Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #653183
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Scalar waves |
| Date | 2024-04-29 06:36 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <l98megFchp8U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <l96663F16l9U1@mid.individual.net> <Me6dnRr7rMaN6rP7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Am Sonntag000028, 28.04.2024 um 18:19 schrieb Ross Finlayson: > On 04/27/2024 10:46 PM, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Hi Ng >> >> I had read recently something from Tom Bearden. >> >> He wrote, that scalar waves are longitudinal waves, which vary in >> velocity and are acompanied by a wave, which runs backwards in time. >> >> The idea is a little strange and would require to give up the constancy >> of the speed of light in vacuum, but to allow a variation of the speed >> of light in vacuum. >> >> This would cause a wavelike behavior, but longitudinal (opposite to >> classical em-waves). >> >> This behaviour was called 'polarized in the time-domain'. >> >> >> Is this somehow correct? >> >> (The 'backwards in time wave' is actually no prblem for me, because I >> had assumed something similar before.) >> >> TH >> >> >> > > It only goes backward, if at all: zero, so, .... > > What that models is that there is a region, all the region > of the affected course of the wave, that is a "locale", > that is a locality, and that according to observer > effect and "real wave collapse", of a superclassical > wave of a locale an extended region, that the "real > wave collapse" is "superclassical flux", i.e. instantaneous. > > I.e., the only reason "model of a wave backward in time > as if time was a dimension not a ray", is because, > otherwise it's "model of a wave instantaneous in an > extended region of space". It's only a projection, > because, the real perspective, is a regional perspective, > which is the locale, not just the point perspective. > > Waves are considered general models of change in open systems. > I had written this 'book': https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing There I use a certain mathematical construct about which I assume, that nature would behave similarly on a very fundamental level. This contains an expansion and a contraction (wave), which build a standing wave and that 'timelike stable structures', which I assume to be what we call 'matter'. The concept is therefor called 'structured spacetime'. The wave and the anti-wave are actually connected, because the world is assumed to be composed from anti-symmetric pointlike elements of spacetime. These are connected with the neighbors, as if these elements would twist each other in a certain mathematical way, as if they were multiplied to the neighbours like quaternions (actually bi-quaternions). Now it easy to assume, that the negative timeline is regarded as positive for a comoving observer, who in turn would regard our timeline as negative. That is quite an unusual concept, but would make sense (at least to me). TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-04-28 07:46 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-04-28 09:19 -0700
Re: Scalar waves Dominick Csikós <di@zsc.hu> - 2024-04-28 16:44 +0000
Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-04-28 10:44 -0700
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-04-29 06:36 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-04-29 06:28 -0700
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-04-30 07:55 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-04-30 08:10 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-04-30 22:27 -0700
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-01 08:18 +0200
Re: Scalar waves nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-05-01 09:46 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-01 11:23 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-03 08:46 +0200
Re: Scalar waves nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-05-01 09:46 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-04-30 10:44 +0200
Re: Scalar waves nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-05-01 09:46 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-01 11:21 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-03 08:56 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-04 08:38 -0700
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-05 08:00 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-05 06:56 -0700
Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-05 07:49 -0700
Re: Scalar waves nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-05-05 23:27 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-06 07:26 +0200
Re: Scalar waves nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-05-06 11:36 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-05-06 13:48 +0300
Re: Scalar waves nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-05-06 13:52 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-07 09:43 +0200
Re: Scalar waves nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-05-07 18:42 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-07 18:53 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-08 08:04 +0200
Re: Scalar waves nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-05-08 14:52 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-08 15:20 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-09 09:49 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-05-08 12:15 +0300
Re: Scalar waves nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-05-08 14:52 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-05-08 15:18 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-08 13:13 -0700
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-09 09:55 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-09 13:02 -0700
Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-09 13:18 -0700
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-10 18:46 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-10 13:04 -0700
Re: Scalar waves nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-05-05 23:18 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-05 15:12 -0700
Re: Scalar waves nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-05-06 11:36 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-06 12:39 -0700
Re: Scalar waves nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-05-05 23:18 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-06 07:35 +0200
Re: Scalar waves nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-05-06 11:36 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Ollis Kalakos <asala@asakoias.gr> - 2024-05-06 17:28 +0000
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-07 09:50 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Parkis Escarrà <acr@aaase.es> - 2024-05-07 09:48 +0000
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-08 08:09 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Tamerlane Oldfart Lefévre <elell@trnvffmar.fr> - 2024-05-08 08:20 +0000
Re: Scalar waves Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-05-11 08:12 +0200
Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 06:59 -0700
Re: Scalar waves Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-12 10:40 -0700
csiph-web