Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #661059

Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:48:16 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

> Den 05.02.2025 23:51, skrev rhertz:
>> On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 12:29:56 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> Den 04.02.2025 22:54, skrev rhertz:
>>>>
>>>> Now, considering that he started with Galilean transform x' = x-vt
>>>>
>
>>> You can't have read §3 properly, you have only
>>> scrutinised the text to find "x' = x − vt", and when you found
>>> it, you got an orgasm, shouting:
>>> "EINSTEIN USED GALILEAN TRANSFORM TO DERIVE LORENTZ WITHOUT ETHER!!"
>>
>> NO, innoble animal!. I didn't write that claim.
>
> You used exactly those words back in 2020,
> and as quoted above, you repeated that x' = x - vt
> is the Galilean transform in §3.
>
>>>
>>> See:
>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Electrodynamics.pdf
>>> Read §3
>>>   Theory of the Transformation of Co-ordinates and
>>>   Times from a Stationary System to another System in
>>>   Uniform Motion of Translation Relatively to the Former
>
> The paragraph is about the transformation of the coordinates
> of an event from one frame of reference to another frame
> of reference which is moving relative to the first.
>
>>>
>>> On the first page (page 5) Einstein defines the coordinate systems.
>>> The "stationary system"  K(x,y,z,t) coordinates are Latin letters
>>> The "moving system"      k(ξ,η,ζ,τ) coordinates are Greek letters
>
> So:
>
> The coordinate transform  K-> k is generally:
> ξ = ξ(x,y,z,t)
> η = η(x,y,z,t)
> ζ = ζ(x,y,z,t)
> τ = τ(x,y,z,t)
>
> The coordinate transform k -> K is generally:
> x = x(ξ,η,ζ,τ)
> y = y(ξ,η,ζ,τ)
> z = z(ξ,η,ζ,τ)
> t = t(ξ,η,ζ,τ)
>
> The Galilean transform K-> k is:
> ξ = x - vt
> η = y
> ζ = z
> τ = t
>
> The Galilean transform k -> K is:
> x = ξ + vτ
> y = η
> z = ζ
> t = τ
>
> The Lorentz transform K-> k is:
> ξ = (x - vt)/√(1−v²/c²)
> η = y
> ζ = z
> τ = (t - (v/c²)x)/√(1−v²/c²)
>
> The Lorentz transform k-> K is:
> x = (ξ + vτ)/√(1−v²/c²)
> y = η
> z = ζ
> t = (τ + (v/c²)ξ)/√(1−v²/c²)
>
>
>>>
>>> So the Galilean transform is: ξ = x - vt
>>
>>
>> NO, innoble animal! ξ is the name of the horizontal axis in the moving
>> frame k.
>
> And x' is a coordinate in k ? :-D
>
>> ξ(x') = x' in the moving frame. I attached a graphic to clarify this
>> but, with your "dog vision" you missed it.
>
> What kind of transform is ξ(x') = x' ?
>
> Did you possibly mean: ξ = (x - vt)/√(1−v²/c²) ?
>
> But at this point we don't know this yet, we only know: ξ = ξ(x,y,z,t)
>
>>
>> x' = x - vt is the well known Galilean transform, along with τ = t' = t.
>
> So  τ is a coordinate in k, but ξ is not a coordinate in k,
> because the coordinates in k are (x',η,ζ,τ), right?
>
> This is fun, isn't it?  :-D
>
> There is only one meaning of x', right?
>
> https://paulba.no/pdf/Dilbert.pdf


As Dono did, you're deviating the attention about the main topic, which
can be read in the title of this thread.


Using ξ(x') = x' is my way TO ENFORCE that x' is a point on the ξ axis.
I also used this way to express ξ(0) = 0, so I could write  the length
of the
"virtual rod r_AB" as  ξ(x') - ξ(0), being 0 and x' the points in the
frame k
where clocks, detectors and the mirror are located.


If you insist with formalisms, better make a forensic analysis of your
pagan
god Einstein, who was pretty good cheating, hacking and taking gullible
assholes like you like 100% IDIOTS.

In your case, and after more than 30 years behaving as a relativistic
sucker,
it's noticeable that you are tired of that shit. You think and write
like a
extremely worn out person, after so much time repeating the same
idiocies.


Accept it: if you EVER had a bit of wit, you've lost it. Do gardening
now, before you become the plant.


You haven't written a word about the graphic. Something to say, asshole?

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-02-04 21:54 +0000
  Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-02-05 04:25 +0000
    Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-02-05 04:39 +0000
  Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-05 09:58 +0100
  Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-02-05 13:29 +0100
    Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2025-02-05 13:03 +0000
    Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-05 14:06 +0100
    Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-02-05 22:51 +0000
      Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-06 08:27 +0100
      Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-02-06 19:48 +0100
        Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-02-06 19:55 +0000
          Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-02-12 14:20 +0100
            Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-02-12 18:11 +0000
              Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-02-19 15:32 +0000
        Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-07 08:06 +0100
    Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-06 08:06 +0100

csiph-web