Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #653838

Re: it's not the universe.

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, alt.atheism
Subject Re: it's not the universe.
Date 2024-05-19 10:15 -0700
Organization To protect and to server
Message-ID <664A33B8.38AD@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <66484D80.5B5C@ix.netcom.com> <lar16dF1696U1@mid.individual.net> <6648E227.37F8@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Maximus wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth'.
> > >
> > >
> > > "heavens and the earth" don't mean...universe.
> > >
> > >
> > > A fish in the ocean might consider the ocean to be the universe,
> > > but
> > >
> > > it's not the universe.
> > >
> > > It's just a bubble of water he's in.
> > >
> > > "heavens and the earth" is not the universe
> > >
> > > it's just the Space you're in.
> > >
> > > The Big Bang was not the creation
> > > of the universe..
> > > it was just the creation of Space.
> > >
> > > All the things in it are just contained in that space.
> > >
> > >
> > > The very first word of this statement is..."In..."
> > >
> > > 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth'.
> > >
> > >
> > > "In" is defined:
> > >
> > > something that is or appears to be enclosed or surrounded by something else.
> > >
> > > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+in
> > >
> > >
> > > Further more that means"God" created the heavens and the earth ...within Space.
> > >
> > > 'enclosed' in Space.
> > >
> > > "surrounded" by Space.
> > >
> > > God is in it to win it.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > and where did this god come from?
> 
> I don't want to step on any religious toes..
> 
> but which God?
> 
> Is it the Something from Nothing?
> 
> the Nothing from Something
> 
> the Nothing from Nothing or
> 
> Something from Something
> 
> Did i miss out Anything?
> 
> Anything from Anything
> 
> If you understand The Code: 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth'.
> 
> and decipher it...
> 
> you would understand that God was ...Necessary.
> 
> Ask his Mother. A Mother knows best.
> 


If you understand The Code:

 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth'.

and decipher it...

then all your questions will be answered.


So, Maxiums asked the question: "and where did this god come from?"


I know the answer to Maxiums question is In The Code...all
one has to do is decipher it.


I simply  ( It's not suppose to be difficult )

(you don't need high school physics from some dumb unqualified physics teacher)

I simply Looked at the word "God" in the code Maxiums referred too..
and i notice the word "created" next to it.


The word created means...to invent.


As everyone already knows...

"Necessity is the mother of invention"


It was the Mother who was the primary driving force
behind God creation/invention.

She felt it was ...Necessary.

In other words, the Universe created God in order
for there to be the heavens and the earth.


 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth'.

There was no God before Him, ...it was just his mother there.




If you ask the question, "What is the age of the earth?"

You simply turn to The Code:

'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth'.

and it reads : the heavens and the earth

Which means the heavens AND THE earth were

BOTH created 'at the same time'.


The age of the earth is the same age of the universe.



The Code does not come from the bible...it came
from somewhere else.



Now here is The Code: 'In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth'.


just decipher it.






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

it's not the universe. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-17 23:41 -0700
  Re: it's not the universe. Maximus <gladiator@colosseum.rome> - 2024-05-18 16:46 +1000
    Re: it's not the universe. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-18 10:15 -0700
      Re: it's not the universe. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-19 10:15 -0700
        Re: it's not the universe. % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2024-05-19 10:26 -0700
      Re: it's not the universe. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-05-26 12:43 -0700
  Re: it's not the universe. George Hammond <ghammond928@gmail.com> - 2024-05-19 19:51 -0400

csiph-web