Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #588552

Re: Dark Matter

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: Dark Matter
Date 2022-07-19 00:06 -0700
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <62D657E9.620D@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <ti4hqi-i9q41.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <62D5EE7C.6F21@ix.netcom.com> <j4bhqi-9g251.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <62D613CC.3B8B@ix.netcom.com> <pfnhqi-50h51.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > Jim Pennino wrote:
> >>
> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> > Jim Pennino wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> >> > The Starmaker wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Sat, 09 Jul 2022 22:50:01 -0700, The Starmaker
> >> >> >> <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >There seems to be a problem with people in the 'scientific community'
> >> >> >> >haven't no idea what the 'so-called' "Dark Matter" is...
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >I have no problem explaining what Dark Matter is, ...but
> >> >> >> >not in terms that you can understand.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >For one...it's dark.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Now, I have no idea where the 'scientific community' gots it's idea of
> >> >> >> a ...Dark Energy, but Dark Matter and Dark Energy has both gots to be
> >> >> >> the same thing!
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Now, here are some...'internet facts'?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > According to the very first sentence in...wikipedia, it reads:
> >> >> > approximately 85% of the matter in the universe
> >> >> > "Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter thought to account for
> >> >> > approximately 85% of the matter in the universe."
> >> >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > and, according to britannica.com:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Dark matter makes up 30.1 percent of the matter
> >> >> > https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 30 percent and 80 percent are two big differences. One of them is lying.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Nope, both are correct.
> >> >>
> >> >> As usual you didn't pay attention to the details, i.e. are you talking
> >> >> mass, energy, both, or what.
> >> >
> >> > The Subject Heading of this thread read: Dark Matter.
> >> >
> >> > https://www.britannica.com/science/dark-matter   reads: Dark Matter
> >> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter        reads: Dark Matter
> >> >
> >> > I can understand your confusion...it's typical.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > They both cannot be correct if the ...'numbers' differ...GREATLY.
> >>
> >> And one more time...
> >>
> >> Both are correct.
> >>
> >> Are you talking mass, energy, both, or what?
> >>
> >>
> > Okay, first you need to understand the 'defitition' of Matter:
> 
> Okay, I give up.
> 
> You can not be educated.

When you keep repeating the same thing, but expect different results...


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-09 22:50 -0700
  Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-09 23:05 -0700
    Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-10 11:38 -0700
    Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-10 12:02 -0700
  Re: Dark Matter "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2022-07-10 13:57 -0700
    Re: Dark Matter Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2022-07-21 13:13 +0000
  Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-15 22:48 -0700
    Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-18 14:36 -0700
      Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-18 14:48 -0700
      Re: Dark Matter Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-07-18 15:48 -0700
        Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-18 16:36 -0700
          Re: Dark Matter Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-07-18 17:40 -0700
            Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-18 19:15 -0700
              Re: Dark Matter Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2022-07-18 23:11 -0500
              Re: Dark Matter Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-07-18 21:11 -0700
                Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-19 00:06 -0700
                Re: Dark Matter Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-07-19 06:31 -0700
                Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-19 10:22 -0700
      Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-19 16:01 -0700
        Re: Dark Matter Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2022-07-19 16:28 -0700
          Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-19 21:10 -0700
        Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-19 20:50 -0700
    Re: Dark Matter The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-07-21 15:52 -0700

csiph-web