Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #660326

Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."

Show key headers only | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 22:37:15 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> "'When the theories of relativity were experimentally confirmed, the red
> > > > > > > >> carpet was rolled out despite (or perhaps because of) the fact that
> > > > > > > >> almost no one understood them.'"
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> - "On the empirical evidence of Special Relativity" by Antonio Leon free
> > > > > > > >> pdf=
> > > > > > > >> https://www.academia.edu/91707309/On_the_empirical_evidence_of_Special_Relativity?email_work_card=view-paper
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > dats true, i don't undersatand nuthin in the theory of relativity.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > nutin at'all
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > nutin.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But you still believe, and that's what counts!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ding-an-Sich
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Einstein was inspired by Kant theory of relativity.
> > > > >
> > > > > Relativity is philosophy...and Einstein twisted Kant theory of
> > > > > relativity.
> > > > >
> > > > > Kants's is more true than' Einstien's.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ding-an-Sich
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+ding-an-sich
> > > >
> > > > The fact is, in Einstein's day...physics and philosophy are the same
> > > > thing.
> > > >
> > > > But everybody seems to have a different philosophy on things..
> > > >
> > > > whose philosophy is better? His or Hers?
> > >
> > > His:things look different depending your point of reference
> > >
> > > Hers:things look the same whatever  your point of reference
> > > (Ding-an-Sich)
> > >
> > > In fact, if you look at Einstein's Desk on the day he died...
> > >
> > > you can see a Philosophy book...
> > >
> > > https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1668464757861683200/photo/1
> > >
> > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FyeTzX3agAEoeJU?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > >
> > > Einstein studied philosophy in school all the way till he died...
> > >
> > > he wanted to know The Mind Of God...
> > >
> > > the rest are details.
> > >
> >
> > (Ding-an-Sich)
> >
> > You want to know what time it is now?
> >
> > it don't matter what your frame of reference is, everybody
> > will ask you what time it is now...
> >
> > the time is..the present time now..
> >
> > the time is now...everywhere!
> >
> > don't matter if your watch
> > is fast or slow..or you are there
> > or here...
> >
> > it's now.
> >
> > The time now is...
> >
> > what time did you say it is now???
> >
> > okay, i was just wondering what time it is now.
> >
> > Now?
> > Yeah, now..wat da fuck do you
> > think i'm talking about...NOW!
> >
> > Now?
> >
> > You know wat i'm going to do you to you now?
> >
> > Now?
> 
> The Fact is...when Albert Einstein uses the term..."present time", he is
> not
> refering to what time it is on the face of a clock now, he is refering
> to
> the missing Now time on the face of a clock.
> 
> Einstein does not think of "present time" having minutes, hours or even
> days!
> 
> Einstein's "present time" is in fact...a universal Now.
> 
> No minutes, no hours, no days, just...NOW.
> 
> Could be yesterday in Einstein't Now time...you cannot get him to narrow
> it down..cause
> he is slippery as a snake.
> 
> And if you try to narrow him down he'll say something like..."I didn't
> say absolutly NOW!"
> 
> "I didn't say this very minute!"
> 
> he is slippery as a snake....
> 

Hell, in Einstein's mind "present time" could also mean...this century.


(which is still...now)


If you study the definition of the word..."present"

you will see 'hidden' within it's meaning...'the structure of
relativity'.


pres·ent
/'preznt/
adjective

    in a particular place.
    "a doctor must be present at the ringside"
    synonyms: in attendance, attending, here, there, near, nearby, at
hand, close/near at hand, adjacent, available, ready, accounted for
    existing or occurring now.
    "she did not expect to find herself in her present situation"
    synonyms: current, present-day, existing, contemporary, immediate,
instant


noun
the period of time now occurring.
"they are happy and at peace, refusing to think beyond the present"
synonyms: now, today, the present time, the here and now, this day and
age, the present moment, the time being

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+present




What is "the here and now"????



What is the Here?




















-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

"In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-09 19:43 +0000
  Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of  relativity." Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2025-01-09 21:21 +0000
  Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-09 22:51 +0100
    Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of  relativity." Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2025-01-09 22:20 +0000
      Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-10 08:01 +0100
    Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-09 22:17 +0000
    Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-09 22:48 +0000
  Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-09 14:37 -0800
    Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-10 00:00 +0000
      Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of  relativity." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-09 23:20 -0800
        Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 12:43 -0800
          Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 13:22 -0800
            Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 13:51 -0800
              Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 14:40 -0800
                Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 18:08 -0800
                Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-13 19:48 -0800
                Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-15 11:16 -0800
    Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-10 01:39 +0000
      Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 12:08 -0800
        Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-10 23:42 +0100
          Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 21:39 -0800
            Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-11 08:19 +0100
              Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 06:05 -0800
                Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-11 16:46 +0100
                Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-01-12 08:14 -0800
                Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-12 18:40 +0100

csiph-web