Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #660413

Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 22:37:15 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> "'When the theories of relativity were experimentally confirmed, the red
> > > > > > > > >> carpet was rolled out despite (or perhaps because of) the fact that
> > > > > > > > >> almost no one understood them.'"
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> - "On the empirical evidence of Special Relativity" by Antonio Leon free
> > > > > > > > >> pdf=
> > > > > > > > >> https://www.academia.edu/91707309/On_the_empirical_evidence_of_Special_Relativity?email_work_card=view-paper
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > dats true, i don't undersatand nuthin in the theory of relativity.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > nutin at'all
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > nutin.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > But you still believe, and that's what counts!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ding-an-Sich
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Einstein was inspired by Kant theory of relativity.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Relativity is philosophy...and Einstein twisted Kant theory of
> > > > > > relativity.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kants's is more true than' Einstien's.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ding-an-Sich
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+ding-an-sich
> > > > >
> > > > > The fact is, in Einstein's day...physics and philosophy are the same
> > > > > thing.
> > > > >
> > > > > But everybody seems to have a different philosophy on things..
> > > > >
> > > > > whose philosophy is better? His or Hers?
> > > >
> > > > His:things look different depending your point of reference
> > > >
> > > > Hers:things look the same whatever  your point of reference
> > > > (Ding-an-Sich)
> > > >
> > > > In fact, if you look at Einstein's Desk on the day he died...
> > > >
> > > > you can see a Philosophy book...
> > > >
> > > > https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1668464757861683200/photo/1
> > > >
> > > > https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FyeTzX3agAEoeJU?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
> > > >
> > > > Einstein studied philosophy in school all the way till he died...
> > > >
> > > > he wanted to know The Mind Of God...
> > > >
> > > > the rest are details.
> > > >
> > >
> > > (Ding-an-Sich)
> > >
> > > You want to know what time it is now?
> > >
> > > it don't matter what your frame of reference is, everybody
> > > will ask you what time it is now...
> > >
> > > the time is..the present time now..
> > >
> > > the time is now...everywhere!
> > >
> > > don't matter if your watch
> > > is fast or slow..or you are there
> > > or here...
> > >
> > > it's now.
> > >
> > > The time now is...
> > >
> > > what time did you say it is now???
> > >
> > > okay, i was just wondering what time it is now.
> > >
> > > Now?
> > > Yeah, now..wat da fuck do you
> > > think i'm talking about...NOW!
> > >
> > > Now?
> > >
> > > You know wat i'm going to do you to you now?
> > >
> > > Now?
> >
> > The Fact is...when Albert Einstein uses the term..."present time", he is
> > not
> > refering to what time it is on the face of a clock now, he is refering
> > to
> > the missing Now time on the face of a clock.
> >
> > Einstein does not think of "present time" having minutes, hours or even
> > days!
> >
> > Einstein's "present time" is in fact...a universal Now.
> >
> > No minutes, no hours, no days, just...NOW.
> >
> > Could be yesterday in Einstein't Now time...you cannot get him to narrow
> > it down..cause
> > he is slippery as a snake.
> >
> > And if you try to narrow him down he'll say something like..."I didn't
> > say absolutly NOW!"
> >
> > "I didn't say this very minute!"
> >
> > he is slippery as a snake....
> >
> 
> Hell, in Einstein's mind "present time" could also mean...this century.
> 
> (which is still...now)
> 
> If you study the definition of the word..."present"
> 
> you will see 'hidden' within it's meaning...'the structure of
> relativity'.
> 
> pres·ent
> /'preznt/
> adjective
> 
>     in a particular place.
>     "a doctor must be present at the ringside"
>     synonyms: in attendance, attending, here, there, near, nearby, at
> hand, close/near at hand, adjacent, available, ready, accounted for
>     existing or occurring now.
>     "she did not expect to find herself in her present situation"
>     synonyms: current, present-day, existing, contemporary, immediate,
> instant
> 
> noun
> the period of time now occurring.
> "they are happy and at peace, refusing to think beyond the present"
> synonyms: now, today, the present time, the here and now, this day and
> age, the present moment, the time being
> 
> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+present
> 
> What is "the here and now"????
> 
> What is the Here?


Where is Here? Is it over there?? 

No, it's here.

dats what I said, over there!

No, it's over here.

dat is what i said, over there!!!!

Okay, where is Here?

Here?

Yes, Here!

It's over here!

Where, there?

No, over here!

Over there!

No, right here!!!

No, here IS here!

Where?

Over here!!


No, it's over here!!!

Come on, you cannot have two here's..







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

"In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-09 19:43 +0000
  Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of  relativity." Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2025-01-09 21:21 +0000
  Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-09 22:51 +0100
    Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of  relativity." Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2025-01-09 22:20 +0000
      Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-10 08:01 +0100
    Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-09 22:17 +0000
    Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-09 22:48 +0000
  Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-09 14:37 -0800
    Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-10 00:00 +0000
      Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of  relativity." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-09 23:20 -0800
        Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 12:43 -0800
          Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 13:22 -0800
            Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 13:51 -0800
              Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 14:40 -0800
                Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-11 18:08 -0800
                Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-13 19:48 -0800
                Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-01-15 11:16 -0800
    Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) - 2025-01-10 01:39 +0000
      Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 12:08 -0800
        Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-10 23:42 +0100
          Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 21:39 -0800
            Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-11 08:19 +0100
              Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 06:05 -0800
                Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-11 16:46 +0100
                Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-01-12 08:14 -0800
                Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity." Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-01-12 18:40 +0100

csiph-web