
>> >There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
>> >haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
>> >
>> >I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
>> >not in terms that you can understand.
>> >
>> >For one...it's dark.
>> 
>> Now, I have no idea where the 'scientific community' gots it's idea of
>> a ...Dark Energy, but Dark Matter and Dark Energy has both gots to be
>> the same thing!
> 
> Now, here are some...'internet facts'?
> 
> 
> According to the very first sentence in...wikipedia, it reads:
> approximately 85% of the matter in the universe
> "Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter thought to account for
> approximately 85% of the matter in the universe."
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
> 
> 
> and, according to britannica.com:
> 
> Dark matter makes up 30.1 percent of the matter
> https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter
> 
> 
> 30 percent and 80 percent are two big differences. One of them is lying. 
> 

Nope, both are correct.

As usual you didn't pay attention to the details, i.e. are you talking
mass, energy, both, or what.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588539

Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 22:50:01 -0700, The Starmaker
> >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
> >> >haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
> >> >
> >> >I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
> >> >not in terms that you can understand.
> >> >
> >> >For one...it's dark.
> >>
> >> Now, I have no idea where the 'scientific community' gots it's idea of
> >> a ...Dark Energy, but Dark Matter and Dark Energy has both gots to be
> >> the same thing!
> >
> > Now, here are some...'internet facts'?
> >
> >
> > According to the very first sentence in...wikipedia, it reads:
> > approximately 85% of the matter in the universe
> > "Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter thought to account for
> > approximately 85% of the matter in the universe."
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
> >
> >
> > and, according to britannica.com:
> >
> > Dark matter makes up 30.1 percent of the matter
> > https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter
> >
> >
> > 30 percent and 80 percent are two big differences. One of them is lying.
> >
> 
> Nope, both are correct.
> 
> As usual you didn't pay attention to the details, i.e. are you talking
> mass, energy, both, or what.

The Subject Heading of this thread read: Dark Matter. 

https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter   reads: Dark Matter
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter        reads: Dark Matter

I can understand your confusion...it's typical. 


They both cannot be correct if the ...'numbers' differ...GREATLY.



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588540

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Jim Pennino wrote:
>> 
>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > The Starmaker wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 22:50:01 -0700, The Starmaker
>> >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
>> >> >haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
>> >> >
>> >> >I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
>> >> >not in terms that you can understand.
>> >> >
>> >> >For one...it's dark.
>> >>
>> >> Now, I have no idea where the 'scientific community' gots it's idea of
>> >> a ...Dark Energy, but Dark Matter and Dark Energy has both gots to be
>> >> the same thing!
>> >
>> > Now, here are some...'internet facts'?
>> >
>> >
>> > According to the very first sentence in...wikipedia, it reads:
>> > approximately 85% of the matter in the universe
>> > "Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter thought to account for
>> > approximately 85% of the matter in the universe."
>> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
>> >
>> >
>> > and, according to britannica.com:
>> >
>> > Dark matter makes up 30.1 percent of the matter
>> > https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter
>> >
>> >
>> > 30 percent and 80 percent are two big differences. One of them is lying.
>> >
>> 
>> Nope, both are correct.
>> 
>> As usual you didn't pay attention to the details, i.e. are you talking
>> mass, energy, both, or what.
> 
> The Subject Heading of this thread read: Dark Matter. 
> 
> https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter   reads: Dark Matter
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter        reads: Dark Matter
> 
> I can understand your confusion...it's typical. 
> 
> 
> They both cannot be correct if the ...'numbers' differ...GREATLY.
 
And one more time...

Both are correct.

Are you talking mass, energy, both, or what?



 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588543

Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > Jim Pennino wrote:
> >>
> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 22:50:01 -0700, The Starmaker
> >> >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
> >> >> >haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
> >> >> >not in terms that you can understand.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >For one...it's dark.
> >> >>
> >> >> Now, I have no idea where the 'scientific community' gots it's idea of
> >> >> a ...Dark Energy, but Dark Matter and Dark Energy has both gots to be
> >> >> the same thing!
> >> >
> >> > Now, here are some...'internet facts'?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > According to the very first sentence in...wikipedia, it reads:
> >> > approximately 85% of the matter in the universe
> >> > "Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter thought to account for
> >> > approximately 85% of the matter in the universe."
> >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > and, according to britannica.com:
> >> >
> >> > Dark matter makes up 30.1 percent of the matter
> >> > https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 30 percent and 80 percent are two big differences. One of them is lying.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Nope, both are correct.
> >>
> >> As usual you didn't pay attention to the details, i.e. are you talking
> >> mass, energy, both, or what.
> >
> > The Subject Heading of this thread read: Dark Matter.
> >
> > https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter   reads: Dark Matter
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter        reads: Dark Matter
> >
> > I can understand your confusion...it's typical.
> >
> >
> > They both cannot be correct if the ...'numbers' differ...GREATLY.
> 
> And one more time...
> 
> Both are correct.
> 
> Are you talking mass, energy, both, or what?
> 
> 
Okay, first you need to understand the 'defitition' of Matter:

Learn to pronounce mat·ter
/'mad?r/
noun

    physical substance in general, as distinct from mind and spirit; (in physics) that which occupies space and possesses rest mass, especially as distinct from energy.

"especially as distinct from energy.".


also you need to unsratand the defintion for 

dis·tinct
/d?'stiNG(k)t/
adjective

    recognizably different in nature from something else 



Do you want the French translation? Or German, or Afganastan??? 





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588548

On 7/18/2022 9:15 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Do you want the French translation? Or German, or Afganastan???

Ask McGinn to "put it in" in him :)


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588549

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Jim Pennino wrote:
>> 
>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > Jim Pennino wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >> > The Starmaker wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 22:50:01 -0700, The Starmaker
>> >> >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
>> >> >> >haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
>> >> >> >not in terms that you can understand.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >For one...it's dark.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Now, I have no idea where the 'scientific community' gots it's idea of
>> >> >> a ...Dark Energy, but Dark Matter and Dark Energy has both gots to be
>> >> >> the same thing!
>> >> >
>> >> > Now, here are some...'internet facts'?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > According to the very first sentence in...wikipedia, it reads:
>> >> > approximately 85% of the matter in the universe
>> >> > "Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter thought to account for
>> >> > approximately 85% of the matter in the universe."
>> >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > and, according to britannica.com:
>> >> >
>> >> > Dark matter makes up 30.1 percent of the matter
>> >> > https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > 30 percent and 80 percent are two big differences. One of them is lying.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Nope, both are correct.
>> >>
>> >> As usual you didn't pay attention to the details, i.e. are you talking
>> >> mass, energy, both, or what.
>> >
>> > The Subject Heading of this thread read: Dark Matter.
>> >
>> > https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter   reads: Dark Matter
>> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter        reads: Dark Matter
>> >
>> > I can understand your confusion...it's typical.
>> >
>> >
>> > They both cannot be correct if the ...'numbers' differ...GREATLY.
>> 
>> And one more time...
>> 
>> Both are correct.
>> 
>> Are you talking mass, energy, both, or what?
>> 
>> 
> Okay, first you need to understand the 'defitition' of Matter:

Okay, I give up.

You can not be educated.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588552

Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > Jim Pennino wrote:
> >>
> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> > Jim Pennino wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> >> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 22:50:01 -0700, The Starmaker
> >> >> >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
> >> >> >> >haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
> >> >> >> >not in terms that you can understand.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >For one...it's dark.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Now, I have no idea where the 'scientific community' gots it's idea of
> >> >> >> a ...Dark Energy, but Dark Matter and Dark Energy has both gots to be
> >> >> >> the same thing!
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Now, here are some...'internet facts'?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > According to the very first sentence in...wikipedia, it reads:
> >> >> > approximately 85% of the matter in the universe
> >> >> > "Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter thought to account for
> >> >> > approximately 85% of the matter in the universe."
> >> >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > and, according to britannica.com:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Dark matter makes up 30.1 percent of the matter
> >> >> > https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 30 percent and 80 percent are two big differences. One of them is lying.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Nope, both are correct.
> >> >>
> >> >> As usual you didn't pay attention to the details, i.e. are you talking
> >> >> mass, energy, both, or what.
> >> >
> >> > The Subject Heading of this thread read: Dark Matter.
> >> >
> >> > https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter   reads: Dark Matter
> >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter        reads: Dark Matter
> >> >
> >> > I can understand your confusion...it's typical.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > They both cannot be correct if the ...'numbers' differ...GREATLY.
> >>
> >> And one more time...
> >>
> >> Both are correct.
> >>
> >> Are you talking mass, energy, both, or what?
> >>
> >>
> > Okay, first you need to understand the 'defitition' of Matter:
> 
> Okay, I give up.
> 
> You can not be educated.

When you keep repeating the same thing, but expect different results...


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588554

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Jim Pennino wrote:
>> 
>> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > Jim Pennino wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >> > Jim Pennino wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > The Starmaker wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 22:50:01 -0700, The Starmaker
>> >> >> >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
>> >> >> >> >haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
>> >> >> >> >not in terms that you can understand.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >For one...it's dark.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Now, I have no idea where the 'scientific community' gots it's idea of
>> >> >> >> a ...Dark Energy, but Dark Matter and Dark Energy has both gots to be
>> >> >> >> the same thing!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Now, here are some...'internet facts'?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > According to the very first sentence in...wikipedia, it reads:
>> >> >> > approximately 85% of the matter in the universe
>> >> >> > "Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter thought to account for
>> >> >> > approximately 85% of the matter in the universe."
>> >> >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > and, according to britannica.com:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Dark matter makes up 30.1 percent of the matter
>> >> >> > https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 30 percent and 80 percent are two big differences. One of them is lying.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Nope, both are correct.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As usual you didn't pay attention to the details, i.e. are you talking
>> >> >> mass, energy, both, or what.
>> >> >
>> >> > The Subject Heading of this thread read: Dark Matter.
>> >> >
>> >> > https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter   reads: Dark Matter
>> >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter        reads: Dark Matter
>> >> >
>> >> > I can understand your confusion...it's typical.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > They both cannot be correct if the ...'numbers' differ...GREATLY.
>> >>
>> >> And one more time...
>> >>
>> >> Both are correct.
>> >>
>> >> Are you talking mass, energy, both, or what?
>> >>
>> >>
>> > Okay, first you need to understand the 'defitition' of Matter:
>> 
>> Okay, I give up.
>> 
>> You can not be educated.
> 
> When you keep repeating the same thing, but expect different results...
 
Exactly why I have decided you can not be educated and have given up on
you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588562

Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > Jim Pennino wrote:
> >>
> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> > Jim Pennino wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Jim Pennino wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 22:50:01 -0700, The Starmaker
> >> >> >> >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
> >> >> >> >> >haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
> >> >> >> >> >not in terms that you can understand.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >For one...it's dark.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Now, I have no idea where the 'scientific community' gots it's idea of
> >> >> >> >> a ...Dark Energy, but Dark Matter and Dark Energy has both gots to be
> >> >> >> >> the same thing!
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Now, here are some...'internet facts'?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > According to the very first sentence in...wikipedia, it reads:
> >> >> >> > approximately 85% of the matter in the universe
> >> >> >> > "Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter thought to account for
> >> >> >> > approximately 85% of the matter in the universe."
> >> >> >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > and, according to britannica.com:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Dark matter makes up 30.1 percent of the matter
> >> >> >> > https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > 30 percent and 80 percent are two big differences. One of them is lying.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Nope, both are correct.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> As usual you didn't pay attention to the details, i.e. are you talking
> >> >> >> mass, energy, both, or what.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The Subject Heading of this thread read: Dark Matter.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter   reads: Dark Matter
> >> >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter        reads: Dark Matter
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I can understand your confusion...it's typical.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > They both cannot be correct if the ...'numbers' differ...GREATLY.
> >> >>
> >> >> And one more time...
> >> >>
> >> >> Both are correct.
> >> >>
> >> >> Are you talking mass, energy, both, or what?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > Okay, first you need to understand the 'defitition' of Matter:
> >>
> >> Okay, I give up.
> >>
> >> You can not be educated.
> >
> > When you keep repeating the same thing, but expect different results...
> 
> Exactly why I have decided you can not be educated and have given up on
> you.

Ohhh, I get it now! It's the word "Dark" dat bothers you. Are you one of those...dark people? Darker than blue? 

Dark is Beautiful! Dark Lives Matter. 

You know, when I tell another guy "Slap me Five!" and I hold out my hand so that
he can slap me five...I quickly flip my hand to the otherside and tell him..."On the Nigger side!!!!"






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588565

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 22:50:01 -0700, The Starmaker
> > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> > >There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
> > >haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
> > >
> > >I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
> > >not in terms that you can understand.
> > >
> > >For one...it's dark.
> >
> > Now, I have no idea where the 'scientific community' gots it's idea of
> > a ...Dark Energy, but Dark Matter and Dark Energy has both gots to be
> > the same thing!
> 
> Now, here are some...'internet facts'?
> 
> According to the very first sentence in...wikipedia, it reads:
> approximately 85% of the matter in the universe
> "Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter thought to account for
> approximately 85% of the matter in the universe."
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
> 
> and, according to britannica.com:
> 
> Dark matter makes up 30.1 percent of the matter
> https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter
> 
> 30 percent and 80 percent are two big differences. One of them is lying.


Now, according to wikipedia...85% of the matter in the universe is dark
matter, and
dark energy contributes 68% of the total energy in the present-day
observable universe.


When you total dark matter and dark energy, dats equals 153 percent! Dat
means here is more dark energy and dark mater then there is a universe. 

Where is the other 53 percent located at????
















-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#588568

In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>> 
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 22:50:01 -0700, The Starmaker
>> > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
>> > >haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
>> > >
>> > >I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
>> > >not in terms that you can understand.
>> > >
>> > >For one...it's dark.
>> >
>> > Now, I have no idea where the 'scientific community' gots it's idea of
>> > a ...Dark Energy, but Dark Matter and Dark Energy has both gots to be
>> > the same thing!
>> 
>> Now, here are some...'internet facts'?
>> 
>> According to the very first sentence in...wikipedia, it reads:
>> approximately 85% of the matter in the universe
>> "Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter thought to account for
>> approximately 85% of the matter in the universe."
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
>> 
>> and, according to britannica.com:
>> 
>> Dark matter makes up 30.1 percent of the matter
>> https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter
>> 
>> 30 percent and 80 percent are two big differences. One of them is lying.
> 
> 
> Now, according to wikipedia...85% of the matter in the universe is dark
> matter, and
> dark energy contributes 68% of the total energy in the present-day
> observable universe.
> 
> 
> When you total dark matter and dark energy, dats equals 153 percent! Dat
> means here is more dark energy and dark mater then there is a universe. 
> 
> Where is the other 53 percent located at????

Try reading footnote a, idiot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics.relativity

csiph-web