Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #658135

Re: Relativity theory from other angles

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Relativity theory from other angles
Date Sat, 19 Oct 2024 08:47:21 +0200
Lines 46
Message-ID <lnh2vlFu8s0U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <-uCcnXHlifVbnY76nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <1987ec55abc9f5f0cd9fd600166729bc@www.novabbs.com> <C0KdnWSiBurDvI76nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace individual.net weugBZERozzFYQqM/FFS4Qyp3p1OhORojP98sjgY3qOqNY7V1J
Cancel-Lock sha1:xBZUMvaSps7nFfviw5uRIH0l7PE= sha256:ZBLB95K96QNqSP5Fp96oGXQJS+4oQzJGHKzCkfgQxqo=
User-Agent Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language de-DE
In-Reply-To <C0KdnWSiBurDvI76nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:658135

Show key headers only | View raw


Am Samstag000019, 19.10.2024 um 05:03 schrieb Ross Finlayson:
> On 10/18/2024 07:48 PM, bertietaylor wrote:
>> On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 0:44:11 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>
>>> Hey, what if you derive
>>> light speed from the
>>> mass-energy equivalency
>>> instead of the other way around?
>>
>> What exactly makes you think that mass and energy are equivalent?
> 
> It's sort of simpler to have everything "pure energy"
> that everything "pure mass" or "pure charge" or
> "pure velocity of an organized image" or
> "pure lifetime of a nuclear radioisotope",
> it's sort of central and sits neatly in the space,
> it's chargeless, massless, has no velocity, always changes.


I personally regard E= m*c² as wrong.

It should be:
delta(E) = -delta(m)*c²

But actually I think, that the imaginary unit i should be used here, too.

Energie is in a way 'rotated' mass, if you multiply mass by i and regard 
i as factor, which would rotate by an angle of 90°.

I named the 'unrotated' pattern 'mass term' and let it point upwards (be 
timelike).

So mass is timelike and charge (potential) spacelike.

Inbetween we have 'light-like' and that is the realm, where energy is 
radiated away.

But non-radiating energy should also be able exist somewhere (as 
'potential') and that is the timeless realm, which we call 'spacelike'.

And that is the hyperplane of the present, if we regard the axis of time 
as normal to it and imaginary.
...


TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Relativity theory from other angles Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-18 17:44 -0700
  Re: Relativity theory from other angles bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-10-19 02:48 +0000
    Re: Relativity theory from other angles Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-18 20:03 -0700
      Re: Relativity theory from other angles Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-18 20:23 -0700
        Re: Relativity theory from other angles hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2024-10-19 04:22 +0000
          Re: Relativity theory from other angles Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-19 09:40 -0700
      Re: Relativity theory from other angles bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-19 06:11 +0000
        Re: Relativity theory from other angles Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-19 09:46 -0700
          Re: Relativity theory from other angles bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-20 09:50 +0000
            Re: Relativity theory from other angles Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-20 09:16 -0700
              Re: Relativity theory from other angles bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) - 2024-10-20 20:54 +0000
                Re: Relativity theory from other angles Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-20 17:35 -0700
                Re: Relativity theory from other angles Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-20 18:15 -0700
                Re: Relativity theory from other angles bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-22 00:50 +0000
                Re: Relativity theory from other angles clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2024-10-22 02:43 +0000
                Re: Relativity theory from other angles Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-22 12:45 -0700
                Re: Relativity theory from other angles bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-22 21:59 +0000
                Re: Relativity theory from other angles Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-22 17:47 -0700
                Re: Relativity theory from other angles bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-23 02:11 +0000
                Re: Relativity theory from other angles bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-21 03:04 +0000
                Re: Relativity theory from other angles Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-21 10:42 -0700
                Re: Relativity theory from other angles bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2024-10-22 00:46 +0000
      Re: Relativity theory from other angles Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-19 08:47 +0200
        Re: Relativity theory from other angles Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-19 09:59 -0700
          Re: Relativity theory from other angles Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-20 08:44 +0200
  Re: Relativity theory from other angles hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2024-10-19 03:06 +0000
    Re: Relativity theory from other angles Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-18 20:30 -0700
  Re: Relativity theory from other angles nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-10-20 21:06 +0200
    Re: Relativity theory from other angles Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-20 17:30 -0700

csiph-web